On Sun, 09 Dec 2012 18:21:43 +0100, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
I can only say that at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
23 steps are shown under Becoming a Fedora Package Collection Maintainer.
Some of them are technical and more or less unavoidable (koji,
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 13:56 -0800, Richard Vickery wrote:
Fedora don't conduct election business of any sort via email. But since
email is probably the #1 means of communication within the Fedora
project, elections are *publicised* via email (as well
- Original Message -
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 11:42 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On 12/10/2012 04:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
c) how do you define 'contributor' ?
Active fas account...
So cla_done as it's requirement for elections (Board,
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 11:42 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On 12/10/2012 04:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
c) how do you define 'contributor' ?
Active fas account...
So cla_done as it's
Quoting Eric H. Christensen (2012-12-10 22:51:11)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The last week or so has seen a couple of patches going into fop in the Fedora
repositories. I recently became a co-maintainer of fop in EPEL5 and was
trying to bring fop into current there.
Compose started at Tue Dec 11 09:15:41 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure]
python-fedmsg-meta-fedora-infrastructure-0.0.3-1.fc18.noarch requires
fedmsg = 0:0.6.1
Broken deps for i386
Hot problems:
ID Components Count
---
121163 kernel 344
118396 kernel 316
100107 gnome-packagekit 204
Hi Davide -
dblistsub-fedora wrote:
[...] I am considering using one of the above to see if they can
usefully substitute the practice of peppering code with tracing
statements (logging or performance analysis are not the focus). As I
would be a beginner in any of them, I was curious about
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Benjamin Lewis ben.le...@benl.co.uk wrote:
There is really no reason why the election messages couldn't go to all
of FAS, and just have a note explaining that you need cla_done to vote.
There is equally no reason, aside from it being more admin work, why you
inode0 wrote:
People working on the elections certainly try to make the community
aware of the elections. Unfortunately we never seem to be able to get
everyone's attention.
One issue is that the voting period is just too short. This time, I found
out about the elections 6-7 minutes after
Mattia Verga wrote:
Now my problem is: how can I make a working build in F18 and Rawhide? Is
there any way to force the use of udisks1 in my package, or it's a
choice that can only be made in kdelibs?
The choice can only be made in kdelibs.
We need to fix the udisks2 backend, it's the only
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
inode0 wrote:
People working on the elections certainly try to make the community
aware of the elections. Unfortunately we never seem to be able to get
everyone's attention.
One issue is that the voting period is
Greetings.
Fedora 18 is entering final change freeze. There will be one more push
to stable at 23:59:59 UTC tonight that will appear in tomorrow's
branched compose.
Newly Submitted updates will land in updates-testing after being
pushed. Only updates that fix accepted blocker and accepted NTH
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 08:29:52 -0500,
Martin Preisler mprei...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I want to push Ogre 1.8.1 into rawhide next week. This will most likely break some packages
but we have a lots and lots of time to fix it all up in rawhide. The changes in Ogre API
aren't extensive enough
On 12/09/2012 03:32 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
snip
Having one repo and refusing commercial software are 2 different issues.
Really, they're not though. The problem is that stuff is shipped
in-distro and builds deps on core packages, and those packages are
revved in a symbiotic relationship
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd love LSB to matter more. But I didn't raise that can of worms
intentionally :) To drill down to a single point though, as I said
above, I don't want the distro to ship every piece of software I might
use. Today, there is
On 12/11/2012 01:09 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Yeah, our how to join Fedora process makes it easiest to start by
adding to the number of packages instead of by adding to the quality
of existing packages. It might be beneficial to have things the other
way - if someone could find a practical way
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 01:02:41PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
I'd love LSB to matter more. But I didn't raise that can of worms
intentionally :) To drill down to a single point though, as I said
above, I don't want the distro to ship every piece of software I might
use. Today, there is too much
see in line
- Original Message -
From: Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 2:33:13 PM
Subject: Re: What would it take to make Software Collections work in Fedora?
On Tue,
Hi all,
As we have EPEL _for_ RHEL we can have things _for_ Fedora as opposed
to _in_ Fedora. It is how several VARs do with their software _for_
RHEL in the Red Hat world.
Some years ago JPackage.org had a yum repo with JBoss AS (community
version) that was tailored to be installed in Fedora.
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 03:18:42PM -0500, Fernando Nasser wrote:
From: Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
So let's say the user has to add the OCaml repo themselves. That's
difficult for the user because lots of tools like yum search no
longer work well.
