On 31/01/12 01:44, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Matthias Runge wrote:
Maybe introducing a testing-release as concession to both sides is
acceptable?
- newest versions, including risk of being broken - rawhide
- (merely) stable versions will be propagated from rawhide to testing
- branching stable
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=commitdiff;h=09220fef36dcc2fe06bd858578119872f889c7e2
As you say, ugh!.
Yeah, this is awful!
Can't you push more strongly in FESCo for a revote? This feature really needs
to be reconsidered, and hopefully thrown
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693233 (pkgreview for nux)
for some slightly more recent status details.
At the end of November I actually did some /very/ rough packaging of unity
(at the time I actually wanted unity-2d but it already required unity
then as was pointed out, and
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:33:39 -0800, AW (Adam) wrote:
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 22:21 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
What's needed to be sure the bug doesn't get closed is for the Version
field to be bumped to a release that's not going EOL. A comment may do
the job, but there's usually
Hi,
are there any plans to get libtiff4 (which was released as stable on Dec 22
2011) into f17? A notable feature is BigTIFF support, often needed when
dealing with GIS stuff.
Thanks
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Matthias Runge wrote:
You're right, putting a testing line between rawhide and stable makes
software in stable a little older. Nobody said, packages in testing
should stay there as long as in debian-testing.
Any time wasted by going through the extra testing branch is too much time.
And the
On 31/01/12 11:55, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Ignorance must be fought through education, not bureaucracy!
Kevin Kofler
Right. Bureaucracy must be minimized, but I also think, processes must
get designed in a way preventing people from making bad errors. If a
little bureaucracy facilitates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Shipwright-2.4.31 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786080
Summary: perl-Shipwright-2.4.31 is available
Product: Fedora
Isn't it time for v4 ?
Alex
- Original Message -
From: Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 12:38:12 PM
Subject: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-17
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:33:39 -0800, AW (Adam)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Test-Refcount tests fail on 32-bit platforms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786085
Summary: perl-Test-Refcount tests fail on 32-bit platforms
Please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782383
Volker
Am Dienstag, 31. Januar 2012, 11:40:47 schrieb Sandro Mani:
Hi,
are there any plans to get libtiff4 (which was released as stable on Dec 22
2011) into f17? A notable feature is BigTIFF support, often needed when
dealing
Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) said:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
But you can add:
Provides: /bin/foo
Ugh! Will that be needed that across the distro for a release or two?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786085
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2012-01-31 10:33:24 EST ---
I propose to remove perl(Devel::FindRef) from
On 01/30/2012 07:55 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
To solve that, I'd be nice if there was a way to roll over an EOL
version into an appropriate release of one of the long-term-supported
systems such as RHEL, Centos or Scientific Linux.
This is impossible due to how the
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:36:32AM -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
The downgrades would actually be better than having an unsupported
system that doesn't get any updates ever. The assumption here is that
the downgrades aren't introducing any security or fundamental
functionality
Package perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton in Fedora 16 is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton in Fedora devel is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton in Fedora 15 is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) said:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
But you can add:
Provides: /bin/foo
Ugh! Will that be needed that across the distro for a release or two?
Package perl-Gtk2-Ex-Carp in Fedora devel is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Gtk2-Ex-Carp
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) said:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
But you can add:
Provides: /bin/foo
Package perl-RT-Client-REST in Fedora 16 is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-RT-Client-REST
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-RT-Client-REST in Fedora devel is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-RT-Client-REST
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) said:
To be precise:
[root@nostromo ~]# mv /bin /cow
[root@nostromo ~]# /cow/ln -s /cow /bin
[root@nostromo ~]# rpm -qf /cow/bash
bash-4.2.20-1.fc16.x86_64
[root@nostromo ~]# rpm -qf /bin/bash
bash-4.2.20-1.fc16.x86_64
rpm should already handle
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) said:
When calculating local on-system provides, it should - in fact, I'd be
surprised if it doesn't. Admins sometimes move directories around and
replace them with symlinks.
