I have a package review (BZ#1022584:Review Request: qpid-qmf - The QPID
Management Framework). I pulled the subpackages from qpid-cpp relating
to QMF so they can built completely separate from Qpid.
--
Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.com
http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/
What do you care what
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:05 AM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com
tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
I have made the first public release of yumdaemon a DBUS API for yum with
python 2 3 client bindings
It can be helpful for applications moving to python 3 but need to performing
yum actions.
future plans
Thanks
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:05 AM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com
tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
I have made the first public release of yumdaemon a DBUS API for yum with
python 2 3 client bindings
It can be
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:34:23AM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
I have a package review (BZ#1022584:Review Request: qpid-qmf - The QPID
Management Framework). I pulled the subpackages from qpid-cpp relating
to QMF so they can built completely separate from Qpid.
I'll take this one.
I'm
On 10/24/2013 07:40 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:34:23AM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
I have a package review (BZ#1022584:Review Request: qpid-qmf - The QPID
Management Framework). I pulled the subpackages from qpid-cpp relating
to QMF so they can built
I'm offering to do one non-complex review for reviewing one of those
packages*:
* Feel free to take both, I'll review two of yours :)
ultimaker2-marlin-firmware
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019852
Ultimaker2 firmware for the 3D printer. (Dependency of new cura update.)
I'll review mod_scgi, if you're interested I need a review for this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=vcsh
Dridi
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
mod_scgi was orphaned quite a while back since it wouldn't build on new
releases, with
Hi,
anyone willing to review or swap reviews?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014607
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014601
Thanks!
Martin
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/04/2013 07:57 AM, Martin Krizek wrote:
Hi,
anyone willing to review or swap reviews?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014607
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014601
Thanks! Martin
Has JSMin finally changed
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc: Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com
Sent: Friday, October 4, 2013 2:33:50 PM
Subject: Re: Review swap: python-jsmin, python-cssmin
PM
Subject: Re: Review swap: python-jsmin, python-cssmin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/04/2013 07:57 AM, Martin Krizek wrote:
Hi,
anyone willing to review or swap reviews?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014607
https
PM
Subject: Re: Review swap: python-jsmin, python-cssmin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/04/2013 07:57 AM, Martin Krizek wrote:
Hi,
anyone willing to review or swap reviews?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014607
https
Hi,
mod_scgi was orphaned quite a while back since it wouldn't build on new
releases, with the new apache. I found a set of patches in the suse rpm
that fix the build. I'd like to get mod_scgi back into the repos. It's
required by most rtorrent front ends, like rutorrent that I've just
submitted
I'm willing to do a review swap if someone will review
python-qpid_messaging:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012077
--
Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.com
http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/
What do you care what people think, Mr. Feynman?
pgp1TszbUo8eW.pgp
Description: PGP
On 25.09.2013 18:25, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
I'm willing to do a review swap if someone will review
python-qpid_messaging:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012077
Hi,
I'll do it for perl-Parse-DebControl [1].
Thanks,
Sandro
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 06:40:34PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 25.09.2013 18:25, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
I'm willing to do a review swap if someone will review
python-qpid_messaging:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012077
Hi,
I'll do it for perl-Parse-DebControl [1
Hi folks,
python-jenkinsapi [0] up for review.
[0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010334
--
Praveen Kumar
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kumarpraveen
http://fedoraproject.org/
http://kumar-pravin.blogspot.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I can take it.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote:
I can take it.
Thanks :)
--
Praveen Kumar
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kumarpraveen
http://fedoraproject.org/
http://kumar-pravin.blogspot.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 00:04 +0200, Christian Krause wrote:
Hi,
according to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers
I'd like to announce that I want to unretire the package gpx-viewer.
The package was retired because it didn't build for multiple Fedora
Hi,
according to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers
I'd like to announce that I want to unretire the package gpx-viewer.
