Heya,
I'm trying to get rawhide running by yum updating a minimal footprint F16
virtual
machine. Only @core package, so no gnome-* nothing else.
Here is some info:
#
[root@dhcp201-139 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
Fedora release 16 (Verne)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744904
Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:19:22 +0530, KC (Kashyap) wrote:
Heya,
I'm trying to get rawhide running by yum updating a minimal footprint F16
virtual
machine. Only @core package, so no gnome-* nothing else.
And no /bin/sh either? It is provided by bash.
ERROR with transaction check vs
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:18:10 -0400
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) said:
On 10/10/2011 08:52 PM, Thomas Spura wrote:
So there doesn't need to be more co-maintainers (which is welcomed
anyway), but it would help to get such updates pushed to stable
Is it possible to do an ethernet Installation of F15 using Apache and PXE
environment on another machine rather than from the internet (
download.fedora.redhat.com) ?
Many thanks,
Aaron
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon
perl-Bio-Graphics has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-Graphics-2.25-1.fc17.noarch requires perl(Bio::DB::BigWig)
On i386:
perl-Bio-Graphics-2.25-1.fc17.noarch requires perl(Bio::DB::BigWig)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras
On 10/11/2011 05:29 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:19:22 +0530, KC (Kashyap) wrote:
Heya,
I'm trying to get rawhide running by yum updating a minimal footprint F16
virtual
machine. Only @core package, so no gnome-* nothing else.
And no /bin/sh either? It is
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.comwrote:
Is it possible to do an ethernet Installation of F15 using Apache and PXE
environment on another machine rather than from the internet (
download.fedora.redhat.com) ?
Yes , It is possible. You can make the
Compose started at Tue Oct 11 08:16:07 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicuuc.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicui18n.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686
On 11 October 2011 13:51, Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Aaron Gray aaronngray.li...@gmail.comwrote:
Is it possible to do an ethernet Installation of F15 using Apache and PXE
environment on another machine rather than from the internet (
Am 11.10.2011 15:20, schrieb Aaron Gray:
Thanks, still needs TFTP but this could simplify things a lot.
If you want to circumvent using TFTP and you are using gPXE (or a PXE
boot ROM that supports booting from HTTP) you could point it to the
pxelinux of boot.fedoraproject.org at
On 11 October 2011 14:34, Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org wrote:
Am 11.10.2011 15:20, schrieb Aaron Gray:
Thanks, still needs TFTP but this could simplify things a lot.
If you want to circumvent using TFTP and you are using gPXE (or a PXE
boot ROM that supports booting from HTTP) you could
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Mon, 10.10.11 15:58, Richard Shaw (hobbes1...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Mon, 10.10.11 15:13, Richard Shaw (hobbes1...@gmail.com)
Thomas Spura (toms...@fedoraproject.org) said:
If the required updates are due to version checks in the extensions,
it might be possible to have RPM have a dependency generator that
checks these and outputs the appropriate Requires/Conflicts lines,
such that this could be easily caught by
I am curious or maybe giving an idea, but I have my package listed there and
currently there is an update for the package I have added to the list. Well
I have the package in bodhi, which I believe is in testing right now. The
problem is that the URM(Upstream release monitoring) keeps opening a
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:35:33AM -0500, Nathan O. wrote:
I am curious or maybe giving an idea, but I have my package listed there and
currently there is an update for the package I have added to the list. Well
I have the package in bodhi, which I believe is in testing right now. The
problem
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Nathan O. ndowen...@gmail.com wrote:
I am curious or maybe giving an idea, but I have my package listed there and
currently there is an update for the package I have added to the list. Well
I have the package in bodhi, which I believe is in testing right now.
Hello all,
I am planning to orphan pida, I haven't used it since probably mid
F14 cycle and I feel it needs a maintainer that will give it more
attention.
-AdamM
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
If I remember correctly I did update it in rawhide.
The master repo says it is updated to the latest version, by looking at the
SPEC
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=worker.git;a=blob_plain;f=worker.spec;hb=master
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:36:01 -0400
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Thomas Spura (toms...@fedoraproject.org) said:
If the required updates are due to version checks in the
extensions, it might be possible to have RPM have a dependency
generator that checks these and outputs the appropriate
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:45:17AM -0500, Nathan O. wrote:
If I remember correctly I did update it in rawhide.