Well,
Hi,
The latest release of nsca finally increases the 512 characters message
limitation to 4096 and is backward compatible with older client using
the 512 characters message. This was a long awaited change. The only
limitation is the nsca server needs to be upgraded first.
The update is already
On 01/31/2012 10:45 AM, Jos Vos wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:36:32AM -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
The downgrades would actually be better than having an unsupported
system that doesn't get any updates ever. The assumption here is that
the downgrades aren't introducing any security or
Hello all,
Is there any problem with koji in these days?
I'm getting random koji problems while building packages like
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3748927name=build.log
Yesterday was the same, however today, just a couple of minutes before
the error I posted in link, I
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Mattia Verga mattia.ve...@tiscali.it wrote:
Hello all,
Is there any problem with koji in these days?
I'm getting random koji problems while building packages like
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3748927name=build.log
Yesterday was the same,
After installing today's Rawhide updates on an x86_64 VM, I started
having troubles running programs. Nothing linked with libselinux.so.1
could actually open that library; the programs were getting EACCESS on
the attempt. I figured I needed to do a relabel, but since restorecon
is linked with
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Mattia Verga mattia.ve...@tiscali.it wrote:
I see I didn't thought to look at root.log. So I will wait some day to
retry the build.
Thanks for the tip!
You shouldn't have to wait, for Rawhide at least. The fixed package
is in the build root now. My
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 11:03 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) said:
To be precise:
[root@nostromo ~]# mv /bin /cow
[root@nostromo ~]# /cow/ln -s /cow /bin
[root@nostromo ~]# rpm -qf /cow/bash
bash-4.2.20-1.fc16.x86_64
[root@nostromo ~]# rpm -qf
Hey, folks. Just wanted to keep the lines of communication open about
our results testing the /usr move feature.
On upgrading existing Rawhide installs: we have multiple reports of
people who have been able to do so successfully following the
instructions given by Harald in the post 'Fedora 17’s
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 14:10 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Add f17-usrmove in the file /etc/yum.repos.d/f17-usrmove.repo
[f17-usrmove]
name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch
failovermethod=priority
baseurl=http://koji.fedoraproject.org/repos/f17-usrmove/latest/$basearch
enabled=1
What would be the pros/cons of a bind mount instead of a soft link for
/bin et al?
gene
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 14:09 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 01/31/2012 12:07 PM, Jerry James wrote:
After installing today's Rawhide updates on an x86_64 VM, I
started having troubles running programs. Nothing linked with
libselinux.so.1 could actually open that library; the programs were
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 11:19 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Yes we have shipped a policy that requires the usrmove functionality.
If you add
/lib64 /lib
to
/etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts.subs_dist
Then run restorecon -R -v /lib64
It should fix
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:26:49AM -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
At the same time, if the deployment is successful, we're no longer
chasing the latest features, and the stability becomes paramount---the
good is the enemy of the best. For a while, Fedora allows us to coast on
such a
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 10:52 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) said:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
But you can add:
Provides: /bin/foo
Ugh! Will
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 11:03 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) said:
To be precise:
[root@nostromo ~]# mv /bin /cow
[root@nostromo ~]# /cow/ln -s /cow /bin
[root@nostromo ~]# rpm -qf /cow/bash
bash-4.2.20-1.fc16.x86_64
[root@nostromo ~]# rpm -qf
James Antill (ja...@fedoraproject.org) said:
[root@nostromo ~]# mv /bin /cow
[root@nostromo ~]# /cow/ln -s /cow /bin
[root@nostromo ~]# rpm -qf /cow/bash
bash-4.2.20-1.fc16.x86_64
[root@nostromo ~]# rpm -qf /bin/bash
bash-4.2.20-1.fc16.x86_64
rpm should already handle this, no
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 14:42 -0500, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 01/31/2012 11:39 AM, Jerry James wrote:
However, the new libvpx is *still* in the Fedora 16 build root
overrides, which is breaking package builds. Spot, if you're done
rebuilding gstreamer-plugins-bad-free, could you expire that
Hello everybody,
I'm trying to build a trident package
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771480) , because it is
needed by my main review request for tv-browser
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754246)
I ran into some problems building the jar from ant:
[javac]
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 13:01:28 -0800,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
I just noticed that, for some reason, I can compose a live image if I
just use regular Rawhide repos, but if I add the /usr move repo, I get
this compose error:
Error creating Live CD : Failed to build
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
Good to see everyone still doesn't read what I write.
