Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

2014-06-24 Thread Ian Malone
On 23 June 2014 23:54, Gerald B. Cox gb...@bzb.us wrote: First of all thank you for your reasoned response. I simply disagree. I understand the fact about require bugs, and the tons of dependent packages. I've seen that also when I've tried to remove a package and noticed it had a myriad of

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

2014-06-24 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 24.06.2014 00:54, schrieb Gerald B. Cox: Regarding your kernel comment, I've been using Fedora since Redhat 6.2 and DNF since it first came out and I've never encountered this. When I update the kernel, it leaves the prior two on my system for rollback, so I have no idea what you're

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

2014-06-24 Thread Thomas Bendler
2014-06-23 17:51 GMT+02:00 Gerald B. Cox gb...@bzb.us: This has got to be the silliest thing I've ever seen, but whatever. You enter the command dnf remove dnf, and guess what? It removes dnf. You enter the command dnf remove kernel, and guess what, it removes the kernel. What a

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

2014-06-24 Thread Richard Hughes
On 24 June 2014 10:31, Thomas Bendler m...@bendler-net.de wrote: you need to unlock the gun before you can shoot in your foot... ...and modern systems ask you up to four, five times How many different locks does a gun have? Last time I checked there was one safety catch -- DNF asks you for

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

2014-06-24 Thread Thomas Bendler
2014-06-24 11:36 GMT+02:00 Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com: On 24 June 2014 10:31, Thomas Bendler m...@bendler-net.de wrote: you need to unlock the gun before you can shoot in your foot... ...and modern systems ask you up to four, five times How many different locks does a gun have?

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

2014-06-24 Thread Jon Kent
Been reading this for a while and I'm getting annoyed by the 'you should know what you are doing' mob. There can be no reason not to have safe guards in dnf to save you from the oh sh#t moments. Everyone has those at some time and those who are learning Linux need these guards to avoid them

Non-responsive maintainer: Hubert Plociniczak (fas: hubert)

2014-06-24 Thread Peter Lemenkov
Hello All! As fas as we know Hubert quit Fedora for a very long time (said in his private email). So it's time to change a poit of contact for the only package Hubert maintained - RabbitMQ server. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rabbitmq-server/ I propose myself (FAS name: peter)

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

2014-06-24 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 24.06.2014 11:36, schrieb Richard Hughes: On 24 June 2014 10:31, Thomas Bendler m...@bendler-net.de wrote: you need to unlock the gun before you can shoot in your foot... ...and modern systems ask you up to four, five times How many different locks does a gun have? Last time I checked

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Hubert Plociniczak (fas: hubert)

2014-06-24 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 01:50:31PM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote: Hello All! As fas as we know Hubert quit Fedora for a very long time (said in his private email). So it's time to change a poit of contact for the only package Hubert maintained - RabbitMQ server.

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

2014-06-24 Thread Thomas Bendler
2014-06-24 11:40 GMT+02:00 Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com: On 06/24/2014 11:31 AM, Thomas Bendler wrote: ​Hopefully you don't write professional software with this kind of attitude. Please don't try to win arguments by labeling the opposition as incompetent. You won't convince anyone,

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

2014-06-24 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 24.06.2014 11:40, schrieb Florian Weimer: On 06/24/2014 11:31 AM, Thomas Bendler wrote: ​Hopefully you don't write professional software with this kind of attitude. Please don't try to win arguments by labeling the opposition as incompetent. You won't convince anyone, and it

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

2014-06-24 Thread Dridi Boukelmoune
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Jon Kent jon.k...@gmail.com wrote: Been reading this for a while and I'm getting annoyed by the 'you should know what you are doing' mob. There can be no reason not to have safe guards in dnf to save you from the oh sh#t moments. Everyone has those at some time

OCaml 4.02 in Fedora 21(?)

