On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 4:48 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Jerry James:
> > Sorry for not cluing you in sooner. I sent email to the maintainers
> > of all the packages I need to rebuild, but that didn't include you.
> > I'll let you know as soon as these builds are tagged into Rawhide.
>
> Oh no,
* Jerry James:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 5:08 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>> And did not bump soname at the same time? I suspected as much once I
>> stared at the problem some more.
>
> Yes, that's exactly right.
Okay, that makes the mpfr transition much harder, and what you did
certainly looks
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 5:08 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
> And did not bump soname at the same time? I suspected as much once I
> stared at the problem some more.
Yes, that's exactly right.
> Oh, if mpfr and mpc had bumped soname at the same time, the
> BuildRequires: change would not have been
* Jerry James:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 12:39 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Sorry, I wasn't aware that you were trying to rebuild gcc this week. I
>> spoke to Jakub about the glibc32 change, and he had no objections.
>>
>> It's not clear how you are handling the transition. Why do you need to
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 12:39 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
> Sorry, I wasn't aware that you were trying to rebuild gcc this week. I
> spoke to Jakub about the glibc32 change, and he had no objections.
>
> It's not clear how you are handling the transition. Why do you need to
> change GCC build
* Florian Weimer:
> * Jerry James:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 8:25 PM Jerry James wrote:
>>> The previous build managed to grab the last build of glibc32 for
>>> s390x, it seems. I'm going to assume that this means that s390x
>>> should be removed from the multilib_64_arches variable in the
* Jerry James:
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 8:25 PM Jerry James wrote:
>> The previous build managed to grab the last build of glibc32 for
>> s390x, it seems. I'm going to assume that this means that s390x
>> should be removed from the multilib_64_arches variable in the gcc
>> spec, just so I can
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 8:25 PM Jerry James wrote:
> The previous build managed to grab the last build of glibc32 for
> s390x, it seems. I'm going to assume that this means that s390x
> should be removed from the multilib_64_arches variable in the gcc
> spec, just so I can keep these builds
Hi all,
I'm in the midst of the mpfr 4 rebuilds. I just tried to kick off a
long chain build, the first build of which is the final gcc rebuild
that will give us an mpfr 4-using gcc. Unfortunately, not all of its
dependencies could be installed on s390x; root.log says:
DEBUG util.py:593: No