The master repo says it is updated to the latest version, by looking at the
SPEC
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=worker.git;a=blob_plain;f=worker.spec;hb=master
There's no
Hello all,
I am planning to orphan pida, I haven't used it since probably mid
F14 cycle and I feel it needs a maintainer that will give it more
attention.
If I can get 0.6.2 to build, I'll take it.
-J
-AdamM
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 10/11/2011 10:36 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Thomas Spura (toms...@fedoraproject.org) said:
If the required updates are due to version checks in the extensions,
it might be possible to have RPM have a dependency generator that
checks these and outputs the appropriate Requires/Conflicts
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:21:03 +0530, KC (Kashyap) wrote:
On 10/11/2011 05:29 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:19:22 +0530, KC (Kashyap) wrote:
Heya,
I'm trying to get rawhide running by yum updating a minimal footprint F16
virtual
machine. Only @core package, so
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:45:17 -0500
Nathan O. wrote:
If I remember correctly I did update it in rawhide.
The master repo says it is updated to the latest version, by looking
at the SPEC
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=worker.git;a=blob_plain;f=worker.spec;hb=master
Apparently, you
Kashyap Chamarthy writes:
Running Transaction Check
ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve:
/bin/sh is needed by groff-base-1.21-5.fc17.x86_64
I have this same problem when trying to upgrade from fedora 15 to rawhide. I
noticed that groff-base package have 2 /bin/sh as dependency, is there
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 18:22:34, Tomi Leppikangas wrote:
Kashyap Chamarthy writes:
Running Transaction Check
ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve:
/bin/sh is needed by groff-base-1.21-5.fc17.x86_64
I have this same problem when trying to upgrade from fedora 15 to rawhide.
I
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 19:22:34 +0300, TL (Tomi) wrote:
Kashyap Chamarthy writes:
Running Transaction Check
ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve:
/bin/sh is needed by groff-base-1.21-5.fc17.x86_64
I have this same problem when trying to upgrade from fedora 15 to rawhide. I
noticed
In trying to clean up the broken dependencies report, I intend to revive
three retired packages:
lwp:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745216
rpc2:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745218
rvm:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745219
In accordance with Fedora
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 01:24:02PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
In trying to clean up the broken dependencies report, I intend to revive
three retired packages:
lwp:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745216
rpc2:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745218
rvm:
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 13:24 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
In trying to clean up the broken dependencies report, I intend to revive
three retired packages:
lwp:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745216
I had a few spare minutes today, so I reviewed and approved this one.
I have two F15 machines one a desktop which is running the new Gnome 3
desktop and a laptop not running the new desktop.
TFTP is not working on the desktop machine on F15 as it was not working on
the updated F14. It worked on F14 before the update. I installed two servers
using PXE using it.
On 10/11/2011 01:42 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
These are all needed for coda. Last I looked at them, getting them building
properly was not so hard, getting them to run properly was a significant
effort,
one that may not be worth it, unless there are way more coda users out there
than I'm aware
On 10/11/2011 01:46 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
I have two F15 machines one a desktop which is running the new Gnome 3
desktop and a laptop not running the new desktop.
TFTP is not working on the desktop machine on F15 as it was not working
on the updated F14. It worked on F14 before the update. I
On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 13:16 +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 11:05:28 +0200
Till Maas wrote:
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 11:43:58PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
3. Can someone (I'm looking at you, QA) make sure all
extensions are still compatible?
The problem
On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 11:14 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 05:28, Christoph Wickert
christoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2011, 12:58 +0200 schrieb drago01:
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Christoph Wickert
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 11:40 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 13:16:52 +0200
Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
It would be great, when bodhi would allow me to add an updated
mozilla-noscript to the firefox update, when I notice, that the new
firefox upadate in
On 10/11/2011 08:16 PM, Jan Vcelak wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 18:22:34, Tomi Leppikangas wrote:
Kashyap Chamarthy writes:
Running Transaction Check
ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve:
/bin/sh is needed by groff-base-1.21-5.fc17.x86_64
I have this same problem when trying to
On 10/11/2011 11:32 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 10/11/2011 08:16 PM, Jan Vcelak wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 18:22:34, Tomi Leppikangas wrote:
Kashyap Chamarthy writes:
Running Transaction Check
ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve:
/bin/sh is needed by
Hello all,
I am planning to orphan pida, I haven't used it since probably mid
F14 cycle and I feel it needs a maintainer that will give it more
attention.
If I can get 0.6.2 to build, I'll take it.
I did. Anyone interested in having pida 0.6.2 would be welcome to review
the
rvm:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745219
I'm reviewing this.
