Am 24.03.21 um 02:44 schrieb Kevin Kofler via devel:
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
This is the reason why MBROLA is not in Fedora. MBROLA is not new. It is
much older than the 2-year-old GitHub project. The license of the voices
has always been the blocker.
PS: This was already discussed when
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> This is the reason why MBROLA is not in Fedora. MBROLA is not new. It is
> much older than the 2-year-old GitHub project. The license of the voices
> has always been the blocker.
PS: This was already discussed when the GitHub project was created in 2019:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 9:18 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Marius Schwarz wrote:
> > is the license AGPL 3.0 useable in terms of distributing the software as
> > a package in a Fedora repo?
>
> The AGPL is acceptable for Fedora, *but*…
>
> > This project is meant:
> >
> >
Marius Schwarz wrote:
> is the license AGPL 3.0 useable in terms of distributing the software as
> a package in a Fedora repo?
The AGPL is acceptable for Fedora, *but*…
> This project is meant:
>
> https://github.com/numediart/MBROLA/blob/master/LICENSE
… MBROLA is *not*, because…
> Example
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 5:42 PM Marius Schwarz wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> is the license AGPL 3.0 useable in terms of distributing the software as
> a package in a Fedora repo?
>
> This project is meant:
>
> https://github.com/numediart/MBROLA/blob/master/LICENSE
>
> Example license for voices:
>
>
hi,
is the license AGPL 3.0 useable in terms of distributing the software as
a package in a Fedora repo?
This project is meant:
https://github.com/numediart/MBROLA/blob/master/LICENSE
Example license for voices:
https://github.com/numediart/MBROLA-voices/blob/master/data/de1/license.txt