The package was retired because it didn't build for multiple Fedora
releases:
Hi,
One more airfoil package:
#1007604 - xflr5: Analysis tool for airfoils, wings and planes
C++/Qt code with simple qmake build and desktop file.
Again, happy to review in exchange.
Thanks,
Sandro
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
happy to review another package in a review swap.
Wolfgang
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
So, I need somehelp with getting 957339 reviewed, and is willing to make
a review (possibly two simple) in return.
The package might look daunting, but it's just a rename.
--alec
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora
Hi!
Would someone be willing to trade me a review for:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997678
It's dead simple at the moment: it just provides a couple directories and RPM
macros. Later on it will grow some httpd magic but that's on hold until Fedora
21 since we're still sorting
On Aug 23, 2013 6:00 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi!
Would someone be willing to trade me a review for:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997678
It's dead simple at the moment: it just provides a couple directories and
RPM
macros. Later on it will
Hello contributors,
I am looking for a review swap on gimp-paint-studio[1] which is a set of
brushes for Gimp.
In addition, it would be nice if someone can sponsor Peter Hanecak[2], a
new Fedora contributor who package some
Gimp application for OpenMamba. Unfortunately, I am ineligible because
Hi,
I have a POP3 mail server package, it's written in Go, are there any people
familiar with such packages?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967258
Thanks.
Sent from Note I
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2013/8/7 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com
Hi,
I have a POP3 mail server package, it's written in Go, are there any
people familiar with such packages?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967258
Thanks.
Sent from Note I
We don't have yet go packaging guidelines, so may i
Hi 80(.),
I will keep an eye on the FLOCK result, then may submit a draft.
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Given the profound advantages of IMAP, especially the management of folders on
one server, and the historical fact that *every single POP3 client* defaults to
deleting the email off the server, I have to ask: why are you spending any time
on such a server?
I've done a lot of integration work
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
Given the profound advantages of IMAP, especially the management of folders
on one server, and the historical fact that *every single POP3 client*
defaults to deleting the email off the server, I have to ask: why are you
Hi all,
One of the packages I maintain (pcl) grew a new dependency, which needs
to be packaged before I can update to the latest upstream release. I'd
like to do a review swap for metslib, which is a small header-only C++
template library:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993456
maintain (pcl) grew a new dependency, which needs
to be packaged before I can update to the latest upstream release. I'd
like to do a review swap for metslib, which is a small header-only C++
template library:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993456
Thanks,
Rich
--
devel
Hi All,
lua in f20 has been bumped to 5.2, and Tom Callaway has been working
hard to post most lua users over. Unfortunately for some apps the port
is far from trivial. So for now we are going to introduce a compat-lua (5.1)
package to allow those apps to keep building (currently they are FTBFS
Hello,
I am looking for a reviewer for gimp-dds-plugin in exchange of swap.
The package is very easy to review with all complete test.
Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988489
Thank you.
Luya
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, 2013-07-28 at 23:08 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for a reviewer for gimp-dds-plugin in exchange of swap.
The package is very easy to review with all complete test.
Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988489
Thank you.
Luya
Hey!
I can't
Hi Ankur,
I'll take it!
Best,
Mario
On 8 July 2013 15:37, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to re-add labyrinth to Fedora. It was deprecated due to
multiple FTBFS bugs, but seems to build just right with the new upstream
release.
I'd be happy to swap reviews
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 09:12 +0200, Mario Ceresa wrote:
Hi Ankur,
I'll take it!
Thanks Mario!
Labyrinth has been re-added to the repositories. I'll push builds soon.
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
Hi,
I would like to re-add labyrinth to Fedora. It was deprecated due to
multiple FTBFS bugs, but seems to build just right with the new upstream
release.
I'd be happy to swap reviews with someone to get this package re-review
expedited :)
The rhbz is here:
Hi,
I have some perl packages need to be reviewed.
Can anyone give me a hand?
They are:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979648 perl-Tapper - A
flexible and open test infrastructure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979652
perl-Algorithm-TrunkClassifier - Implementation of
Anyone interested in swapping reviews with my two pending requests?
