On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 07:18:12AM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> Compose started at Tue Feb 18 19:39:04 UTC 2014
>
> Broken deps for i386
> --
> [koji]
> koji-vm-1.8.0-2.fc20.noarch requires python-virtinst
Ping^2?
From what I
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Przemek Klosowski <
przemek.klosow...@nist.gov> wrote:
> On 11/12/2013 07:47 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
>
> 2) if you know that some machines change fingerprint and you *trust it*
> you can do:
>
> ~/.ssh/config:
> Host 192.168.1.1
> UserKnownHostsFile /dev/n
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '-MM-DD HH:MM UTC'
Links to all tickets below
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 02:23:02AM +0100, Sancho Lerena wrote:
> I submitted a package for review / looking for SPONSOR some weeks ago, but it
> stills waiting, is there anyone who want to help me with this package ?.
> Pandora FMS is a monitoring software, and this is the agent for Linux.
>
> h
On 01/15/2014 04:16 PM, Jan Staněk wrote:
What should one do if the SW he is trying to package produce only
unversioned *.so files? I'm currently trying to package LMDB [1] as
possible alternative for BerkeleyDB in Fedora, and the hand-written
makefile produce only liblmdb.so.
I'm trying to pers
- Original Message -
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
>
> To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
>
> or run:
> date -d '
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:27:41 -0600
Jon wrote:
> Propose the unit file be packaged.
>
> * Releng does not want this in fedora-release.
Not true, just not convinced its the best place for it. If it turns out
it really is the best place then I will gla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 13:30:46 +0530
Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 07:18:12AM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> > Compose started at Tue Feb 18 19:39:04 UTC 2014
> >
> > Broken deps for i386
> > ---
- Original Message -
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:27:41 -0600
> Jon wrote:
>
> > Propose the unit file be packaged.
> >
> > * Releng does not want this in fedora-release.
> Not true, just not convinced its the best place for it. If it turn
Hi All,
I have submitted a package for a bioinformatics tool - autodocksuite for
review.
Can someone please review the package for inclusion in Fedora?
Here is the review request -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067041
Thanks.
Regards,
Mukundan.
--
devel mailing list
devel@l
Tomas Mraz (tm...@redhat.com) said:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
>
> To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
>
> or run:
> date
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out if it makes sense to rename the cloud-utils
(sub-)package for EPEL7 and F21.
Upstream (Ubuntu) used to have a single package named cloud-utils which we
decided to split up into two packages, cloud-utils and
cloud-utils-growpart. The reason being that cloud-utils pulls
If upstream (in this case ubuntu) renamed it totally makes sense to
rename. As for the rpm implications I believe you:
1) notify the list package(s) renaming
2) add the appropriate Obsoletes tag in the new packages
That's it I think? someone else may want to weigh in tho.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at
On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 14:38 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 14 February 2014 21:43, Przemek Klosowski
> wrote:
> > If we are providing a next-generation UI for installing, to replace yum
>
> That's not what we're doing.
To expand a bit: insofar as Software - the tool we're discussing here,
an
On 02/19/2014 01:25 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
On 01/15/2014 04:16 PM, Jan Staněk wrote:
Looking around to some other projects (e.g. v8) people usually tend to
use version of the package to be soname version of the library. However,
I see some questions raised by that approach:
A pretty detailed
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
i think limiting to systemd is wrong. maybe the package should be
fedora-config- it could put other config snippets, or pull in
packages for the experience of the product.
Yes, we could potentially obsolete the NetworkManager-config-server
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> i think limiting to systemd is wrong. maybe the package should be
> fedora-config- it could put other config snippets, or pull in packages
> for the experience of the product.
>
> 1
On Wed, 19.02.14 18:31, Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >
> >i think limiting to systemd is wrong. maybe the package should be
> >fedora-config- it could put other config snippets, or pull in
> >packages for the experience of th
On 19 February 2014 18:16, Adam Williamson wrote:
> For those
> who really want a GUI package installer, the old gpk is still available
> in a not-installed-by-default package (though I assume Richard will
> eventually drop it), and yumex is always an option.
There are quite a few distros that ha
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
I think it's perfectly fine to have them conflict.
