On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote:
There are many broken redirect links, please fix asap.
There's a trac instance on the project page to report bugs
https://fedorahosted.org/pkgdb2/
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 05/16/2014 07:16 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 05/15/2014 06:30 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 05/15/2014 06:14 PM, Michael Simacek wrote:
I've updated log4j in rawhide today.
The packages that are known to be broken by this update are:
Have you rebuilt axis and slf4j? They take classes
On 05/16/2014 09:10 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 05/16/2014 07:16 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 05/15/2014 06:30 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 05/15/2014 06:14 PM, Michael Simacek wrote:
I've updated log4j in rawhide today.
The packages that are known to be broken by this update are:
Have
I intend to retire rubygem-virt-p2v, which was a tool for
converting physical machines to virtual machines.
It is obsolete, replaced by a newly rewritten virt-p2v tool
which is part of libguestfs and will be available in Rawhide soon.
Note that 'fedpkg retire' happens to be broken at the moment
On Thu, 15 May 2014 13:06:59 -0300
Henrique Junior henrique...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I was taking a look at Fedora Package DB and saw that some very
important computational chemistry softwares (ghemical, mopac, mpqcare... )
marked as orphaned in F20, is that correct?
As a chemist I'm very
On Thursday, May 15, 2014, 8:28:33 PM, I wrote:
Has anyone else noticed problems with the Fedora mailing lists today?
As of last night, I am not getting copied on my posts, but can see
them at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ppc/2014-May/date.html
I tried checking my mail
Are they permitted, and do they work?
Specifically I need to install all the Xorg drivers (since I don't
know what hardware will be installed on the target machine), thus:
Requires: xorg-x11-drv-*
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Dne 15.5.2014 22:49, T.C. Hollingsworth napsal(a):
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
This is usefully detailed, but it’s not always clear what parts need to be
done by “other developers” (to use the template wording), particularly the
two “will need to be
On 16/05/14 11:28, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Are they permitted, and do they work?
Specifically I need to install all the Xorg drivers (since I don't
know what hardware will be installed on the target machine), thus:
Requires: xorg-x11-drv-*
I'm not sure if they work but I think a
2014-05-16 6:23 GMT-03:00 Susi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org:
On Thu, 15 May 2014 13:06:59 -0300
Henrique Junior henrique...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I was taking a look at Fedora Package DB and saw that some very
important computational chemistry softwares (ghemical, mopac,
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:09:33PM +0100, Andrew Price wrote:
On 16/05/14 11:28, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Are they permitted, and do they work?
Specifically I need to install all the Xorg drivers (since I don't
know what hardware will be installed on the target machine), thus:
On 16 May 2014 00:53, Henrique Junior henrique...@gmail.com wrote:
Too bad I don't have the time to be a packager anymore...
If anyone does pick this up, ghemical needs an AppData file:
https://github.com/hughsie/createrepo_as_logs/blob/master/ghemical/ghemical-2.99.2-24.fc20.log
Richard
--
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:51:24AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
After more than 15 months in development, today we deployed pkgdb2
into production at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/
pkgdb is the application that manages package metadata for Fedora, including
commit access for
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
It seems it is not possible to request commit access in a single
branch? It's all or nothing now?
The UI is not very clear...
Click on Manage the committers to request a single branch.
I made the mistake of clicking Request Commit Access and this automatically
On Fri, 16 May 2014 06:08:29 -0400
Al Dunsmuir al.dunsm...@sympatico.ca wrote:
On Thursday, May 15, 2014, 8:28:33 PM, I wrote:
Has anyone else noticed problems with the Fedora mailing lists
today?
As of last night, I am not getting copied on my posts, but can see
them at
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
After more than 15 months in development, today we deployed pkgdb2
into production at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/
Fedora Package Database -- Version 1.6
Shouldn't this read 2.0 or something?
--
devel
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 05:15:52PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
After more than 15 months in development, today we deployed pkgdb2
into production at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/
Fedora Package Database -- Version 1.6
Shouldn't this read 2.0 or something?
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 05:15:52PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
After more than 15 months in development, today we deployed pkgdb2
into production at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/
Quick summary:
- On topic of merge reviews, no big news so far, still in progress.
jreznik mentioned to potentially use this as a template for Ruby
software collections in the future
- pknirsch mentioned in the open floor section that we might get some
more helping hands to help on rel-eng
On Fri, 16 May 2014 08:26:23 -0300
Henrique Junior henrique...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-05-16 6:23 GMT-03:00 Susi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org:
Computational chemistry is by no means dead. There are big packages
available for real calculations, e.g. NWChem and PSI4 are available in
Dear all,
Here is some information regarding the consequences of deploying pkgdb2:
* The first and most annoying one is that PkgDB2 having a new API, it needs
a new packagedb-cli [1] which is necessary to have `fedpkg retire` working.
There is already a bug opened for it [2] but the solution is
On Fri, 16 May 2014 11:28:20 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Are they permitted, and do they work?
Specifically I need to install all the Xorg drivers (since I don't
know what hardware will be installed on the target machine), thus:
Requires: xorg-x11-drv-*
That doesn't work.
On 05/16/2014 06:24 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Dear all,
* Finally, the form used in bugzilla to do SCM requests has been updated and
now asks for the `Upstream URL`
Why? What is this supposed to be useful for?
AFAIS,
- this pkgdb-URL is redundant to the contents of the RPM
= This
On Fri, 16 May 2014 18:51:47 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 11:28:20 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Are they permitted, and do they work?
Specifically I need to install all the Xorg drivers (since I don't
know what hardware will be installed on the target
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 18:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 09:56 -0400, James Antill wrote:
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 10:42 +0300, Marius A wrote:
Wow, this is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks!
On Fedora 21, any way to apply these before installing to SDD from
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 22:58 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 22:55:21 +0200,
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
This would make sense for non cloud images as well. Is there any
reason why we have to
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 14:52 -0400, James Antill wrote:
yum fs refilter
...the former alters all the yumdb.ts_install_langs and
yumdb.tsflag_nodocs flags for the installed packages (without having to
do an actual reinstall), so that those packages are marked as having
their docs/langs
Hi,
recently I have installed rstudio in my machine to see how it works, it
insists to install two packages rstudio and another.
I found then later that R created a directory called R in my home directory. I
find that behavior annoying to have a program installing a directory right in
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
755
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
209
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
89
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
755
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
102
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0440/fwsnort-1.6.4-1.el6
87
I'd like to prune the git repo for libtaskotron. This would include
removing the remote branches for:
origin/feature/T46-bodhi-comment-directive
origin/feature/T47-bodhi-download
origin/feature/T79-upgradepath
origin/feature/T97-CheckDetail-TAP
origin/feature/config
I'm
On Mon, 12 May 2014 08:12:48 -0600
Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
We're _finally_ getting close to an initial release of Taskotron.
It's not quite all of phase 1 and there are certainly things that
still need to be finished but from an initial functionality
standpoint, we're getting close
# Fedora QA Devel Meeting
# Date: 2014-05-19
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Now that Taskotron 0.1 has been released, it's time to start planning
for 0.2 so let's do a meeting right after the Fedora QA
33 matches
Mail list logo