- 972943 lpf
- 956134 mnmlicons-fonts
Both looks in my eyes simple. All offers welcome!
--alec
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 06/13/2013 01:59 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
Anyone interested in swapping reviews with my two pending requests?
- 972943 lpf
I'm waiting for some build to complete, meantime, I can try this one :)
- 956134 mnmlicons-fonts
Both looks in my eyes simple. All offers welcome!
--alec
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 10:29 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
- 956134 mnmlicons-fonts
I can take this one.
Would you take either anka-coder fonts[1] or lifeographer[2] in return
for this one Alec?
Both are *simple* reviews :)
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949954
[2]
On 2013-06-13 11:40, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 10:29 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
- 956134 mnmlicons-fonts
I can take this one.
Fine!
Would you take either anka-coder fonts[1] or lifeographer[2] in return
for this one Alec?
Both are *simple* reviews :)
[1]
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 12:18 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
I think I'll go for 973868 lifeographer. Admittedly, this is the easy
path, but to be honest I'm very new to fonts and feel like a little
more experience would help before reviewing font packages...
I thought the font would be easier, but
Hi,
I'd like to resurrect the lifeograph[1,2] package that was deprecated a
few releases ago because it didn't have a maintainer[3]. As per the wiki
instructions[4], I've opened a review ticket here[5]. It should be a
simple review. Could someone please swap reviews with me so I could get
this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri 07 Jun 2013 07:20:03 PM CEST, Björn Esser wrote:
Hi there!
Anybody interested in review swaps? I currently have two simple
review-bugs open waiting to be reviewed:
git-extras - Little git extras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri 07 Jun 2013 08:29:57 PM CEST, Björn Esser wrote:
Are you also interested to review bugs in RPMFusion ? :)
Why not? Sure :) Where to apply for packager-status in rpmfusion?
Great !
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2531
I'm
/show_bug.cgi?id=967568
The package is writen in python.
I'm glad to review another package in a review swap.
cheers.
Wolfgang
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
, auto-session, and many other features. MintMenu can either be
added to your mate-panel or launched in its own window.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967568
The package is writen in python.
I'm glad to review another package in a review swap.
cheers.
Wolfgang
--
devel
Thanks,
i've catched your review.
Wolfgang
Message: 14
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 11:18:03 -0430
From: Eduardo Javier Echeverria Alvarado echevemas...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Review Swap offer
Message-ID
Hi all,
Now upstream has released the latest version which should all problems.
Please, consider a review help.
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
On 05/15/2013 05:33 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 15.05.2013 17:24, Christopher Meng wrote:
I've noticed it
How to solve it?
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Conflicts#Library_Name_Conflicts
Erm, no the problem here is not a name conflict, but that
the library simple is
Thanks.
Upstream decide to change its name.
I'll update the review request later.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 09:47 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
And then you can install both versions, so that you can use
both apps linked against the old and new version, but
only one -devel package, as there can be only 1 unversioned
symlink for ldd, so installing both + the -devel for the
在 2013-5-16 PM11:09，Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org写道：
[skip]
This software is developed under MAC and the author haven't use any Linux
distros at all. So he didn't notice the conflicts when he first released it.
Now the packager of Debian and FreeBSD has also found this problem, so
upstream
Hi,
I have 3 packages:
cego: A relational and transactional database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189
liblfc: Lemke Foundation Classes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959974
liblfc-xml: Lemke Foundation Classes XML extension
Hi,
On 15/05/13 17:08, Christopher Meng wrote:
Hi,
I have 3 packages:
cego: A relational and transactional database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189
liblfc: Lemke Foundation Classes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959974
Regarding this one, I foresee a
I've noticed it
How to solve it?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 15.05.2013 17:24, Christopher Meng wrote:
I've noticed it
How to solve it?
