W dniu 04.04.2014 19:43, Mikolaj Izdebski pisze:
On 04/04/2014 07:14 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
[snip]
Is it useful for these messages to go to the devel (or test, for that
matter) lists? They seem mostly to just raise the noise.
It is definitely useful, but I wish there was some way of
On 4 April 2014 17:59, Fedora Rawhide Report rawh...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
Broken deps for i386
--
[solr3]
solr3-3.6.2-5.fc21.noarch requires
mvn(org.apache.lucene:lucene-stempel)
solr3-3.6.2-5.fc21.noarch requires
It is definitely useful, but I wish there was some way of excluding
long-standing problems that no one cares to fix.
It might be nice if there was a counter for how many weeks
they have been broken, though probably a bit harder to implement.
Jens
--
devel mailing list
[totpcgi]
totpcgi-selinux-0.5.5-1.fc21.noarch requires
file:///usr/share/doc/selinux-policy/html/index.html
If I understand correctly such packages which need extra selinux policy,
shouldn't they depend on a more vital dep instead of this?
--
devel mailing list
On 04/06/2014 03:11 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
[totpcgi]
totpcgi-selinux-0.5.5-1.fc21.noarch requires
file:///usr/share/doc/selinux-policy/html/index.html
If I understand correctly such packages which need extra selinux policy,
shouldn't they depend on a more vital dep instead of
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 01:42:49PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 11:32:57AM -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
As far as I am concerned they are very useful. In more detail I am
looking mostly at Broken deps and Summaries, with only an occasional
peek at a changelog
On 04/04/2014 01:17 PM, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
On Friday, April 4, 2014, 1:42:49 PM, Matthew Milleru wrote:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 11:32:57AM -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
As far as I am concerned they are very useful. In more detail I am
looking mostly at Broken deps and Summaries, with only
On Sat, 05 Apr 2014 09:08:57 -0600
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
Like wise. The one change that might be nice would be to try would be
to consolidate the broken deps a bit - just a single note that a
package has broken dep in all arches (and listing those deps) rather
than
[snip]
Is it useful for these messages to go to the devel (or test, for that
matter) lists? They seem mostly to just raise the noise.
--
Matthew Miller-- Fedora Project--mat...@fedoraproject.org
Tepid change for the somewhat better!
--
devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 13:14:30 -0400
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
[snip]
Is it useful for these messages to go to the devel (or test, for that
matter) lists? They seem mostly to just raise the noise.
it is very useful to
Dne 4.4.2014 19:14, Matthew Miller napsal(a):
[snip]
Is it useful for these messages to go to the devel (or test, for that
matter) lists? They seem mostly to just raise the noise.
I'm definitely going through this email every day. Not just to see what
is broken but what is new as well.
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 07:39:18PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
I'm definitely going through this email every day. Not just to see what
is broken but what is new as well.
Okay, carry on then. Just checking!
--
Matthew Miller-- Fedora Project--mat...@fedoraproject.org
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 11:32:57AM -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
As far as I am concerned they are very useful. In more detail I am
looking mostly at Broken deps and Summaries, with only an occasional
peek at a changelog information, but on a number of occasions these
messages were crucial
On 04/04/2014 07:14 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
[snip]
Is it useful for these messages to go to the devel (or test, for that
matter) lists? They seem mostly to just raise the noise.
It is definitely useful, but I wish there was some way of excluding
long-standing problems that no one cares to
On Friday, April 4, 2014, 1:42:49 PM, Matthew Milleru wrote:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 11:32:57AM -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
As far as I am concerned they are very useful. In more detail I am
looking mostly at Broken deps and Summaries, with only an occasional
peek at a changelog
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 01:14:30PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
[snip]
Is it useful for these messages to go to the devel (or test, for that
matter) lists? They seem mostly to just raise the noise.
To add to what others have said, I also find this a useful message.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones,
16 matches
Mail list logo
