On Fri, 7 Aug 2015, Petr Šabata wrote:
This package's license tag was wrong all along; the license
tag will be corrected to `MIT'. Updates are on the way.
hm, I had 1.01 packages pending..
Also, the license says GPL+ or Artistic. The README says:
Permission to use, copy, modify, and
This package's license tag was wrong all along; the license
tag will be corrected to `MIT'. Updates are on the way.
P
pgpiyQZKR8lcF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
GPL/Artistic is the perl license; the module's META.json specifies the MIT
license. The text included in the module is similar to the MIT and ISC
license text, it is definitely not the Artistic license or GPL. Personally
I would seek clarification from the author(s).
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:49
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 11:17:33AM -0400, Dan Book wrote:
GPL/Artistic is the perl license; the module's META.json specifies the MIT
license. The text included in the module is similar to the MIT and ISC
license text, it is definitely not the Artistic license or GPL. Personally
I would seek
