On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 11:37 -0700, susmit shannigrahi wrote:
My understanding was that we never touch databases in RPMs, period. We
don't create, modify, update, or remove. I can't recall at the moment
where this stems from, but the rationale, as I recall, was that we can
never be sure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
One of my packages (ReviewBoard) just released a point update that makes
a problematic change for installed instances.
Specifically, they identified an issue with ReviewBoard running on
mod_wsgi that requires that an option (WSGIPassAuthorization) be
On 10 January 2011 13:02, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As a caveat, this is a project that always requires at least some manual
intervention on upgrade, as individual sites need to have an upgrade
script run on them. So end-users
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 08:02 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
As a caveat, this is a project that always requires at least some manual
intervention on upgrade, as individual sites need to have an upgrade
script run on them. So end-users are used to taking some action.
Unfortunately, upstream
Hi,
with the recent evolution-data-server 2.91.5 release in Rawhide are done
some internal changes in the soname versions and a location where the
backend files for the addressbook and calendar should be saved.
From the commit log:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/10/2011 08:37 AM, Mat Booth wrote:
On 10 January 2011 13:02, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As a caveat, this is a project that always requires at least some manual
intervention
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/10/2011 09:02 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 08:02 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
As a caveat, this is a project that always requires at least some manual
intervention on upgrade, as individual sites need to have an
I think, just in case it's not clear, that the typical way this should
be handled is that on installation the software should not create the
necessary database; instead the creation process should be documented
for the user to complete manually. So when the software is packaged,
there's no
Hello All!
I would like to swap reviews. Here are mine ones (all of them are
Erlang-related):
* erlang-ebloom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/652616
* erlang-skerl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/652648
* erlang-luke https://bugzilla.redhat.com/652585
* erlang-webmachine
I have just notice, in the spec
-DWITH_READLINE=ON
Which means, according to INSTALL-SOURCE :
* -DWITH_READLINE=bool
Whether to use the readline library bundled with the
distribution.
Does this use of a bundled library is wanted ?
To use the system library, option
I have just tagged gtk3-2.99.0 into rawhide. There are abi and api
changes, so all dependent packages will have to be rebuilt (the most
obvious change is that the libraries are now called libg[dt]k-3.0.so
instead of libg[gt]k-x11-3.0.so).
There are a number of api changes that I am not going to
MC == Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com writes:
MC * gtk-update-icon-cache-3.0 and gtk-builder-convert-3.0 have been
MC dropped (since they were identical to their un-suffixed cousins in
MC the gtk2 package). If you are using gtk-update-icon-cache in %post
MC of a gtk3-using package, you should
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
MC == Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com writes:
MC * gtk-update-icon-cache-3.0 and gtk-builder-convert-3.0 have been
MC dropped (since they were identical to their un-suffixed cousins in
MC the gtk2 package). If you are using gtk-update-icon-cache in %post
MC
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 15:00 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I have built most packages that had a gtk3 dependency already, and
tagged them into rawhide. The following are the leftovers:
libindicator-gtk3
I see you committed a bump+rebuild but didn't actually push a build,
AFAICT - I can't see
Summary of changes:
d3b4553... Import of perl-Net-STOMP-Client. (*)
d1f9491... Populate branches. (*)
d9bb370... New 0.9 upstream. (*)
d194bf6... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*)
a3e18c1... New upstream 0.9.2. (*)
6d5f507... dist-git conversion (*)
363b043... Rebuild. (*)
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com writes:
I have just notice, in the spec
-DWITH_READLINE=ON
Which means, according to INSTALL-SOURCE :
* -DWITH_READLINE=bool
Whether to use the readline library bundled with the
distribution.
Does this use of a bundled library
Hello Peter,
I have one gnome-guitar (gtk mono based) at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663018
I will take erlang-ebloom and erlang-skerl .
Thanks
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All!
I would like to swap reviews. Here are mine
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 14:13 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
MC == Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com writes:
MC * gtk-update-icon-cache-3.0 and gtk-builder-convert-3.0 have been
MC dropped (since they were identical to their un-suffixed cousins in
MC the gtk2 package). If you are using
I just pushed a new release of bodhi into production.
http://bodhi.fedoraproject.org
It's a minor release that contains a small number of fixes, including:
Backend bug fixes
- Don't try and remove the -pending koji tags when resuming a push
- Don't fetch security bug
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 06:54:56PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 14:13 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
MC == Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com writes:
MC * gtk-update-icon-cache-3.0 and gtk-builder-convert-3.0 have been
MC dropped (since they were identical to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm having a problem under mock 1.1.6 on F13/x86_64 where I can't seem to
download the repo information for F14/x86_64 (all other releases/arches work
fine).
The root.log is here:
http://pastebin.com/irkWhjtg
For some reason it seems like yum can't
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:47 PM, susmit shannigrahi
thinklinux@gmail.com
Nice, thanks.
Given the size of the wiki, I am surprised that there is no
documentation in this regard.
I have started one: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FAQ
I don't think spreading out the
On 01/10/2011 09:47 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
commit 7ea2316fcdfe97222125cfde576de4fd28265ac8
Author: Marcela Mašláňovámmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jan 10 09:45:39 2011 +0100
re-add macros. -tests sub-package was missing during update
perl-Test-SharedFork.spec |8 +++-
The lightweight tag 'perl-Net-STOMP-Client-0.9.5-1.fc15' was created pointing
to:
2b1f113... - New upstream 0.9.5
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Net-STOMP-Client-0.9.5-1.fc14' was created pointing
to:
2b1f113... - New upstream 0.9.5
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
25 matches
Mail list logo