2014-06-24 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I'm in two minds about whether to add OCaml 4.02 to Fedora 21: - The only significant change that we care about is full AArch64 support. Currently Fedora 21 uses an AArch64 backend that I hastily backported from upstream before the upstream backend was completely finished (which, to

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

2014-06-24 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 24.06.2014 12:05, schrieb Dridi Boukelmoune: Because I totally agree with you and IIRC this kind of stuff has been added over time in yum. Also IMHO some of those features are very fedora/el specific, and allows yum to work only on fedora and downstream distros. Yum expects the kernel rpm

Re: PostgreSQL systemd config scheme change

2014-06-24 Thread Pavel Raiskup
OT Argh, it is quite painful to keep all CC's in loop :(. I suppose that something is broken with this list. Both of email replies missed my MAILBOX and both have trimmed CC lists. Trying to reattach but not giving it a big chance. /OT - Original Message - From: Florian Weimer

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

2014-06-24 Thread Steve Clark
On 06/23/2014 06:54 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: First of all thank you for your reasoned response. I simply disagree. I understand the fact about require bugs, and the tons of dependent packages. I've seen that also when I've tried to remove a package and noticed it had a myriad of dependencies

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

2014-06-24 Thread Ian Malone
On 24 June 2014 11:03, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 24.06.2014 11:40, schrieb Florian Weimer: On 06/24/2014 11:31 AM, Thomas Bendler wrote: Hopefully you don't write professional software with this kind of attitude. Please don't try to win arguments by labeling the

Fedora 21 Changes Freeze in two weeks - 2014-07-08

2014-06-24 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
Greetings! Fedora 21 Changes Freeze is currently scheduled to no earlier than 2014-07-08 [1] and we're getting closer to this date. Btw this is also Fedora 21 Branch from Rawhide date. At this point, all accepted changes should be substantially complete, and testable. Additionally, if a change is

Re: Orphaning or Retiring SOAPpy

2014-06-24 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 04:13:39PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: Hi, I am wondering if someone is interested in picking up the maintainance of SOAPpy in Fedora. The upstream we were following [1] is dead for a while. There are some forks that seems to be moving forward but one would

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

2014-06-24 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 24.06.2014 12:56, schrieb Ian Malone: On 24 June 2014 11:03, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 24.06.2014 11:40, schrieb Florian Weimer: On 06/24/2014 11:31 AM, Thomas Bendler wrote: Hopefully you don't write professional software with this kind of attitude. Please don't

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

2014-06-24 Thread Nils Philippsen
On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 11:45 +0200, Thomas Bendler wrote: 2014-06-24 11:36 GMT+02:00 Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com: On 24 June 2014 10:31, Thomas Bendler m...@bendler-net.de wrote: you need to unlock the gun before you can shoot in your foot...

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

2014-06-24 Thread Sergio Pascual
2014-06-24 14:25 GMT+02:00 Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com: On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 11:45 +0200, Thomas Bendler wrote: 2014-06-24 11:36 GMT+02:00 Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com: On 24 June 2014 10:31, Thomas Bendler m...@bendler-net.de wrote: you need to unlock

Warning on DNF discussion: let's talk like grown-ups

2014-06-24 Thread Matthew Miller
This is a reminder of the Fedora Code of Conduct, linked at the bottom of every message. See https://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct if you've missed it. It's _abundantly_ clear that there are two sides of this issue which can be taken by reasonable people. Please refrain from disparaging the

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

2014-06-24 Thread jeandet
Le mardi 24 juin 2014 à 14:43 +0200, Sergio Pascual a écrit : 2014-06-24 14:25 GMT+02:00 Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com: On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 11:45 +0200, Thomas Bendler wrote: 2014-06-24 11:36 GMT+02:00 Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com: On

Env and Stack WG - two free seats

2014-06-24 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
Debi and Toshio resigned, because they have other duties. Thanks for their time and work in Working Group. I guess Env and Stacks WG would be a good place for Atomic and Docker. We are missing members with such knowledge, also there are no representatives of QA or releng. It would be great if

Meeting minutes for Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2014-06-24)

