On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 17:56 -0300, James Bowes wrote:
python-vobject -- A python library for manipulating vCard and
vCalendar files
I have taken this one.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 17:56 -0300, James Bowes wrote:
gitg -- GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system
This one seem to already have found a new owner: nacho.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 09:31 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 11/02/2011 07:54 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
* #683 - Zif as default PackageKit backend for desktop users -
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ZifByDefaultForDesktop
(sgallagh, 17:03:32)
* AGREED:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/11/11 21:56, James Bowes wrote:
ipython -- An enhanced interactive Python shell mod_wsgi -- A WSGI
interface for Python web applications in Apache
I'm interested in those two packages and requested rights in pkgdb.
Is there no branch
Hi,
For some reason, Evolution is not finding any of the plugins or anything.
It'll start but has on the title bar
(null) Evolution.
From the command line, I'm getting this
[paul@PB3 ~]$ evolution
e-utils-WARNING **: /usr/lib64/evolution/3.2/libcomposer.so.0: undefined
symbol:
On 2 Nov 2011 07:57, Paul Johnson p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
For some reason, Evolution is not finding any of the plugins or anything.
It'll start but has on the title bar
(null) Evolution.
From the command line, I'm getting this
[paul@PB3 ~]$ evolution
e-utils-WARNING **:
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 17:04 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
For f15 through rawhide and epel 6 there is a new update coming for fedpkg
(part of fedora-packager).
This build is a pretty major rewrite to make use of a shared pyrpkg backend.
Coming along for the ride is a new build of GitPython
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 10:00 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Anonymously checking doesn't help:
$ fedpkg clone R-widgetTool -a
Never-mind this part, I had a typo (R-widgetTool*s*).
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 10:00 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Also:
$ fedpkg clone R-widgetTool
Cloning into R-widgetTool...
Received disconnect from ip: 2: Too many authentication failures for
builder
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
[... snip ...]
It seems it is not reading the
Good Morning,
Can I use Red Hat Developer Suite and Red Hat Application Server Packages
for Fedora15?
LADHIB Souheil
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Compose started at Wed Nov 2 08:16:11 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
PackageKit-zif-0.6.19-3.fc16.x86_64 requires zif = 0:0.2.5
bibletime-2.8.1-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libclucene.so.0()(64bit)
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 08:31 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 09:31 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 11/02/2011 07:54 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
* #683 - Zif as default PackageKit backend for desktop users -
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 08:01:16 +, PR (Peter) wrote:
Any ideas on what's happened?
[paul@PB3 ~]$ rpm -qa evolution*
evolution-data-server-3.2.0-1.fc17.x86_64
evolution-spamassassin-3.2.0-1.fc17.x86_64
evolution-data-server-devel-3.2.0-1.fc17.x86_64
On 11/01/2011 11:30 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
I installed F16 RC2 Live, and tried to install qtparted.
It won't install because the most recent qtparted RPM is from F15 and
requires libparted.so.0, and F16 has libparted.so.1 pulled in by F16's
parted.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 09:01:33AM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
Up to now the glusterfs and hekafs versions and releases have been the
same for f16 and rawhide, i.e.: glusterfs-3.2.4-1.x86_64.fc16.rpm,
glusterfs-3.2.4-1.x86_64.fc17.rpm, hekafs-0.7-16.x86_64.fc16.rpm, and
On 31.10.2011 18:49, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
17:39:57 sgallagh I'm hesitant to mention UsrMove, both because tl;dr and
also I'm told that the Feature hasn't been updated as they were instructed
to
We attended LinuxCon in Prague last week, so this week, we will update the rest.
17:40:25 *
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 22:14:11 +0200
Jussi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I'm Gary's sponsor. I, too, have been trying to contact him for a long
time. As nothing has happened, I have revoked my sponsorship.
I've orphaned the following:
daemonize
rancid
sipcalc
kevin
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 08:54:13AM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/11/11 21:56, James Bowes wrote:
ipython -- An enhanced interactive Python shell mod_wsgi -- A WSGI
interface for Python web applications in Apache
I'm interested in
On Nov 2, 2011, at 2:00 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
While doing the update, it seems that the version are not enforced.
There are not GitPython = XXX (I don't know how fedpkg will do with the
old version)
fedpkg will work with the older GitPython. There is some other software being
used
On Nov 2, 2011, at 2:00 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
It seems it is not reading the username from the certificate.
That's right, it does not just yet. I plan on working on user discovery code
soon as I also have to support discovering user name based on kerberos
information.
--
Jesse
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750622
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=531391action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=531391action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750624
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=531390action=diff
Dne 2.11.2011 01:04, Jesse Keating napsal(a):
For f15 through rawhide and epel 6 there is a new update coming for
fedpkg (part of fedora-packager).
What's wrong with patches in
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-packager/ticket/{98,99,100,101}?
