Re: uClibc-ng (was Re: Static libraries in Fedora distribution)

2017-03-18 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
On 18 March 2017 at 22:24, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > You should consider switching to uClibc-ng [1]. > uClibc project is frozen, latest release [2] was done five years ago and > last > git commit [3] nearly two. > Than you for putting one more useful pebble in the my

uClibc-ng (was Re: Static libraries in Fedora distribution)

2017-03-18 Thread Xose Vazquez Perez
On 03/18/2017 10:11 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > Did you try to link it against uClibc? > If t is about executable size depends which one libc functions linking with > uClibc should give you waay smaller binaries. > Please just try :) > *Install please uClibc-devel package and put