2014-06-24 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
#fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2014-06-24) Meeting started by mmaslano at 12:04:47 UTC. The full logs are available at

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

2014-06-24 Thread Ian Malone
On 24 June 2014 12:51, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 24.06.2014 12:56, schrieb Ian Malone: On 24 June 2014 11:03, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 24.06.2014 11:40, schrieb Florian Weimer: On 06/24/2014 11:31 AM, Thomas Bendler wrote: Hopefully you don't

yum install kernel = 11 Packages dnf install kernel = Nothing to do

2014-06-24 Thread poma
One exemplary example of how to or how to not to. # yum clean all Loaded plugins: langpacks Cleaning repos: rawhide Cleaning up everything # yum --enablerepo \* clean all Loaded plugins: langpacks Cleaning repos: fedora fedora-debuginfo fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug

[RFE/ENH] A network bandwidth monitor plugin for NetworkManager

2014-06-24 Thread poma
We’ll Build A Dream House Of Net - by Dan Williams http://blogs.gnome.org/dcbw/2014/06/20/well-build-a-dream-house-of-net/ Geez, are we done yet? Not even close! Seriously, there’s more but I’m kinda tired of typing. Try it out (the final release will be

Re: Comps change proposal: NetworkManager subpackages

2014-06-24 Thread Dan Winship
On 06/20/2014 08:25 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: AIUI, the split in NM split off: * wifi support into NetworkManager-wifi * bluetooth (DUN and PAN? didn't one get dropped? i forget) connection support into NetworkManager-bluetooth * cellular modem support into NetworkManager-wwan *

Re: delta repo data - FTL

2014-06-24 Thread Jonathan Dieter
On 06/24/2014 03:23 PM, Tomas Mlcoch wrote: Hi poma, the short answer is no. The idea (to have deltas between two repodata) and purpose (be able to gen and apply such deltas) is the same, but the used techniques and ideas are different. snip So, what will it take to get this into Fedora?

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

2014-06-24 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 06/23/2014 07:35 PM, Mattia Verga wrote: If yum history showed that a protection for critical packages is useful and appreciated by the majority, why the yum replacement shouldn't implement that protection saying it's unuseful? I'd go into a different direction: The fact, yum had such a

Comps change for OpenJDK 8

2014-06-24 Thread Omair Majid
Hi, With the Java 8 Change [0] that promotes java-1.8.0-openjdk to the default Java runtime, I am going to be retiring java-1.7.0-openjdk shortly. I need to make a change to comps to make sure that it does not try and pull in java-1.7.0-openjdk. Patch is attached. It was reviewed on IRC by

Re: [RFE/ENH] A network bandwidth monitor plugin for NetworkManager

2014-06-24 Thread Dan Williams
On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 08:57 +0200, poma wrote: We’ll Build A Dream House Of Net - by Dan Williams http://blogs.gnome.org/dcbw/2014/06/20/well-build-a-dream-house-of-net/ Geez, are we done yet? Not even close! Seriously, there’s more but I’m kinda tired of

Re: Comps change for OpenJDK 8

2014-06-24 Thread Aleksandar Kurtakov
In the commit I see java-1.5.0-gcj, you might want to drop it now that gcc-java is no longer built. Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse team - Original Message - From: Omair Majid oma...@redhat.com To: fedora-devel devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 8:58:46 PM

Re: Comps change for OpenJDK 8

2014-06-24 Thread Omair Majid
* Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com [2014-06-24 14:36]: In the commit I see java-1.5.0-gcj, you might want to drop it now that gcc-java is no longer built. Done. This was accidentally overlooked when java-1.5.0-gcj was retired. Thanks, Omair -- PGP Key: 66484681 (http://pgp.mit.edu/)

Spins-kickstarts change for OpenJDK 8

2014-06-24 Thread Omair Majid
Hi, * Omair Majid oma...@redhat.com [2014-06-24 14:31]: With the Java 8 Change [0] that promotes java-1.8.0-openjdk to the default Java runtime, I am going to be retiring java-1.7.0-openjdk shortly. And this patch, for spins-kickstarts, removes all mention of java-1.7.0-openjdk from the