Matěj
--
devel mailing list
On 11/02/2011 10:14 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 11/01/2011 11:30 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
I installed F16 RC2 Live, and tried to install qtparted.
It won't install because the most recent qtparted RPM is from F15 and
requires libparted.so.0, and F16 has libparted.so.1 pulled in by F16's
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
Given that neither Anaconda nor parted/qtparted worked, is there an
alternative workflow for dual-boot installing with pre-existing OS?
I finished the install by going back into Windows, and shrinking their
partition from within Windows.
Maybe give RC4 a shot? The RC4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750039
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Nov 2, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
Dne 2.11.2011 01:04, Jesse Keating napsal(a):
For f15 through rawhide and epel 6 there is a new update coming for
fedpkg (part of fedora-packager).
What's wrong with patches in
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-packager/ticket/{98,99,100,101}?
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 09:47 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Nov 2, 2011, at 2:00 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
It seems it is not reading the username from the certificate.
That's right, it does not just yet. I plan on working on user discovery code
soon as
I also have to support
On Nov 2, 2011, at 11:20 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
I would appreciate even a quick patch as without fedpkg is unusable to
me (and I guess I'm not the only one whose login != fas username).
There is a global fedpkg option to define your username.
-u USER, --user USER Override the
Jesse Keating wrote:
Please test these updates and let me know if all is good, or if you have
other issues. Bodhi karma, email, IRC, smoke signal, just let me know.
)
( (
)
(
)
-X-
Works fine here. Pulled, uploaded new source code, and built a package.
--
devel
I looked at other spec files with systemd .system files. The relevant
part of my spec file is:
...
%files server
...
%if 0%{?fedora} 17
# Legacy init
%{_sysconfdir}/init.d/glusterd
%{_sysconfdir}/init.d/glusterfsd
%else
%{_unitdir}/glusterd.service
%{_unitdir}/glusterfsd.service
%endif
...
and
On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 15:05:19 -0400
Kaleb S. KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.com wrote:
I looked at other spec files with systemd .system files. The relevant
part of my spec file is:
...
%files server
...
%if 0%{?fedora} 17
# Legacy init
%{_sysconfdir}/init.d/glusterd
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 03:05:19PM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
I looked at other spec files with systemd .system files. The relevant
part of my spec file is:
...
%{_unitdir}/glusterd.service
%{_unitdir}/glusterfsd.service
...
and the koji build is failing with:
...
Processing
Paul Howarth wrote:
You need to BuildRequire: systemd-units, which is where the
%{_unitdir} macro is defined.
Shouldn't this [systemd-units] be added to the main build root?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 09:17:49AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I've orphaned the following:
Thank you.
I've taken
daemonize
and
rancid
Co-Maintainers very-welcome.
--
sven === jabber/xmpp: s...@lankes.net
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/11/11 17:23, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Is there no branch mod_wsgi for epel6?
I believe mod_wsgi is in RHEL6 thus no EPEL6 branch at this time.
-Toshio
Yes it is. I just checked this (should have done this earlier, before
asking)
- --
I upgraded my three machines to (what will be) F-16 and I really wish to
congratulate all Fedora developers on a job well done. Especially
noticeable is increase in speed and responsiveness of my laptop.
So, pat yourselves on the back folks - you deserve it! And thank you.
PS. Of course, kudos
Bojan Smojver wrote:
I upgraded my... machines to (what will be) F-16 and I really wish to
congratulate all Fedora developers on a job well done.
PS. Of course, kudos to all upstream folks as well.
+1
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Final Release Candidate 5
(RC5) is now available for testing. Changes are listed in the rel-eng
ticket below. Please see the following pages for download links
(including delta ISOs) and testing instructions. Serverbeach1 is still
available as a mirror
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748140
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-11-02
02:59:16 EDT ---
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-JSON-Path:
fa43d374c431c65fa7253a6ca23ec783 JSON-Path-0.101.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 9d13f7edb301a5a3eb652835408165485dd2b371
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri Oct 21 12:46:51 2011 +0800
Initial Packaging of perl-JSON-Path.
This package was submitted for review in Fedora on Fri Oct 21 2011:
commit 8a424e7f79877906ac191a3f6559996dbedc2a8c
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Nov 2 16:42:49 2011 +0800
The package was approved in Fedora.
Sources were uploaded to the lookaside cache with fedpkg. This commit
reflects the change in the sources and
Summary of changes:
9d13f7e... Initial Packaging of perl-JSON-Path. (*)
8a424e7... The package was approved in Fedora. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
Summary of changes:
9d13f7e... Initial Packaging of perl-JSON-Path. (*)
8a424e7... The package was approved in Fedora. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Software-License-0.103003 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750790
Summary: perl-Software-License-0.103003 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Fails to build on ARM, needs to use default setjmp not ucontext
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750805
Summary: Fails to build on ARM, needs to use
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750805
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com 2011-11-02
09:20:55 EDT ---
Hi Henrik,
Isn't the attachment
50 matches
Mail list logo
