This note comes from crt1.o, which is linked into every normal program
(both static and dynamic). Off hand, I'm not sure of anything that
actually checks this note.
What it indicates is the minimum required kernel version that glibc was
built for (its --enable-kernel configure option). This
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 20:00:21 -0500, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
On 9/20/2010 16:41, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Fedora Koji Build System
build...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Miro-3.0.3-2.fc13 unsuccessfully untagged from
dist-f13-updates-testing-pending by
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:31:06 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:59:51PM +, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Well, we're not, thankfully, in the same situation as some other distro
where each third-party repository overlap quite a lot because they
rebuild, possibly
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 01:43:43 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
The Mandriva policy is a reasonable starting point:
http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Policies/SoftwareMedia#Backports_policy
it's sketchy and not greatly written, but the basic idea is that
backports should only be 'leaf' packages
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 08:49 +, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 01:43:43 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
The Mandriva policy is a reasonable starting point:
http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Policies/SoftwareMedia#Backports_policy
it's sketchy and not greatly written,
On 09/21/2010 02:19 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 01:43:43 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
The Mandriva policy is a reasonable starting point:
http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Policies/SoftwareMedia#Backports_policy
it's sketchy and not greatly written, but the basic idea
2010/9/21 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 08:49 +, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Sounds like the only way to package Firefox under such a backport scheme
would be to bundle Gecko etc.
Yup. In MDV, Firefox isn't/wasn't allowed under the backports
guidelines. I
Hi all,
Yorba, the company that develops our current default photo management
tool (Shotwell), finally released an updated version of Valencia, a
gedit Vala development environment, a few months back. We've had this
package in our review queue for a lot longer, and unfortunately the
review got
Martin Stransky stransky at redhat.com writes:
I'm working on it, recently it's delayed in rel-eng:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4125
Thank you!
--
Bojan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 2010-09-15, I wrote:
However, only a few packages in Fedora provide -static variants. This
has meant that I've had to locally build these, which is obviously not
desirable from a maintenance perspective.
So, would be acceptable to register requests for -static package
variants as
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:39:09 -0400, Tom wrote:
Bryn M. Reeves writes:
On 09/15/2010 05:06 PM, Robert Spanton wrote:
So, would be acceptable to register requests for -static package
variants as tickets on bugzilla? Or is there a better way to try to
encourage people to generate these
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 01:51:03 +0200, Michał wrote:
Setting up official backport repo will avoid repos fragmentation.
Keeping all cool updates in one place appears to be a reasonable idea.
Am I right?
Wait a minute! You need to define fragmentation here. It seems you refer
to the geographical
Thanks for your announcement, Andre. I will be away on holidays in the
following three days, so testers please help validate the DVD, CD and
Live Image installation tests[1]. Thanks in advance!
Rgds,
Hurry
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
On Tue,
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 13:49 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 01:51:03 +0200, Michał wrote:
Setting up official backport repo will avoid repos fragmentation.
Keeping all cool updates in one place appears to be a reasonable idea.
Am I right?
Wait a minute! You need to
On 09/20/2010 02:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 01:05 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
I have recently switched from F13 to F14 using preupgrade.
abtr-gui UI seems to be good but misses button to manually install
debug-info of package similar
to KDE 4.5 crash report. Will
section
lxdm-0.3.0-0.1.20100921gitcf9b2cbb.fc15
---
* Tue Sep 21 2010 Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org -
0.3.0-0.1.20100921gitcf9b2cbb
- Update to GIT snapshot of 20100921 (fixes #635396)
mantis-1.1.8-4.fc15
---
* Mon Sep 20 2010
One thing I wanted to point out. Windows users get to install the
latest Firefox, KDE, and other apps without having to wait for a new
Windows release. If users had to wait for Windows 8 to get the latest
Firefox, things would be messy. I don't understand what the fear is of
doing this on
Is GNU/Linux supposed to be a mirror into software's past?
