Re: should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

2010-05-06 Thread Ville Skyttä
On Thursday 06 May 2010, Ivana Hutarova Varekova wrote: On 05/06/2010 01:28 AM, Ding Yi Chen wrote: - Ivana Varekovavarek...@redhat.com wrote: Sorry for the late response, this solution seems fine for me. From my point of view man and man-db sould provide man-reader. Ivana

Re: should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

2010-05-05 Thread Ding Yi Chen
- Ivana Varekova varek...@redhat.com wrote: Sorry for the late response, this solution seems fine for me. From my point of view man and man-db sould provide man-reader. Ivana -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

2010-05-05 Thread Ivana Hutarova Varekova
On 05/06/2010 01:28 AM, Ding Yi Chen wrote: - Ivana Varekovavarek...@redhat.com wrote: Sorry for the late response, this solution seems fine for me. From my point of view man and man-db sould provide man-reader. Ivana -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

2010-04-01 Thread Ivana Varekova
On 03/10/2010 05:27 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 14:59 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: There is no strong dependency between man and man-pages. man is just one utility amongst many utilities which can be used to process man-pages. Perhaps it would make sense to

Re: should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

2010-03-10 Thread Jesse Keating
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 14:59 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: There is no strong dependency between man and man-pages. man is just one utility amongst many utilities which can be used to process man-pages. Perhaps it would make sense to introduce a Provides:(man-reader) or some such and add a

Re: should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

2010-03-10 Thread Adam Jackson
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 11:56 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 03/10/2010 11:40 AM, Ivana Hutarova Varekova wrote: from my point of view, the vast majority of users uses man to show the wanted man-page content (the reason to add the dependency). Agreed. Actually, I am having problems to

should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

2010-03-08 Thread Ivana Hutarova Varekova
For now in fedora there are 11 packages which contains language mutations of man-pages (man-pages-{cs,da,de,es,fr,it,ja,ko,pl,ru,uk}) and man-pages package. Only 2 of them (man-pages-es, man-pages-it) requires man package. I think man dependences should be consistent in all man-pages*

Re: should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

2010-03-08 Thread Alain Portal
Le Lundi 8 Mars 2010 11:25:40, Ivana Hutarova Varekova a écrit : For now in fedora there are 11 packages which contains language mutations of man-pages (man-pages-{cs,da,de,es,fr,it,ja,ko,pl,ru,uk}) and man-pages package. Only 2 of them (man-pages-es, man-pages-it) requires man

Re: should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

2010-03-08 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 03/08/2010 11:25 AM, Ivana Hutarova Varekova wrote: For now in fedora there are 11 packages which contains language mutations of man-pages (man-pages-{cs,da,de,es,fr,it,ja,ko,pl,ru,uk}) and man-pages package. Only 2 of them (man-pages-es, man-pages-it) requires man package. I