-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/23/2015 10:24 AM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> On 09/23/2015 10:03 AM, Marco Driusso wrote:
>> OK, many thanks for the replies. Go for plain 'itpp'.
>
>> For anyone interested in reviewing the package, this is the
>> bugzilla ticket, I need a spon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/23/2015 10:03 AM, Marco Driusso wrote:
> OK, many thanks for the replies. Go for plain 'itpp'.
>
> For anyone interested in reviewing the package, this is the
> bugzilla ticket, I need a sponsor! ->
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
OK, many thanks for the replies. Go for plain 'itpp'.
For anyone interested in reviewing the package, this is the bugzilla
ticket, I need a sponsor! ->
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264686
Cheers,
Marco
On 22/09/15 13:33, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 6:44 AM, J
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 22/09/15 10:40 +0200, Marco Driusso wrote:
>
>> So I think we have two options:
>> 1) use 'itpp' as the name of the package, which corresponds to the
>> include dir name, but not to the lib file name (libitpp.so); in this
>>
>
> All lib
On 22/09/15 10:40 +0200, Marco Driusso wrote:
So I think we have two options:
1) use 'itpp' as the name of the package, which corresponds to the
include dir name, but not to the lib file name (libitpp.so); in this
All libraries start with "lib" but that doesn't mean the package that
provides
In line with tarball name, it's better to use itpp.
No +1 for libitpp if itpp had been there for several years.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://awk.io
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:40:13AM +0200, Marco Driusso wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a question about the right name to give to a package of the IT++
> library (package review request here ->
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264686, any review - and also
> sponsorship, I need one! - i
I think you want to use just plain itpp
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015, 10:40 AM Marco Driusso wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a question about the right name to give to a package of the IT++
> library (package review request here ->
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264686, any review - and
> al
Hi all,
I have a question about the right name to give to a package of the IT++
library (package review request here ->
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264686, any review - and
also sponsorship, I need one! - is welcome).
Some info:
- the actual name of the library is 'IT++', ac