See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Conflicts#Library_Name_Conflicts
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi Wolfgang,
Hmm, you may want to send another mail with a subject of just
Review Swap and where you're slightly more verbose about your
intent to swap in the body of the mail, as well as give some
more details on the packages you're looking to swap for.
Only having the words REVIEW SWAP
--
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 15:37:32 +0200
From: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Reviewer needed for some packages? REVIEW SWAP
Message-ID: 51923e1c.5080
Hello,
I'm looking for a packager to swap a review of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960771 with.
Thank you,
Mirek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 05/09/2013 09:46 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking for a packager to swap a review of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960771 with.
Me! Me! Me!! :P
I'll take it in exchange for
(fx2lafw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922246
Alex
--
devel mailing list
to review them.
The usual way to deal with this is to ask for a review swap, you
cannot expect people to review your packages, without ever doing
a review in return, that would mean some people would be only
ever doing reviews without ever getting any of their packages
into Fedora, which just does
On 05/05/2013 02:45 AM, Alex G. wrote:
Hi,
Billy Mays here with a special ml offer:
I have 4 packages I'd like to get in before the Release of F19. For each of
these
slots, I'm offering to review a package of your choosing.
But wait, there's more! Choose your slot within 72 hours, and I
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Alex G. mr.nuke...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/05/2013 02:45 AM, Alex G. wrote:
Hi,
Billy Mays here with a special ml offer:
I have 4 packages I'd like to get in before the Release of F19. For each of
these
slots, I'm offering to review a package of your
2 (two) trivial qt-based applicaions for sale:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333 - QuiteRSS - RSS/Atom
aggregator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960194 - QTerminal -
terminal emulator
Welcome!
PS: I prefere to review qt-based applications. And/or C/C++.
On 06.05.2013 21:33, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
2 (two) trivial qt-based applicaions for sale:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333 - QuiteRSS -
RSS/Atom aggregator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960194 - QTerminal -
terminal emulator
Welcome!
I'll take qterminal in
Thanks.
Ok.
06.05.2013 23:44, Sandro Mani:
On 06.05.2013 21:33, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
2 (two) trivial qt-based applicaions for sale:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333 - QuiteRSS -
RSS/Atom aggregator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960194 - QTerminal -
terminal
There's only one slot left! Only one! Oh n! Grab it before it's gone!
(fx2lafw)https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922246
Alex (under mentorship from ghost of Billy Mays)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 05/06/2013 02:49 PM, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
Thanks.
Ok.
06.05.2013 23:44, Sandro Mani:
On 06.05.2013 21:33, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
2 (two) trivial qt-based applicaions for sale:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333 - QuiteRSS - RSS/Atom
aggregator
On 05/06/2013 10:17 PM, Alex G. wrote:
And I'll take QuiteRSS in exchange for:
(fx2lafw)https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922246
OOPS. I see it's already taken.
Alex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
I have 4 packages I'd like to get in before the Release of F19. For each of
these
slots, I'm offering to review a package of your choosing.
But wait, there's more! Choose your slot within 72 hours, and I will add, free
of
charge, a smiley face to the review of your package.
Supplies are
Hi,
I am seeking for a reviewer for jimtcl - A small embeddable Tcl
interpreter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959747
If anyone is willing to review this, I am happy to review a package of
him/her instead.
Regards
Markus
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
05.05.2013 13:25, Markus Mayer:
Hi,
I am seeking for a reviewer for jimtcl - A small embeddable Tcl
interpreter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959747
If anyone is willing to review this, I am happy to review a package of
him/her instead.
Let's swap with
On 05/05/2013 01:19 PM, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
05.05.2013 13:25, Markus Mayer:
Hi,
I am seeking for a reviewer for jimtcl - A small embeddable Tcl
interpreter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959747
If anyone is willing to review this, I am happy to review a package of
him/her
On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 02:45 -0500, Alex G. wrote:
Hi,
I have 4 packages I'd like to get in before the Release of F19. For each of
these
slots, I'm offering to review a package of your choosing.