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

2014-06-24 Thread Andre Robatino
Gerald B. Cox gbcox at bzb.us writes: Sigh A gun doesn't require you to go into root mode before using it; and it doesn't ask you if you are sure before you pull the trigger.  dnf requires root mode _every_ time you use it. Same for asking if you're sure (unless the -y option is used). Any

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

2014-06-24 Thread Andre Robatino
Gerald B. Cox gbcox at bzb.us writes: I also cringe when I see the -y or --assumeyes option mentioned.  IMO that is just inviting disaster. I'm surprised no one is demanding that be removed.  It is dangerous. Someone might need to use yum or dnf in a script. Personally, that's the _only_ time

Re: dnf even allows to uninstall RPM and systemd without warnings

2014-06-24 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 08:16:08PM +, Andre Robatino wrote: I also cringe when I see the -y or --assumeyes option mentioned.  IMO that is just inviting disaster. I'm surprised no one is demanding that be removed.  It is dangerous. Someone might need to use yum or dnf in a script.

[ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

2014-06-24 Thread Till Maas
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

2014-06-24 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2014-06-24 15:12, Till Maas wrote: The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone adopts them. I have posted patches for a few of these (some before I realized they were orphaned), should anyone want

Re: OCaml 4.02 in Fedora 21(?)

2014-06-24 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:08:15AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: I'm in two minds about whether to add OCaml 4.02 to Fedora 21: - The only significant change that we care about is full AArch64 support. Currently Fedora 21 uses an AArch64 backend that I hastily backported from

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

2014-06-24 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:12:11PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: Depending on: jbosscache-support hibernate3 (maintained by: gil, jhernand, msrb) hibernate3-3.6.10-14.fc21.src requires jbosscache-common-parent = 1.6-8.fc21

Re: DNF: why does it refresh metadata all the time

2014-06-24 Thread White, Langdon
On Jun 21, 2014 12:26 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: what you or i prefer don't matter Sure it does. Otherwise you would not insist that your perspective is the only right one and everyone else who has a different

Re: comps categories: are they any use to anyone any more?

2014-06-24 Thread Kevin Kofler
Bill Nottingham wrote: Check the post-install tools; I believe at least one of apper or yumex still uses them. Apper also uses those categories, so they both do. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

2014-06-24 Thread Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich
Package(co)maintainers === NearTree tmatsuu The following packages require above mentioned packages: Depending on: NearTree rasmol (maintained by:

Re: Fedora 21 Changes Freeze in two weeks - 2014-07-08

2014-06-24 Thread Dave Johansen
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote: Greetings! Fedora 21 Changes Freeze is currently scheduled to no earlier than 2014-07-08 [1] and we're getting closer to this date. Btw this is also Fedora 21 Branch from Rawhide date. At this point, all accepted

setterm syntax changed

2014-06-24 Thread Felix Miata
Was there good reason to change it? For well over a decade across all distros I've used, I've included this line in root's .bashrc, always: setterm -foreground white -bold -background blue -blank 59 -store The current man page has changed to require -- where - was sufficient

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

2014-06-24 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:31:18AM +0700, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote: Package(co)maintainers === NearTree tmatsuu The following packages require above

Self Introduction: David Nichols

2014-06-24 Thread David Nichols
Hello, My name is David Nichols, and I'm the author of the Qore programming language. I've recently made a package submission request to Fedora for Qore, which is under review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691 I've been running fedora (and before that redhat) for many

EPEL epel beta report: 20140624 changes

2014-06-24 Thread EPEL Beta Report
Compose started at Tue Jun 24 08:15:02 UTC 2014 New package: florence-0.6.2-1.el7 Extensible scalable on-screen virtual keyboard for GNOME New package: perl-File-NFSLock-1.21-10.el7 Perl module to do NFS (or not) locking New package: pysubnettree-0.23-3.el7

