Rex Dieter wrote:
On 01/14/2014 08:11 PM, David Airlie wrote:
It looks like OpenGTL is going to be the sticking point,
upstream appears dead,
I'll go poke upstream tomorrow, to verify (un)dead status or not.
Confirmed with upstream that OpenGTL is indeed dead, and new versions of
On 14 Jan 2014 06:04, David Airlie airl...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've gotten a build tag f21-llvm for attempting to rebase rawhide to llvm
3.4
Assuming there aren't any major stumbling blocks, are there any plans to
back port llvm 3.4 to f20 (like was done for llvm 3.3 in f19)?
I need
On 14 Jan 2014 06:04, David Airlie airl...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've gotten a build tag f21-llvm for attempting to rebase rawhide to llvm
3.4
Assuming there aren't any major stumbling blocks, are there any plans to back
port llvm 3.4 to f20 (like was done for llvm 3.3
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:54 PM, David Airlie airl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 14 Jan 2014 06:04, David Airlie airl...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've gotten a build tag f21-llvm for attempting to rebase rawhide to
llvm
3.4
Assuming there aren't any major stumbling
On 14 Jan 2014 06:04, David Airlie airl...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've gotten a build tag f21-llvm for attempting to rebase rawhide to llvm
3.4
Assuming there aren't any major stumbling blocks, are there any plans to
back
port llvm 3.4 to f20 (like was done for
On 01/14/2014 08:11 PM, David Airlie wrote:
It looks like OpenGTL is going to be the sticking point,
upstream appears dead,
I'll go poke upstream tomorrow, to verify (un)dead status or not.
-- rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 15 Jan 2014 02:11, David Airlie airl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 14 Jan 2014 06:04, David Airlie airl...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've gotten a build tag f21-llvm for attempting to rebase rawhide
to llvm
3.4
Assuming there aren't any major stumbling blocks, are
Hi all,
I've gotten a build tag f21-llvm for attempting to rebase rawhide to llvm 3.4,
so far I've started just getting llvm built into the buildroot,
and once it gets past arm it seems like it should succeed.
That leaves the fun of rebasing and fixing all the llvm dependant packages:
mesa
