On 27. 5. 2013 at 10:31:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.05.2013 09:32, schrieb Jan Zelený:
On 25. 5. 2013 at 09:34:32, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Michael Ekstrand mich...@elehack.net
wrote:
Performance improvement: improve scaling to 5K+ installed
On 05/22/2013 05:47 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
As a packager, some way to transparently handle an upgrade when a
directory changes to a symlink or vice-versa.
+1
--
Miroslav Suchy
Red Hat Systems Management Engineering
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 05/27/2013 09:32 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Unfortunately there is not much we can do about this. Debian has completely
different repository policy - they keep all versions of packages in the repo so
there is no need to update metadata on client machines every time.
Actually we can do something.
On 28.05.2013 09:51, Jan Zelený wrote:
I couldn't agree more. But as I have said, we need to find the most simple and
unintrusive things that can be done to improve this. For instance: file lists
take a considerable portion of the entire metadata size. But if we were to
remove them, things like
Hello,
while reviewing quota sources, I found the (BSD and GPLv2+) license
declared in RPM package is not sufficient. There are source files with
different licenses making resulting package (BSD and LGPLv2+ and GPLv2
and GPLv2+). Thus some binary files are effectively GPLv2-only in
contrast to
Il 27/05/2013 23:11, Adam Williamson ha scritto:
As soon as your
f19 build diverges from master at all, merging becomes inappropriate
(and probably impossible) and you should instead use 'cherry-pick'. It
helps to have at least a vague overview of how git is designed to be
used, and what is
commit 078048fe9155d9d5a0fe8525983fd6c1e3a356a3
Author: Robin Lee cheese...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue May 28 17:30:47 2013 +0800
Update to 0.14
- Use Build.PL
- BR: perl(Test::Pod), perl(Module::Build::Tiny)
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Hash-MultiValue.spec |
On 05/28/2013 11:30 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 27/05/2013 23:11, Adam Williamson ha scritto:
As soon as your
f19 build diverges from master at all, merging becomes inappropriate
(and probably impossible) and you should instead use 'cherry-pick'. It
helps to have at least a vague overview of
On 28. 5. 2013 at 11:39:35, Alek Paunov wrote:
On 28.05.2013 09:51, Jan Zelený wrote:
I couldn't agree more. But as I have said, we need to find the most simple
and unintrusive things that can be done to improve this. For instance:
file lists take a considerable portion of the entire
On 05/22/2013 03:43 PM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Please send your requests as replies to this email so they can be properly
discussed.
Have equivalent of apt-get autoremove.
I.e. If you run
yum install foo
and it will install packages bar and bra for dependencies.
Then when I remove package foo,
On 05/27/2013 03:24 PM, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
Hi,
There's a new build of DNF for Fedora rawhide and F19's
updates-testing[1] today. 0.3.6 is almost only a bugfix release, but
note that F19 users didn't get 0.3.5 so there's more changes happening
there. Also see the release notes[2].
In past
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 13:14 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 05/22/2013 03:43 PM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Please send your requests as replies to this email so they can be properly
discussed.
Have equivalent of apt-get autoremove.
That's what yum-plugin-remove-with-leaves does.
--
Mathieu
--
On 05/28/2013 01:19 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
In past dnf had problem upgrading kernel, so I always upgraded kernel
using yum and rest of system using dnf.
I know that recently you fixed two bugs related to upgrading kernel. But
is it all? Can I now trust dnf even for kernel upgrades? Or there
I've corrected license declaration at sharutils package:
- GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+ and Public Domain
+ GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+ and (LGPLv3+ or BSD) and LGPLv2+ and Public Domain and GFDL
The only effective difference is the texinfo documentation is covered by
GFDL instead of GPL.
The (LGPLv3+ or BSD)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967825
Bug ID: 967825
Summary: perl-Module-Pluggable-4.8 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Module-Pluggable
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967828
Bug ID: 967828
Summary: perl-POE-Component-IRC-6.83 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-POE-Component-IRC
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On 28.05.2013 13:54, Jan Zelený wrote:
On 28. 5. 2013 at 11:39:35, Alek Paunov wrote:
On 28.05.2013 09:51, Jan Zelený wrote:
I couldn't agree more. But as I have said, we need to find the most simple
and unintrusive things that can be done to improve this. For instance:
file lists take a
On 05/28/2013 06:25 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 13:14 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 05/22/2013 03:43 PM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Please send your requests as replies to this email so they can be properly
discussed.
