I built a new version of libedit yesterday. This is the Rawhide update:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-91ae75deeb
It has said "1 of 60 required tests running" for about the last 21
hours. If I click through to the Automated Test Results, it appears
to me that all but one of
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 14:10 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On 04/05/2011 07:21 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 09:13 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> >> This is my first experience with a
> >> critpath update, so I'm feeling pretty ignorant of how it's supposed
> >> to work.
On 04/05/2011 07:21 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 09:13 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
>> This is my first experience with a
>> critpath update, so I'm feeling pretty ignorant of how it's supposed
>> to work. If I still need a proventester, what kind of bribe do I need
>> to offer?
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 12:05 -0700, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> Really, just offer some instructions on how to test it in your plea. I
> saw this update several times and skipped over it since I didn't really
> know how to properly test it and didn't bother taking the time to figure
> it out.
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 09:13 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> > Yeah, handling cases like this where a somewhat 'obscure' library hits
> > critpath through deps is something I've been thinking about.
> > package-specific test cases would help, if someone would write them. :)
> > I think this gets to be
On 04/01/2011 08:13 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> And, as an aside, that update still only has karma of 2. How do I
> tell if either of the respondents is a proventester? Is that
> indicated in the feedback somehow?
Their nick would show up as "username (proventester)" instead of just
"username". A
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 10:34 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The latest libedit update is CRITPATH, so it needs some karma. The
> > direct consumers of libedit, if my repoquery-fu is up to the
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 10:34 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The latest libedit update is CRITPATH, so it needs some karma. The
> direct consumers of libedit, if my repoquery-fu is up to the task, are
> the following, with their maintainers listed first, followed by
Hi all,
The latest libedit update is CRITPATH, so it needs some karma. The
direct consumers of libedit, if my repoquery-fu is up to the task, are
the following, with their maintainers listed first, followed by
comaintainers:
Io-language: limb
asterisk: jcollie, fabbione, itamarjp
ceph: josef
I just built a new libedit snapshot (20110227) for Rawhide and F-15 to
pick up some bug fixes. This rebuild doesn't involve an soname
change, but I thought I should give a heads-up anyway, for two
reasons.
First, I previously did an update to the 20100424 snapshot on February
7, the same day as t
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> I'm not sure that libedit provides the entire readline API. I'll
> block out some time to compare the two, hopefully tomorrow but
> possibly not until the end of the week. I'll follow up here when I've
> done that.
It does not provide even t
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> So, is it time to replace the old unmaintained compat-readline5 which is
> kept only for licensing reasons with this now?
>
> And would it make sense to try to replace readline with libedit systemwide,
> even? It feels quite silly to have multi
Jerry James wrote:
> In particular, the latest version includes wide character (Unicode)
> support.
So, is it time to replace the old unmaintained compat-readline5 which is
kept only for licensing reasons with this now?
And would it make sense to try to replace readline with libedit systemwide,
I need a libedit update to attempt to resolve bug #511303. In particular,
the latest version includes wide character (Unicode) support. I've just
done the rebuild. This should not effect other programs that use libedit,
but just in case, check your programs for any weirdness. If I'
14 matches
Mail list logo
