[Test-Announce] 2013-09-09 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2013-09-09 Thread Tim Flink
will likely center around F20 alpha testing. This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic suggestions to the meeting wiki page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20130909 The current proposed agenda is included below. == Proposed Agenda Topics == 1. Previous Meeting

[Test-Announce] 2013-09-09 @ 16:00 UTC - F20 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #4

2013-09-09 Thread Tim Flink
# F20 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #4 # Date: 2013-09-09 # Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net We're in F20 alpha freeze and you know what that means - monday blocker review meetings! We'll be running through the final blockers and freeze

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Alpha Test Compose 5 (TC5) Available Now!

2013-09-09 Thread Kamil Paral
I might be a little confused now. Yesterday, or Friday I did sudo fedup-cli --network 19 and I got F20, and I'm up on F20 at the moment. That is highly unlikely, that would indicate a bug in fedup. Are you sure you used 19 and that you really are on 20? Now am I to do a ...--network

Some Spacewalk packages orphaned

2013-09-09 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Hi, I orphaned following packages in Fedora (and EPEL): nocpulse-common perl-NOCpulse-CLAC perl-NOCpulse-Debug perl-NOCpulse-Gritch perl-NOCpulse-Object perl-NOCpulse-SetID perl-NOCpulse-Utils spacewalk-admin They transitively need new package, which is not yet in Fedora. And since I do not use

Re: Fedora/Redhat and perfect forward secrecy

2013-09-09 Thread Andrew Haley
On 09/07/2013 12:52 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: Regardless, I think that argument would be an ignorant one: Approximately no one runs non-ECDH PFS on the web: it's insanely slow and it breaks clients. Hmm. Isn't non-ECDH PFS just straight integer (mod N) Diffie-Hellman? And that's what is

Re: Fedora/Redhat and perfect forward secrecy

2013-09-09 Thread Florian Weimer
On 09/09/2013 11:58 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: On 09/07/2013 12:52 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: Regardless, I think that argument would be an ignorant one: Approximately no one runs non-ECDH PFS on the web: it's insanely slow and it breaks clients. Hmm. Isn't non-ECDH PFS just straight integer

[Test-Announce] Fwd: Fedora 20 Alpha Change freeze

2013-09-09 Thread Kamil Paral
A bit late, but forwarding here anyway. - Forwarded Message - From: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2013 7:24:40 AM Subject: Fedora 20 Alpha Change freeze -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, as

Re: Dracut HostOnly or ConfigurationOnly?

2013-09-09 Thread Kamil Paral
On 09/06/2013 10:15 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote: Can this not be done automatically? If the system fails to boot because of significant hardware changes, it's an obvious option to regenerate initramfs. I can't image a normal user go to the rescue mode and run dracut --regenerate-all. Not

Re: Dell XPS 13 (Sputnik) no longer working with fedora kernels = 3.10

2013-09-09 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 08.09.2013 01:42, Chuck Anderson wrote: On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:45:03PM +0200, Łukasz Jagiełło wrote: 2013/9/5 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn denni...@conversis.de Working fine here. #v+ [root@p0x ~]# uname -a Linux p0x 3.10.10-200.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Aug 29 19:05:45 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64

[Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting, Thursday, September 12 @ 17:00 UTC

2013-09-09 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this important meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 20 Alpha. Thursday, September 12, 2013 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 19:00 CEST) Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to

Re: Dracut HostOnly or ConfigurationOnly?

2013-09-09 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 09/09/2013 11:48 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: On 09/06/2013 10:15 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote: Can this not be done automatically? If the system fails to boot because of significant hardware changes, it's an obvious option to regenerate initramfs. I can't image a normal user go to the rescue mode and

Re: Retiring libeio

2013-09-09 Thread Paul Howarth
On 08/09/13 08:48, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sat, 7 Sep 2013 18:03:48 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: I adopted libeio back when Node.js still bundled it to aid in the unbundling effort, but upstream fixed the bundling problem here by no longer using libeio for anything. That explains a

Re: Default boot/root filesystem

2013-09-09 Thread Josef Bacik
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote: On 09/07/2013 10:35 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9/6/13 5:48 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: According to this:

Re: Default boot/root filesystem

2013-09-09 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 09/09/2013 02:35 PM, Josef Bacik wrote: In a 21 century distro the sub community would decide which default filesystem would be their preference to deliverer the best out of the box experience for their product but hey rings to rule them all and hobbits too. I'd like to see this become a

PostgreSQL 9.3 in Fedora 20?

