The glyph coverage of those fonts is rather incomplete.
With the standard Hungarian encodings (either iso8859-2 or utf8) they are near
to useless, unfortunately.
J. Virágh
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Saturday 22 May 2010 10:14:01 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 20.05.2010 18:42, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 14:25 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> >> I'd expect most of the support to end up in F13 updates, so I'm not
> >> sure a feature page really makes sense.
> >
> > This happ
OggConvert made a release today that adds support for Web-M and fixes Dirac
support, so that will allow people with the WebM enabled in GStreamer to
convert to it... At least now we have a working free software converter that
can be included in Fedora.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
On 20.05.2010 18:42, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 14:25 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> I'd expect most of the support to end up in F13 updates, so I'm not
>> sure a feature page really makes sense.
> This happens with a lot of our features anyway, [...]
And that imho is quite bad
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 20:21 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Are there any plans to have Red Hat Legal look at the patent-freeness of
> > WebM before we leap to include it? We don't take other people's word for
> > it in most cases of potential patent problems, so I don't think it
> > follows that
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 13:47 -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
>> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:21:01AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> > Peter Robinson wrote:
>> > > I don't see when the support lands in F-13 there couldn't be press
>> > > statement
Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
> > I'm not sure we need to push it all the way into F13, but a special WebM
> > repo would be nice so this can be easily tested by any user on F13
> > systems in preparation for full 'support' in F14.
>
> Are there any plans to have Red Hat Legal look
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 13:47 -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:21:01AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > I don't see when the support lands in F-13 there couldn't be press
> > > statements about it, just because it appears after the release doesn't
>
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:21:01AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
> > I don't see when the support lands in F-13 there couldn't be press
> > statements about it, just because it appears after the release doesn't
> > mean its not significant and isn't worth making a statement abo
On 05/21/2010 05:21 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>> I don't see when the support lands in F-13 there couldn't be press
>> statements about it, just because it appears after the release doesn't
>> mean its not significant and isn't worth making a statement about.
>
> In fact this
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 07:40:00AM -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
>Instead of continuing to beat the same same horse you've killed a 100
>times over on this list, have you considered looking for another distro
>or community project that is more aligned with your wishes and goals?
I second this.
jo
Kevin Kofler said the following on 05/21/2010 02:21 AM Pacific Time:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>> I don't see when the support lands in F-13 there couldn't be press
>> statements about it, just because it appears after the release doesn't
>> mean its not significant and isn't worth making a statement
Peter Robinson wrote:
> I don't see when the support lands in F-13 there couldn't be press
> statements about it, just because it appears after the release doesn't
> mean its not significant and isn't worth making a statement about.
In fact this is a big failure of our feature process, but wheneve
2010/5/20 Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) :
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Adam Miller
> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> -AdamM (from Android )
>>
>> On May 20, 2010 1:50 PM, "Jesse Keating" wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 11:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 23:51 +0530, Rahul...
>>
Rahul Sundaram writes:
On 05/20/2010 08:38 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
On 05/20/2010 03:19 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Expect a patent fight before the end of this.
Excerpt from http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/?p=377
Addendum C: Summary for the lazy
... [a lot left out]
With regard t
2010/5/20 Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) :
> It's too bad that we can't say that Fedora 13 has all these cool things.
> Fedora would get some considerable notoriety for being the first to fully
> support it. Then again, we cannot fully support it for HTML5 since Firefox
> doesn't have it... And Chromium is s
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Adam Miller
wrote:
> +1
>
> -AdamM (from Android )
>
> On May 20, 2010 1:50 PM, "Jesse Keating" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 11:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 23:51 +0530, Rahul...
>
> And with the amount of coordination needed to m
+1
-AdamM (from Android )
On May 20, 2010 1:50 PM, "Jesse Keating" wrote:
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 11:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 23:51 +0530, Rahul...
And with the amount of coordination needed to make sure all the stuff is
in the right place for making youtube work,
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 11:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 23:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 05/20/2010 11:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > I believe this kind of situation is why marketing has the 'talking
> > > points' concept.
>
> > ... which is derived from th
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 23:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/20/2010 11:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > I believe this kind of situation is why marketing has the 'talking
> > points' concept.
> ... which is derived from the feature list.
Yup. Derived from. The point is that it's *not* the s
On 05/20/2010 11:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I believe this kind of situation is why marketing has the 'talking
> points' concept.
>
... which is derived from the feature list.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 10:03 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Bastien Nocera (bnoc...@redhat.com) said:
> > > Any grand plans? Should we put up a feature page?
> >
> > I'd expect most of the support to end up in F13 updates, so I'm not sure
> > a feature page really makes sense.
>
> Well, it's pr
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 14:25 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> I'd expect most of the support to end up in F13 updates, so I'm not
> sure
> a feature page really makes sense.
This happens with a lot of our features anyway, but it does make a nice
talking point and media splash to announce Fedora 14 i
On Thu, 20 May 2010, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/20/2010 08:38 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>> On 05/20/2010 03:19 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>
>>> Expect a patent fight before the end of this.
>>>
>> Excerpt from http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/?p=377
>>
>> Addendum C: Summary for the lazy
>
On 05/20/2010 08:38 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> On 05/20/2010 03:19 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
>> Expect a patent fight before the end of this.
>>
> Excerpt from http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/?p=377
>
> Addendum C: Summary for the lazy
> ... [a lot left out]
> With regard to patents,
On 05/20/2010 03:19 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Expect a patent fight before the end of this.
Excerpt from http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/?p=377
Addendum C: Summary for the lazy
... [a lot left out]
With regard to patents, VP8 copies way too much from H.264 for anyone
sane to be comfortable with i
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 10:03 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Bastien Nocera (bnoc...@redhat.com) said:
> > > Any grand plans? Should we put up a feature page?
> >
> > I'd expect most of the support to end up in F13 updates, so I'm not sure
> > a feature page really makes sense.
>
> Well, it's pr
Bastien Nocera (bnoc...@redhat.com) said:
> > Any grand plans? Should we put up a feature page?
>
> I'd expect most of the support to end up in F13 updates, so I'm not sure
> a feature page really makes sense.
Well, it's probably useful to list it simply from a PR/marketing
standpoint.
Does to
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 14:25 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > * Gstreamer plugins - Is it separate? Is anyone looking into that?
>
> They're currently separate branches of the usual -base, -good, and -bad
> GStreamer plugins. They will be merged in the near future, and will
> probably land in F
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 18:39 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://openvideoalliance.org/2010/05/google-frees-vp8-codec-for-html5-the-webm-project/
>
> "All videos that are 720p or larger, uploaded to YouTube after May 19th,
> will be be encoded in WebM."
>
> So you all already heard the
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://openvideoalliance.org/2010/05/google-frees-vp8-codec-for-html5-the-webm-project/
>
> "All videos that are 720p or larger, uploaded to YouTube after May 19th,
> will be be encoded in WebM."
>
> So you all already heard the news
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 18:39:41 +0530,
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> So you all already heard the news, Google has released web-m as a
> royalty free format under a BSD license style license. They have also
> have started using it in YouTube. So if we get things aligned, Fedora
> 14 would be ab
Hi,
http://openvideoalliance.org/2010/05/google-frees-vp8-codec-for-html5-the-webm-project/
"All videos that are 720p or larger, uploaded to YouTube after May 19th,
will be be encoded in WebM."
So you all already heard the news, Google has released web-m as a
royalty free format under a BSD lic
33 matches
Mail list logo
