Hi,
I would suggest adding qt-sql-ibase driver to the Fedora repository.
This driver provides the InterBase/FireBird plugin for Qt 4. The patch
for the spec
file:https://raw.github.com/Ignotus/spec-files/e35c5f95b72b63f7f51b7ae4cfc4e06fc3d62d97/sqlibase.patch
Regards,
--
Minh [ignotus] Ngo
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Minh Ngo nlmin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would suggest adding qt-sql-ibase driver to the Fedora repository.
This driver provides the InterBase/FireBird plugin for Qt 4. The patch
for the spec
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 23:53:38 -0400 (EDT), PW (Paul) wrote:
It would be nice if we could upload/commit the .asc or .sig file, and have
the rpmbuild script
automatically check the tar ball.
Some packagers do upload the detached sig and add it to the spec
as another Source file URL.
The
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com writes:
The uploaded tarball checksum enters the sources file in git, and any
tarball downloaded from the lookaside cache MUST match that checksum.
Else it wouldn't be downloaded and used. Source RPM build in koji would
fail.
That won't help if the
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 23:27 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 07/04/2011 10:53 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
It would be nice if we could upload/commit the .asc or .sig file, and have
the rpmbuild script
automatically check the tar ball.
Hm, yes. It would be nice to see Koji support
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 11:01:15 +0200, AS (Andreas) wrote:
The uploaded tarball checksum enters the sources file in git, and any
tarball downloaded from the lookaside cache MUST match that checksum.
Else it wouldn't be downloaded and used. Source RPM build in koji would
fail.
That won't
Compose started at Tue Jul 5 08:15:20 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell)
almanah-0.7.3-12.fc16.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.0()(64bit)
On 07/05/2011 10:40 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Minh Ngonlmin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would suggest adding qt-sql-ibase driver to the Fedora repository.
This driver provides the InterBase/FireBird plugin for Qt 4. The patch
for the spec
0. F15 x86_64
1. yumdownloader --source atlas
2. rpmbuild -D 'enable_native_atlas 1' atlas.spec
error: line 75: Bad Requireflags: qualifiers: Requires(posttans):
chkconfig
How can it be that my system fails rpmbuild but fedora build is OK?
--
devel mailing list
commit 9ab194bf113d263ec0396c4ff896b6684536c749
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Tue Jul 5 14:47:43 2011 +0200
Initial import.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Test-ConsistentVersion.spec | 51 ++
sources
On 05/07/11 13:42, Neal Becker wrote:
0. F15 x86_64
1. yumdownloader --source atlas
2. rpmbuild -D 'enable_native_atlas 1' atlas.spec
error: line 75: Bad Requireflags: qualifiers: Requires(posttans):
chkconfig
How can it be that my system fails rpmbuild but fedora build is OK?
Because
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 08:42:57 -0400, NB (Neal) wrote:
0. F15 x86_64
1. yumdownloader --source atlas
2. rpmbuild -D 'enable_native_atlas 1' atlas.spec
error: line 75: Bad Requireflags: qualifiers: Requires(posttans):
chkconfig
How can it be that my system fails rpmbuild but fedora
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Minh Ngo nlmin...@gmail.com wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719002
you will have it soon :-)
--
Itamar Reis Peixoto
msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br
+55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP)
+55 34 9158 9329 (TIM)
+55 34 8806 3989
[Is there a Fedora-specific systemd list? Not that I can find.]
We'd like to request that virtio-serial devices (/dev/virtio-ports/*)
are tagged so we can use them as systemd devices. Dan Berrange thinks
the right incantation is to add:
SUBSYSTEM==virtio-ports, TAG+=systemd
to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719056
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=511339action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:47:18PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
[Is there a Fedora-specific systemd list? Not that I can find.]
We'd like to request that virtio-serial devices (/dev/virtio-ports/*)
are tagged so we can use them as systemd devices. Dan Berrange thinks
the right
2011/7/4 Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@redhat.com:
Excerpts from Michał Piotrowski's message of Mon Jul 04 13:11:06 +0200 2011:
Unfortunately I do not have enough java programming experience to help
you in fixing problems.
