On 07/06/2014 07:10 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
So, the question is: Is it worth signing my own kernel?
Only if you keep your own key on a sufficiently separated machine,
otherwise it's equivalent to disabling Secure Boot anyway.
It's also not clear if the Virtualbox kernel modules themselves
Dne 1.7.2014 19:17, Rex Dieter napsal(a):
KDE SIG has been discussing moving forward with another kde x.y+1 update for
Fedora 20, largely due to it's extended lifetime (and f21's delayed
release), extending the same rationale per
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Update_policy
There have
On Fri, 04 Jul 2014 18:01:00 +0200, David Howells wrote:
I'm seeing this message:
extracting debug info from
/home/dhowells/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/cross-gcc-4.9.0-2.fc21.x86_64/usr/lib/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/4.9.0/libcloog-isl.so.4
/usr/lib/rpm/debugedit: -b arg has to be either the same length as
Hi Kevin,
Not impossible, but we would probibly want it running inside Fedora
Infrastructure and need to be careful security wise.
That is also a part of our design.
Kind regards,
-- Jan Pacner
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi everyone!
It's time to summarize where we are with Fedora 21 release as we're now
really close to all that release fun. Tomorrow, on 2014-07-08 we will
branch Fedora 21 from rawhide, according to the schedule [1].
* If there is anything blocking you/your product or if there's potential
risk of
On Friday 04 of July 2014 00:09:03 Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 23.06.14 16:23, Pavel Raiskup (prais...@redhat.com) wrote:
$ cat /etc/postgresql/postgresql@com_example
PGDATA=/some/path/pg/com_example
PGPORT=@SOMEPORT@
$ systemctl start postgresql@com_example
Would you
Dne 27.6.2014 18:34, Juan Orti Alcaine napsal(a):
El Sábado, 28 de junio de 2014 00:31:26 Christopher Meng escribió:
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
He is or was a Red Hat employee.
No.
Please use this email address:
(...)
Thank you.
Hi Juan,
Have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/04/2014 07:36 AM, Thomas Woerner wrote:
On 07/03/2014 09:32 PM, Stef Walter wrote:
On 03.07.2014 15:39, Rex Dieter wrote:
I'm looking into providing a predefined firewalld service
definition for kde-connect, per
On 07/01/2014 11:31 AM, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
Env and Stacks Working Group has noble plan to make development in
Fedora easier and also work with new technologies, which are not in
Fedora yet.
The whole statement can be found here:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/03/2014 05:47 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:14:52PM +0200, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
In a sense, there's a certain amount of this definition that
every Fedora install will have. The Products then add to this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/06/2014 03:43 AM, William wrote:
On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 10:05 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Stephen Gallagher
sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 07/03/2014 01:42 AM,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116612
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 10:32:25AM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Fri, 04 Jul 2014 18:01:00 +0200, David Howells wrote:
I'm seeing this message:
extracting debug info from
/home/dhowells/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/cross-gcc-4.9.0-2.fc21.x86_64/usr/lib/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/4.9.0/libcloog-isl.so.4
On Mon, 07.07.14 14:48, Pavel Raiskup (prais...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Friday 04 of July 2014 00:09:03 Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 23.06.14 16:23, Pavel Raiskup (prais...@redhat.com) wrote:
$ cat /etc/postgresql/postgresql@com_example
PGDATA=/some/path/pg/com_example
On even weeks WG meeting will be at 12:00 UTC, 14:00 Central Europe,
8:00 (noon) Boston, 5:00 San Francisco, 21:00 Tokyo in #fedora-meeting
on Freenode.
= Topics =
* new members, two free seats
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks
* Docker plans
* Tasklist
*
On Monday 07 of July 2014 15:57:30 Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 07.07.14 14:48, Pavel Raiskup (prais...@redhat.com) wrote:
I'd always advise against inventing addition configuration files that
are neither the daemons own, nor systemd's.
I hope we can call this as a systemd's
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a reference to a clustering group inside the servers
category in comps-f21.xml.in, but no definition of clustering
anywhere that I can see. Also:
[comps]$ make validate
...
comps-f21.xml:46: element
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/06/2014 03:43 AM, William wrote:
On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 10:05 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Stephen Gallagher
sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
7 packages were orphaned
eclipse-p2-discovery [f19, f20] was orphaned by kdaniel
Equinox p2 discovery
On Mon, 07.07.14 17:07, Pavel Raiskup (prais...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Monday 07 of July 2014 15:57:30 Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 07.07.14 14:48, Pavel Raiskup (prais...@redhat.com) wrote:
I'd always advise against inventing addition configuration files that
are neither the
On 07/07/2014 02:55 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/04/2014 07:36 AM, Thomas Woerner wrote:
On 07/03/2014 09:32 PM, Stef Walter wrote:
On 03.07.2014 15:39, Rex Dieter wrote:
I'm looking into providing a predefined firewalld service
definition
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/07/2014 01:03 PM, Thomas Woerner wrote:
On 07/07/2014 02:55 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On 07/04/2014
07:36 AM, Thomas Woerner wrote:
On 07/03/2014 09:32 PM, Stef Walter wrote:
On 03.07.2014 15:39, Rex Dieter wrote:
I'm looking into
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email
addresses in FAS). If they're not
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 04:26:07PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
* A script automating most of the process of validating and processing the
request can be found at
On 07.07.2014 20:58, Artifex Maximus wrote:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 04:26:07PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
* A script automating most of the process of validating and processing the
request can be found at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116601
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Artifex Maximus artife...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 04:26:07PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
* A script automating most of the process of validating and processing the
request
- Original Message -
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/06/2014 07:41 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 06.07.2014 13:38, drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 04:26:07PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
* A script automating most of
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 15:25:52 -0400 (EDT)
Tomas Hozza tho...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Jaromir was an intern at Red Hat and finished today.