Really? If I add several
A while back I ran my static checker on all of the Python extension
modules in Fedora 17:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/StaticAnalysisOfPythonRefcounts
I wrote various scripts to build the packages in a mock environment that
injects my checker into gcc, then wrote various scripts to
On 12/11/2012 02:41 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
commit 8949ba49ab66e8642a38087fd19217dabc4f117b
Author: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Dec 11 21:40:52 2012 +
Build with -fpic on 32 bit too. Use -fpic on supported platforms over -fPIC
g2clib.spec | 15 +--
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
On 12/11/2012 02:41 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
commit 8949ba49ab66e8642a38087fd19217dabc4f117b
Author: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Dec 11 21:40:52 2012 +
Build with -fpic on 32 bit too.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 01:38:43PM +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Quoting Eric H. Christensen (2012-12-10 22:51:11)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The last week or so has seen a couple of patches going into fop in the
On Ter, 2012-12-11 at 14:04 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 02:02:57PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 05:15:46PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Seg, 2012-12-10 at 09:05 +0100, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a function
* Fernando Nasser [11/12/2012 23:05] :
As we have EPEL _for_ RHEL we can have things _for_ Fedora as opposed
to _in_ Fedora. It is how several VARs do with their software _for_
RHEL in the Red Hat world.
We already have third party repositories for Fedora.
Emmanuel
--
devel mailing list
On Sex, 2012-09-21 at 01:14 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:48:34AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 04:44:48PM +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 23:16 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
So instead of
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, inode0 wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Benjamin Lewis ben.le...@benl.co.uk wrote:
There is really no reason why the election messages couldn't go to all
of FAS, and just have a note explaining that you need cla_done to vote.
There is equally no reason, aside from
Eric H. Christensen wrote:
This is a good point. Unfortunately this would lead to the only option
being to remove fop and Publican from EPEL5 because fop is broken...
badly.
If no one needs it then I'll just retire it.
Uh, I don't think it's possible to retire shipped packages. (At least in
On 11 December 2012 18:20, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Eric H. Christensen wrote:
This is a good point. Unfortunately this would lead to the only option
being to remove fop and Publican from EPEL5 because fop is broken...
badly.
If no one needs it then I'll just retire it.
2012/12/11 David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com:
A while back I ran my static checker on all of the Python extension
modules in Fedora 17:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/StaticAnalysisOfPythonRefcounts
I wrote various scripts to build the packages in a mock environment that
injects my
Hi Rich,
On 07.12.2012 18:54, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Well this is a more general question about virtualization. I agree
that it's sometimes more convenient to use an external kernel and
initrd to boot a guest, and libvirt supports this mode (see the
kernel and initrd in libvirt XML). But:
commit 8dc5e42e94ec4dbbf0e02c2be4143617d13fb725
Author: Robin Lee cheese...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Dec 12 11:21:43 2012 +0800
Update to 1.9
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Net-Dropbox-API.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885741
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Fixes internal test suite. Suitable for F≥18.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Module-Used:
2e9070db0280df846e4e8ab62069fbee Test-Module-Used-0.2.4.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 511ec768025b29042397ef5f1fe9981fef3220f6
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Dec 11 09:15:16 2012 +0100
0.2.4 bump
.gitignore |1 +
.rpmlint |2 ++
perl-Test-Module-Used.spec | 10 ++
sources|2
Summary of changes:
511ec76... 0.2.4 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885741
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885741
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Test-Module-Used-0.2.4-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-Module-Used-0.2.4-1.fc18
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877951
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Directory-Queue-1.7-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877913
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Config-Validator-0.6-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885998
Bug ID: 885998
Summary: perl-Digest-SHA-5.80 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Digest-SHA
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On 12/10/2012 05:56 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Sorry for breaking the thread, I wasn't subscribed on the list, so I
did not get the answer. I am now.
Reply to Petr Šabata:
I believe most of those things should still be in the spec file
if the 'old' option is used. Though I haven't looked at your
2012/12/11 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org:
- Removed find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -size 0 -exec rm -f {}
\;
I think this one is still needed for arch-specific packages.
The removal of empty directories from the buildroot in %install is not
needed though, so you could delete that.
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Digest-SHA:
e26ab85c8f4e68a56b23c1e951d5e461 Digest-SHA-5.80.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 3f69dcab689cae907264fb6270da15dc520c4e31
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Dec 11 13:59:06 2012 +0100
5.80 bump
.gitignore |1 +
Digest-SHA-5.80-reset_cflags.patch | 15 +++
perl-Digest-SHA.spec | 11 +--
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perltidy:
2fd84e72296337c78f2c024af3005aa8 Perl-Tidy-20121207.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 682c0b52603d26c3ac15b66c1e58706ef6fc0a27
Author: Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi
Date: Tue Dec 11 18:04:23 2012 +0200
Update to 20121207.
perltidy.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perltidy.spec
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885741
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package perl-Test-Module-Used-0.2.4-1.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885450
Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Product: Security Response
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877015
Bug 877015 depends on bug 876974, which changed state.
