On Tuesday, January 25, 2011 06:40:00 pm Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 01/25/2011 10:58 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > reconsider the OnlyShowIn=KDE; for System Settings
> > * ''AGREED'' to not enable it by now and ask upstream what they think
> > * reasons are
> > ** we cannot add KDE to the name as
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672665
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
> -Original Message-
> From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:devel-
> boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of David Woodhouse
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 7:01 AM
> To: Michael Chan
> Cc: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org; KM, Paniraja; Iyer, Shyam; Rose,
> Charles; jla
Scenario:
Assume I have package "foo". It's installed already, and the local RPM
database covers it and all its dependencies.
App "foo" used to run fine a month ago, but a rebuild no longer does.
Dependencies have been updated. Too many for "rpm -qa --last|less" or
yum's log to be helpful.
I'd l
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:52:52PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> I'd like to run an RPM query on "foo" that displays the %{buildtime}
> for all of foo's Requires, sorted by buildtime.
>
> Does anyone know of an existing tool that can do exactly this already?
No, but I have a script which can l
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:56:43 +, Richard wrote:
> No, but I have a script which can list all the dependencies of a
> package recursively [using data from yum, not rpm] if that is helpful:
>
> http://git.annexia.org/?p=febootstrap.git;a=blob;f=febootstrap_yum_rpm.ml;h=e70940df06edb87b616d739bf0
> repoquery --tree-requires ... [...] seems to be broken here,
Ah, it's just Adobe's packages that are broken and confuse the
depsolving. For example:
$ repoquery --whatprovides libgcc_s.so.1
libgcc-0:4.5.1-4.fc14.i686
AdobeReader_nor-0:8.1.7-1.i486
AdobeReader_ita-0:8.1.7-1.i486
AdobeReader_suo-
On 01/26/2011 02:56 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> I think there should be way
> how to confugure from for example Gnome and same would be great for Gnome
> Applications to be configurable from other environments. Plasma, Shell
> whatever
> are just the face, what does matter are applications.
>
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 01:24:09 pm Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 01/26/2011 02:56 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > I think there should be way
> > how to confugure from for example Gnome and same would be great for Gnome
> > Applications to be configurable from other environments. Plasma, Shell
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 12:52 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Scenario:
>
> Assume I have package "foo". It's installed already, and the local RPM
> database covers it and all its dependencies.
>
> App "foo" used to run fine a month ago, but a rebuild no longer does.
> Dependencies have been updat
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 08:36 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 12:52 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Scenario:
> >
> > Assume I have package "foo". It's installed already, and the local RPM
> > database covers it and all its dependencies.
> >
> > App "foo" used to run fine a mont
In my python application, I need to include a .so binary I built of a custom
gstreamer plugin. My python application works fine with this plugin when
launching from the command line.
Now that I am packaging my python application into a fedora rpm, I need to
compile the plugin as part of the packa
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 00:16 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> There is a PostgreSQL 9.1alpha3 for i686, but I can't find one for
> x86_64. Can I get SRPM for 9.1?
Uh. Seems like I forgot to upload them.
I don't have access to master RPM buildfarm ATM. May I ask you to build
you own package using
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 08:52 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 08:36 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 12:52 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > Scenario:
> > >
> > > Assume I have package "foo". It's installed already, and the local RPM
> > > database covers it and
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Upgrade perl(version) to 0.88
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672839
Summary: Upgrade perl(version) to 0.88
Product: Fedora
Ve
Just remove the line 'BuildArch: noarch' from your specfile?
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Erik Blankinship wrote:
> In my python application, I need to include a .so binary I built of a
> custom gstreamer plugin. My python application works fine with this plugin
> when launching from th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672839
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar 2011-01-26 10:12:30 EST ---
Created attachment 475413
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachmen
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672839
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672839
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672665
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672665
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672839
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
2011/1/26 Devrim GÜNDÜZ :
> On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 00:16 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> There is a PostgreSQL 9.1alpha3 for i686, but I can't find one for
>> x86_64. Can I get SRPM for 9.1?
>
> Uh. Seems like I forgot to upload them.
>
> I don't have access to master RPM buildfarm ATM. May I ask
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 08:36:00 -0500, seth wrote:
> I just want to make sure I have this:
>
> 1. rpm -qR foo
>
> 2. take each of those resolve it out to what provides them
> 3. return the buildtime + pkg name of each of those, sorted by buildtime
>
> correct?
Yes.
$ repoquery --qf '%{buildtime:
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 16:40 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 08:36:00 -0500, seth wrote:
>
> > I just want to make sure I have this:
> >
> > 1. rpm -qR foo
> >
> > 2. take each of those resolve it out to what provides them
> > 3. return the buildtime + pkg name of each of tho
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 08:13:18 +0100
Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
> 2011/1/25, Marian Ganisin :
> > Hi,
> Hi
>
> > Is anyone in contact with this person:
> > Account Name: jima
> I see jima daily chatting on #ipv6 on freenode.
