TeamGit is a really nice gui to git
2010/6/19, Jarod Wilson ja...@wilsonet.com:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 01:08 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Fedpkg should hide the GIT details from you.
But it's a
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 5:37 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 09:15:09 -0400,
Digimer li...@alteeve.com wrote:
Hi all,
I asked this on buildsys, so this is something of a repost. I'm not
sure where to turn at this point, so if this isn't the right list,
On 18 June 2010 18:38, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote:
Hello, all!
And the foundations and first floors of this skyscraper is Zope2 and its
dependencies, which I have built up. The latest version of Zope2 is 2.12.7.
All the spec files are accessible through my git repo:
On 06/19/2010 09:21 PM, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
On 18 June 2010 18:38, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote:
Hello, all!
And the foundations and first floors of this skyscraper is Zope2 and its
dependencies, which I have built up. The latest version of Zope2 is 2.12.7.
All the spec files are
On 19 June 2010 19:31, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote:
On 06/19/2010 09:21 PM, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
[..]
In rpmfusion, Zope is an out-dated version, 2.10.x, which works with
Python 2.4 only.
My package here is the latest version of Zope, 2.12.7, which works with
Python 2.6, and so no compat-python
2010/6/20 Rakesh Pandit rakesh.pan...@gmail.com:
Thanks for clarification. I will see whether I can help with some
dependencies and zope3 part (review as well).
--
--
The original zope/plone in Fedora/EPEL bundles dozens of third party
python modules, nearly all of those modules need review
Hello to all.
The subject package is currently orphaned and I'm thinking of taking it
over.
One problem I can foresee is that, as far as I can tell, there's no longer
an upstream maintainer and at least one patch is required to fix compilation
issues (warnings) and the code needs a general
On 19 June 2010 22:01, Chen Lei wrote:
2010/6/20 Rakesh Pandit rakesh.pan...@gmail.com:
Thanks for clarification. I will see whether I can help with some
dependencies and zope3 part (review as well).
--
--
The original zope/plone in Fedora/EPEL bundles dozens of third party
python
Hi all,
a new version of Hatari has recently been released:
http://hatari.berlios.de/
The new version drops the old build system based on autotools and now
it only support cmake. An (optional) python GUI is now bundled with
the emulator. Moreover some static libraries have been introduced
2010/6/20 Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
a new version of Hatari has recently been released:
http://hatari.berlios.de/
The new version drops the old build system based on autotools and now
it only support cmake. An (optional) python GUI is now bundled with
the emulator.
lör 2010-06-19 klockan 19:32 +0200 skrev Andrea Musuruane:
I do not know how should I threat those internal libraries. How should
I package them? Because upstream uses static libraries the dynamic
versions cmake creates are not versioned.
I want to takeover the ownership of the subject package, however, I don't seem
to be able to do so from within the package database.
Can anyone please advise?
Thanks.
Ian--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 12:37:17AM +0100, ianrichardba...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to takeover the ownership of the subject package, however, I don't seem
to be able to do so from within the package database.
Can anyone please advise?
It's currently orphaned so that looks okay. What's your
Username is chameleon, and I am a new contributor so I don't yet have
sponsorship.
Thanks for replying.
Ian
- Reply message -
From: Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, Jun 20, 2010 02:28
Subject: Ownership of DMity
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 09:59 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com
wrote:
Sorry, my reply was more directed against the assertion that NSCD should
be mandatory to solve this without changes to glibc. I agree that it
would be
On 20 June 2010 07:40, ianrichardbaker wrote:
Username is chameleon, and I am a new contributor so I don't yet have
sponsorship.
[..]
Read:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join
You will need
Thanks for your reply.
I had read the Wiki page, but there's no mention of new contributors adopting
orphaned packages.
So I have to submit the orphan as new all over again in order to kickstart the
new contributor process?
Thanks.
Ian
- Reply message -
From: Rakesh Pandit
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 21:08 +0800, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote:
The 'zope' package itself is most kept under the same conventions of the
legacy 2.10.x 'zope' package.
We have a unique opportunity to address many of the failings of the
current zope namespace. We should get anyone interested (and
On 20 June 2010 09:47, ianrichardbaker wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
I had read the Wiki page, but there's no mention of new contributors
adopting orphaned packages.
Ok.
So I have to submit the orphan as new all over again in order to kickstart
the new contributor process?
[..]
In case
On 20 June 2010 10:10, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
[..]
In case this package has not been update since last 3 months you can
resubmit it for review. But if it has been updated recently (in last 3
months) you will have to get sponsored first and then later claim it
(or ask for co-maintainership in
On 06/20/2010 12:22 AM, Jonathan Steffan wrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 21:08 +0800, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote:
The 'zope' package itself is most kept under the same conventions of the
legacy 2.10.x 'zope' package.
We have a unique opportunity to address many of the failings of the
current zope
On 10-06-19 12:37 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 09:15:09 -0400,
Digimerli...@alteeve.com wrote:
Hi all,
I asked this on buildsys, so this is something of a repost. I'm not
sure where to turn at this point, so if this isn't the right list, would
anyone be able to
On 10-06-19 08:51 AM, mike cloaked wrote:
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 5:37 AM, Bruno Wolff IIIbr...@wolff.to wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 09:15:09 -0400,
Digimerli...@alteeve.com wrote:
Hi all,
I asked this on buildsys, so this is something of a repost. I'm not
sure where to turn at
Author: remi
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-SSLGlue/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv474
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Net-SSLGlue.spec sources
Log Message:
update to 0.4
Index: .cvsignore
Author: remi
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-SSLGlue/F-12
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv2232
Modified Files:
perl-Net-SSLGlue.spec sources
Log Message:
update to 0.4
Index: perl-Net-SSLGlue.spec
Author: remi
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-SSLGlue/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv2746
Modified Files:
perl-Net-SSLGlue.spec sources
Log Message:
update to 0.4
Index: perl-Net-SSLGlue.spec
26 matches
Mail list logo