Bug 876974 Summary: CVE-2012-5526 perl-CGI: Newline injection due to improper
CRLF escaping in Set-Cookie and P3P headers [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876974
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876974
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-CGI-3.59-235.fc18, perl-5.16.2-235.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
Product: Security Response
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877015
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-CGI-3.59-235.fc18, perl-5.16.2-235.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-Dropbox-API:
5f5d053f7a116d0f645ce6835e545cb8 Net-Dropbox-API-1.9.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit eb33f55ad29feed595d0d2e4d5858fc51110bed4
Author: Robin Lee cheese...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Dec 12 11:41:56 2012 +0800
BuildRequires: perl(Module::Install)
perl-Net-Dropbox-API.spec | 20 +---
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869529
Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PerlIO-via-dynamic:
c1f33e4c4612ef7023545f4f94ee7c56 PerlIO-via-dynamic-0.14.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 40028e335f097e22caa3cf3a3780abf48d876568
Author: Robin Lee cheese...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Dec 12 11:50:54 2012 +0800
Update to 0.14
.gitignore |1 +
perl-PerlIO-via-dynamic.spec |8 ++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8
Summary of changes:
40028e3... Update to 0.14 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872995
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-PerlIO-via-dynamic-0.14-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-PerlIO-via-dynamic-0.14-1.fc18
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886339
Bug ID: 886339
Summary: defined(@array) is deprecated at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mail/Sender.pm
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: perl-Mail-Sender
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Log-Dispatch:
83d93f06cce7e6f407960ac7d2f21fd5 Log-Dispatch-2.34.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 18ddab196900f15d6812bafcd3cd12d5fb7a9db3
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Dec 12 06:35:10 2012 +0100
Upstream update.
- Update BR:s.
.gitignore |2 +-
Log-Dispatch-2.29.diff | 75
commit d36738896f6fafd34f18bea772b452ecadef15c3
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Dec 12 06:59:43 2012 +0100
Fix broken condition to BR: perl(Test::Pod::No404s).
- Conditionally BR: perl(LWP::Protocol::https).
perl-Log-Dispatch.spec | 11 +--
1
Summary of changes:
18ddab1... Upstream update. (*)
d367388... Fix broken condition to BR: perl(Test::Pod::No404s). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
Summary of changes:
8ea5bd0... Perl 5.16 rebuild (*)
986a59c... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass (*)
18ddab1... Upstream update. (*)
d367388... Fix broken condition to BR: perl(Test::Pod::No404s). (*)
539072c... Merge cleanup.
(*) This commit already existed
commit 539072c278252d25cc53f6e6f554012b0c179bc6
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Dec 12 07:03:56 2012 +0100
Merge cleanup.
perl-Log-Dispatch.spec |6 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Log-Dispatch.spec
commit 40d250be33d1be6e67a7b62d1f3be6b4c4eab2ff
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Dec 12 08:50:28 2012 +0100
Add %bcond_with network (Test::Pod::No404 based tests fail in koji).
perl-Log-Dispatch.spec | 14 +-
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1
Summary of changes:
40d250b... Add %bcond_with network (Test::Pod::No404 based tests fail (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Summary of changes:
40d250b... Add %bcond_with network (Test::Pod::No404 based tests fail (*)
e8759ff... Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f18' into f17
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
commit e8759ffdc50c43baef90900bc17bfc79bf667817
Merge: 539072c 40d250b
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Dec 12 08:53:13 2012 +0100
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f18' into f17
perl-Log-Dispatch.spec | 14 +-
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+),
Summary of changes:
8ea5bd0... Perl 5.16 rebuild (*)
986a59c... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass (*)
18ddab1... Upstream update. (*)
d367388... Fix broken condition to BR: perl(Test::Pod::No404s). (*)
539072c... Merge cleanup. (*)
8a6942e... Merge
commit 8a6942e78ce995ada7cab98dff97ddca98084e5e
Merge: cf1ba42 539072c
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Dec 12 07:06:07 2012 +0100
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f17' into f16
.gitignore |2 +-
Log-Dispatch-2.29.diff | 75
commit ecc108dafa7d669ee1d781265ccde0c0fa33c063
Merge: 8a6942e e8759ff
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Dec 12 08:54:10 2012 +0100
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/f17' into f16
perl-Log-Dispatch.spec | 14 +-
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+),
76 matches
Mail list logo