But wait, there's more! Choose your slot within 72 hours, and I will add,
free of
charge, a
On 05/05/2013 12:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 02:45 -0500, Alex G. wrote:
Hi,
I have 4 packages I'd like to get in before the Release of F19. For each of
these
slots, I'm offering to review a package of your choosing.
But wait, there's more! Choose your slot within
I'd like to get trac10 (trac 1.0.1) into EL-6 sooner rather than later, so
I'll take one of yours in return. Thanks!
-J
--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to get trac10 (trac 1.0.1) into EL-6 sooner rather than later, so
I'll take one of yours in return. Thanks!
-J
--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to get trac10 (trac 1.0.1) into EL-6 sooner rather than later,
so
I'll take one of yours in return. Thanks!
-J
--
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to get trac10 (trac 1.0.1) into EL-6 sooner rather than later,
so
On 04/28/2013 01:48 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
There are many review requests here.
Can someone help do a review(even only one of them)?
It'll be way easier for you to find a reviewer, when you'd be reviewing
other packages yourself.
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
--
On 04/29/2013 08:59 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 04/28/2013 01:48 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
There are many review requests here.
Can someone help do a review(even only one of them)?
It'll be way easier for you to find a reviewer, when you'd be reviewing
other packages yourself.
Matthias
On 04/29/2013 09:12 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 04/29/2013 08:59 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 04/28/2013 01:48 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
There are many review requests here.
Can someone help do a review(even only one of them)?
It'll be way easier for you to find a reviewer, when you'd be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/26/2013 03:22 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
Should be a simple review. Let me know if anyone is interested.
Rahul, it would be helpful to put a link to the review ticket in
request emails like this.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
Hi
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.comwrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/26/2013 03:22 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
Should be a simple review. Let me know if anyone is interested.
Rahul, it would be helpful to put a link to
Hi,
There are many review requests here.
Can someone help do a review(even only one of them)?
I really appreciate your help.
Here is the list:
monitorix - A free, open source, lightweight system monitoring tool (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=947071)
repsurgeon - A tool
Looking for swap one trivial to another one.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957333
Home page: http://code.google.com/p/quite-rss/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi
Should be a simple review. Let me know if anyone is interested.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello,
I'd like to swap reviews for [1] (gtkspellmm30, i.e. the C++ bindings
for GtkSpell3 - should be fairly quick and easy).
Thanks,
Sandro
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919260
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 02:02:27AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to swap reviews for [1] (gtkspellmm30, i.e. the C++
bindings for GtkSpell3 - should be fairly quick and easy).
I will do it in exchange for libmwaw:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928226 .
D.
--
19.04.2013 13:44, Lokesh Mandvekar:
T.C.: thanks for the reviews. And I didn't know the fedora-review tool
existed.
Tips'n'tricks: total building and checking of package (for review):
rpmbuild -ba rpmbuild/SPECS/package.spec fedora-review -r -n
rpmbuild/SRPMS/package-ver-rel.dist.src.rpm
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 09:57:41PM -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Lokeszoh Mandvekar l...@buffalo.edu wrote:
I'd like to offer a review swap.
I've taken both. In return, you may choose from:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894724
https
Hi
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
T.C.: thanks for the reviews. And I didn't know the fedora-review tool
existed. I'll review the first 2 for sure, perhaps all 4 (now that I know
fedora-review makes it so easy)
It is probably less advertised than it should be. I
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 02:20:32PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
T.C.: thanks for the reviews. And I didn't know the fedora-review tool
existed. I'll review the first 2 for sure, perhaps all 4 (now that I know
fedora-review
I'd like to offer a review swap.
Here are my review requests:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953379
and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947492
Let me know.
Thanks,
--
Lokesh
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar l...@buffalo.edu wrote:
I'd like to offer a review swap.
I've taken both. In return, you may choose from:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894724
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921847
https://bugzilla.redhat.com
601 - 700 of 886 matches
Mail list logo
