Re: rawhide report: 20110818 changes

2011-08-22 Thread Tom Callaway
On 08/18/2011 10:00 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: >> I'm not sure about this as I really don't want to include the full >> headers. How much of the email is actually required? > >> From the apropos wiki page[1]: > "A copy of the email, containing full headers, must be included as a source > file"

Re: rawhide report: 20110818 changes

2011-08-18 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
[ I've posting only on devel. This doesn't have a lot to do with testing. ] * Zaniyah [18/08/2011 15:49] : > > I've done these two. It's probably best to add a comment in the review ticket every time you update your package, giving the urls to spec file and the new package. > I'm not sure about

Re: rawhide report: 20110818 changes

2011-08-18 Thread Zaniyah
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 15:23 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > * Zaniyah [18/08/2011 15:17] : > > > > I put a review request in for the required Perl library some time ago, > > but nothing seems to have happened since. I'm not aware of anything > > outstanding on it. > > JFTR, the review is https://

Re: rawhide report: 20110818 changes

2011-08-18 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
* Zaniyah [18/08/2011 15:17] : > > I put a review request in for the required Perl library some time ago, > but nothing seems to have happened since. I'm not aware of anything > outstanding on it. JFTR, the review is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621559 In his review, Mark asked fo

Re: rawhide report: 20110818 changes

2011-08-18 Thread Zaniyah
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 12:57 +, Rawhide Report wrote: > gold-2.1.12.2-6.fc16.noarch requires perl(Data::Properties) I put a review request in for the required Perl library some time ago, but nothing seems to have happened since. I'm not aware of anything outstanding on it. Jess -- devel mai