Henrique Junior wrote:
It may sound a little off-topic to this thread, but since we are talking
about bring new stuff into F14 I would like to know the opinion of you,
guys, about the new openSUSE's tumbleweed [1] [2] repo, that tries to
bring to openSUSE some rolling release behaviour.
Maybe
Am Donnerstag, den 24.03.2011, 14:48 -0700 schrieb Henrique Junior:
It may sound a little off-topic to this thread, but since we are
talking about bring new stuff into F14 I would like to know the
opinion of you, guys, about the new openSUSE's tumbleweed [1] [2]
repo, that tries to bring to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-PPIx-EditorTools-0.13 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690783
Summary: perl-PPIx-EditorTools-0.13 is available
Product:
Henrique Junior wrote:
It may sound a little off-topic to this thread, but since we are talking
about bring new stuff into F14 I would like to know the opinion of you,
guys, about the new openSUSE's tumbleweed [1] [2] repo, that tries to
bring to openSUSE some rolling release behaviour.
Maybe
On 03/25/2011 07:38 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 24.03.2011, 14:48 -0700 schrieb Henrique Junior:
It may sound a little off-topic to this thread, but since we are
talking about bring new stuff into F14 I would like to know the
opinion of you, guys, about the new openSUSE's
On 03/25/2011 12:38 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 24.03.2011, 14:48 -0700 schrieb Henrique Junior:
It may sound a little off-topic to this thread, but since we are
talking about bring new stuff into F14 I would like to know the
opinion of you, guys, about the new openSUSE's
Summary of changes:
f594937... 0.13 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi @all,
I've setup a F14 box (minimal install) on a Supermicro server. So far, so
good. After some configuration (mainly automtic stuff done by puppet) and a
reboot I noticed that only the 1Gb network cards where configured but not
the 10Gb cards. I didn't even see eth2 and eth3 using ifonfig
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 01:46:28PM +0100, Thomas Bendler wrote:
Hi @all,
I've setup a F14 box (minimal install) on a Supermicro server. So far, so
good. After some configuration (mainly automtic stuff done by puppet) and a
reboot I noticed that only the 1Gb network cards where configured but
Hi.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:16:41 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
We do have a rolling release, it's called rawhide.
You are mixing up rolling release with development dump yard.
I'm not yet conviced that there is a significant difference in the
long term.
--
devel mailing list
Am 25.03.2011 17:07, schrieb Ralf Ertzinger:
Hi.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:16:41 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
We do have a rolling release, it's called rawhide.
You are mixing up rolling release with development dump yard.
I'm not yet conviced that there is a significant difference in
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
I wonder if it would be possible to fix the kernel so that running a shared
library does not crash, but give a meaningful error message, and if Debian
would change their policy then.
As far as the kernel is concerned, these shared libraries are
2011/3/25 Andy Gospodarek go...@redhat.com
[...]
Your devices are not showing up because the driver is failing to load.
That is one strange thing, modprobe didn't report any error and you can see
the driver in the lsmod list.
Erroe -15 is IXGBE_ERR_RESET_FAILED, so it seems there is either
On 03/24/2011 03:16 AM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
At first, you mean 'Fedora was know for offering the '
But during the the update policy I think we will never see firefox-4.0
as an official Fedora 14 package.
Firefox 4 wouldn't have been pushed as an update regardless of the
policy. It is
Am 25.03.2011 17:12, schrieb Reindl Harald:
and in the backrgound i try to build a firefox4-package based
on the remi-srpms with target /opt to get both running without
change my whole browser and get lost most extensions and themes
what fails and i could spit mozilla in the face because
On 03/25/2011 05:07 PM, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
Hi.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:16:41 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
We do have a rolling release, it's called rawhide.
You are mixing up rolling release with development dump yard.
I'm not yet conviced that there is a significant difference in the
2011/3/25 Thomas Bendler m...@bendler-net.de
[...]
One remark, the error occured with the standard ixgbe module (2.0.62-k2), so
I upgraded the module to the latest version (3.2.10-NAPI) but still have the
same error.
And another remark, the network card work without problems when using
Hi,
given the recent Comodo problem I was looking how OpenSSL handles
certificate revocation and found good information here:
using OCSP
http://etutorials.org/Programming/secure+programming/Chapter+10.+Public+Key+Infrastructure/10.12+Checking+Revocation+Status+via+OCSP+with+OpenSSL/
using CRL
perl-WWW-Mechanize has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.66-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(HTML::Form) =
0:1.00
perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.66-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(HTML::Form) =
0:1.038
On i386:
perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.66-3.fc15.noarch
Am 25.03.2011 18:32, schrieb Genes MailLists:
On 03/25/2011 12:21 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
what fails and i could spit mozilla in the face because they
are still ignoring x86_64, guys we are living in 2011 :-(
mozilla definitely puts out 64 bit firefox-4 and thunderbird starting
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.8 Release Candidate 2. This release has fixes for bugs
found in 1.2.8 testing and bugs from earlier releases.
Installation
yum install --enablerepo=updates-testing 389-ds
# or for EPEL
yum install
Am 25.03.2011 21:39, schrieb Felix Miata:
What do you suppose
http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/4.0/linux-x86_64/de/
contains? mozilla.org predates mozilla.com many years. The former (via an
alias) is the only place I look for Mozilla product downloads.
that
Compose started at Fri Mar 25 13:15:31 UTC 2011
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 3/25/2011 17:38, Branched Report wrote:
Compose started at Fri Mar 25 13:15:31 UTC 2011
An empty list? Quick, ship it!
In all seriousness, did something go wrong with the compose or are there
actually no depsolving problems?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690783
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PPIx-EditorTools:
1dda4cb38ab7768b69c75b81c3b788b5 PPIx-EditorTools-0.13.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690783
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-25
08:23:52 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690443
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-25
08:22:41 EDT ---
commit 9684382aea97a2eabfcf1f34741cf954a1101a15
Author: Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri Mar 25 20:07:37 2011 -0500
Rebuild so it will provide the right perl() module
perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit a8d686323e80ce025a523e995bf099d713f14249
Author: Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri Mar 25 20:42:51 2011 -0500
Rebuild to fix provides
perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690783
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit 888e70bd42cb387b862a06d9ccd89586e909414d
Merge: f8b26cf 0b5ed3f
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Sat Mar 26 06:47:07 2011 +0100
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into f14/master
Conflicts:
.gitignore
perl-Plack.spec
None of these are serious.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690584
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
33 matches
Mail list logo