There might be a more simple way to do it though. There was already
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719048
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-05
12:23:32 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719048
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-05
12:23:21 EDT ---
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 23:27 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
In the mean time, perhaps AutoQA could have a check added against the
source checksum?
That sounds like an excellent idea for a contribution! Remember, the
AutoQA project is explicitly designed to allow and indeed encourage
tests
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 11:13 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 23:27 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 07/04/2011 10:53 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
It would be nice if we could upload/commit the .asc or .sig file, and
have the rpmbuild script
automatically check the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719069
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=511349action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=511349action=edit
Thanks,
--noriko
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 07/05/2011 05:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I didn't see any suggestion that packages be *required* to have a
signature, only that we somehow run an automated check on one if there
is one.
Rather than making specific Source numbers special case, why not just go
on naming? The
commit c31401ce2b103de2f5d5e1910f86924c573b22c6
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Tue Jul 5 19:44:59 2011 +0200
Initial import.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Net-Server-SS-PreFork.spec | 56 +++
sources
commit 6cb9f317774c3f46510ae965296215bf396c933b
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Tue Jul 5 19:55:17 2011 +0200
Initial import.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Net-Server-SS-PreFork.spec | 56 +++
sources
On Tue, 05.07.11 16:54, Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
Heya,
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:47:18PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
[Is there a Fedora-specific systemd list? Not that I can find.]
We'd like to request that virtio-serial devices (/dev/virtio-ports/*)
are
I recently asked the givaro maintainer, D Haley (CCed), for permission
to become comaintainer, so I can push out a coordinated update of
givaro and linbox. I received a reply stating that this had been done
in pkgdb. Today I built new givaro and linbox versions for Rawhide.
I would also like to
On Tue, 05.07.11 20:36, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
We'd like to request that virtio-serial devices (/dev/virtio-ports/*)
are tagged so we can use them as systemd devices. Dan Berrange thinks
the right incantation is to add:
SUBSYSTEM==virtio-ports,
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 12:41:31 -0600, JJ (Jerry) wrote:
I recently asked the givaro maintainer, D Haley (CCed), for permission
to become comaintainer, so I can push out a coordinated update of
givaro and linbox. I received a reply stating that this had been done
in pkgdb. Today I built new
Hi,
W dniu 16 czerwca 2011 21:37 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
Hi,
Do anyone noticed any problems with mounting eCryptfs recently on F15?
It seems to me unlikely that I have an I/O errors on few disks.
Especially if only eCryptfs reports them.
I've got two dirs
On 05/07/11 21:11, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
W dniu 16 czerwca 2011 21:37 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
Hi,
Do anyone noticed any problems with mounting eCryptfs recently on F15?
It seems to me unlikely that I have an I/O errors on few disks.
Especially if
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 20:57:33 +0200
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 12:41:31 -0600, JJ (Jerry) wrote:
I recently asked the givaro maintainer, D Haley (CCed), for
permission to become comaintainer, so I can push out a coordinated
update of givaro and linbox.
W dniu 5 lipca 2011 21:13 użytkownik nodata l...@nodata.co.uk napisał:
On 05/07/11 21:11, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
W dniu 16 czerwca 2011 21:37 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
Hi,
Do anyone noticed any problems with mounting eCryptfs recently on F15?
It seems
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Benjamin Lewis ben.le...@benl.co.uk wrote:
On 07/05/2011 05:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I didn't see any suggestion that packages be *required* to have a
signature, only that we somehow run an automated check on one if there
is one.
Rather than making
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 14:32:42 -0600, JJ (Jerry) wrote:
You are a member of the Advanced Fedora Packager Group (aka
provenpackagers),
which made it possible for you to commit in git. Bodhi, however, doesn't
handle provenpackagers membership in the same way.
Wow, my memory must be worse
On 07/05/2011 03:46 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Some packagers do upload the detached sig and add it to the spec
as another Source file URL.
