On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 06:57:26PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 4/13/12 5:52 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
e2fsprogs 1.42 is in RC4.1 but 1.42.2 is upstream current. Chances of
rolling this in before final?
http://e2fsprogs.sourceforge.net/
1.42.2 is in rawhide...
I'm a little leery
Mattia Verga wrote:
Greetings,
I saw the changes in packaging guidelines related to PIE:
/If your package meets the following criteria you *MUST* enable the PIE
compiler flags: /
* /Your package is long running. This means it's likely to be started
and keep running until the
Compose started at Sat Apr 14 08:15:03 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8
[aeolus-configserver]
aeolus-configserver-0.4.5-1.fc17.noarch
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 04:52 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
b) upstream wont accept submitted units with /etc/sysconfig/ files
which
means those that still want to do this will need start carrying
patches
in the form of EnvironmentFile=-/etc/sysconfig/$SERVICE against
upstream
units
On 04/14/2012 12:26 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
I hope that systemd always supports sysV, has part of specification of
systemd. IMHO.
It will for sometime due to 3rd parties but that does not give us an
excuse to not migrate all our legacy sysv init scripts to native systemd
units.
Hopefully
If you're maintaining a GNOMEish package and you want it included in
the 3.4.1 release, please build the package like normal and then add
the build ID to:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtzJKpbiGX1zdGJzeU9waFJFZmgyQzBuN2VxU0lxbHc
Most of the packages released on ftp.gnome.org with
Richard Hughes wrote:
If you're maintaining a GNOMEish package and you want it included in
the 3.4.1 release, please build the package like normal and then add
the build ID to:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtzJKpbiGX1zdGJzeU9waFJFZmgyQzBuN2VxU0lxbHc
Can we not find a way to
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 20:58 -0400, Anthony Green wrote:
Sorry folks -- thanks for untagging. I'll ping the list again after May 9,
as was suggested earlier in this thread.
Here's a lightly tested patch which implements my suggestion of keeping
the symbols as empty stubs.
Incidentally -
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 15:52:18 +0200,
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Richard Hughes wrote:
If you're maintaining a GNOMEish package and you want it included in
the 3.4.1 release, please build the package like normal and then add
the build ID to:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:53:18PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:49:29PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:11:40AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
So that's a
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:21:15PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:53:18PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:49:29PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012
Am 14.04.2012 18:39, schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:21:15PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
I'm not arguing that's how yum works now, but it doesn't have to work
that way!
It could incrementally
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:21:15PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:53:18PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Apr
Hello!
I'm a 17 year old high school student living in the northeast United States.
For the past two years I've been distro surfing and I think I've found a home
in Fedora, and want to contribute. What better place to start than to package
some of the missing software that I use? I'm starting
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 04:57:29 PM Tom Callaway wrote:
A bundling exception for boost within Passenger was granted, due to the
intrusive nature of the forked changes, the efforts of the maintainer to
merge as many of them as possible into the upstream boost source tree,
and the visible
On 04/14/2012 02:32 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 04:57:29 PM Tom Callaway wrote:
A bundling exception for boost within Passenger was granted, due to the
intrusive nature of the forked changes, the efforts of the maintainer to
merge as many of them as possible into
On Saturday, April 14, 2012 03:11:46 PM Rex Dieter wrote:
No need for this to be mutually exclusive, unless one (or both) of you
are averse to being comaintainers?
I'm objecting based on the matters of principle and due process.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
--
Systems Architect, Kolab
If you're maintaining a GNOMEish package and you want it included in
the 3.4.1 release, please build the package like normal and then add
the build ID to:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtzJKpbiGX1zdGJzeU9waFJFZmgyQzBuN2VxU0lxbHc
Can we not find a way to coordinate GNOME
On 14 April 2012 22:31, Debarshi Ray rishi...@lostca.se wrote:
What about using a page on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ ?
Unless I'm mistaken, you can't have more than one person editing a
wiki page at the same time. Seeing as there's normally 3 or 4 of us
building packages simultaneously, it
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 00:04:05 +0100
Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 April 2012 22:31, Debarshi Ray rishi...@lostca.se wrote:
What about using a page on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ ?
Unless I'm mistaken, you can't have more than one person editing a
wiki page at the same
Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
[...]
Incidentally - keeping the generated autotools stuff in git makes
tracking down what *really* changed extremely painful. It looks
like the ABI was bumped in ee6696fdf4768ba6dd037fb6dd99435afa13816e
but that commit has thousands of lines of
Horst H. von Brand vonbr...@inf.utfsm.cl writes:
[...]
Please go with (3), keeping generated files in git is just dumb.
Please don't demean those who do it for well-considered reasons.
- FChE
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-File-ChangeNotify-0.22 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812521
Summary: perl-File-ChangeNotify-0.22 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Coro-6.08 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812520
Summary: perl-Coro-6.08 is available
Product: Fedora
perl-RPM2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.x86_64 requires librpmio.so.2()(64bit)
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.x86_64 requires librpm.so.2()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-RPM2-1.0-2.fc17.i686 requires librpmio.so.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811144
--- Comment #7 from Tim Landscheidt t...@tim-landscheidt.de 2012-04-14
14:10:38 EDT ---
Thanks. Unfortunately I noticed just
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810243
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
27 matches
Mail list logo