In accordance with Fedora policy
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Deprecated_Package),
I am posting here, and asking for help in re-reviewing these
On 10/11/2011 08:38 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:21:03 +0530, KC (Kashyap) wrote:
On 10/11/2011 05:29 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:19:22 +0530, KC (Kashyap) wrote:
Heya,
I'm trying to get rawhide running by yum updating a minimal footprint F16
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:01:00 -0400
David Michael wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Thomas Spura
toms...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
The automatic requires proposed in bug #745038, does this:
Requires: firefox = 3.0
Requires: firefox = 10.0a1
and seems to
Python 3.2's distutils was byte-compiling .py files to the wrong
location, putting the .pyc/.pyo files in the same directory as the .py
files, rather than in the __pycache__ subdirectory.
This has led to some python3 packages having duplicate .pyc files in
their payloads:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:49:54AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
There obviously is a _legitimate_ question as to whether you ought to be
able to add your package into anyone else's update if you aren't a
provenpackager; it's not necessarily something we'd want to do. But I
think
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:57:35 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 11:40 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 13:16:52 +0200
Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
It would be great, when bodhi would allow me to add an updated
mozilla-noscript to the
On 10/11/2011 11:59 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
rvm:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745219
I'm reviewing this.
Done.
In accordance with Fedora policy
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Deprecated_Package),
I
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 20:46 +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
Well, I do. It seems pretty simple: we only have a few extensions
packaged. We should consider extensions to be effectively API
dependencies of Firefox, which means any Firefox update must also
include updates for the dependencies -
On Tue, 11.10.11 03:38, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
[Unit]
After=network.target
Before=remote-fs-pre.target
Wants=remote-fs-pre.target
This should appear in F16 soon.
This is now waiting in bodhi.
Would be cool if you could check if this works as intended for you!
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 20:02:41, Panu Matilainen wrote:
This is a bug in rpm's handling of %pretrans dependencies. I'll try to
get it fixed tomorrow, BUT this also does point out a problem in the
package:
%pretrans scripts can almost never in real life be /bin/sh scripts,
because on
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:35:33AM -0500, Nathan O. wrote:
I am curious or maybe giving an idea, but I have my package listed there and
currently there is an update for the package I have added to the list. Well
I have the package in bodhi, which I believe is in testing right now. The
Thanks for all the help, and glad it seemed to help you find a issue with
URM, Till
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:35:33AM -0500, Nathan O. wrote:
I am curious or maybe giving an idea, but I have my package listed there
We are going to be having another proventesters meetup tomorrow on IRC
in #fedora-meeting at 18:00UTC.
Purpose of meetup: Brainstorm ideas on improving testing and processes
for testing updates.
* Intro/gather more agenda items
* Recruiting more proventesters/testers.
* One stop page for
Le dimanche 09 octobre 2011 à 13:28 +0200, Christoph Wickert a écrit :
Am Sonntag, den 09.10.2011, 12:58 +0200 schrieb drago01:
That just reminds me while packing firefox extensions is not a good idea.
How else would you install an extension globally for all users?
Or automate the
On 11 October 2011 18:49, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/11/2011 01:46 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
I have two F15 machines one a desktop which is running the new Gnome 3
desktop and a laptop not running the new desktop.
TFTP is not working on the desktop machine on F15 as it was
Am Samstag, 8. Oktober 2011, 18:55:11 schrieb tim.laurid...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 17:49 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 10/07/2011 02:49 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
I know a lot of people wanted to
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 03:07:11PM -0500, Nathan O. wrote:
Thanks for all the help, and glad it seemed to help you find a issue with
URM, Till
Thank you for the report. I dug a little deeper and identified and fixed
the bug that was responsible for the multiple bug reports.
Kind regards
Till
Thanks, and your welcome
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 03:07:11PM -0500, Nathan O. wrote:
Thanks for all the help, and glad it seemed to help you find a issue with
URM, Till
Thank you for the report. I dug a little deeper
On 10/11/2011 09:32 PM, Thomas Spura wrote:
The main *BIG* difference is, that draft symlinks the extension
*directory* and the script expects a install.rdf file below that.
