Re: The new Update Acceptance Criteria are broken (was: Re: Heads Up - New Firefox update)

2010-10-31 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:37:38 +0100, Kevin wrote: Martin Stransky wrote: there's a new Firefox update waiting in Bodhi and we can't push it to stable because of new rules. We recommend you to update to it ASAP as it fixes a public critical 0day vulnerability

rawhide report: 20101031 changes

2010-10-31 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sun Oct 31 08:15:03 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 1:anjuta-2.31.90.0-3.fc15.i686 requires libvala-0.10.so.0 1:anjuta-2.31.90.0-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libvala-0.10.so.0()(64bit)

Re: Is python-libs segfaulting behind mod_python for anyone in F-14?

2010-10-31 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Hi, mod_python project is officially dead since june, it had no release since february 2007. You should move to mod_wsgi which a community supported alternative for python web applications. http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2010/06/modpython-project-is-now-officially.html

Re: Fast Light Tool Kit

2010-10-31 Thread José Matos
On Sunday 31 October 2010 02:58:21 Dominic Hopf wrote: I think it's likely something like a BuildRequires: fltk already should be enough. I'd suggest to just try out that and see what happens. :) Most probably it should be BuildRequires: fltk-devel -- José Abílio -- devel mailing list

Re: Fast Light Tool Kit

2010-10-31 Thread Alexander Boström
lör 2010-10-30 klockan 17:05 -0400 skrev Eric Sparks Christensen: The source is a single file with no readme and I'm not exactly sure how to package the software. Probably: cc -o foo foo.c $(fltk-config --cflags --ldflags) /abo -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Is python-libs segfaulting behind mod_python for anyone in F-14?

2010-10-31 Thread Bojan Smojver
Haïkel Guémar karlthered at gmail.com writes: Hi, mod_python project is officially dead since june, it had no release since february 2007. You should move to mod_wsgi which a community supported alternative for python web applications. http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2010/06/modp

Re: The new Update Acceptance Criteria are broken

2010-10-31 Thread Clyde E. Kunkel
On 10/31/2010 03:18 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:37:38 +0100, Kevin wrote: Martin Stransky wrote: there's a new Firefox update waiting in Bodhi and we can't push it to stable because of new rules. We recommend you to update to it ASAP as it fixes a public critical 0day

Re: Fast Light Tool Kit

2010-10-31 Thread Ben Boeckel
Eric \Sparks\ Christensen spa...@fedoraproject.org wrote: The source I downloaded contained a single file so I'm not sure what needs to happen. Well, since asking upstream for a copy of the license to ship is required for the guidelines, maybe a simple Makefile could be asked for as well.

Looking for a good Radix tree (Patricia) library in fedora

2010-10-31 Thread Philip Prindeville
I'm the CPAN owner of Net::Patricia (perl-Net-Patricia.rpm) and it currently supports IPv4 and IPv6. Both are done with specialized data structures. I'm looking for something that handles a more generic binary data blob... so that I could have arbitrary searches. For instance, in Perl, I

Re: The new Update Acceptance Criteria are broken (was: Re: Heads Up - New Firefox update)

2010-10-31 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 04:37 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Martin Stransky wrote: there's a new Firefox update waiting in Bodhi and we can't push it to stable because of new rules. We recommend you to update to it ASAP as it fixes a public critical 0day vulnerability

Re: The new Update Acceptance Criteria are broken (was: Re: Heads Up - New Firefox update)

2010-10-31 Thread Miloslav Trmač
Adam Williamson píše v Ne 31. 10. 2010 v 18:06 -0700: On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 04:37 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Yet another blatant example of failure of the Update Acceptance Criteria, needlessly exposing our users to critical vulnerabilities. Kevin, could you *please* not word things

Re: The new Update Acceptance Criteria are broken (was: Re: Heads Up - New Firefox update)

2010-10-31 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Williamson wrote: I already wrote this to -test a couple of days ago: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-October/095135.html and we're discussing it there. I think the thread demonstrates things tend to go much more constructively if you avoid throwing words like

File CGI-PSGI-0.13.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by eseyman

2010-10-31 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CGI-PSGI: adf5eb13bd031f350679b41a48ea9069 CGI-PSGI-0.13.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-CGI-PSGI] Update to 0.13

2010-10-31 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
commit 2230cc46c4216b7b884cd263821b79ce3f5a675e Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr Date: Sun Oct 31 12:43:33 2010 +0100 Update to 0.13 .gitignore |1 + perl-CGI-PSGI.spec |5 - sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2