On 03/10/2013 11:26 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
I find that being a bit more explicit when specifying the files ina
package is a great way to catch so bumps.
Filed a ticket with FPC to add this as a guideline
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/266
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
Compose started at Sun Mar 10 08:15:08 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-python-1.21.3-6.fc19.x86_64 requires
libboost_python.so.1.50.0()(64bit)
[aws]
aws-2.11.0-13.fc19.i686 requires
[clementine]
clementine-1.1.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires
libprotobuf.so.7()(64bit)
[dmlite-plugins-memcache]
dmlite-plugins-memcache-0.5.0-3.fc19.x86_64
requires libprotobuf.so.7()(64bit)
[dmlite-plugins-s3]
dmlite-plugins-s3-0.5.0-2.fc19.x86_64 requires
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:15:41 -0700, Conrad Meyer wrote:
API compatibility breakage, but I don't remember the tool for
diffing shared objects — can anyone point me to it?
rpmsodiff
abi-compliance-checker
--
Fedora release 19 (Rawhide) - Linux 3.9.0-0.rc1.git0.4.fc19.x86_64
loadavg: 0.13 0.12
On Sun, 2013-03-10 at 12:15 -0700, Conrad Meyer wrote:
[... snip list of broken deps ...]
I've emailed all the relevant maintainers; protobuf 2.5.0
(#883822) bumped .so from 7 to 8 and I didn't notice until
after kicking off the build, mea culpa.
I find that being a bit more explicit when