As I said, rpm _does something_ to make the above work for -qf (the
above even works if you inside /cow ... as long as the /bin symlink
exists!).
However, it _does not_ work, if you
* Przemek Klosowski [31/01/2012 00:37] :
To solve that, I'd be nice if there was a way to roll over an EOL
version into an appropriate release of one of the
long-term-supported systems such as RHEL, Centos or Scientific
Linux.
This would be a massive distraction from our mission.
Get the
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 15:58 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
James Antill (ja...@fedoraproject.org) said:
[root@nostromo ~]# mv /bin /cow
[root@nostromo ~]# /cow/ln -s /cow /bin
[root@nostromo ~]# rpm -qf /cow/bash
bash-4.2.20-1.fc16.x86_64
[root@nostromo ~]# rpm -qf /bin/bash
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-File-HomeDir:
cb058c68393631344c2b906026091016 File-HomeDir-0.99.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit c825db995b4c1a3b3135338570eeac0914216457
Author: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue Jan 31 16:36:08 2012 -0500
0.99
.gitignore |1 +
perl-File-HomeDir.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 15:03 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 13:01:28 -0800,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
I just noticed that, for some reason, I can compose a live image if I
just use regular Rawhide repos, but if I add the /usr move repo, I get
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 17:00 -0500, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 01/31/2012 04:52 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 15:03 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 13:01:28 -0800,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
I just noticed that, for some reason, I
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 14:10 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Hello Testers and rawhide Users,
Fedora 17 will locate the entire base operating system in /usr. The
directories
/bin, /sbin, /lib, /lib64 will only be symlinks:
/bin → /usr/bin
/sbin → /usr/sbin
/lib → /usr/lib
/lib64 →
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:00:21 -0500
Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
No, xulrunner failed because I need to patch nss-softokn to fix a bug
in rawhide, but nss-softokn has already been modified for /usr move
and I wasn't sure how to actually push the fix out into rawhide. If
someone can
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 14:23 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 14:10 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Hello Testers and rawhide Users,
Fedora 17 will locate the entire base operating system in /usr. The
directories
/bin, /sbin, /lib, /lib64 will only be symlinks:
/bin →
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 14:19:14 -0800,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
AIUI, at this point you're stuck either reverting the /usr move
modifications in nss-softokn and building for Rawhide, or waiting until
we push the /usr move packages into Rawhide proper...
What about
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 23:36, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 14:23 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 14:10 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Hello Testers and rawhide Users,
Fedora 17 will locate the entire base operating system in /usr. The
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 02:38 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
Installation fails at partitioning stage, with udisksd hitting Error
opening /etc/crypttab file: Failed to open file '/etc/crypttab': No such
file or directory (g-file-error-quark, 4)
The file /etc/crypttab indeed doesn't exist. I'm
commit f177ee58367b3ad4279a60b4fcd5723f73ce4c5e
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue Jan 31 10:01:27 2012 +0100
Rewrite *-tests package (Don't use tests macros).
rt3.spec | 53 +++--
1 files changed, 35
Summary of changes:
f177ee5... Rewrite *-tests package (Don't use tests macros). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 1b6b3e37b5c7afe26f9cfb527cd7c23b336d7110
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue Jan 31 10:06:12 2012 +0100
Fix changelog entry typo.