2013-09-09 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, I know that currently Fedora 20 is in feature freeze state. But Alpha version is still not released and PosgreSQL developers released new latest and greates version http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/release-9-3.html with cool features. Are there chances to get this version for F20?

Re: Default boot/root filesystem

2013-09-09 Thread Till Maas
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 05:35:05PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: If people want to switch the Fedora default to XFS, I'll gladly file the feature. :) Why is XFS better than ext4. When I checked a few months ago, XFS did not even support shrinking, but only growing. Even now there seems to be

Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 in Fedora 20?

2013-09-09 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 17:19:54 +0200, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I know that currently Fedora 20 is in feature freeze state. But Alpha version is still not released and PosgreSQL developers released new latest and greates version

Re: Fedora/Redhat and perfect forward secrecy

2013-09-09 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 09.09.2013 12:55, schrieb Florian Weimer: On 09/09/2013 11:58 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: On 09/07/2013 12:52 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: Regardless, I think that argument would be an ignorant one: Approximately no one runs non-ECDH PFS on the web: it's insanely slow and it breaks clients.

Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 in Fedora 20?

2013-09-09 Thread Honza Horak
On 09/09/2013 05:37 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 17:19:54 +0200, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I know that currently Fedora 20 is in feature freeze state. But Alpha version is still not released and PosgreSQL developers released new latest and greates

Re: Dracut HostOnly or ConfigurationOnly?

2013-09-09 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 09.09.2013 14:11, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson: On 09/09/2013 11:48 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: On 09/06/2013 10:15 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote: Can this not be done automatically? If the system fails to boot because of significant hardware changes, it's an obvious option to regenerate

Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 in Fedora 20?

2013-09-09 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 09.09.2013 17:37, schrieb Bruno Wolff III: On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 17:19:54 +0200, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I know that currently Fedora 20 is in feature freeze state. But Alpha version is still not released and PosgreSQL developers released new latest and

[Owner-change] Fedora packages ownership change

2013-09-09 Thread nobody
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours === 15 packages were orphaned - perl-NOCpulse-Gritch [EL-5,EL-6,devel,f18,f19,f20] was orphaned by msuchy Perl throttled email notification for Spacewalk

Re: Proposal: AppData files in all application packages?

2013-09-09 Thread Remi Collet
Le 09/09/2013 17:51, Florian Müllner a écrit : On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com wrote: Le 06/09/2013 11:33, Richard Hughes a écrit : [1] http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/appdata/ I don't see any localization information in those specifications...

Re: Default boot/root filesystem

2013-09-09 Thread Eric Sandeen
On 9/9/13 10:56 AM, Till Maas wrote: On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 05:35:05PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: If people want to switch the Fedora default to XFS, I'll gladly file the feature. :) Why is XFS better than ext4. When I checked a few months ago, XFS did not even support shrinking, but

Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 in Fedora 20?

2013-09-09 Thread Pavel Raiskup
I know that currently Fedora 20 is in feature freeze state. But Alpha version is still not released and PosgreSQL developers released new latest and greates version http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/release-9-3.html with cool features. Are there chances to get this version for F20?

Re: Proposal: AppData files in all application packages?

2013-09-09 Thread Florian Müllner
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com wrote: Le 06/09/2013 11:33, Richard Hughes a écrit : [1] http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/appdata/ I don't see any localization information in those specifications... From the above link: Questions: [...] How do I

Re: Fedora/Redhat and perfect forward secrecy

2013-09-09 Thread Paul Wouters
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Reindl Harald wrote: I don't get it, either google dhe versus ecdhe performance http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-perfect-forward-secrecy.html Let’s focus on the server part. Enabling DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA cipher suite hinders the performance of TLS handshakes by a

Re: Dracut HostOnly or ConfigurationOnly?

2013-09-09 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 09.09.2013 18:38, schrieb Jared K. Smith: On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: i think you misread the post - IMHO the intention was that once again a feature with zero benefit was acknowledged without caseful

Re: Fedora/Redhat and perfect forward secrecy

2013-09-09 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 09.09.2013 18:12, schrieb Paul Wouters: On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Reindl Harald wrote: I don't get it, either google dhe versus ecdhe performance http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-perfect-forward-secrecy.html Let’s focus on the server part. Enabling DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA cipher suite

Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 in Fedora 20?

