-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/12/11 23:08, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Hi,
Once in a while comes back the question: is insert nick here
around ? Normally followed by: I have opened and pinged him
several time on bugzilla #/email/irc/insert what I missed here.
Great
2011/12/5 Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr:
- koji ➙ last build...
This doesn't seem to work correctly. My last build was 2 days ago:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=988
And the script says it was Nov 2...
Otherwise a great start :)
Thanks,
Tom
--
devel mailing
On 12/02/2011 02:08 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 12/02/2011 04:12 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/01/2011 07:11 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
On Thu, 01 Dec 2011 15:45:48 +0100
Ralf Corsepiusrc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 12/01/2011 11:23 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
Ralf,
On 11/18/2011 05:53 PM, Ralf
On 11/28/2011 06:20 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Roman Rakusrra...@redhat.com writes:
How are fedora with grub2 users supposed to set up crashkernel kernel
argument? [...]
Does GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX=crashkernel=auto in /etc/default/grub work,
followed by grub2-mkconfig?
- FChE
I thought that
On 11/28/2011 04:30 PM, Roman Rakus wrote:
How are fedora with grub2 users supposed to set up crashkernel kernel
argument? Or even any argument? Writing own script for it?
I'm asking because I'm maintaining system-config-kdump and I'm not sure
how to ensure this.
RR
Thanks all for answers.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753955
--- Comment #8 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-12-06 09:05:44 EST ---
Created attachment 541406
--
On 12/05/2011 05:26 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Well, this happens... one thing that would be nice is if folks gave the
rkhunter maintainers (of which I am one) a heads up so we could add it
to the whitelist.
Apologies. I assumed (incorrectly it turns out) that rkhunter folks were
aware of this.
commit 6050c9ca3e628a25f2dff1d708c78b98eb33d19a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Dec 6 15:11:15 2011 +0100
Fix CVE-2011-4114
perl-PAR-Packer-1.010-CVE-2011-4114.patch | 84 +
perl-PAR-Packer.spec |8 +++-
2 files
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 11:07 +0100, Thomas Spura wrote:
2011/12/5 Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr:
- koji ➙ last build...
This doesn't seem to work correctly. My last build was 2 days ago:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=988
And the script says it was Nov 2...
After yesterday's rebuilds, there remain 271 binary packages from 232
source packages that still require libpng-compat.
No FTBFS bugs have been filed at this time.
There's a pretty wide variety of failures represented here. In addition
to the libpng API changes, a quick scan also unconvers
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 10:18 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/12/11 23:08, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Hi,
Once in a while comes back the question: is insert nick here
around ? Normally followed by: I have opened and pinged him
several
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
* Fri Jun 13 2008 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com 2.2.12-8
- Install icons in /usr/share/pixmaps, not /usr/share/icons as this
package has historically done; the former is considered correct.
Digging further, the reason I changed it is
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed
2011/12/6 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com:
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 12:08 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
As you all might know, it is currently impossible to boot the default
install of F16 on Macs. It does not seem to matter if you use boot
loaders such as reFit and Bootcamp or remove MacOS
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 10:26:00 +
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
It might be interesting to run this script across every single user
in the Fedora accounts system, and proactively identify any users
whom have not done anything in Fedora for a period longer than say
6-9 months.
commit 88f43bf7a8840b8285a50afab968c4c9bdc04c01
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Dec 6 15:11:15 2011 +0100
Fix CVE-2011-4114
perl-PAR-Packer-1.010-CVE-2011-4114.patch | 84 +
perl-PAR-Packer.spec |8 +++-
2 files
On 12/06/2011 05:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 11:08:32PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
snip
It might be interesting to run this script across every single user
in the Fedora accounts system, and proactively identify any users
whom have not done anything in Fedora
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 10:53 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
But this might find some people who were active in say bugzilla but
missed the fas changes, etc.
Just for reference, the bugzilla check doesn't work on F16, something
changed between the version 0.6.0 and 0.6.2 and what's returned has
Hi.
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:15:42 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote
Couldn't run /usr/sbin/dumpcap in child process: Permission denied
Are you a member of the 'wireshark' group? Try running
'usermod -a -G wireshark _your_username_' as root.
