On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 03:34:53PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> It's fixed in the latest, automake-12.2
I think you mean 1.12.2 :-)
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/CVE-2012-3386
> http://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=7294
However I don't think I see any fixed Fedora builds (1.12
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Monday at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
- none at this time -
= New business =
#topic #
Am 12.07.2012 21:54, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
> Again.. tmpfs is restricted to half the RAM size by default. You can't
> store 8-9GB of trash.. only 2GB, which might land on swap over time.
is it limited to half the RAM or 2 GB?
on my machine half the RAM is 8 GB
what about a application storing 4
On 07/13/2012 10:14 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 07/13/2012 09:14 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
On 07/12/2012 09:54 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Again.. tmpfs is restricted to half the RAM size by default. You can't
store 8-9GB of trash.. only 2GB, which might land on swap over time.
As I have
On 07/13/2012 09:14 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> On 07/12/2012 09:54 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>
>> Again.. tmpfs is restricted to half the RAM size by default. You can't
>> store 8-9GB of trash.. only 2GB, which might land on swap over time.
>
> As I have already pointed out some time ago, isn't a
Roman wrote:
> It is possible it can break many scripts even in rpm's
> scriptlets, but as I already said, it's because bad
> habits. So the main gain will be the people will learn how
> is the globbing in bash and in the whole environment
> working.
Please don't. If an author or maintainer want
If you run "make distcheck" (the rule generated by automake),
be sure that it is safe. Until a few days ago, running that
rule in a directory readable by others would put you at risk
from a local attacker. It can be exploited reliably.
It's fixed in the latest, automake-12.2
http://bugzilla.
Roman Rakus wrote:
> By default, the nullglob is turned off. And it tends people to use bad
> habits in shell scripting.
What habits exactly, and why are those habits bad?
> In my POV the nullglob could be turned on by default. However, i would
> like to hear opinions from others.
Changing a p
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 08:37:19AM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:09:05 +0200, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > I think if those packages are languishing, it's like
> > the packager was already notified and chose not to push.
>
> Package goes into testing with the goal to get int
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/13/2012 01:31 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> I wouldn't back this change either but that's not the behaviour of
> nullglob. If nothing matches the glob the word remains unchanged
> (i.e. *.foo -> *.foo):
Eh, nevermind.. not enough coffee.
Bryn.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/13/2012 01:06 PM, Scott Schmit wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 01:56:29PM +0200, Roman Rakus wrote:
>> Hi, I have a question about nullglob bash's shell option. I want
>> to hear opinions. The behavior is nicely described in bash
>> reference ma
I take dejango-recaptcha and gnome-rdp, sorry answer to late
2012/7/13 Patrick Uiterwijk
> I have taken tcptrack
> Op 12 jul. 2012 19:08 schreef "Jitesh Shah" het
> volgende:
>
> django-recaptcha
>> gnome-rdp
>> libdwarf
>> tcptrack
>>
>> Jitesh
>> --
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@lists.fedora
On 07/13/2012 02:19 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
This could cause serious surprising breakages of scripts with strange
consequences. I'm strictly against this change. If something at all
should be changed in this regard to break bad habits then it should be
the failglob option although I am not convince
On Fri, 2012-07-13 at 13:56 +0200, Roman Rakus wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a question about nullglob bash's shell option. I want to hear
> opinions.
> The behavior is nicely described in bash reference manual [1]
> By default, the nullglob is turned off. And it tends people to use bad
> habits in shel
On 07/13/2012 02:06 PM, Scott Schmit wrote:
So ls *.foo should list the entire directory if no files match *.foo?
It's a bad habit for me to expect ls *.foo to return nothing in this
case? You're going to need to convince me.
And if there are directories ending with .foo? Hopefully you are not
u
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 01:56:29PM +0200, Roman Rakus wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a question about nullglob bash's shell option. I want to hear
> opinions.
> The behavior is nicely described in bash reference manual [1]
> By default, the nullglob is turned off. And it tends people to use
> bad habits in
Hi,
I have a question about nullglob bash's shell option. I want to hear
opinions.
The behavior is nicely described in bash reference manual [1]
By default, the nullglob is turned off. And it tends people to use bad
habits in shell scripting.
In my POV the nullglob could be turned on by default
I have taken tcptrack
Op 12 jul. 2012 19:08 schreef "Jitesh Shah" het
volgende:
> django-recaptcha
> gnome-rdp
> libdwarf
> tcptrack
>
> Jitesh
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fed
On 07/12/2012 07:08 PM, Jitesh Shah wrote:
django-recaptcha
gnome-rdp
In fact, these package have already been taken by somebody without
announcement here.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/de
On 12/07/12 18:08, Jitesh Shah wrote:
libdwarf
I've taken this.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 07/12/2012 09:54 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> Again.. tmpfs is restricted to half the RAM size by default. You can't
> store 8-9GB of trash.. only 2GB, which might land on swap over time.
As I have already pointed out some time ago, isn't a bizarre situation
that as an application developer I can
21 matches
Mail list logo
