On 04/27/2010 12:45 AM, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> On 04/23/2010 12:03 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> We do have an agreement with Mozilla and as such, we are permitted to
> use the Firefox and Thunderbird trademarks.
You certainly mean: RH has an agreement with Mozilla.
That's of no importance in
On 04/25/2010 10:00 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Those packages are also sometimes not compliant with Fedora policies such
>> as usage of system libraries because any patches to use a system library
>> need trademark approval.
>
> Another one: Thunderbird STILL bundles its own Gecko instea
Hi all,
So far we have very less attendance in storage test day[1].
I know that installation and storage device may be the
barriers for involvements, but for the ones who have
RAID, ISCSI, FCoE, multipath devices, can you please
spend a little time to participate in this test day?
It would be
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 19:54 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 10:11 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Christoph Wickert
> > wrote:
> > > I'm upstreaming reports from 'lazy idiots' too and some of them get
> > > fixed. In fact the percentage of the
The meeting slot is coming up in 1hr 50mins (15:00 UTC). We haven't had
a lot to discuss lately and there's nothing on the proposed agenda this
week, so I'm suggesting not to hold the meeting - if there's anything
worse than an unnecessary meeting I'm yet to find it ;). If anyone has
something they
Compose started at Tue Apr 27 09:15:03 UTC 2010
New package extundelete
An ext3 and ext4 file system undeletion utility
New package goldendict
A feature-rich dictionary lookup program
New package json-c
A JSON implementation in C
New package openvas-scanner
Op
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496369
--- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper 2010-04-27
09:45:32 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 11 is nearing its end of lif
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
--
= Weekly KDE Summary
I made a operating system anyone up for testing it for me
--
Lama boy ;-)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Author: mmaslano
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-XXX/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv19833
Modified Files:
perl-XXX.spec
Log Message:
* Tue Apr 27 2010 Marcela Maslanova - 0.12-6
- Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0
Index: perl-XXX.spec
=
Author: mmaslano
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Manip/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20908
Modified Files:
perl-Date-Manip.spec
Log Message:
* Tue Apr 27 2010 Marcela Maslanova - 6.07-3
- Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0
Index: perl-Date-Manip.spec
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Luming Yu wrote:
> God must have fixed the problem for us. :-)
> or some mysterious things happened with the web site
> offering the mysterious video, which sometimes working, sometimes
> not working
It's most likely a connectivity problem associated with ho
This seems like a strange place to post something like that. In any
case, more information would have been nice.
-AdamM
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:50 AM, jerrick Davis wrote:
> I made a operating system anyone up for testing it for me
>
>
> --
> Lama boy ;-)
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@l
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 4:50 PM, jerrick Davis wrote:
> I made a operating system anyone up for testing it for me
>
>
> --
> Lama boy ;-)
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
is it a fedora-based or you meen an edu
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:21:10 + (UTC), Leigh wrote:
> Author: leigh123linux
>
> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/awn-extras-applets/F-12
> +%{_datadir}/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES/awn-extras.mo
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-04-27)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 19:00:01 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-04-27/fesco.2010-04-27-19.00.log.html
Meeting summary
-
All open Fedora 11 bugs recently received a comment warning about the
upcoming end of life for Fedora 11. This email serves as correction to
part of that notification.
Due to an error on my part this warning was sent out earlier than it
should have been. The statement "Approximately 30 (thirt
Adam Williamson wrote:
> I think a rather large part of the problem here is that all the above
> 'special exception' pleading applies far more to Firefox than it does to
> Thunderbird. Firefox is a special exception; it's a phenomenon, the
> single most successful F/OSS app, an app with its own ver
Adam Williamson wrote:
> You can't modify Fedora under F/OSS principles and still call it Fedora,
> just like you can't modify Firefox under F/OSS principles and still call
> it Firefox. Both of us do this to protect the good name of the project.
> We'd be in an extremely glass house-y situation if
Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Rebranding can be a difficult task, but this task also can be easily
> measured in man-hours, man-days or man-months, and this would be a
> ultimate solution, while chatting with lawers can consume much more
> time w/o success (nothing personal here).
And the rebranding wor
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 23:35 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> In fact, I don't see Firefox as being the "absolute requirement" it's
> painted to be at all, we could even consider just not shipping it at all and
> picking a different default browser for the GNOME spin, e.g. Epiphany which
> is the off
Christopher Aillon wrote:
> Also, in the past, certain distributors have altered or broken standards
> compliance in their clients with patches, and in continuing to do so,
> they no longer ship with Mozilla trademarks. They have effectively
> created a different browser and mail client that behav
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 17:55:39 -0400,
Matt McCutchen wrote:
>
> Epiphany is a non-starter. In the default configuration, it doesn't
> validate SSL certificates at all (bug 569577). An unbranded Mozilla
> browser would be a much better choice.
The way Firefox does it, is more to help compan
Christopher Aillon wrote:
> Mozilla has to bundle to ship on Windows, Mac, even their builds for
> Linux where they don't control what versions of libraries are present on
> the system, if they are installed at all (hooray choice!). That has
> absolutely no bearing at all on Fedora however because
Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 23:46 +0800 schrieb Robin 'cheese' Lee:
> 1. Directories like /usr/share/locale/ru_RU.* are not provided by any
> package. This conflicts with guidelines.
file a bug against the filesystem package because it should provide a
proper skeleton for the locales.
