On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 05:39:10PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
As Notting pointed out, not everything that goes into -testing makes it
into stable, and even then some would say waiting for -testing is too
late, and things in dist-f14-updates-candidate (eg the fresh builds)
should go into
Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) said:
I'm willing to sacrifice my stable rawhide desktop system in the name of
getting Fedora more testing. Where should this discussion be had?
FESCo. rel-eng will implement it (it's a one-line koji command), but the
decision isn't really rel-eng's to make
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/27/2010 08:17 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) said:
I'm willing to sacrifice my stable rawhide desktop system in the name of
getting Fedora more testing. Where should this discussion be had?
FESCo. rel-eng
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:17:37AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
FESCo. rel-eng will implement it (it's a one-line koji command), but the
decision isn't really rel-eng's to make unilaterally.
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/452
Ahsome.
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org
Senior Systems
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:10:35 -0700,
Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
- -updates. A potential way to fix this is to have bodhi not /move/ the
build from dist-f14-updates-candidate into -testing or -updates, but
instead just add -testing or -updates as a secondary tag to the build.
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:10:35AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
I'll copy this to the ticket as well, but there are some non-trivial
roadblocks to this.
Thanks for putting thought into it. I don't think it's at all urgent, but it
my exposure to packages which need testing.
--
Matthew Miller
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 01:58:41AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Sorry for breaking this (again), but with this in place things should be
at the appropriate places now for F14.
What about for Rawhide, where I'm testing all of this? It looks like the
update was just built on F14.
Thanks!
--
Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) said:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 01:58:41AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Sorry for breaking this (again), but with this in place things should be
at the appropriate places now for F14.
What about for Rawhide, where I'm testing all of this? It looks like
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:37:52AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
What about for Rawhide, where I'm testing all of this? It looks like the
update was just built on F14.
rawhide's currently inheriting systemd from F-14; it will get the new
version when it gets to the stable tree.
Really? I
Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) said:
What about for Rawhide, where I'm testing all of this? It looks like the
update was just built on F14.
rawhide's currently inheriting systemd from F-14; it will get the new
version when it gets to the stable tree.
Really? I haven't been paying
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 01:56:03PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Really? I haven't been paying enough attention, I guess. Why don't
inherited packages hit rawhide when they get to the testing tree? Seems
like that'd help a lot with the testing!
There's the chance that things could go into
11 matches
Mail list logo