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Brandon Lozza bran...@pwnage.ca wrote:
One thing I wanted to point out. Windows users get to install the
latest Firefox, KDE, and other apps without having to wait for a new
Windows release. If users
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633750
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:36:46 -0400, you wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Gerald Henriksen ghenr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 21:58:53 -0400, you wrote:
2010/9/20 Micha? Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
Ok, so maybe it's time to setup Fedora backports repo for these that
wants
commit a369372a4b5626a96f973aca52393977e8d4e66b
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 14 17:38:20 2010 +0200
6.11 bump
perl-Test-Inter required to build is missing now.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Date-Manip.spec | 19 +++
sources
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/21/2010 07:20 AM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
One thing I wanted to point out. Windows users get to install the
latest Firefox, KDE, and other apps without having to wait for a new
Windows release. If users had to wait for Windows 8 to get the
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/21/2010 07:20 AM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
One thing I wanted to point out. Windows users get to install the
latest Firefox, KDE, and other apps without having to wait
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
--
= Weekly KDE
Compose started at Tue Sep 21 13:15:26 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
RackTables-0.18.3-1.fc14.noarch requires /usr/local/bin/php
RackTables-0.18.3-1.fc14.noarch requires perl(File::FnMatch)
A bug was filed against meshlab because of an FTBFS for Fedora 14. I
added a patch to resolve it and submitted an update. After seven days
with no feedback, I was able to push it to stable.
For an FTBFS for a new Fedora release, does it really make sense to have
the seven day delay? I don't
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:23:37PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 19:30UTC (3:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
I won't be able to make it, as per usual, due to having to commute to
the
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:06:09 -0700, Eric Smith wrote:
For an FTBFS for a new Fedora release, does it really make sense to have
the seven day delay? I don't see what the downside would be of allowing
it to be pushed to stable immediately. Even if there's something wrong
with the update, it
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 15:46 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
Thank you to all the feature owners and developers for all their hard
work to make Fedora 14 the best Fedora release yet. We are almost to
the end!
As a follow-up to last week's reminder
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 10:06 -0700, Eric Smith wrote:
A bug was filed against meshlab because of an FTBFS for Fedora 14. I
added a patch to resolve it and submitted an update. After seven days
with no feedback, I was able to push it to stable.
For an FTBFS for a new Fedora release, does
DEBUG util.py:260: Transaction Check Error:
DEBUG util.py:260:file /usr/lib/girepository-1.0/DBusGLib-1.0.typelib
conflicts between attempted installs of dbus-glib-0.86-4.fc14.i686 and
gobject-introspection-0.9.6-1.fc15.i686
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager
Join us on irc.freenode.net #fedora-meeting for this important meeting.
Wednesday, September 22, 2010 @ 21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT)
Before each public release Development, QA, and Release Engineering
meet to determine if the release criteria are met for a particular
release. This meeting
If someone has enough interest in backporting something from a newer
release, we can set up a personal repo on the repos.fedorapeople.org. Just
like firefox4 and yum-rawhide repo.
Maybe we wait for Copr. Seth Vidal is working on it. We can easily set up
and manage a backport or testing repo on
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:20:05 -0400, you wrote:
One thing I wanted to point out. Windows users get to install the
latest Firefox, KDE, and other apps without having to wait for a new
Windows release. If users had to wait for Windows 8 to get the latest
Firefox, things would be messy. I don't
On Tuesday, September 21, 2010, 2:54:31 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
On 09/21/2010 01:45 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 17:50 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Isn't that a security related
update?
Ping...
I'm working on it, recently it's delayed in rel-eng:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:06:09 -0700
Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com wrote:
A bug was filed against meshlab because of an FTBFS for Fedora 14. I
added a patch to resolve it and submitted an update. After seven
days with no feedback, I was able to push it to stable.
Were there reports of the
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:59:06 -0400, you wrote:
However, if for example Microsoft had a similar system and did package
software for it. Their users would be up in arms for the latest
firefox too and Microsoft wouldn't keep them on an old firefox
version.
You are ignoring the troubles Microsoft
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-09-21)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 19:30:01 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-09-21/fesco.2010-09-21-19.30.log.html
Meeting summary
Greetings.