You didn't reply to the part of my mail where I was describing the
"Workstation on a Server" case. Are you saying that you do not believe
this case is valid? Or that such users would
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>
> I think it's perfectly fine to have them conflict.
>
> You didn't reply to the part of my mail where I was describing the
> "Workstation on a Server" case.
>
Sorry, i read that as
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 03:33:43PM -0800, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
> https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47700
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47700/0001-Ticket-47700-Unresolved-external-symbol-references-b.2.patch
> git patch file (master, take2) -- Using ld option "-z defs", cleane
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2014-02-20 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2014-02-20 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST
2014-02-20 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EST
2014-02-20 1
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:12:38PM -0500, James Antill wrote:
> #topic #382 Go Packaging Guidelines Draft
> .fpc 382
> https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/382
I won't be around at the time of the meeting -- I don't know if I'm needed,
or if some of the other people with interest in Go can show
As far as two (or more) fedora-presets' being installed at once, I
would say we allow the user to resolve the problem via .rpmnew
The implication is "users would have to pick a -config/-preset package
and then e.g. adjust things"
This only works if the preset file has the same name across all the
On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 15:12 -0600, Jon wrote:
> As far as two (or more) fedora-presets' being installed at once, I
> would say we allow the user to resolve the problem via .rpmnew
>
> The implication is "users would have to pick a -config/-preset package
> and then e.g. adjust things"
>
> This on
Hi,
Sorry I'm little busy right now, to detail much but I submit the same
build twice, one ended in arm builder and fails the other ended in
buildvm-26.phx2 and don't failed, so I though this much be reported ...
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6549489
http://koji.fedorapr
On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 18:03 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 15:12 -0600, Jon wrote:
> > As far as two (or more) fedora-presets' being installed at once, I
> > would say we allow the user to resolve the problem via .rpmnew
> >
> > The implication is "users would have to pick a -con
On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 19:27 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/19/2014 01:25 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
> > On 01/15/2014 04:16 PM, Jan Staněk wrote:
>
> > Looking around to some other projects (e.g. v8) people usually tend to
> > use version of the package to be soname version of the library. Howev
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 19:27 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On 02/19/2014 01:25 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
> > > On 01/15/2014 04:16 PM, Jan Staněk wrote:
> >
> > > Looking around to some other projects (e.g. v8) people usually tend to
> > > u
Something seems to be wrong with 'fedpkg new-sources' here. :-(
% fedpkg new-sources libuv-v0.10.25.tar.gz
Uploading: 329a61fa3c30acf46efef1a9221b2054 libuv-v0.10.25.tar.gz
Could not execute new_sources: Lookaside failure: (60, "Peer's
certificate issuer has been marked as not trusted by the use
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 20:35:22 -0700
"T.C. Hollingsworth" wrote:
> Something seems to be wrong with 'fedpkg new-sources' here. :-(
>
> % fedpkg new-sources libuv-v0.10.25.tar.gz
> Uploading: 329a61fa3c30acf46efef1a9221b2054 libuv-v0.10.25.tar.gz
> Could not execute new_sources: Lookaside failure
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:26:06PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> Sorry I'm little busy right now, to detail much but I submit the same
> build twice, one ended in arm builder and fails the other ended in
> buildvm-26.phx2 and don't failed, so I though this much be reported ...
>
>
> http:/
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I've seen this a few times and it was something wacky in ~/.pki/
>
> can you try a 'mv ~/.pki ~/.pki.sav' and see if it works?
That did the trick. Thanks for the _very_ quick help. :-)
-T.C.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:40:41PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > Sorry I'm little busy right now, to detail much but I submit the same
> > build twice, one ended in arm builder and fails the other ended in
> > buildvm-26.phx2 and don't failed, so I though this much be reported ...
> >
> >
> >
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Dave Johansen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 08:06:53 -0700
>> Dave Johansen wrote:
>>
>> > I'm trying to build qt-creator 3.0.1 for EL6 and have suc
On Qua, 2014-02-19 at 23:45 -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:40:41PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > > Sorry I'm little busy right now, to detail much but I submit the same
> > > build twice, one ended in arm builder and fails the other ended in
> > > buildvm-26.phx2 and do
37 matches
Mail list logo