This means, the symlinking needs to happen one step below that, so that
all files inside of the extension_id folder are
Hey, folks. There's a grub update in updates-testing atm (being pushed
stable soon) which splits the EFI stuff off into a new grub-efi
subpackage. If you have an EFI install of F16 you will need to have
grub-efi installed or else your system won't boot any more. So, if you
have an EFI install,
On 2011-10-10 12:05, David Nalley wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Adam Miller
maxamill...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Do any of those cloud providers ever run the stock image or do they roll
their own with a custom built kernel anyways? I don't have a lot of
insight into this but was
Curious to know, I am thinking about getting a Yubikey to use on FAS and
other related logins. I seen you must burn the key. I am concidering getting
the Yubikey with the Lasspass subscription included. The question is, if I
burn the key first then is it still usuable on Lastpass? I am assuming
On 10/11/2011 08:38 PM, Nathan O. wrote:
Curious to know, I am thinking about getting a Yubikey to use on FAS and
other related logins. I seen you must burn the key. I am concidering
getting the Yubikey with the Lasspass subscription included. The
question is, if I burn the key first then is
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
As far as I know if you burn the key you will lose the ability to use
the yubikey's servers and I'm guessing coincidentally the lastpass as
well. I have seen that you are allowed to upload a new key to their
servers to restore its useability. So
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 21:22 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
On 11 October 2011 18:49, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/11/2011 01:46 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
I have two F15 machines one a desktop which is running the
new Gnome 3
desktop and a laptop not
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:03:55PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:35:33AM -0500, Nathan O. wrote:
I am curious or maybe giving an idea, but I have my package listed there and
currently there is an update for the package I have added to the list. Well
I have the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718870
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718870
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.40 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745070
Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.40 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-POE-Component-IRC-6.74 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745071
Summary: perl-POE-Component-IRC-6.74 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-XML-LibXSLT-1.73 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745072
Summary: perl-XML-LibXSLT-1.73 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744553
--- Comment #2 from Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2011-10-11 06:49:47 EDT ---
*** Bug 745071 has been marked as a duplicate of
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745071
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745072
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-XML-LibXSLT:
99b372c85cae773a073d4387e305c29c XML-LibXSLT-1.73.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 6b0d7e96ef4b659f43e7dc57f4db8c2aec04da39
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Oct 11 12:56:20 2011 +0200
1.73 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-XML-LibXSLT.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745072
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745070
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-SQL-Translator:
4a1578519f535f5df19deae8e3661242 SQL-Translator-0.11010.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: amavisd doesn't start in fc15
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745337
Summary: amavisd doesn't start in fc15
Product: Fedora
commit e72dbebe47841db79d21b53c03ba161c85924e92
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Oct 12 05:40:08 2011 +0200
update to 0.11010
.gitignore |1 +
perl-SQL-Translator.spec | 26 ++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed,
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Carp-REPL:
89b98f874cb3d0b4ede1363dcb3baa1e Carp-REPL-0.15.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit c8d886d4e1e2b1f77d4bc1c43d988ca9613a5af1
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Oct 12 06:20:07 2011 +0200
initial import (rhbz#742556)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Carp-REPL.spec | 68 +++
sources |1
commit a291db4f33b5f8a29c227f56136c59f56248fe4f
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Oct 12 06:21:20 2011 +0200
rebuild with new gmp
perl-Math-BigInt-GMP.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Math-BigInt-GMP.spec
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CatalystX-Profile:
708ab56ebf8707c1668b1a48f3518c2f CatalystX-Profile-0.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit da8a286c428967117a8ca88d23952c6ebb884e40
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Oct 12 06:22:14 2011 +0200
initial import (rhbz#742557)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-CatalystX-Profile.spec | 59 +++
sources
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for
perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-DBIC:
ae13f2cbae763eef1bbad7abcd4f618d Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-DBIC-0.12.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
commit 6e1be019b2a42025be676adbdccea33b53abc0b6
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Oct 12 06:23:33 2011 +0200
initial import (rhbz#742555)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-DBIC.spec | 67 ++
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin:
1ed6869bb214f012c8594f8096d528f4 CatalystX-SimpleLogin-0.15.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 748961cea143aad8bc9d11065984ce159f367c2e
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Oct 12 06:24:41 2011 +0200
initial import (rhbz#742560)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin.spec | 91 +++
sources
commit fc9e3c6601e2ba032e2fa5cf6876b2df594cc4a4
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Oct 12 06:25:13 2011 +0200
fix spelling in description
perl-CatalystX-SimpleLogin.spec |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 68c6ce2e8a28e908b3f7d94eac90820895f35768
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Oct 12 06:27:04 2011 +0200
rebuild with new gmp
perl-Math-GMP.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Math-GMP.spec
94 matches
Mail list logo