> 2. /usr/
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Right. There've been times where it hasn't done this properly and that's
> when you used to get empty reports from abrt, but that's much less
> likely to happy with current code; it's better at making sure the
> debuginfos get installed, and also complains a lot more before
The operating system i made has fedora components but it also has suse
components i realy need people to test it before i can release it if you are
interested email me at lamabo...@gmail.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 16:59 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 17:55:39 -0400,
> Matt McCutchen wrote:
> >
> > Epiphany is a non-starter. In the default configuration, it doesn't
> > validate SSL certificates at all (bug 569577). An unbranded Mozilla
> > browser would be
Matt McCutchen wrote:
> Epiphany is a non-starter. In the default configuration, it doesn't
> validate SSL certificates at all (bug 569577). An unbranded Mozilla
> browser would be a much better choice.
That's a wrong bug ID. RH/Fedora bug 569577 is a Nautilus crash. GNOME bug
569577 is a Bansh
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 00:35 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > Epiphany is a non-starter. In the default configuration, it doesn't
> > validate SSL certificates at all (bug 569577). An unbranded Mozilla
> > browser would be a much better choice.
>
> That's a wrong bug ID. RH/
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> The way Firefox does it, is more to help companies sell certificates than
> to actually help security.
+1
All it does is it leads people to use completely unencrypted HTTP instead,
to avoid the "big scary warnings". How does that provide any added security?
I like the w
Am Mittwoch, den 28.04.2010, 00:05 +0200 schrieb Christoph Wickert:
> Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 23:46 +0800 schrieb Robin 'cheese' Lee:
>
> > 1. Directories like /usr/share/locale/ru_RU.* are not provided by any
> > package. This conflicts with guidelines.
>
> file a bug against the filesystem
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 23:55 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> You mean "compliance" with Mozilla's own "standards" such as APNG which
> require a bundled hacked version of a system library to support?
Kevin, you keep bringing up APNG, so let me address that one. I know the
story because the Mozilla im
Christoph Wickert wrote:
>> 1. Directories like /usr/share/locale/ru_RU.* are not provided by any
>> package. This conflicts with guidelines.
>
> file a bug against the filesystem package because it should provide a
> proper skeleton for the locales.
No, it's this package (gentoo) which is broken
Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote:
> /usr/share/locale/es_MX/LC_MESSAGES/gentoo.mo
I'd suggest:
mv %{_buildroot}%{_datadir}/locale/es_MX %{_buildroot}%{_datadir}/locale/es
if they don't provide a separate es(_ES) translation. Mexican Spanish is not
so different from Castillian Spanish that it can't be und
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 23:38 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > You can't modify Fedora under F/OSS principles and still call it Fedora,
> > just like you can't modify Firefox under F/OSS principles and still call
> > it Firefox. Both of us do this to protect the good name of th
Chris Tyler wrote:
> APNG was created to fill a void -- there was a need for a modern
> animated format with two qualities: it needed to be lightweight and
> backward-compatible (degrade gracefully). After nearly a year of
> discussion and consultation, the PNG group decided not to back it;
Becaus
On 04/27/2010 05:58 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
The OP had an issue w. thunderbird - which many find to be a pretty
decent mail client.
This thread has morphed ...
As for Firefox, I'd actually prefer to put fedora effort behind
chromium - google-chrome is an order of magnitude better than fir
On Sun 25 April 2010 2:55:58 pm Kevin Kofler wrote:
> They still suck in the system integration
> domain in many ways, e.g. openSUSE's KDE integration patches have yet to
> be merged, and of course our maintainers refuse to merge openSUSE's
> patches due to the usual trademark concerns
In their
On 04/28/2010 07:00 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote:
>
>> /usr/share/locale/es_MX/LC_MESSAGES/gentoo.mo
>>
> I'd suggest:
> mv %{_buildroot}%{_datadir}/locale/es_MX %{_buildroot}%{_datadir}/locale/es
> if they don't provide a separate es(_ES) translation. Mexican Spanis
Hi list,
I noticed f13-beta can't mount 4G USB memory stick (fat)
Any plan to fix it?
Thanks,
Luming
# dmesg | tail
sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 23 00 00 00
sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
sdb: sdb1
sd 6:0:0:0: [sdb]
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Luming Yu wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I noticed f13-beta can't mount 4G USB memory stick (fat)
> Any plan to fix it?
Need more information.
1) Did this work before?
2) FAT16 is limited to 2GB for the most part.. FAT32 is required for
4GB. Although it looks like it was f
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Luming Yu wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I noticed f13-beta can't mount 4G USB memory stick (fat)
>> Any plan to fix it?
>
> Need more information.
> 1) Did this work before?
Never tried it before , but it
I wrote:
> Yes, definitely. We should ask Debian about using the ice* names they're
> using, and also share patches with them.
An alternative would be using GNU IceCat:
http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuzilla/
but they don't have a rebranded Thunderbird.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Mail Lists wrote:
> On 04/27/2010 05:58 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
>
> The OP had an issue w. thunderbird - which many find to be a pretty
> decent mail client.
>
> This thread has morphed ...
>
> As for Firefox, I'd actually prefer to put fedora effort behind
>
45 matches
Mail list logo
