On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
[...] and removes functionality
No it does not.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
For a few last months I've been line after line putting together the
Anaconda Addon Development Guide [1] -- a short and straightforward
guide describing how an addon for the Anaconda installer can be
implemented, tested, deployed and packaged. I believe it is now almost
finished, but it needs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037518
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 20.
Thursday, December 12, 2013 17:00 UTC (12 PM EST, 9 AM PST, 18:00 CET)
Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determine if
Compose started at Tue Dec 10 07:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client
[blueman]
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
I am at a point where I think it starts to look good, the unit-tests are
passing
and I seem to be able to do what I want with it. Thus I thought this would be
a
good time to call for testers and collect bug reports and RFE.
#fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2013-12-10)
Meeting started by bkabrda at 13:02:36 UTC. The full logs are available
at
drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
wrote:
[...] and removes functionality
No it does not.
Yes, it does, see my example:
| a printf wrapper for logging which adds a timestamp in front of the
| format string, e.g.
| log(processed %d items,
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
wrote:
[...] and removes functionality
No it does not.
Yes, it does, see my example:
| a printf wrapper for logging which adds a
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '-MM-DD HH:MM UTC'
Links to all tickets
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:02:15AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
#topic #1211 F21 System Wide Change: Headless Java
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/HeadlessJava
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1211
For this feature I want to point out, that there are JVM-based languages with
On 12/10/2013 04:35 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
-Werror=format-security removes the functionality of building format strings
at
Le 06/12/2013 11:51, Remi Collet a écrit :
Le 28/11/2013 03:25, Adam Williamson a écrit :
Hi, folks. We have just over one week to the Fedora 20 Go/No-Go meeting,
and a big happy pile of blocker bugs - everyone's having fun! In order
to be able to complete testing in time for the go/no-go
Once upon a time, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de said:
printf( ptr );
Aside from everything else, using the printf() family of functions when
you don't want formatted output is bad practice. There's really no
excuse for calling printf(foo); if you don't want formatted output (i.e.
you
Once upon a time, Chris Adams li...@cmadams.net said:
Aside from everything else, using the printf() family of functions when
you don't want formatted output is bad practice. There's really no
excuse for calling printf(foo); if you don't want formatted output (i.e.
you don't pass a format
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 07:12:03AM +0100, Mattias Ellert wrote:
fre 2013-12-06 klockan 15:06 -0500 skrev Darryl L. Pierce:
Additionally, some code (like my package, qpid-cpp) uses code that's
generated by another app like Swig. We have no control over what that
code is. So enabling this as
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 03:58:21PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 15:06 -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
Additionally, some code (like my package, qpid-cpp) uses code that's
generated by another app like Swig. We have no control over what that
code is. So enabling this as
On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 17:42 +0100, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 06/12/2013 11:51, Remi Collet a écrit :
Le 28/11/2013 03:25, Adam Williamson a écrit :
Hi, folks. We have just over one week to the Fedora 20 Go/No-Go meeting,
and a big happy pile of blocker bugs - everyone's having fun! In order
Le 10/12/2013 18:20, Adam Williamson a écrit :
It would've worked better if you'd nominated it as one before the
meeting :/
I have raised the issue on ML Dec 6th.
And bug blocks #980657 (Final 20 freeze exception tracker) since this date.
NB: I just tried to have F20 in a correct state...
1. There are legitimate use-cases where GCC's assumption does not hold, .e.g.:
#include stdio.h
void foo( int a )
{
char hello0[] = hello0;
foo.c line 5: warning: 'const' omitted
char hello1[] = hello1;
foo.c line 6: warning: 'const' omitted
char *ptr;
foo.c line 8: warning:
On 12/06/2013 08:11 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Jackson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 02:21 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
QString line;
line.fill( '-', 60 );
qDebug( line.ascii() );
As you can see, the format string being passed here is provably constant.
So fix the compiler.
This package makes baby seals wish they could be clubbed. Upstream has
killed it. I disavow any knowledge of it.
Retired: R-RScaLAPACK
~tom
==
¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸(((º OSAS @ Red Hat
University Outreach || Fedora Special Projects || Fedora Legal
--
devel mailing list
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
I am at a point where I think it starts to look good, the unit-tests are
passing
and I seem to be able to do what I want with it. Thus I thought
tis 2013-12-10 klockan 12:18 -0500 skrev Darryl L. Pierce:
Of all the packages I
maintain, only one was affected by this issue. That one was easily
solvable by deleting the bundled swig generated code in the sources and
have the build regenerate it with a newer swig version that doesn't
On 12/10/2013 02:20 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
So please, have a look at it, play with it, break it (no seriously, do, but
don't
forget to report how you did it afterward) and if you have any problem/RFE
feel
free to note them at:
Just a heads-up, christmas holidays are coming our
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:05:34AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
#topic #1185 Enable -Werror=format-security by default
.fesco 1185
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1185
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1201 is not resolved yet.