Have equivalent of apt-get autoremove.
That's what
Am 28.05.2013 13:14, schrieb Miroslav Suchý:
On 05/22/2013 03:43 PM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Please send your requests as replies to this email so they can be properly
discussed.
Have equivalent of apt-get autoremove.
I.e. If you run
yum install foo
and it will install packages bar and
Compose started at Tue May 28 08:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[dragonegg]
dragonegg-3.1-19.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-9.fc19
[ekiga]
ekiga-4.0.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libedata-book-1.2.so.17()(64bit)
Compose started at Tue May 28 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[bochs]
bochs-2.6.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires vgabios
[deltacloud-core]
deltacloud-core-rhevm-1.1.3-1.fc19.noarch requires rubygem(rbovirt) =
0:0.0.18
On 05/28/2013 01:14 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
dnf autoremove
should tell me that packages bar and bra were installed as
dependencies for package, which is no more present on disk (and no other
package requires them) and can be removed.
There's an RFE for this already:
This is basically the major impediment to the uninstall of a product that
consists of several packages. Some of these packages may be, at time of
uninstall, also required by other packages, so the and no other package
requires them part is essential.
--Fernando
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We've opened the box for the Fedora 19 Schrödinger's Cat beta release
and confirmed it's alive! Ready to purr at the latest free and open
source technology? Download it now:
http://fedoraproject.org/get-prerelease
What is the Beta release?
On 05/24/2013 09:20 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/23/2013 07:08 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Have you tried using dnf instead of yum? It is much faster.
To be perfectly honest we don't plan to invest much effort in
developing new
things for yum, it will more and more shift towards maintenance mode
On 05/27/2013 09:14 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Might use python-bugzilla to extend it, I guess
The speed of bugzilla.redhat.com is prohibiting, the following takes 3
seconds on my machine:
#! /usr/bin/python2.7
import bugzilla
rhbz =
Quoting Panu Matilainen (2012-09-21 10:17:27)
A directory (empty or not) can't be automatically replaced by anything
else (symlink or otherwise) in the existing rpm versions. If absolutely
necessary, it can be accomplished by doing the necessary renames and
symlinks in %pretrans -p lua
On Tue, 28 May 2013 08:51:03 +0200
Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
after a yum clean metadata yum update on a slow line you
have to wait a very long time and even the download of the
presto-metadata often is larger and takes longer as the
packages which are updated in reality
Am Dienstag, den 28.05.2013, 07:49 -0600 schrieb Tim Flink:
- do some investigation to be somewhat sure that we're not
ignoring
existing tools (autotest is first on my list, beaker is
probably
worth exploring a bit)
This comparison will not be easy, the tools are large with
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 13:14 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 05/22/2013 03:43 PM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Please send your requests as replies to this email so they can be properly
discussed.
Have equivalent of apt-get autoremove.
Try yum autoremove in F19.
--
devel mailing list
On 05/28/2013 06:50 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Quoting Panu Matilainen (2012-09-21 10:17:27)
A directory (empty or not) can't be automatically replaced by anything
else (symlink or otherwise) in the existing rpm versions. If absolutely
necessary, it can be accomplished by doing the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966926
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
The Fedora ARM team is pleased to announce the Fedora 19 Beta for ARM is now
available for download from:
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/releases/test/19-Beta/Images/armhfp/
This marks the last significant milestone before reaching the final release of
Fedora 19 for ARM,
Hi
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
That would slow the build down by 5 minutes for 100 bugs and go up with
each release.
If you store the results, you would only need to get the details of the
bugs fixed from the last release.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
On 28.05.2013 18:51, seth vidal wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2013 08:51:03 +0200
Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
after a yum clean metadata yum update on a slow line you
have to wait a very long time and even the download of the
presto-metadata often is larger and takes longer as the
packages
On Mon, 27 May 2013 20:41:08 +0100
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
I done it
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/debconf.git/log/
but now [debconf] Created branch HEAD, we have a a branch called
HEAD , can the git administrator of Fedora delete this branch ?