2013-09-09 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 17:41:51 +0200, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: http://www.heise.de/open/meldung/PostgreSQL-9-3-veroeffentlicht-1953017.html in english: it is released Yeah, I just saw that. Given that it is released it seems reasonable to get it into F20 and F21. We

Re: Dracut HostOnly or ConfigurationOnly?

2013-09-09 Thread Jared K. Smith
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.netwrote: i think you misread the post - IMHO the intention was that once again a feature with zero benefit was acknowledged without caseful think about the negative impact And I think you once again exaggerate, Harald. Just

Re: [389-devel] RFC: New Design: Fine Grained ID List Size

2013-09-09 Thread Rich Megginson
On 09/09/2013 02:27 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: On 09/07/2013 05:02 AM, David Boreham wrote: On 9/6/2013 8:49 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote: This is a good idea, and it is something that we discussed briefly off-list. The only downside is that we need to change the index format to keep a count of

Re: Fedora/Redhat and perfect forward secrecy

2013-09-09 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Paul Wouters p...@nohats.ca wrote: For the client, clearly CPU is not the limiting factor. For regular TLS servers, this should also not matter. For fully loaded TLS servers or TLS accelerators, the factor 3 on the CPU load will matter, but we're talking

Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 in Fedora 20?

2013-09-09 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2013/9/9 Pavel Raiskup prais...@redhat.com I know that currently Fedora 20 is in feature freeze state. But Alpha version is still not released and PosgreSQL developers released new latest and greates version http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/release-9-3.html with cool

Re: 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat)

2013-09-09 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 12:17:57AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 06.09.2013 20:26, schrieb Darryl L. Pierce: Have your filed a BZ? What's the BZ#? don't get me wrong but i expect bugs viewable at every single boot as fixed without a specific report and to be honest not existing at all by

Re: 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat)

2013-09-09 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 07:07:46PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: don't get me wrong but i expect bugs viewable at every single boot as fixed without a specific report a http://www.redhat.com/magazine/020jun06/features/bugzilla/ +1 --

[Bug 1006000] New: perl-Pod-Spell-1.06 is available

2013-09-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006000 Bug ID: 1006000 Summary: perl-Pod-Spell-1.06 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Pod-Spell Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1006001] New: perl-Socket-2.012 is available

2013-09-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006001 Bug ID: 1006001 Summary: perl-Socket-2.012 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Socket Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: Fedora/Redhat and perfect forward secrecy

2013-09-09 Thread Paul Wouters
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Gregory Maxwell wrote: I am certainly not ignoring legal concerns. While there are some patented EC cryptographic techniques, the basic infrastructure including ECDH over prime fields was first published back in 1984 and is not patentable. The IETF has published an

Re: Fedora/Redhat and perfect forward secrecy

2013-09-09 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Paul Wouters p...@nohats.ca wrote: [not speaking for Red Hat] You seem to believe only valid legal claims can put Red Hat in court. Of course not. Though I'm not aware of anyone making any claims at all over basic non-specially optimized ECDH on prime fields.

Re: Wider feedback requested on two changes to our base/core defaults

2013-09-09 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 09.09.13 19:42, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote: On 09/09/2013 07:30 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Wed, 21.08.13 18:45, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote: And I have come across a bit of scalability issue due to us defaulting to using short

Re: Wider feedback requested on two changes to our base/core defaults

2013-09-09 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 21.08.13 18:45, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote: And I have come across a bit of scalability issue due to us defaulting to using short hostnames in login and command prompt when creating OS containers in any real numbers. I am pretty sure we should continue to default

Re: Wider feedback requested on two changes to our base/core defaults

2013-09-09 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 09/09/2013 07:53 PM, Ian Malone wrote: I'd like to add myself as another datapoint for 'uses different users', and often via ssh. In any case, that bash prompt trick surely only works if applied to all user profiles or all systems being used. They already are quite different between

Re: Proposal: AppData files in all application packages?

