On 18 March 2017 at 22:24, Xose Vazquez Perez
wrote:
> You should consider switching to uClibc-ng [1].
> uClibc project is frozen, latest release [2] was done five years ago and
> last
> git commit [3] nearly two.
>
Than you for putting one more useful pebble in the my
On 03/18/2017 10:11 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> Did you try to link it against uClibc?
> If t is about executable size depends which one libc functions linking with
> uClibc should give you waay smaller binaries.
> Please just try :)
> *Install please uClibc-devel package and put