I'd like to ask for feedback and helping cleaning up an updates policy
draft page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft
How can we clarify the language or the layout of the page to be more
clear? Are there places that it could be more like the existing
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 15:45, Gerald Henriksen ghenr...@gmail.com wrote:
you want something better than stable for KDE you can one click
install the factory KDE repo. You can one click install the trunk repo
too. They even have two Chromium branches available for single click
install (version 6
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:36:15 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
DEBUG util.py:260: Transaction Check Error: DEBUG util.py:260:file
/usr/lib/girepository-1.0/DBusGLib-1.0.typelib conflicts between
attempted installs of dbus-glib-0.86-4.fc14.i686 and
gobject-introspection-0.9.6-1.fc15.i686
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 15:47:04 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Greetings.
I'd like to ask for feedback and helping cleaning up an updates policy
draft page:
Do you want feedback on the mailing list or the Talk page pn the wiki?
--
devel mailing list
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:09:32 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 15:47:04 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Greetings.
I'd like to ask for feedback and helping cleaning up an updates
policy draft page:
Do you want feedback on the mailing
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Greetings.
I'd like to ask for feedback and helping cleaning up an updates policy
draft page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft
How can we clarify the language or the layout of the page to be
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Were there reports of the existing build causing problems?
I don't think there was any prior F14 build of meshlab. I got email for
the FTBFS bug.
I don't see the point of pushing it as an update at all, unless it's
fixing some bad behavior in the existing build or
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:10:37PM +, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:36:15 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
DEBUG util.py:260: Transaction Check Error: DEBUG util.py:260:file
/usr/lib/girepository-1.0/DBusGLib-1.0.typelib conflicts between
attempted installs of
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 22:10 +, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:36:15 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
DEBUG util.py:260: Transaction Check Error: DEBUG util.py:260:file
/usr/lib/girepository-1.0/DBusGLib-1.0.typelib conflicts between
attempted installs of
We've built gobject-introspection 0.9.6 in rawhide today. This version
changes the format of .gir files, making it necessary to rebuild all
packages that install gir files. I've started doing those rebuilds, but
I didn't get entirely through, so there will be some fallout in
tomorrows rawhide.
--
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 10:59 -0400, Brandon Lozza wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/21/2010 07:20 AM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
One thing I wanted to point out. Windows users get to install the
latest Firefox, KDE, and other apps without having
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:49:13 -0700
Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com wrote:
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Were there reports of the existing build causing problems?
I don't think there was any prior F14 build of meshlab. I got email
for the FTBFS bug.
Yeah, there was a 1.2.2-4.fc14 build.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568172
Daniel Berrange berra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit bcc8e8ea586b2a028a516f8df6621f1e6ec82b7f
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Sep 21 11:16:48 2010 +0100
Conditionalize long-running tests
Turn long-running tests back on and support build --without long_tests
to skip them
perl-IO-Compress.spec | 20
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-MooseX-Types-DateTimeX-0.07 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636008
Summary: perl-MooseX-Types-DateTimeX-0.07 is available
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Compress-2.030-3.fc15' was created pointing to:
bcc8e8e... Conditionalize long-running tests
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit c49338e7365df29113d3c342d884a2df045390eb
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 21 10:56:24 2010 +0200
1.01 imported.
perl-Test-Inter.spec | 53 ++
1 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit db1f54a9c9f944324260aa47f33bf59671958e52
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 21 13:10:36 2010 +0200
Add sources file
.gitignore |1 +
sources|1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index
commit 205faab517e58f3531db62e0a61d1dbe8017f991
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 21 13:52:41 2010 +0200
- 633760 update
perl-XXX.spec |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-XXX.spec b/perl-XXX.spec
index
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633760
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-XXX:
2879b4cc13904aec7e0959cd65fcf074 XXX-0.17.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4526930e9a76eaece53087135d2377294ce6a609
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 21 13:58:21 2010 +0200
- 633760 update
.gitignore |1 +
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Inter:
445166a7472e609b96e4474d95552827 Test-Inter-1.01.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 2153c73058fe751f8fed6b8bc7b9c9cdd1d8dc39
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 21 15:18:51 2010 +0200
Package %{perl_privlib} as this is noarch package
perl-Test-Inter.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633720
Bug 633720 depends on bug 633879, which changed state.
Bug 633879 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Inter - Framework for more
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633720
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-boolean:
efcf5ffe3822823bf302960a3c89699c boolean-0.23.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
65 matches
Mail list logo