After the last meeting the 'meeting' keyword was removed
Hi all-
I've been using Fedora for quite a few years as my main desktop OS,
and I think it's time I contributed back by writing some packages.
(Also, there are packages I want -- I might as well create them.)
For my day job, I work at a trading company, writing algorithmic
trading software. I
# F20 Final Blocker Review meeting #5
# Date: 2013-12-11
# Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Sadly we didn't build an RC yet and we still have proposed blockers to
consider, so please folks, come out and help us review the new crop.
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
597
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
112
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6
54
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
597
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
112
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5
88
Hi,
I've created this package since 1.3.6 in EPEL branch so sysadmins you
can use this awesome tools to check your system's security via `sudo
yum install lynis`. Note please don't rely on this software blindly.
Thanks.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Fєdоґa ї₴ al$о a кїпd оf нaт lїкє Яёd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039712
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
There is a bug in Fedora 21 orbig-2.0 headers preventing from compilation:
[ CC xs/GnomeAbout.c ]
[...]
In file included from /usr/include/orbit-2.0/orbit/util/orbit-util.h:5:0,
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Archive-Zip:
d117644d735f732b399ddbe88d931300 Archive-Zip-1.34.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit f5f2bf4684ab8e0184a128cadc83a3917353a198
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Dec 10 10:33:35 2013 +0100
1.34 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Archive-Zip.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039712
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Orbit-2.0 headers has been fixed in ORBit2-2.14.19-11.fc21.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039712
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Gnome2-1.045-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Gnome2-1.045-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039712
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039712
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Gnome2-1.045-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Gnome2-1.045-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039712
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Gnome2-1.045-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Gnome2-1.045-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Gtk3:
b6c9f6bd6f49c1e12b893c26bc6d02ef Gtk3-0.015.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit ab1d957540b9b3404e9c19dbe71f08da5f09512e
Author: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Dec 10 10:59:45 2013 +
Update to 0.015 release (rhbz #1021207)
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
perl-Gtk3.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
Summary of changes:
ab1d957... Update to 0.015 release (rhbz #1021207) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Starter:
8c8d867a36f22d0cffb9e0f9e5f635f2 Module-Starter-1.62.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021207
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Gtk3-0.015-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Gtk3-0.015-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
commit 6c5d555aa7d4e0c29d0805b7a4ef54308cbac521
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Dec 10 12:50:39 2013 +0100
1.62 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Module-Starter.spec | 32 +---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 23
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039715
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This is a bug-fixing release suitable for F≥19.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Summary of changes:
6c5d555... 1.62 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 918eaefd3e114433e087272eb18a117cce7ca4d1
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Dec 10 12:50:39 2013 +0100
1.62 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Module-Starter.spec | 32 +---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 23
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039715
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039715
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Module-Starter-1.62-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Module-Starter-1.62-1.fc20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039715
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Module-Starter-1.62-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Module-Starter-1.62-1.fc19
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039719
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-POE:
0fb64ec09c2a2b22bb555a2a0de7d638 POE-1.358.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 996262a95881461e0ad91ee0b9ba170bae7321c0
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Dec 10 13:39:37 2013 +0100
1.358 bump
.gitignore |1 +
.rpmlint |2 ++
filter-provides.sh | 11 ---
filter-requires.sh | 10 --
perl-POE.spec |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039719
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016253
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021207
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021207
Daniel Berrange berra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-pmtools:
444187e2b9361c423b783c31d395 pmtools-1.30.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 2e0ad0a00118398e3232fc170c434c9943fa6f08
Author: Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt
Date: Tue Dec 10 21:47:02 2013 +
Update to version 1.30.
.gitignore|1 +
perl-pmtools.spec | 10 +++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040195
Bug ID: 1040195
Summary: perl-CPANPLUS-0.9144 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CPANPLUS
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CPANPLUS:
08fc9b7d972d987b0173c8a3c508b1ae CPANPLUS-0.9144.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit cafae430563764547227be83cd1bb5eb8534153c
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Dec 11 08:55:59 2013 +0100
0.9144 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-CPANPLUS.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47623/0001-Ticket-47623-fix-memleak-caused-by-47347.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
This is a backport of Nathan Kinder's make rpms patches to 1.3.1
- Add make rpms build target
- Allow RPM builds to be run without configure
- Add git commit hash to developer rpm build name
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47611
- Original Message -
On 11/28/2013 12:42 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
I hope I covered all the important points. Basically, we can make this work
in a way acceptable for upstream, if we package setupttols and pip as
wheels. It'll require some extra effort, but I think it's worth it.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/57/
---
Review request for blockerbugs.
Bugs: 438
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/57/
---
(Updated Dec. 10, 2013, 3:54 p.m.)
Review request for blockerbugs.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/58/#review119
---
Ship it!
This looks good to me. It bothers me that so many
72 matches
Mail list logo