Did you try, perhaps, running 'usermod -a -G
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 13:52 -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 12/06/2011 05:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 11:08:32PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
snip
It might be interesting to run this script across every single user
in the Fedora accounts system, and
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 20:32 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
It seems like the boot procedure has changed quite a bit from F15 to
F16, and not just the GRUB2 change. I am sure these were changed for
the best of reasons, but it is very frustrating to not be able to use
F16 on hardware that
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 09:44 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
* Fri Jun 13 2008 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com 2.2.12-8
- Install icons in /usr/share/pixmaps, not /usr/share/icons as this
package has historically done; the former is considered
2011/12/6 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com:
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 10:26:00 +
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
It might be interesting to run this script across every single user
in the Fedora accounts system, and proactively identify any users
whom have not done anything in Fedora
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Jonathan Underwood
jonathan.underw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Weirdly I am seeing that mock (1.1.18 on a rhel 6 machine) is now
deleting the logs if a package rebuilds successfully. The logs are not
deleted if the package fails to complete building. I've looked at
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 09:44:33PM +0100, Thomas Spura wrote:
2011/12/6 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com:
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 10:26:00 +
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
It might be interesting to run this script across every single user
in the Fedora accounts system, and
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 01:08:10 +
Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Weirdly I am seeing that mock (1.1.18 on a rhel 6 machine) is now
deleting the logs if a package rebuilds successfully. The logs are not
deleted if the package fails to complete building. I've
Adam Williamson wrote:
The short version of what you should do is, at a minimum, put a 48x48
version of the icon in /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48 . It's really good
to put a .svg version of the icon in /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable
too, and what with GNOME using very large icons on its
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Upgrade to new upstream version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760472
Summary: Upgrade to new upstream version
Product: Fedora EPEL
commit 732f3f20607882f269ca2e9c3e34d4f41af0836f
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Dec 6 11:17:33 2011 +0100
Poke icon cache
perl-PAR-Packer.spec | 18 +-
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-PAR-Packer.spec
commit b45cffe68b4e5e6f1920e5138b4c04c338b07210
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Dec 1 15:46:19 2011 +0100
Fix CVE-2011-4114
perl-PAR-1.002-CVE-2011-4114.patch | 89
perl-PAR.spec | 10 -
2 files changed, 98
commit 29555072e8e22a681a67c4046d2dd76a1e0eac27
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Dec 1 15:46:19 2011 +0100
Fix CVE-2011-4114
perl-PAR-1.002-CVE-2011-4114.patch | 89
perl-PAR.spec | 10 -
2 files changed, 98
commit e9c31e5fe012574693edcec484ad502c46db34a2
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Dec 1 15:46:19 2011 +0100
Fix CVE-2011-4114
perl-PAR-1.002-CVE-2011-4114.patch | 89
perl-PAR.spec | 10 -
2 files changed, 98
commit caf5df098adb318c914803819bd550b6c2c17ab6
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Dec 6 15:11:15 2011 +0100
Fix CVE-2011-4114
perl-PAR-Packer-1.010-CVE-2011-4114.patch | 84 +
perl-PAR-Packer.spec |8 +++-
2 files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753955
--- Comment #9 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-12-06 09:23:39 EST ---
How to test:
Create /tmp/par-$(USER) directory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760132
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-06
10:03:22 EST ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760132
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-06
10:01:15 EST ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753957
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-06
10:01:22 EST ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760132
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-06
10:04:01 EST ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753957
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-06
10:04:06 EST ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753957
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-06
10:03:28 EST ---
On 12/02/2011 04:34 PM, Jan Kasprzak wrote:
Hello, Fedora Perl developers!
I use both Perl and Fedora extensively at work, and I have decided that
we should try to migrate from locally-compiled Perl to the Perl from Fedora.
This includes building all the CPAN modules we depend on as
Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
: On 12/02/2011 04:34 PM, Jan Kasprzak wrote:
: Welcome to Perl packaging for Fedora.
:
: Paul (one of sponsors) was already looking at your review, but because
: of license it could take more time. Could you prepare something else
: from your list? It might be faster
42 matches
Mail list logo