2013-09-09 Thread Elad Alfassa
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.comwrote: Le 09/09/2013 17:51, Florian Müllner a écrit : On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com wrote: Le 06/09/2013 11:33, Richard Hughes a écrit : [1]

Re: Wider feedback requested on two changes to our base/core defaults

2013-09-09 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 21.08.13 21:06, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote: I would like us to change our default to use long hostname instead as in the fqdn or container01.ackme.com and would love any kind of feed back in that regard ( why we should not default to that ). +1 always good to show the

Re: Wider feedback requested on two changes to our base/core defaults

2013-09-09 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 09/09/2013 08:05 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 09.09.13 19:42, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote: On 09/09/2013 07:30 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Wed, 21.08.13 18:45, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote: And I have come across a bit of scalability

Re: Wider feedback requested on two changes to our base/core defaults

2013-09-09 Thread Ian Malone
On 22 August 2013 15:50, Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 08:21 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com said: - The user@ is mostly useless; if you su/sudo to root, the character at the end of the prompt changes from

Re: Wider feedback requested on two changes to our base/core defaults

2013-09-09 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 09/09/2013 07:30 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Wed, 21.08.13 18:45, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote: And I have come across a bit of scalability issue due to us defaulting to using short hostnames in login and command prompt when creating OS containers in any real

Re: Proposal: AppData files in all application packages?

2013-09-09 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 23:08 +0300, Elad Alfassa wrote: 3.10 *will* support localization. Patches already landed. https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-software/commit/?id=5b5d58c4abde7229f39246ccf3e42bb04d68bd15

Re: Proposal: AppData files in all application packages?

2013-09-09 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/07/2013 06:14 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: On 7 September 2013 11:03, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote: Why not open bugzillas with the packages with .Desktop

Re: Proposal: AppData files in all application packages?

2013-09-09 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 17:59 +0200, Remi Collet wrote: Sorry, but this need more explanation / sample / howto. As I understand, localization is not planned for 3.10. Sorry, but without translation, I just think this is a NO-GO for me. Remi. Translations are now supported, see

Re: Some Spacewalk packages orphaned

2013-09-09 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:00:49AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Hi, I orphaned following packages in Fedora (and EPEL): nocpulse-common perl-NOCpulse-CLAC perl-NOCpulse-Debug perl-NOCpulse-Gritch perl-NOCpulse-Object perl-NOCpulse-SetID perl-NOCpulse-Utils spacewalk-admin They

Re: Some Spacewalk packages orphaned

2013-09-09 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:59:56PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: Most if not all packages depend on a package I recently retired, therefore because it did not build for two releases. Since the packages Actually they depend on a retired package, that I blocked, because it was not blocked. But the

[perl-Net-Patricia] Update to 1.21

2013-09-09 Thread Orion Poplawski
commit 106f800a565df3e4bea251adabe4878cac471f42 Author: Orion Poplawski or...@nwra.com Date: Mon Sep 9 15:06:03 2013 -0600 Update to 1.21 .gitignore |1 + perl-Net-Patricia.spec |7 +-- sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3

[perl-Net-Patricia] Fix changelog dates

2013-09-09 Thread Orion Poplawski
commit 89d8d2b6d59f321519f6101cc49cd08801a5dbcf Author: Orion Poplawski or...@nwra.com Date: Mon Sep 9 15:08:07 2013 -0600 Fix changelog dates perl-Net-Patricia.spec |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Net-Patricia.spec

[perl-Net-Patricia] License changed to GPLv2+

2013-09-09 Thread Orion Poplawski
commit c047e2c19dd92d138b9dbfc452977925d2ca3d35 Author: Orion Poplawski or...@nwra.com Date: Mon Sep 9 15:17:34 2013 -0600 License changed to GPLv2+ perl-Net-Patricia.spec |5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Net-Patricia.spec

New testng 6.8.7

2013-09-09 Thread punto...@libero.it
hi If there are no dissenting opinions update testng to 6.8.7 regards gil attachment: puntogil.vcf-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Proposal: AppData files in all application packages?

2013-09-09 Thread Remi Collet
Le 06/09/2013 11:33, Richard Hughes a écrit : [1] http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/appdata/ [2] https://github.com/hughsie/fedora-appstream/tree/master/appdata-extra I don't see any localization information in those specifications... Isn't this supposed to be a user-friendly feature ?

