Hi,
I am receiving the following email from Koji:
fmtools has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree:
On x86_64:
fmtools-tkradio-2.0.1-2.el6.
noarch requires python-lirc
On i386:
fmtools-tkradio-2.0.1-2.el6.noarch
Hi,
I am mail bombed with mails complaining about broken deps originating
from those EPEL6-versions of packages I maintain in Fedora.
* I am not these packages' maintainer (I maintain them in Fedora, but do
not maintain them in EPEL) - Stop this silly mail-bombardment!
* The broken deps these
Compose started at Sun Dec 19 08:15:04 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
apvlv-0.0.9.8-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libpoppler.so.9()(64bit)
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0()(64bit)
On 12/19/2010 03:43 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Hi,
I am receiving the following email from Koji:
fmtools has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree:
On x86_64:
fmtools-tkradio-2.0.1-2.el6.
noarch requires
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net wrote:
On 12/19/2010 03:43 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Hi,
I am receiving the following email from Koji:
fmtools has broken dependencies in the epel-6
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 11:24:56 +0100, Ralf wrote:
Hi,
I am mail bombed with mails complaining about broken deps originating
from those EPEL6-versions of packages I maintain in Fedora.
* I am not these packages' maintainer (I maintain them in Fedora, but do
not maintain them in EPEL) -
Hi packagers,
I have an easy package to review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664298
autojump - A fast way to navigate your filesystem from the command line.
Anyone interested in a review swap ?
Thanks,
Thibault
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 12:31:16 -0200
Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote:
That is the problem. python-lirc has never been built for RHEL.
I know it works because I built it myself on rhel5 a long time ago,
and I run it there just fine.
I will do the request as you suggested.
You may
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:32:30 +0100
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
This is due to a flaw in the Fedora PKGNAME-owner aliases and using
them also for EPEL. There are no separate aliases for EPEL package
ownership.
In pkgdb one can see that there is a different owner for the EPEL
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 12:05:09 +0100
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
Nonsense. The current releng procedure is bureaucracy and a
bottle-neck. (How often does releng reject koji buildroot override
requests?)
Not sure. I haven't been subscribed to the list too long...
I'm in favour
Hello, Thibault.
I ready swap and took it.
19.12.2010 20:59, Thibault North wrote:
Hi packagers,
I have an easy package to review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664298
autojump - A fast way to navigate your filesystem from the command line.
Anyone interested in a review swap
On December 19, 2010 02:56:05 pm Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
Hello, Thibault.
I ready swap and took it.
Thanks Pavel. Let me know which one I can review for you.
Thibault
19.12.2010 20:59, Thibault North wrote:
Hi packagers,
I have an easy package to review:
Hi,
I asked about PGSQL 9 for F14 but it was too late. So how is it now?
Any plans for PGSQL 9 and MySQL 5.5 in F15?
--
Best regards,
Michal
Sent from my fscking awesome Black Hole Generator
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Yes.
regards, tom lane
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2010/12/19 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com:
Yes.
Great :)
Will it be possible to easily rebuild PGSQL 9 packages for RHEL 6?
regards, tom lane
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
Best regards,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I noticed that Comfortaa is not listed in Fonts group using PackageKit
or yum groupinfo command. Have newer fonts past Fedora 13 similar issue?
If so, how to fix that problem?
- --
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic Web Designer
E: l...@fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
c43129f... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*)
9bc92f9... - rebuild against perl 5.10.1 (*)
d48cc68... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*)
5901cf7... dist-git conversion (*)
148d019... New. (*)
2277108... - Upstream update. - Install
commit 90e4990e13ecb0428213b0d23db44e2f1810ab65
Merge: 94c5957 abee3b4
Author: Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org
Date: Sun Dec 19 15:35:34 2010 +0100
Merge branch 'master' into el6
Conflicts:
.gitignore
perl-Text-vFile-asData.spec | 49
rt3 has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-RT-Test-3.8.8-2.el6.noarch requires perl(Test::Email)
On i386:
perl-RT-Test-3.8.8-2.el6.noarch requires perl(Test::Email)
On ppc64:
perl-RT-Test-3.8.8-2.el6.noarch requires perl(Test::Email)
Please resolve
perl-AnyEvent has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-AnyEvent-5.27-1.el6.noarch requires perl(Event::Lib)
perl-AnyEvent-5.27-1.el6.noarch requires perl(IO::Async::Handle)
On i386:
perl-AnyEvent-5.27-1.el6.noarch requires perl(Event::Lib)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [abrt] perl-Padre-0.64-1.fc14: Process /usr/bin/perl was killed by
signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664319
Summary: [abrt]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664319
--- Comment #1 from mdegg...@gmail.com 2010-12-19 15:53:45 EST ---
Created attachment 469635
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Rebase on upstream version 4.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664360
Summary: Rebase on upstream version 4.0
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664360
Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: RFE: Please update HTML::Tree to version 4.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664362
Summary: RFE: Please update HTML::Tree to version 4.1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664362
Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664360
Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
27 matches
Mail list logo