Great! Except I haven't done so. I wasn't required to submit a signature
for my package nor does the Package Guildline pages refer to doing so.
Might be
On 07/05/2011 11:59 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
That sounds like an excellent idea for a contribution! Remember, the
AutoQA project is explicitly designed to allow and indeed encourage
tests to be contributed - we would love it if the core AutoQA team
worked mostly on the framework, and tests
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-App-SVN-Bisect:
a929a878b7bee04adae2e592770c0ea2 App-SVN-Bisect-1.1.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 7956d87dec5870634a605931b439ac134e6bb07a
Author: Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org
Date: Wed Jul 6 00:13:25 2011 +0200
update to 1.1
.gitignore |1 +
perl-App-SVN-Bisect.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
Google finds these:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/386
-
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-announce/2009-March/msg00010.html
Thanks. I remember reading that fedora-devel message, but somehow
I've been testing with grub and found an interesting problem. When I
install the package
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/grub/0.97/71.fc15/x86_64/grub-0.97-71.fc15.x86_64.rpm
everything is fine and grub works as it should:
[root@localhost x86_64-redhat]# grub
Probing devices to guess
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 17:11 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 07/05/2011 11:59 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
That sounds like an excellent idea for a contribution! Remember, the
AutoQA project is explicitly designed to allow and indeed encourage
tests to be contributed - we would love it if
On 07/02/2011 12:57 PM, Iain Arnell wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Paul Howarthp...@city-fan.org wrote:
Hmm, that file is just the list of unbuilt packages; I was looking for
something that included the relationships between the packages so I
could figure out why Test::EOL couldn't
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Crypt-RC4:
4ca59a7e58ac9597c3b4f3f46ea22629 Crypt-RC4-2.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 7d1c47054ed883a31ccf7f3eed1b0160ccf61522
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Jun 27 11:19:24 2011 +0800
Initial packaging of perl-Crypt-RC4.
This was submitted for review in Fedora on Mon Jun 27 2011:
commit 8178fb4e5d08d04d7d12a41bb37d5d0a3369d256
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue Jul 5 16:24:36 2011 +0800
The package was approved in Fedora.
Sources were uploaded to the lookaside cache with fedpkg. This commit
reflects the change in the sources and
Summary of changes:
7d1c470... Initial packaging of perl-Crypt-RC4. (*)
8178fb4... The package was approved in Fedora. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
Summary of changes:
7d1c470... Initial packaging of perl-Crypt-RC4. (*)
8178fb4... The package was approved in Fedora. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718190
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.10 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718962
Summary: perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.10 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Test-Inter-1.03 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718961
Summary: perl-Test-Inter-1.03 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715559
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-PerlIO-locale-0.08 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718960
Summary: perl-PerlIO-locale-0.08 is available
Product:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-ConsistentVersion:
f4e90bd16dd08330e6c89da0abc7b8ec Test-ConsistentVersion-v0.2.3.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit c530d8e556e86e763e4abee778f7317ec3fbd771
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Tue Jul 5 14:39:48 2011 +0200
Initial import.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Test-ConsistentVersion.spec | 51 ++
sources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719048
Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTTP-Server-Simple:
70d4ae98affb9e921ab1478bbdffca3b HTTP-Server-Simple-0.44.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 485519268cb2de01e91d6c09b3fa7ed13fbd6821
Author: Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jul 5 11:53:25 2011 -0400
spec cleanup, add explicit requires on perl(CGI)
perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec | 24
sources |2 +-
2 files
commit 45cbae995c3045919c2afd2980ca1445179241ed
Author: Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jul 5 12:03:14 2011 -0400
spec cleanup, add explicit requires on perl(CGI)
perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec | 20 +++-
sources |2 +-
2 files
commit c06efce0c18a84f0324787874404fe3a87d7fa39
Author: Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jul 5 12:05:23 2011 -0400
spec cleanup, add explicit requires on perl(CGI)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-HTTP-Server-Simple.spec | 17 -
sources
60 matches
Mail list logo
