On 10/27/2010 11:12 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
it's a bit of a tricky line to draw. We have a size test that makes sure
builds aren't over the targeted sizes, we could add a test that a
minimal install doesn't go over a given size after installation, I
guess. What size would be the target?
On 10/26/2010 04:22 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Having said that, I don't think this seems serious enough to be a
blocker, though obviously we'd like the minimal install to be as minimal
as possible. Does it cause major problems for any spins? I doubt it, I
expect most of them will have cairo
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 13:01 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 10/26/2010 04:22 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Having said that, I don't think this seems serious enough to be a
blocker, though obviously we'd like the minimal install to be as minimal
as possible. Does it cause major problems for
I did a minimal install yesterday, and was surprised to find that
cairo, and a bunch of X libs were still installed.
The dependancy chain that pulled them in looks like this..
policycoreutils - dbus-glib - gobject-introspection - fontconfig - cairo
Could any part of that chain have its
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
I did a minimal install yesterday, and was surprised to find that
cairo, and a bunch of X libs were still installed.
The dependancy chain that pulled them in looks like this..
policycoreutils - dbus-glib -
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
Unfortunately we didn't notice this dependency until pretty late in
F14...I'm not sure what can be done reasonably at this point, since
all of these packages are critical path.
Though I will say that if this was
Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) said:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
Unfortunately we didn't notice this dependency until pretty late in
F14...I'm not sure what can be done reasonably at this point, since
all of these packages are critical
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 17:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) said:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
Unfortunately we didn't notice this dependency until pretty late in
F14...I'm not sure what can be done
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 17:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) said:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
Unfortunately we didn't notice this
Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 17:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) said:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
Unfortunately we
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 15:52:38 -0700,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Having said that, I don't think this seems serious enough to be a
blocker, though obviously we'd like the minimal install to be as minimal
as possible. Does it cause major problems for any spins? I doubt it,
11 matches
Mail list logo
