Am 22.08.2011 16:36, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
Am 21.08.2011 22:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
Ignoring the pace at which this discussion is approaching incivility,
in
what way would bleeding-edge updates to systemd address any of the
above?
For games, many would argue the pushing the latest and
Am 23.08.2011 15:36, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
Fedora? Production? I do that, but I'm mental
yes - from F9 to F14 this was really easy
VMware-Cluster with snapshots, some backup-machines as test
all machines using the same internal cache-repo and no external
per server 4-6 minutes and 30
Am 23.08.2011 15:36, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
Fedora? Production? I do that, but I'm mental
yes - from F9 to F14 this was really easy
VMware-Cluster with snapshots, some backup-machines as test
all machines using the same internal cache-repo and no external
per server 4-6 minutes and 30
Am 21.08.2011 22:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
Ignoring the pace at which this discussion is approaching incivility, in
what way would bleeding-edge updates to systemd address any of the above?
For games, many would argue the pushing the latest and greatest to every
release is good. I might agree
Am 21.08.2011 22:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
Ignoring the pace at which this discussion is approaching incivility, in
what way would bleeding-edge updates to systemd address any of the
above?
For games, many would argue the pushing the latest and greatest to every
release is good. I might
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 14:20, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 21.08.2011 22:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
Ignoring the pace at which this discussion is approaching incivility, in
what way would bleeding-edge updates to systemd address any of the above?
For games, many would argue
Am 22.08.2011 16:36, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
Am 21.08.2011 22:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
Ignoring the pace at which this discussion is approaching incivility, in
what way would bleeding-edge updates to systemd address any of the
above?
For games, many would argue the pushing the latest and
Am 20.08.2011 20:49, schrieb Michał Piotrowski:
2011/8/20 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
Am 20.08.2011 19:58, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Sat, 20.08.11 16:25, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
WHY do F16 and F17 get permanently updated and nobody cares
about the
Am 20.08.2011 20:49, schrieb MichaÅ Piotrowski:
2011/8/20 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
Am 20.08.2011 19:58, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Sat, 20.08.11 16:25, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
WHY do F16 and F17 get permanently updated and nobody cares
about the
WHY do F16 and F17 get permanently updated and nobody cares
about the beta-release called F15 GA any longer?
F15 is SEVEN versions behind!
sometimes it seems nobody cares about GA-Releases to have
arguments updating to the next as soon as possible where
all will be better and the things which
Hi,
2011/8/20 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
WHY do F16 and F17 get permanently updated and nobody cares
about the beta-release called F15 GA any longer?
It's maintained - serious bugs are fixed.
F15 is SEVEN versions behind!
sometimes it seems nobody cares about GA-Releases to
On Sat, 20.08.11 16:25, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
WHY do F16 and F17 get permanently updated and nobody cares
about the beta-release called F15 GA any longer?
F15 is SEVEN versions behind!
Like most packages in Fedora systemd in released distributions is only
updated
Am 20.08.2011 19:58, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Sat, 20.08.11 16:25, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
WHY do F16 and F17 get permanently updated and nobody cares
about the beta-release called F15 GA any longer?
F15 is SEVEN versions behind!
Like most packages in Fedora
2011/8/20 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
Am 20.08.2011 19:58, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Sat, 20.08.11 16:25, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
WHY do F16 and F17 get permanently updated and nobody cares
about the beta-release called F15 GA any longer?
F15 is SEVEN
14 matches
Mail list logo