And he updated conserver as well yesterday. ;)
kevin
signature.asc
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:25:40 +1300
Al Reay wrote:
> Looks like it's made the news
>
> http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/01/25/1723259/Fedora-Infrastructure-Compromised
Disappointingly the slashdot story paraphrased another site that went
with a sensationalized headline and was low on facts. The
Trying to build a new Asterisk package in rawhide this morning I'm getting this:
DEBUG backend.py:745: /usr/bin/yum --installroot
/var/lib/mock/dist-f15-build-966033-145591/root/ groupinstall build
DEBUG util.py:281: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot
/var/lib/mock/dist-f15-build-966
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:58:52 -0600
Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> Trying to build a new Asterisk package in rawhide this morning I'm
> getting this:
>
> DEBUG backend.py:745: /usr/bin/yum --installroot
> /var/lib/mock/dist-f15-build-966033-145591/root/ groupinstall build
> DEBUG util.py:281: Executin
Hi,
Evolution team drops support for gtk2 in 2.91.6 release of
evolution-related packages (gtkhtml3, evolution-data-server and
evolution) which might make trouble for dependent packages which are
still gtk2. I expect there will follow gtk3 updates for them in the near
future too, if not don
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672068
--- Comment #2 from Nathanael Noblet 2011-01-26 12:29:33
EST ---
I'll take a look.. I put it in /usr/share/dspam as other proje
Hi Milan,
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Milan Crha wrote:
> Hi,
> Evolution team drops support for gtk2 in 2.91.6 release of
> evolution-related packages (gtkhtml3, evolution-data-server and
> evolution) which might make trouble for dependent packages which are
> still gtk2. I expect th
commit b0bf55a540fef7594b83236a9967024f1534af71
Author: Nathanael D. Noblet
Date: Wed Jan 26 11:42:21 2011 -0700
forgot to bump the release
dspam.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/dspam.spec b/dspam.spec
index bc20193..334e412 100644
--- a/d
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-01-26)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 17:30:01 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-01-26/fesco.2011-01-26-17.30.log.html
Meeting summary
-
commit dd6fe8fbb5d9a641daf7cf60f3bdd22da7c8f405
Merge: aa4ed7e 2258698
Author: Nathanael D. Noblet
Date: Wed Jan 26 12:00:31 2011 -0700
Merge remote branch 'origin/master' into el5/master
dspam-3.9.0-docs.patch | 45 +++
dspam-3.9.0-dspamsock
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 09:30:24AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:25:40 +1300
> Al Reay wrote:
>
> > Looks like it's made the news
> >
> > http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/01/25/1723259/Fedora-Infrastructure-Compromised
>
> Disappointingly the slashdot story paraphrased ano
On 01/27/2011 01:12 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 09:30:24AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> Disappointingly the slashdot story paraphrased another site that went
>> with a sensationalized headline and was low on facts. They didn't even
>> point to the actual announcement for
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:15 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Richard wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:29:44PM +, mike cloaked wrote:
>>> I was recently testing an f14 install on an old laptop without wifi
>>> hardware - so I bought a small usb wifi adapter (Micro
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 08:58:36PM +, mike cloaked wrote:
> I wonder how long it will be before the RTL8192SU driver will be
> regarded as stable enough to go into mainstream? This works without
> any problems at all for me. Or is that a question to ask in the
> kernel list?
>
My guess is n
about the fact that "services must not be enabled by default"
I'm not sure to understand well
You mean that the initscript provided by upstream should be changed ?
for example with firebird we have this in the init script :
# chkconfig: 345 80 20
# description: Start/Stop firebird database server
> "pm" == philippe makowski writes:
pm> You mean that the initscript provided by upstream should be changed
pm> ?
Yes.
pm> chkconfig: 345 80 20
pm> chkconfig: - 80 20
- J<
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672068
--- Comment #7 from Matej Cepl 2011-01-26 16:59:28 EST ---
a) SuexecUserGroup context needs to be in VirtualHost, not in plain D
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672068
--- Comment #8 from Matej Cepl 2011-01-26 17:00:42 EST ---
Suggesting http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/suexec.html for more
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:43:11 +0100
philippe makowski wrote:
> about the fact that "services must not be enabled by default"
> I'm not sure to understand well
>
> You mean that the initscript provided by upstream should be changed ?
Yeah.
Basically there are several things to think about:
*
Hello all,
I hate to do this, but I'm running out of spare time these days and
I am going to have to start dropping some of the packages I just don't
use anymore because keeping up with them is added time and effort.
I will be orphaning the following packages, please feel free to pick
them up:
I some how goofed an thought I still was the owner for glade3, there are
just some old bugs sitting in my queue apparently. Appologies to
huzaifas (current owner of glade3).
-AdamM
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 18:15 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi Milan,
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Milan Crha wrote:
> >Hi,
> > Evolution team drops support for gtk2 in 2.91.6 release of
> > evolution-related packages (gtkhtml3, evolution-data-server and
> > evolution) which might
47 matches
Mail list logo