Done.
Note that you
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 11:30 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 27/05/2013 23:11, Adam Williamson ha scritto:
As soon as your
f19 build diverges from master at all, merging becomes inappropriate
(and probably impossible) and you should instead use 'cherry-pick'. It
helps to have at least a
On Tue, 28 May 2013 20:42:13 +0300
Alek Paunov a...@declera.com wrote:
So, it seems that yum already have the filelists on demand
optimization implemented. Why you are asking for removing a feature,
which do not make the things worse ... ?
I'm not.
But when you download the filelists -
Dne Út 28. května 2013 10:11:55, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
On 05/27/2013 09:32 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Unfortunately there is not much we can do about this. Debian has
completely
different repository policy - they keep all versions of packages in the
repo so there is no need to update
Dne Út 28. května 2013 09:33:11, Fernando Nasser napsal(a):
This is basically the major impediment to the uninstall of a product that
consists of several packages. Some of these packages may be, at time of
uninstall, also required by other packages, so the and no other package
requires them
Dne Út 28. května 2013 14:59:20, Alek Paunov napsal(a):
On 28.05.2013 13:54, Jan Zelený wrote:
On 28. 5. 2013 at 11:39:35, Alek Paunov wrote:
On 28.05.2013 09:51, Jan Zelený wrote:
I couldn't agree more. But as I have said, we need to find the most
simple
and unintrusive things that can
Dne Út 28. května 2013 11:51:21, seth vidal napsal(a):
On Tue, 28 May 2013 08:51:03 +0200
Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
after a yum clean metadata yum update on a slow line you
have to wait a very long time and even the download of the
presto-metadata often is larger and takes
On 05/15/2013 02:12 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
To play the devil's advocate a bit, if we automate it without requiring announce
we end up without any additional info about reasons why package was orphaned.
This is a easily solvable problem. pkgdb can just require the
maintainer to
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 14:58 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
3) reports on source url which don't work - havent been done in a
llong time afaik and needs to be automated and way to silence them in
known cases in a per package way (by checking in a file into the git
repo for that package for
On Tue, 28 May 2013 14:58:35 -0400
Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a easily solvable problem. pkgdb can just require the
maintainer to specify the reason for orphaning and the report can
collect that info and post it here There are lots of things we could
improve by just
On 05/28/2013 03:10 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
I wonder if we could use fedmsg there, and trigger the check on each
spec update of the rawhide branch or something like that.
Sure.
6) abi bumps could trigger rebuilds as needed automatically by the
buildsystem. Several distributions including
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 13:17:44 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2013 14:58:35 -0400
Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
11) automatic period rebuilds in rawhide to highlight FTBFS issues
aren't done as often anymore
Can you expand on this? Not sure what you
On 05/28/2013 03:17 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
5) update to new upstream versions in Rawhide - a tool could do bump
the spec, do scratch builds automatically of newer versions, if that
works ask the maintainer to apply a diff after reviewing the changes.
I suppose. It doesn't seem like it's that
On 28.05.2013 21:18, seth vidal wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2013 20:42:13 +0300
Alek Paunov a...@declera.com wrote:
So, it seems that yum already have the filelists on demand
optimization implemented. Why you are asking for removing a feature,
which do not make the things worse ... ?
I'm not.
But
# F19 Final Blocker Review meeting #1
# Date: 2013-05-29
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
The proposed blocker list for F19 final already has quite a few bugs on
it already so we're getting an early start on the blocker review
Hey, folks. Just a heads-up: in recent releases the anaconda team have
started a policy of more or less 'freezing' anaconda for the whole
post-Beta period. Apart from some specific planned developments, they
intend to mostly take only fixes for Freeze Exception and Blocker bugs
into anaconda
Hi,
in upstream GNOME, we're starting to convert the 'make check' style
tests in many modules into installed tests that can be run against an
installed system. We run these tests in our build system whenever a
build completes. You can see this in action here:
http://build.gnome.org/#gnome-ostree
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 20:13 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Hi,
in upstream GNOME, we're starting to convert the 'make check' style
tests in many modules into installed tests
The most important URL is this one:
https://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/InstalledTests
The most recent status update
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 13:17 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
2) e-v-r problems - sporadic reports
Should also add this, although, it actually could be a check done in
the new wonderful QA setup.