rt3.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/rt3.spec b/rt3.spec
index 5918564..d7e3d78
Summary of changes:
1b6b3e3... Fix changelog entry typo. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
9c99e50... Upstream update. (*)
e345589... Remove redundant R: config(rt3), Remove P: config(rt3). Rew (*)
2b1b581... Fix typo in filter rules. Add lexdir, manualdir, RT3_LEXDIR (*)
3917e42... Rename rpmbuild option with_tests into with_runtests. (*)
f177ee5...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784053
--- Comment #5 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
2012-01-31 05:33:41 EST ---
This bug wasn't present in F15
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786085
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Package perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils in Fedora 16 is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils in Fedora devel is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils in Fedora 15 is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Gtk2-Ex-Dialogs in Fedora devel is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Gtk2-Ex-Dialogs
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Gtk2-Ex-Dialogs in Fedora 15 is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Gtk2-Ex-Dialogs
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
commit 8cba77c318bf0cf28d6d3444c6f77a935f338046
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jan 31 14:05:04 2012 +0100
Modernize spec file
perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils.spec | 30 --
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit b3759b8c16c5109323ef85412c11af541aa8678b
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jan 31 14:12:12 2012 +0100
Fix a typo in test dependencies
perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils.spec
commit 44e5ee4f24f9a579d430fa0b0df5263367ef16c7
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jan 31 14:28:41 2012 +0100
Modernize spec file
perl-Gtk2-Ex-Dialogs.spec | 38 --
1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Package perl-Gnome2-GConf in Fedora 16 is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Gnome2-GConf
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Gnome2-GConf in Fedora devel is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Gnome2-GConf
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Gnome2-VFS in Fedora 16 is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Gnome2-VFS
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Gnome2-VFS in Fedora devel is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Gnome2-VFS
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Gnome2-VFS in Fedora 15 is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Gnome2-VFS
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Gnome2 in Fedora 16 is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Gnome2
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Package perl-Gnome2 in Fedora devel is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Gnome2
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Package perl-Gnome2 in Fedora 15 is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Gnome2
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 271bb9e69546c332b8da2e21b34cef7161ad816f
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue Jan 31 15:54:24 2012 +0100
Misc. specfile improvements.
rt3.spec | 20 +++-
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/rt3.spec b/rt3.spec
Summary of changes:
271bb9e... Misc. specfile improvements. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
271bb9e... Misc. specfile improvements. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Package perl-RT-Client-REST in Fedora 15 is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-RT-Client-REST
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Gtk2-Ex-Carp in Fedora 15 is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Gtk2-Ex-Carp
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Gtk2-Ex-Carp in Fedora 16 is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Gtk2-Ex-Carp
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Hello,
The only remaining orphaned Perl package is mod_perlite. If nobody takes it,
it will be removed from F17.
I'd like to thank everybody who unorphaned some of the packages to keep
Perl ecosystem in Fedora rich and vibrant.
-- Petr
pgpxNlgY437uo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784832
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Catalyst-Action-REST:
df7509fb496779f056212f4870acd53f Catalyst-Action-REST-0.96.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for
perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap:
4e7f7b255c9aeceb627e45d2b8d814f9
Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap-0.16.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
commit 447246d73cb394d7e120d14f267ea1e1f7751659
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Feb 1 05:38:27 2012 +0100
update to 0.96
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Catalyst-Action-REST.spec |6 +-
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7
commit b556bcd6f5b7bd67ea8f3785e109b752c8eb5f88
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Feb 1 05:47:13 2012 +0100
update to 0.16
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap.spec | 19 ---
sources
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Email-Sender:
9c511cb098d9aba00ed43c0cb33a4b3a Email-Sender-0.110002.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 43404331a1948ef8aeb693d91a473cb0f0cbae0b
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Feb 1 05:53:25 2012 +0100
update to 0.110002
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Email-Sender.spec |8 +---
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Spec:
b798ab9f048406419c8212f44cc2ebf9 Test-Spec-0.40.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 565aa305c83ccea73eca4cbe07e41c859e0df27c
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Feb 1 06:09:30 2012 +0100
update to 0.40
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Test-Spec.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786085
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
This fix is now correctly tested.
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/55
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/55/0001-Ticket-55-Limit-of-1024-characters-for-nsMatchingRul.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/38
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/38/0001-Ticket-38-nisDomain-schema-is-incorrect.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/6
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/6/0001-Ticket-6-protocol-error-when-doing-a-proxied-auth.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
