Re: tor-lsb -- hey, look, package script, don't complain to _me_. I'm just installing you.

2010-05-30 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 01:38:15PM +0800, Chen Lei wrote: It's actually the same problem and both caused by the misusing of redhat-lsb. The tor package looks very different from other daemons in fedora, e.g. vsftpd squid etc, a small package with so many subpackages and a metapackage seems

Meego in Fedora repos?

2010-05-30 Thread Valent Turkovic
Hi, just wondering is there a plan to have Meego packages in Fedora repos? Fedora has been really fast to include latest Moblin packages so will this continue or have you decided to drop Meego from Fedora repos? Cheers. -- pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt blog:

Re: Meego in Fedora repos?

2010-05-30 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, just wondering is there a plan to have Meego packages in Fedora repos? Fedora has been really fast to include latest Moblin packages so will this continue or have you decided to drop Meego from Fedora repos?

rawhide report: 20100530 changes

2010-05-30 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sun May 30 08:15:11 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- almanah-0.7.3-1.fc14.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.12 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9 dates-0.4.11-3.fc14.i686

Problem with elipse in Fedora 13

2010-05-30 Thread Casimiro de Almeida Barreto
Hello, I've got the following problem with eclipse after update to F13: upon launch it freezes at initial banner uses about 80% of CPU time. Console messages are: [casim...@localhost 155965261]$ eclipse [1] 24191 [casim...@localhost 155965261]$ CompilerOracle: exclude

Re: Meego in Fedora repos?

2010-05-30 Thread Chen Lei
2010/5/30 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com: On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Valent Turkovic Its under review. I'm waiting for a few upstream updates that need to hit as part of the gnome 2.31.2 release. There's a few new packages, some renames but most of it should be in the repos in the

Re: Meego in Fedora repos?

2010-05-30 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/5/30 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com: On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Valent Turkovic Its under review. I'm waiting for a few upstream updates that need to hit as part of the gnome 2.31.2 release. There's a few

Re: ImageMagick update

2010-05-30 Thread Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
22.05.2010 17:28, Hans de Goede пишет: Hi, On 05/17/2010 03:13 AM, Chen Lei wrote: 2010/5/16 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)fo...@hubbitus.com.ru mailto:fo...@hubbitus.com.ru About ABI breakage there separate problem in ImageMagick -

Re: ImageMagick update

2010-05-30 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote: Actually spec file contain string to delete in root build directory: rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.la What can happened bad if I do: find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name *.la -exec rm -f {} \; as Chen Lei suggested

Re: ImageMagick update

2010-05-30 Thread Mamoru Tasaka
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 05/30/2010 11:59 PM +9:00: 22.05.2010 17:28, Hans de Goede пишет: This is not necessarily good advice either: 1) As these la files are for plugins which are located outside of %{_libdir}, they do no harm 2) In the past there have been cases with

Re: ImageMagick update

2010-05-30 Thread Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
30.05.2010 19:22, Mamoru Tasaka пишет: Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 05/30/2010 11:59 PM +9:00: 22.05.2010 17:28, Hans de Goede пишет: This is not necessarily good advice either: 1) As these la files are for plugins which are located outside of %{_libdir}, they do

Re: Inclusion user rpm macros file in spec

2010-05-30 Thread Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
21.05.2010 20:58, Panu Matilainen ?: On Fri, 21 May 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote: Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote: I think because macroses should be included before it processed as shell script. Is there some variant of %include or similar? AFAIK, no. E.g. in

Re: tor-lsb -- hey, look, package script, don't complain to _me_. I'm just installing you.

2010-05-30 Thread Paul Wouters
On Sun, 30 May 2010, Matthew Miller wrote: For the purposes of this complaint, I don't care. I do care that whenever you install the package, it spits out this gem: oouch... redhat-lsb is still broken. See the report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522053 for details. This

Re: FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues

2010-05-30 Thread Elio Maldonado
Not sure but I strongly suspect a change made to nss.spec to be the cause. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596840#c7 Elio - Original Message - From: Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com To: Development discussions related to Fedora

Re: Problem with elipse in Fedora 13

2010-05-30 Thread Mat Booth
On 30 May 2010 14:31, Casimiro de Almeida Barreto casimiro.barr...@gmail.com wrote: Any help appreciated !!! Best regards, Have you tried the usual eclipse -clean and/or removing your ~/.eclipse folder? In fact, does it even get to the point where it asks you what workspace you want to

Why does pari require tetex-dvi?

2010-05-30 Thread Sam Varshavchik
I am wondering why an upgrade to F13 suddenly plonked a massive texlive hairball on my disk. Various Perl crypto modules have a dependency on perl-Math-Pari, which requires pari. Ok. # rpm -q -l pari /usr/lib64/libpari-gmp.so.2 /usr/lib64/libpari-gmp.so.2.3.4 /usr/share/doc/pari-2.3.4

Re: Meego in Fedora repos?

2010-05-30 Thread Kevin Kofler
Peter Robinson wrote: Not decided about the handset side of things yet. The vast majority of the components from MeeGo Core are already in rawhide (and F-13 for that matter). Most of the Netbook UX stuff is. Some of the handset stuff can't yet compile on rawhide due to newer QT components but

Re: Why does pari require tetex-dvi?

2010-05-30 Thread Chen Lei
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530565 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Package Review Stats for last week ending 30th May

2010-05-30 Thread Rakesh Pandit
Top two FAS account holders who have completed reviewing Package review components on bugzilla for last weeks ending 30th May were Alexander Kurtakov and Daiki Ueno. Alexander Kurtakov : 6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596074

libmodplug soname bump coming in rawhide

2010-05-30 Thread Ville Skyttä
Hello, I'll be pushing libmodplug 0.8.8.1 which comes with a soname bump to rawhide soon. Affected (binary) packages in Fedora: gstreamer-plugins-bad-free modplugplay qmmp SDL_sound xine-lib xmms2 xmms-modplug I'll be taking care of the rebuilds where ACLs allow. I've verified that all of

File DateTime-Format-Natural-0.87.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2010-05-30 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DateTime-Format-Natural: 4ab9148c964d819cb59f907da58afa3c DateTime-Format-Natural-0.87.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-Natural/devel .cvsignore, 1.15, 1.16 perl-DateTime-Format-Natural.spec, 1.19, 1.20 sources, 1.15, 1.16

2010-05-30 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-Natural/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13646 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-DateTime-Format-Natural.spec sources Log Message: * Sun May 30 2010 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.87-1 - update to

[Bug 597707] New: please update perl-Software-License to latest upstream release

2010-05-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: please update perl-Software-License to latest upstream release https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597707 Summary: please update perl-Software-License