Florian Weimer writes:
* Sam Varshavchik:
> Stephen Smoogen writes:
>
>>https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/
>>2826>https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2826
>>
>>
>> And thanks for opening a bug. I will watch to see what happens.
>
> I'm genuinely
On 1/2/24 11:49, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Sam Varshavchik:
Stephen Smoogen writes:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/
2826>https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2826
And thanks for opening a bug. I will watch to see what happens.
I'm genuinely
* Sam Varshavchik:
> Stephen Smoogen writes:
>
>>https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/
>>2826>https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2826
>>
>>
>> And thanks for opening a bug. I will watch to see what happens.
>
> I'm genuinely curious. Am I really the
Stephen Smoogen writes:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/
2826>https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2826
And thanks for opening a bug. I will watch to see what happens.
I'm genuinely curious. Am I really the only one seeing this? The bug seems
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 at 17:24, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Stephen Smoogen writes:
>
> > I am trying to figure out the logic of this section:
> >
> >
> > ```
> >
> > static char * lastUname = NULL; // So lastUname is NULL
> > static uid_t lastUid;
> >
> > if (!thisUname) {
> >
Stephen Smoogen writes:
I am trying to figure out the logic of this section:
```
static char * lastUname = NULL; // So lastUname is NULL
static uid_t lastUid;
if (!thisUname) {
lastUname = rfree(lastUname); // lastUname should still be NULL and
we are freeing NULL and
On Tue, 26 Dec 2023 at 07:32, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Stephen Smoogen writes:
>
> >
> > I am guessing the problem is really with the free(lastUname) since the
> rfree
>
> Yes. Multiple execution threads will reach lastUname and try to free the
> same pointer. glibc rightfully complains about
Stephen Smoogen writes:
I am guessing the problem is really with the free(lastUname) since the rfree
Yes. Multiple execution threads will reach lastUname and try to free the
same pointer. glibc rightfully complains about the double-free.
isn't referred to (but not sure if an optimization
On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 at 11:07, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 at 15:51, Sam Varshavchik
> wrote:
>
>> Stephen Smoogen writes:
>>
>> > »My apologies for bad quoting.. email from phone. What version of rpm
>> build
>> > is used and what are some packages which are rebuilt that
Sam Varshavchik writes:
Looking at a diff between the 4.19.0 an 4.19.1 tags, a call to rpmfiStat()
was added to fill_archive_entry(). The backtrace above shows the execution
finding its way from rpmfiStat() into very-much-thread-unsafe code in rpmug.c
That code is used only by
Stephen Smoogen writes:
#1 0x7f05dd8588ee raise (libc.so.6 + 0x3e8ee)
#2 0x7f05dd8408ff abort (libc.so.6 + 0x268ff)
#3 0x7f05dd8417d0 __libc_message.cold (libc.so.6 +
0x277d0)
#4 0x7f05dd8b47a5
On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 at 15:51, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Stephen Smoogen writes:
>
> > »My apologies for bad quoting.. email from phone. What version of rpm
> build
> > is used and what are some packages which are rebuilt that show this
> issue.
> > This may be needed if the core dump is due to
Stephen Smoogen writes:
»My apologies for bad quoting.. email from phone. What version of rpm build
is used and what are some packages which are rebuilt that show this issue.
This may be needed if the core dump is due to something else in the
environment like memory limits etc
It's
My apologies for bad quoting.. email from phone. What version of rpm build
is used and what are some packages which are rebuilt that show this issue.
This may be needed if the core dump is due to something else in the
environment like memory limits etc
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us
It seems that rpmbuild dumps core at the end of the build process, every
once in a while. Typical:
Wrote:
/__w/courier-libs/courier-libs/courier-authlib/rpm/RPMS/x86_64/courier-authlib-userdb-debuginfo-0.72.0.20231223-101.fc39.x86_64.rpm
Wrote:
15 matches
Mail list logo