We already in fact do an 'upgradepath' check in AutoQA. It frequently
fails. Maintainers can sign
Hi
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 13:17 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/resultsdb/frontend/search?type=Testcaseterms=upgradepath
it tests that the build does not break the upgrade path from previous
releases or to
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 22:36 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 13:17 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967719
--- Comment #1 from Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com ---
Created attachment 753757
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=753757action=edit
full backtrace during the crash
Note that in the frame #3, the my_perl variable changes from a
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Hash-MultiValue:
38e63bcdc224ee25a098085190ccc291 Hash-MultiValue-0.14.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
078048f... Update to 0.14 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967783
Bug ID: 967783
Summary: abi-compliance-checker-1.99 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: abi-compliance-checker
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Pluggable:
28806a26002ef887db8430f14ba3f5cd Module-Pluggable-4.8.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967825
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This bug-fix release is suitable for F≥19.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
commit 4d71e0f5acac3b4a2c9c9c93b27e917e91d4fa55
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue May 28 14:13:49 2013 +0200
4.8 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Module-Pluggable.spec | 13 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+),
Summary of changes:
4d71e0f... 4.8 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967825
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Module-Pluggable-4.8-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Module-Pluggable-4.8-1.fc19
--
You are receiving
commit 48a4f8bf97fca4ff92edd498c976ee625e3ede24
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue May 28 14:26:06 2013 +0200
Correct typo in dependencies
perl-Text-Soundex.spec | 13 -
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Text-Soundex.spec
Summary of changes:
48a4f8b... Correct typo in dependencies (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires
perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires
commit d11fa67e5fd68722f3f3b730c4cbe96a297a6d8f
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue May 28 15:39:43 2013 +0200
Correct typo in dependencies
perl-Term-UI.spec |9 ++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Term-UI.spec
Summary of changes:
4dc4825... Correct typo in dependencies (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4dc4825241e5ec6e5606d3fcf4eb31192b8dbbf2
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue May 28 15:44:45 2013 +0200
Correct typo in dependencies
perl-File-CheckTree.spec |9 ++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-File-CheckTree.spec
commit e3051fe18d0ceed650d7e09b3803e16e645ddb86
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue May 28 15:52:38 2013 +0200
Correct typo in dependencies
perl-Archive-Extract.spec |9 ++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Archive-Extract.spec
Summary of changes:
e3051fe... Correct typo in dependencies (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 76f2d787fcc0f12d188d6d259c475fe4a912e3cf
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue May 28 16:00:25 2013 +0200
Correct typo in dependencies
perl-B-Lint.spec |9 ++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-B-Lint.spec b/perl-B-Lint.spec
Summary of changes:
76f2d78... Correct typo in dependencies (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962126
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Regexp-Grammars-1.028-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967829
Bug ID: 967829
Summary: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate-0.08 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate
Keywords: FutureFeature,
commit fcd38d505483e6a21f335d0e7db87a1fe6d344ee
Author: Richard M. Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com
Date: Tue May 28 16:54:42 2013 -0500
Update to latest upstream release.
.gitignore |1 +
abi-compliance-checker.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3
Summary of changes:
fcd38d5... Update to latest upstream release. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
fcd38d5... Update to latest upstream release. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967828
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||967945
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967830
Bug ID: 967830
Summary: perl-threads-lite-0.033 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-threads-lite
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967831
Bug ID: 967831
Summary: perl-Tk-804.031 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Tk
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962318
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962317
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967719
Bug ID: 967719
Summary: Segfault in Perl_gv_fetchpvn_flags when trying to
initialize back_perl openldap backend
Product: Fedora
Version: 19
Component: perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967823
Bug ID: 967823
Summary: perl-Class-Unload-0.08 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Class-Unload
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967825
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962318
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Hash-MultiValue-0.14-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Hash-MultiValue-0.14-1.fc19
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967823
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967823
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This is a bug-fix release suitable for all Fedoras.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
91 matches
Mail list logo
