On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 02:16:25PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 02:28:00PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > [2] https://github.com/systemd/zram-generator
>
> Oh...
>
> ExecStart=sh -c 'echo {disksize} >/sys/block/%i/disksize
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 02:22:43PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 08/24/2018 07:42 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 05:11:28PM -, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > > Why not Haskell?
> > >
> > > Seriously: you provide no reason for rust other than that "C is not
> >
On 08/24/2018 07:42 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 05:11:28PM -, Jeff Johnson wrote:
Why not Haskell?
Seriously: you provide no reason for rust other than that "C is not attractive".
C is surely a reliable implementation language for long running system serv
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 02:28:00PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> [2] https://github.com/systemd/zram-generator
Oh...
ExecStart=sh -c 'echo {disksize} >/sys/block/%i/disksize'
It's necessary to directly write to /sys. We have zramctl(8)
everywhere...
On Sat, 25 Aug 2018 15:54:45 +0200
Björn Persson wrote:
> Obviously the classification is far from complete. Otherwise
> Objective-C would occur about as frequently as C and C++, for example.
Thanks. I was just wondering what the gotchas were for rust, but I
guess they won't be found there. Ma
stan wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 16:15:53 -0400
> David Malcolm wrote:
> > https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/658.html
>
> Is there a list like that for rust?
Not in CWE apparently.
This seems to be their current schema:
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/xsd/cwe_schema_v6.0.1.xsd
It contains t
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 16:15:53 -0400
David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 17:11 +, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/658.html
Is there a list like that for rust?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject
On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 20:24 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 04:15:53PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 17:11 +, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > > Why not Haskell?
> > >
> > > Seriously: you provide no reason for rust other than that "C is
> > >
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 04:15:53PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 17:11 +, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > Why not Haskell?
> >
> > Seriously: you provide no reason for rust other than that "C is not
> > attractive".
> >
> > C is surely a reliable implementation language for long
On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 17:11 +, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> Why not Haskell?
>
> Seriously: you provide no reason for rust other than that "C is not
> attractive".
>
> C is surely a reliable implementation language for long running
> system services.
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/658.html
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 05:11:28PM -, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> Why not Haskell?
>
> Seriously: you provide no reason for rust other than that "C is not
> attractive".
>
> C is surely a reliable implementation language for long running system
> services.
I love C myself and spend my days writi
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> Why not Haskell?
>
> Seriously: you provide no reason for rust other than that "C is not
> attractive".
Why Haskell? You've provided no reason for Haskell.
Seems to me it's more likely people will be, or can become Rust
competent before th
Why not Haskell?
Seriously: you provide no reason for rust other than that "C is not attractive".
C is surely a reliable implementation language for long running system services.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe sen
o keep them mean and lean, but
C is not an attractive option for many people. We have wanted to explore
the approach of writing generators in Rust. zram-generator doubles as a
proof-of-concept and example of a simple-yet-not-trivial systemd generator
in Rust.
Without further ado: upstream project
14 matches
Mail list logo
