On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 14:10 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On 04/05/2011 07:21 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 09:13 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> >> This is my first experience with a
> >> critpath update, so I'm feeling pretty ignorant of how it's supposed
> >> to work.
On 04/05/2011 07:21 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 09:13 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
>> This is my first experience with a
>> critpath update, so I'm feeling pretty ignorant of how it's supposed
>> to work. If I still need a proventester, what kind of bribe do I need
>> to offer?
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 12:05 -0700, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> Really, just offer some instructions on how to test it in your plea. I
> saw this update several times and skipped over it since I didn't really
> know how to properly test it and didn't bother taking the time to figure
> it out.
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 09:13 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> > Yeah, handling cases like this where a somewhat 'obscure' library hits
> > critpath through deps is something I've been thinking about.
> > package-specific test cases would help, if someone would write them. :)
> > I think this gets to be
On 04/01/2011 08:13 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> And, as an aside, that update still only has karma of 2. How do I
> tell if either of the respondents is a proventester? Is that
> indicated in the feedback somehow?
Their nick would show up as "username (proventester)" instead of just
"username". A
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 10:34 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The latest libedit update is CRITPATH, so it needs some karma. The
> > direct consumers of libedit, if my repoquery-fu is up to the task, are
> > the following, wit
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 10:34 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The latest libedit update is CRITPATH, so it needs some karma. The
> direct consumers of libedit, if my repoquery-fu is up to the task, are
> the following, with their maintainers listed first, followed by
> comaintainers:
>
> I
Hi all,
The latest libedit update is CRITPATH, so it needs some karma. The
direct consumers of libedit, if my repoquery-fu is up to the task, are
the following, with their maintainers listed first, followed by
comaintainers:
Io-language: limb
asterisk: jcollie, fabbione, itamarjp
ceph: josef, bo