I think it is OK if you remove his acls right away.
ok. I assume then he doesn't want to continue to maintain those
packages?
kevin
signature.asc
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:35:16PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Just as a quick aside, I'd like to note that what you've all just
witnessed is a perfect example of Open Source working exactly as it
should. A mistake was made and another eagle-eyed contributor spotted
it immediately.
Pat
Hey everyone! Thinking of running for FESCo but haven't made up your mind?
Now is the time -- the nomination period closes at 23:59:59 UTC today. (That
is, _very soon_.)
See https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2014-July/003219.html
for details, and add your nomination here:
On 07/07/2014 12:03 PM, Thomas Woerner wrote:
On 07/07/2014 02:55 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Thomas, the real question here is this: If a package wants to install
(and maintain) its own set of firewalld service definitions, is the
approach Stef took the best one? If so, we should submit a
Compose started at Mon Jul 7 08:15:02 UTC 2014
New package: python-trollius-0.4-1.el7
A port of the Tulip asyncio module to Python 2
Updated Packages:
mingw-qt5-qtbase-5.3.1-2.el7
* Sun Jul 06 2014 Erik van Pienbroek epien...@fedoraproject.org -
I failed to install xfig on RHEL7
epel-release-7-0.2.noarch
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
You'd better open a bug in the bugzilla under Fedora EPEL against the
relevant component if it is available in the EPEL6.
If not, open a bug under Fedora and request the epel7 branch.
Thanks.
___
epel-devel mailing list
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
806
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
261
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
141
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
806
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
153
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0440/fwsnort-1.6.4-1.el6
138
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110723
Murray McAllister mmcal...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|impact=low,public=20140618,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110723
Murray McAllister mmcal...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1116708
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116595
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116606
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116559
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116601
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-IO-Socket-Timeout-0.25-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-IO-Socket-Timeout-0.25-1.fc20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116596
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116601
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-IO-Socket-Timeout-0.25-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-IO-Socket-Timeout-0.25-1.el6
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116598
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116600
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This is a bug-fix release suitable for all Fedoras.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116600
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116600
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-IO-Socket-IP-0.30-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-IO-Socket-IP-0.30-1.fc20
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116600
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-IO-Socket-IP-0.30-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-IO-Socket-IP-0.30-1.fc19
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116603
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116603
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This is just a repackage from a different SCM.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116603
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116602
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116603
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-List-Compare-0.39-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-List-Compare-0.39-1.fc19
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116603
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-List-Compare-0.39-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-List-Compare-0.39-1.fc20
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116608
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This is a bug-fix release suitable for F≥20.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116609
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116608
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116608
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Storable-2.51-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Storable-2.51-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116611
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116611
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This bug-fix release is suitable for F≥20.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116611
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116612
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This is a mainly bug-fix release, however it changes API in list context.
Therefore this version will go into F21 only.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116611
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Text-TabularDisplay-1.37-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-TabularDisplay-1.37-1.fc20
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116612
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116883
Bug ID: 1116883
Summary: perl-Syntax-Keyword-Junction-0.003008 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Syntax-Keyword-Junction
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116884
Bug ID: 1116884
Summary: perl-Test-Class-0.46 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test-Class
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116884
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003
--- Comment #19 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com ---
Unpushed and deleted update for 'EL6' branch since it conflicts with the base
package `perl-Time-modules` (we overlooked this earlier).
See #1116852 for details.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116600
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116603
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116608
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116611
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029710
--- Comment #9 from Steve Tindall s10...@elrepo.org ---
Hum. This just gets stranger.
To summarize, my amavisd.conf used on your system correctly identifies and
blocks a zipped exe attachment, but fails to quarantine and send notification.
On
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47781
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47781/0001-Ticket-47781-Server-deadlock-if-online-import-starte.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47781
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47781/0001-Ticket-47781-Add-CI-test.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 00:18:25 -0600
Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
This has taken a bit longer than I wanted it to but we have a mostly
working taskotron dev instance at:
https://taskotron-dev.fedoraproject.org/
This is 100% deployed from infra's ansible repo but other than the
proxy
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 12:36:35 -0600
Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm taking taskotron-stg down to rebuild it using the new method that
we'll be using going forward.
I hope that this will only take a couple of hours, but we'll see :)
In the meantime, if you really want to see what
80 matches
Mail list logo