Re: New testng 6.8.7

2013-09-09 Thread 80
2013/9/9 punto...@libero.it punto...@libero.it hi If there are no dissenting opinions update testng to 6.8.7 regards gil Is it a bugfix release or does it bring some disruptive changes ? In the former case, you need not to ping this list about it, in the latter, you need to be more

Re: Release Ownership for oyranos

2013-09-09 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 3:55 AM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've released ownership for oyranos which currently FTBFS in f20. I will not have time to fix in the f20 time frame, so it might be blocked or even retired if none volunteer to maintain it. There will be a need to

New testng 6.8.7

2013-09-09 Thread punto...@libero.it
hi If there are no dissenting opinions update testng to 6.8.7 regards gil attachment: puntogil.vcf-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Wider feedback requested on two changes to our base/core defaults

2013-09-09 Thread Simo Sorce
On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 21:30 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Wed, 21.08.13 18:45, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote: And I have come across a bit of scalability issue due to us defaulting to using short hostnames in login and command prompt when creating OS containers in

Re: Wider feedback requested on two changes to our base/core defaults

2013-09-09 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 09.09.13 18:30, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote: Kerberos and x509 both require FQDNs. It makes no sense to stick to short names for servers, and having a FQDN on a laptop does not hurt anything (a FreeIPA enrolled laptop must have a FQDN anyway as it uses the keytab to do

Re: Wider feedback requested on two changes to our base/core defaults

2013-09-09 Thread Ian Malone
On 9 September 2013 20:53, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote: On 09/09/2013 07:53 PM, Ian Malone wrote: I'd like to add myself as another datapoint for 'uses different users', and often via ssh. In any case, that bash prompt trick surely only works if applied to all user profiles

does mc really require perl*?

2013-09-09 Thread Felix Miata
I did a TC5 minimal install last night, which omitted mc, my most used cmdline tool. So: # yum install mc ... installing for dependencies: gpm-libs (which I never ever use) perl* (29 packages)... Seriously? What does mc need perl for? I installed mc plus gpm-libs with rpm --nodeps, and it

Re: Wider feedback requested on two changes to our base/core defaults

2013-09-09 Thread Simo Sorce
On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 00:35 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 09.09.13 18:30, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote: Kerberos and x509 both require FQDNs. It makes no sense to stick to short names for servers, and having a FQDN on a laptop does not hurt anything (a FreeIPA enrolled

Re: Wider feedback requested on two changes to our base/core defaults

2013-09-09 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 09/09/2013 10:54 PM, Ian Malone wrote: Thank you for the put down. However, firstly I'm not referring to the fqdn issue, but the mention of dropping user name and secondly I'm not the administrator of all the systems I use. I was simply trying to provide some user input here. My proposal is

EPEL Fedora 5 updates-testing report

2013-09-09 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 505 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5 19 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5 14

[Bug 1005669] perl-HTTP-Body: remote command-injection flaw in HTTP::Body::Multipart versions 1.08 and later

2013-09-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005669 Murray McAllister mmcal...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1000695] perl-Template-Alloy-1.019 is available

2013-09-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000695 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- This is a bug-fix release suitable for F ≥ 20. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug

[pkgdb] perl-NOCpulse-Gritch ownership changed

2013-09-09 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-NOCpulse-Gritch in Fedora 18 was orphaned by msuchy To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-NOCpulse-Gritch -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-NOCpulse-Gritch ownership changed

2013-09-09 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-NOCpulse-Gritch in Fedora EPEL 6 was orphaned by msuchy To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-NOCpulse-Gritch -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-NOCpulse-Gritch ownership changed

2013-09-09 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-NOCpulse-Gritch in Fedora EPEL 5 was orphaned by msuchy To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-NOCpulse-Gritch -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-NOCpulse-Gritch ownership changed

2013-09-09 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-NOCpulse-Gritch in Fedora 19 was orphaned by msuchy To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-NOCpulse-Gritch -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-NOCpulse-Gritch ownership changed

2013-09-09 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-NOCpulse-Gritch in Fedora 20 was orphaned by msuchy To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-NOCpulse-Gritch -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-NOCpulse-Gritch ownership changed

2013-09-09 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-NOCpulse-Gritch in Fedora devel was orphaned by msuchy To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-NOCpulse-Gritch -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-NOCpulse-Utils ownership changed

2013-09-09 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-NOCpulse-Utils in Fedora devel was orphaned by msuchy To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-NOCpulse-Utils -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-NOCpulse-Utils ownership changed

2013-09-09 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-NOCpulse-Utils in Fedora EPEL 6 was orphaned by msuchy To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-NOCpulse-Utils -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-NOCpulse-Utils ownership changed

2013-09-09 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-NOCpulse-Utils in Fedora EPEL 5 was orphaned by msuchy To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-NOCpulse-Utils -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-NOCpulse-Utils ownership changed

2013-09-09 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-NOCpulse-Utils in Fedora 20 was orphaned by msuchy To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-NOCpulse-Utils -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-NOCpulse-Utils ownership changed

2013-09-09 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-NOCpulse-Utils in Fedora 19 was orphaned by msuchy To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-NOCpulse-Utils -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-NOCpulse-Utils ownership changed

2013-09-09 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-NOCpulse-Utils in Fedora 18 was orphaned by msuchy To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-NOCpulse-Utils -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

File Template-Alloy-1.019.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2013-09-09 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Template-Alloy: fb6ce35078bf768625014de8aeb5f88e Template-Alloy-1.019.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Template-Alloy] 1.019 bump

2013-09-09 Thread Petr Pisar
commit c1f7534f9ec93164f0a4aa54b961b090247ef813 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Mon Sep 9 09:58:17 2013 +0200 1.019 bump .gitignore |1 + .rpmlint |2 + perl-Template-Alloy.spec | 98 +++--- sources

[perl-Template-Alloy/f20] 1.019 bump

2013-09-09 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 4538ea6f0483a883ba60c8e9acd6df3e5fa03961 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Mon Sep 9 09:58:17 2013 +0200 1.019 bump .gitignore |1 + .rpmlint |2 + perl-Template-Alloy.spec | 98 +++--- sources

[Bug 1000695] perl-Template-Alloy-1.019 is available

2013-09-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000695 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1000695] perl-Template-Alloy-1.019 is available

2013-09-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000695 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Template-Alloy-1.019-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Template-Alloy-1.019-1.fc20 -- You are

File Tree-DAG_Node-1.16.tgz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

2013-09-09 Thread Paul Howarth
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Tree-DAG_Node: d44a70df0914827cd04513ae30dd7a00 Tree-DAG_Node-1.16.tgz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Tree-DAG_Node] Update to 1.16

2013-09-09 Thread Paul Howarth
commit 85f79f0783b8377acf7c6bf08c3e8232b6a21081 Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Mon Sep 9 10:29:11 2013 +0100 Update to 1.16 - New upstream release 1.16 - Merge patch (slightly modified by me) from Tom Molesworth (CPAN RT#88501): - Remove 'use open

[perl-Tree-DAG_Node/f20] Update to 1.16

2013-09-09 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes: 85f79f0... Update to 1.16 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Tree-DAG_Node] Created tag perl-Tree-DAG_Node-1.16-1.fc20

2013-09-09 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Tree-DAG_Node-1.16-1.fc20' was created pointing to: 85f79f0... Update to 1.16 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Tree-DAG_Node] Created tag perl-Tree-DAG_Node-1.16-1.fc21

2013-09-09 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Tree-DAG_Node-1.16-1.fc21' was created pointing to: 85f79f0... Update to 1.16 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi

2013-09-09 Thread buildsys
perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi-0.21-13.fc20.x86_64 requires libswipl.so.6.2.6()(64bit) On i386: perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi-0.21-13.fc20.i686 requires libswipl.so.6.2.6 On armhfp:

Broken dependencies: slic3r

2013-09-09 Thread buildsys
slic3r has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) On i386: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) On armhfp: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires

Broken dependencies: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes

2013-09-09 Thread buildsys
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

2013-09-09 Thread buildsys
perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On armhfp: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.3.1-3.fc20.noarch requires root-core Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Expr

2013-09-09 Thread buildsys
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp:

Broken dependencies: perl-PDL

2013-09-09 Thread buildsys
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit) On i386: perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)

Broken dependencies: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML

2013-09-09 Thread buildsys
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On i386: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On armhfp:

Broken dependencies: perl-Unix-Statgrab

2013-09-09 Thread buildsys
perl-Unix-Statgrab has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.x86_64 requires libstatgrab.so.6()(64bit) On i386: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.i686 requires libstatgrab.so.6 On armhfp: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.armv7hl

  1   2   >