EPEL clamav for el7

2014-06-24 Thread Andreas . Reschke
Hi there, I want to setup a test installation for the next CentOS7. But I can't find any clamav at the epel beta for el7. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards Mr. Andreas Reschke MAHLE International GmbH Unix/Linux-Administration (FIG51) Pragstr. 26 - 46, 70376 Stuttgart, Germany Phone: +49

EPEL Fedora 6 updates-testing report

2014-06-24 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 793 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6 140 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0440/fwsnort-1.6.4-1.el6 125

EPEL Fedora 5 updates-testing report

2014-06-24 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 793 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5 248 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5 128

[Bug 1112553] New: perl-Cache-Cache-1.06-15.fc21 FTBFS on loaded machine: t/5_test_size_aware_file_cache.t is time sensitive

2014-06-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112553 Bug ID: 1112553 Summary: perl-Cache-Cache-1.06-15.fc21 FTBFS on loaded machine: t/5_test_size_aware_file_cache.t is time sensitive Product: Fedora Version: rawhide

[Bug 1104721] perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-RateLimit-1.0-10.fc21 FTBS: t/03complex.t fails randomly

2014-06-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104721 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- It still fails sometimes. Probably there is another race. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug

[Bug 1112571] New: perl-Gtk3-WebKit-0.06-2.fc21 FTBFS:

2014-06-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112571 Bug ID: 1112571 Summary: perl-Gtk3-WebKit-0.06-2.fc21 FTBFS: Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Gtk3-WebKit Assignee: dd...@cpan.org Reporter:

[Bug 1112571] perl-Gtk3-WebKit-0.06-2.fc21 FTBFS:

2014-06-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112571 David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1

[Bug 1112609] New: perl-PPI-Tester-0.15-3.fc21 FTBFS: %check phase fails because of Xvfb

2014-06-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112609 Bug ID: 1112609 Summary: perl-PPI-Tester-0.15-3.fc21 FTBFS: %check phase fails because of Xvfb Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-PPI-Tester

[Bug 1092963] perl-Gtk2-1.2491 is available

2014-06-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092963 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1105167] perl-Filter-1.50 is available

2014-06-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105167 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Filter-1.50-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1105167] perl-Filter-1.50 is available

2014-06-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105167 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Filter-1.50-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1112890] New: EL7 build needed to satisfy Publican 4.1 build.

2014-06-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112890 Bug ID: 1112890 Summary: EL7 build needed to satisfy Publican 4.1 build. Product: Fedora Version: 19 Component: perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom Assignee: r.landm...@redhat.com

[Bug 1112891] New: EL7 build needed to satisfy Publican 4.1 build.

2014-06-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112891 Bug ID: 1112891 Summary: EL7 build needed to satisfy Publican 4.1 build. Product: Fedora Version: 19 Component: perl-Locale-Msgfmt Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter:

[Bug 1112892] New: EL7 build needed to satisfy Publican 4.1 build (on EL7)

2014-06-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112892 Bug ID: 1112892 Summary: EL7 build needed to satisfy Publican 4.1 build (on EL7) Product: Fedora Version: 19 Component: perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon Assignee:

[Bug 1112891] EL7 build needed to satisfy Publican 4.1 build.

2014-06-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112891 --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com --- I don't have time to maintain this package for EPEL 7. If you want to do that, you're welcome. I can request the branches for you if you send me you FAS login. -- You are receiving

Fedora 21 Changes Freeze in two weeks - 2014-07-08

2014-06-24 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
Greetings! Fedora 21 Changes Freeze is currently scheduled to no earlier than 2014-07-08 [1] and we're getting closer to this date. Btw this is also Fedora 21 Branch from Rawhide date. At this point, all accepted changes should be substantially complete, and testable. Additionally, if a change is

[ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

2014-06-24 Thread Till Maas
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: