EPEL Fedora 6 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 828 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6 175 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0440/fwsnort-1.6.4-1.el6 160 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0590/oath-toolkit-2.0.2-4.el6 69 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1471/chicken-4.8.0.6-2.el6 66 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1477/drupal7-views-3.8-1.el6 47 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1616/puppet-2.7.26-1.el6 38 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1693/perl-Email-Address-1.905-1.el6 32 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1745/mediawiki119-1.19.17-1.el6 13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1906/polarssl-1.3.2-2.el6 13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1913/ipython-0.13.2-5.el6 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1961/cobbler-2.6.3-1.el6 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1923/sdcc-3.2.0-1.el6 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1947/drupal6-6.32-1.el6 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1980/moodle-2.4.11-1.el6 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1940/phpMyAdmin-4.0.10.1-1.el6 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1999/exim-4.72-6.el6 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2045/ansible-1.6.10-1.el6 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2050/drupal7-7.30-1.el6 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing gfal2-2.6.8-1.el6 koji-1.9.0-4.el6 lnst-5-1.el6 nagios-plugins-bonding-1.4-3.el6 nagios-plugins-openmanage-3.7.12-1.el6 nsd-3.2.18-1.el6 perl-DBD-ODBC-1.50-2.el6 rubygem-settingslogic-2.0.9-3.el6 subnetcalc-2.3.1-1.el6 task-2.3.0-1.el6 Details about builds: gfal2-2.6.8-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2064) Grid file access library 2.0 Update Information: Update to gfal2 2.6.8 Release 2.5.5 of GFAL2 Release 2.5.5 of GFAL2 ChangeLog: * Mon Jul 28 2014 Alejandro Alvarez Ayllon aalvarez at cern.ch - 2.6.8-1 - Release 2.6.8 of GFAL2 * Sat Jun 7 2014 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 2.5.5-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild koji-1.9.0-4.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2056) Build system tools Update Information: add upstream patch to compress docker images update to upstream 1.9.0 ChangeLog: * Tue Jul 29 2014 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us - 1.9.0-4 - add upstream patch to compress docker images * Thu Jun 12 2014 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us - 1.9.0-3 - add patch to move builder workdir to /var/tmp - add support for making raw.xz images * Sun Jun 8 2014 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 1.9.0-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild * Mon Mar 24 2014 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us - 1.9.0-1 - update to upstream 1.9.0 References: [ 1 ] Bug #958499 - koji-vm should not be using python-virtinst code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958499 [ 2 ] Bug #995764 - koji-vm cannot be installed because of missing dependency on python-virtinst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995764 lnst-5-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2062) Common code for lnst-ctl and lnst-slave Update Information: update to version 5 ChangeLog: * Mon Jul 28 2014 Jiri Pirko jpi...@redhat.com - 5-1 - Updating to stable release 5 nagios-plugins-bonding-1.4-3.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2058) Nagios plugin to monitor Linux bonding interfaces
Re: HEADSUP: json-c SONAME BUMP
On 07/28/2014 10:40 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 28/07/2014 18:02, Miloslav Trmač ha scritto: No, that would completely defeat the point of the soname. If upstream won’t use sonames or symbol versioning, it’s better for Fedora to patch the software to use them properly, even if it means having to continue to patch it. IIRC we do have various packages that have to do this. In this particular case, maybe it's possible to add back the symbols so that the ABI is preserved. We need a soname bump and one point anyway to address the symbol collisions between json-c, json-glib, and jansson. The json-c/json-glib collisions actually materialize in existing binaries. Removing some symbols seems kind of unavoidable, but it is obviously best to bundle all this into a single soname bump. -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Self Introduction / Contributing a package to Fedora
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 09:27:12PM -0500, Derek Pressnall wrote:
The Fedora packaging process can be a bit tricky the first time
around; I'd recommend locating a member of the Fedora Sponsors who is
interested in helping you with your first package and showing you the
ropes.
Ok, where do I find a Sponsor? on this list, or is there another one? Or
is that the whole part where I have to submit the package, open up a bug
report, and reference that here? (I think that's what I got out of the
docs last time I went through it).
I bet, there are quite a few sponsors reading here.
You're right, it's the whole part with opening a bug etc. The process is
described at [1]. I suggest you to submit your spec for review.
To mark your bug as blocked by the lack of being sponsored, you should
add insert 177841 as a blocker for your bug. (Blocks field).
At least some sponsors are watching that NEEDSPONSOR bug (numbered
177841); they'll get an auto mail about a change.
A few remarks about your spec given at [2]:
- Source0 should be a valid URL (if possible)
- in files section, you should use %{_bindir} instead of /usr/bin
- the same applies to your install section
- and of course your changelog must contain entries
- insert real version numbers and release numbers to Version and Release
Once you did that, you might want to try rpmlint -i on your SPEC and
SRPM file. That will check for most common issues and will report them.
HTH,
Matthias
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
[2] https://github.com/derekp7/snebu/blob/master/snebu.spec
--
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: HEADSUP: json-c SONAME BUMP
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 09:43:14AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: TL;DR: Updates revoked, rawhide+f21 reverted to 0.12 without bump, deciding if we need to add epoch to revert back to 0.11. Thank you. I noticed, you're a bit quick in pushing updates to stable releases. When pushing to older branches, please keep our stable updates policy in mind [1]. Thanks, Matthias [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Stable_Releases -- Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Dracut, dmsquash, and overlays
You're not quite right about how the overlay works. The default in-memory overlay is just 512MB. And the device-mapper docs note that if it fills up the snapshot will become useless and be disabled, returning errors.[1]. You should also note that the overlay is a block-level snapshot - so any changes to existing files or filesystem metadata will cause data to be written to the overlay. Furthermore, the default chunk size is 4kb - so any change less than 4kb will take 4kb of space. After hitting a wall several times today, I began to see what you're talking about here. ;) I assume you're using filesystem images 'cuz you don't have a reliable network connection (otherwise you'd probably be using NFS or iSCSI or something)? The network connection is reliable, but I'm working with thousands of nodes that need a largely stateless system with only a few persistent items. Since your systems have lots of RAM, why not just use a regular ext4 filesystem image as your root filesystem? Then you don't need to worry about blowing up the overlay at all. Are you suggesting an ext4 r/w filesystem stored in RAM? I haven't seen how to do that in dracut with the existing scripts. If you need compression to save RAM: why not use a squashfs image directly, and mount/bind a tmpfs to the places you'll be writing data? I'd be interested in that for sure but the dmsquash module in dracut seems to require a real ext/btrfs/xfs filesystem for device mapper. I couldn't find a way to boot a plain squashfs with a filesystem in it. Is there a particular reason you need to use dmsquash-live, or is this just a case of the hammer making all your problems look like nails? My goal is to live boot our servers since the majority of our systems would be stateless. Being able to reboot into a known good, tested state would be advantageous. I've worked with Debian's Live Systems project[1] and their strategy is to mount a squashfs read only but then use aufs to provide a writeable filesystem overlay. It's handy since you can fill up the overlay without causing the snapshot to overflow. However, AUFS isn't in the upstream kernel and that makes things a bit challenging. It sounds like oVirt node does a lot of what you need and might be a good starting point, it's basically a minimal KVM plus associated userspace hypervisor. It can be booted as a live image, pxe boot or installed. http://www.ovirt.org/Category:Node http://www.ovirt.org/Node_Building http://www.ovirt.org/Node_PXE Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Self Introduction / Contributing a package to Fedora
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 08:30:10AM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
Ok, where do I find a Sponsor? on this list, or is there another
one? Or
is that the whole part where I have to submit the package, open up a bug
report, and reference that here? (I think that's what I got out of the
docs last time I went through it).
I bet, there are quite a few sponsors reading here.
You're right, it's the whole part with opening a bug etc. The process is
described at [1]. I suggest you to submit your spec for review.
To mark your bug as blocked by the lack of being sponsored, you should
add insert 177841 as a blocker for your bug. (Blocks field).
At least some sponsors are watching that NEEDSPONSOR bug (numbered
177841); they'll get an auto mail about a change.
A few remarks about your spec given at [2]:
- Source0 should be a valid URL (if possible)
- in files section, you should use %{_bindir} instead of /usr/bin
- the same applies to your install section
- and of course your changelog must contain entries
- insert real version numbers and release numbers to Version and Release
Once you did that, you might want to try rpmlint -i on your SPEC and
SRPM file. That will check for most common issues and will report them.
HTH,
Matthias
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
[2] https://github.com/derekp7/snebu/blob/master/snebu.spec
As someone who has recently become a packager, I'd also highly
recommend:
* Reading/following this article:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
* Using the fedora-review tool to check your package as you fiddle and
tweak
* Do informal reviews on packages that are similar to yours and have
been posted by people who do not need a sponsor - just be sure to
mention up front that it is informal and you aren't a packager yet.
I can't stress enough how helpful it is to practice by reviewing other
packages before trying to submit yours. You may be surprised at how many
oh, right, oops moments you'll have. :)
Regards,
Jeff
--
Jeff Backus
jeff.bac...@gmail.com
http://github.com/jsbackus
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Meeting minutes Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2014-07-29)
#fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2014-07-29) Meeting started by mmaslano at 13:02:33 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-07-29/env-and-stacks.2014-07-29-13.02.log.html . Meeting summary --- * init process (mmaslano, 13:09:26) * rpmgrill vs taskotron (mmaslano, 13:09:38) * rpmgrill consumes quite a lot of resources -- CPU/disk/(network) -- we need to find out if taskotron be capable of running such utility (hhorak, 13:49:14) * for rpmgrill it would be beneficial if taskotron results could be grouped by their desire (groups like SecurityPolicy, BuildLog) (hhorak, 13:49:14) * current rpmgrill search with tooltips is here: http://rpmgrill-fc20.edsantiago.com:5000/search (hhorak, 13:49:14) * we'll should try to go with the integrating of rpmgrill into taskotron for now and only if it turns to be problematic we should start to maintain a separate system for rpmgrill (hhorak, 13:49:14) * docker copr (mmaslano, 13:52:33) * BaseWG voted and decided to own base images (mmaslano, 13:53:04) * LINK: https://vpavlin.fedorapeople.org/copr-docker.svg (vpavlin, 13:53:56) * LINK: https://vpavlin.fedorapeople.org/build.json (vpavlin, 13:54:14) Meeting ended at 14:08:22 UTC. Action Items Action Items, by person --- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --- * hhorak (30) * mmaslano (27) * vpavlin (17) * EdSantiago (11) * zodbot (5) * bkabrda (1) * suehle (1) * bochecha (1) * spot (1) * mhroncok (1) * samkottler (0) * tjanez (0) * juhp (0) * sic (0) * pkovar (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
File Test-Pod-Coverage-1.10.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by jplesnik
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Pod-Coverage: c9ea5f4182415b13d2db18484a38c01b Test-Pod-Coverage-1.10.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Self Introduction / Contributing a package to Fedora
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
wrote:
A few remarks about your spec given at [2]:
- Source0 should be a valid URL (if possible)
- in files section, you should use %{_bindir} instead of /usr/bin
- the same applies to your install section
- and of course your changelog must contain entries
- insert real version numbers and release numbers to Version and Release
Thanks for your input, this really helps. I will fix these errors, compare
against some other recent SRPMs, and get it in shape before requesting
formal review. Just a couple more quick questions:
For the Source0 URL, since this project is hosted on Github, the URL that
leads to the tar.gz file doesn't contain the tar file name (it is
https://github.com/derekp7/snebu/tarball/master;, which ends up creating
the tar.gz file name on the fly through HTTP header / javascript magic). I
will address this by attaching an exported copy of the tar.gz file as a
binary asset to the Github progject release.
Also, in the spec file, the release is 1%{?dist} so that is uses the dist
macro to fill in automatically. But I'd like for the SRPM file to be
release agnostic (so I don't have to host one for each release of Fedora).
If I rename the .src.rpm file to not include fc19, then rpmlint
complains. Is there a proper way to build the SRPM so that the binary RPMS
built from it use the %{?dist} macro, but the SRPM is release agnostic?
Or should I just one SRPM for the most current Fedora release?
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Self Introduction / Contributing a package to Fedora
Hi
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Derek Pressnall wrote:
For the Source0 URL, since this project is hosted on Github, the URL that
leads to the tar.gz file doesn't contain the tar file name (it is
https://github.com/derekp7/snebu/tarball/master;, which ends up creating
the tar.gz file name on the fly through HTTP header / javascript magic). I
will address this by attaching an exported copy of the tar.gz file as a
binary asset to the Github progject release.
Refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Github
Also, in the spec file, the release is 1%{?dist} so that is uses the
dist macro to fill in automatically. But I'd like for the SRPM file to be
release agnostic (so I don't have to host one for each release of Fedora).
Well the build system will host the SRPMS for you and you don't have to do
it separately. Although dist macro is not mandated it is used by the vast
majority of packages in Fedora
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Self Introduction / Contributing a package to Fedora
On 29/07/14 15:45, Derek Pressnall wrote: For the Source0 URL, since this project is hosted on Github, the URL that leads to the tar.gz file doesn't contain the tar file name (it is https://github.com/derekp7/snebu/tarball/master;, which ends up creating the tar.gz file name on the fly through HTTP header / javascript magic). I will address this by attaching an exported copy of the tar.gz file as a binary asset to the Github progject release. No need to do that - we have a guideline on how to handle GitHub: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Github Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Dracut, dmsquash, and overlays
On Mon, 2014-07-28 at 21:26 -0500, Major Hayden wrote: On Jul 28, 2014, at 17:11, Will Woods wwo...@redhat.com wrote: Since your systems have lots of RAM, why not just use a regular ext4 filesystem image as your root filesystem? Then you don't need to worry about blowing up the overlay at all. Are you suggesting an ext4 r/w filesystem stored in RAM? I haven't seen how to do that in dracut with the existing scripts. Any filesystem image *should* work as a live image. dmsquash-live images get handled specially, but plain ext4 (or squashfs, or cramfs, or btrfs, or whatever) should work just as well. See dmsquash-live-root.sh, where (if given a filesystem image) it checks the filesystem type and mounts it accordingly: https://github.com/haraldh/dracut/blob/master/modules.d/90dmsquash-live/dmsquash-live-root.sh#L64 Or just try it: root=live:http://host.your.sys/path-to/ext4.img If this doesn't work, that's a bug in dracut, and should be filed accordingly. -w -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Review swaps
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote: The python-ZODB3 package, which I maintain, has been split into pieces. I need several package reviews to get all the new pieces into place. I am happy to swap reviews for these, but the number of reviews I need is sufficiently large that it will take me a little time to get to all of the reviews I am asked to do. If you can have a little patience with me, then this is what I need: 1. python-repoze-sphinx-autointerface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102858 Already under review, but the review may have stalled. This review has, in fact, stalled. Is somebody interested in swapping a review for this one? 2. python-persistent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102950. Depends on #1. Ditto the comment for #1. Ditto. I need another review swap for this. 4. python-random2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104322 This one is still up for grabs. 5. python-zodbpickle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107321 This one is also still up for grabs. Let me know what I can review for you in exchange. Thanks, -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Review swaps
On 07/29/2014 07:19 PM, Jerry James wrote: On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote: The python-ZODB3 package, which I maintain, has been split into pieces. I need several package reviews to get all the new pieces into place. I am happy to swap reviews for these, but the number of reviews I need is sufficiently large that it will take me a little time to get to all of the reviews I am asked to do. If you can have a little patience with me, then this is what I need: 1. python-repoze-sphinx-autointerface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102858 Already under review, but the review may have stalled. This review has, in fact, stalled. Is somebody interested in swapping a review for this one? We are victims of same man :D Reviews swap between your RR and mine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103420 ? -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-07-11) meeting minutes and logs
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 01:44:40PM -0400, Mike Pinkerton wrote: Mattdm then followed with 2 1/2 additional topics: 1a. Identifying different Fedora products -- fedora-release-* contents and /etc/os-release As I understand it, you are trying to decide where and how to set a flag that will signal the product that is either installed or to be installed. There was mention of dropping product specific snippets in /usr/lib/os-release.d/ as one solution. Does it have to be any more complex than the approach used by systemd? If fedora-release were to drop all product specific snippets in /usr/lib/os-release.d/, then a system admin could use a symbolic link in /etc/os-release.d to flag which product (or no product) he wanted installed. Similar to: So, one catch is that os-release.d, with snippets, isn't currently supported by the upstream standard. (If there is work to make it so, awesome.) And it's not completely trivial, because either /etc/os-release needs to be regenerated on change to the .d snippets, or else software which reads that file (like agetty) needs to be updated to follow the .d directory too. But also, ideally, the contents of /etc/os-release aren't just notes -- they actually reflect the state of the system. Having it managed by RPM (or some higher-level tool, theoretically) is helpful there. Here: Then, if a system admin wanted to change the box to a server, or to a non-productized box, he could simply change the symbolic link to: /etc/os-release.d/product - /usr/lib/os-release.d/server.product the _name_ has changed, but you don't necessarily have any of the actual software (either installed or running) that makes it Fedora Server. That's significantly less useful. /etc/os-release.d/product - /usr/lib/os-release.d/generic.product and then run whatever product syncing tool you develop -- perhaps: dnf product-sync Okay, so, yeah -- something like that would be needed. But if we're gonna have such a tool, might as well make it also update the os-release information. -- Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org Fedora Project Leader -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-07-11) meeting minutes and logs
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:28:11PM -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote: I appreciate your continued consideration of this item. I'm not clear on how Anaconda is supposed to work with different products, but if it is reading whatever product flag you set in order to determine the package list, couldn't a single netinstall CD work for all products, as well as a generic, non-productized install, assuming that there were a place in the UI to specify which product the user wanted installed? Actually, this seems to already be the case. A netinstall is produced as a Fedora Server deliverable, but it can be used to install a non-Product system, and, if other Products adopted the same conventions, also any other Product. But does anyone own that netinstall working in this way? Presumbably Server only cares about it being able to install Server, and the rest is a side-effect. -- Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org Fedora Project Leader -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Review swaps
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote: We are victims of same man :D Victim is kind of a harsh word. I suspect something has happened in Real Life that is making him extra busy. Reviews swap between your RR and mine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103420 ? Sure, I'd be happy to do so. You've informally done the first step of the Reviewer not responding part of the policy for stalled package reviews (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews). Can you do the second step (clearing out the review flag, etc.), so what happened is clear? I'll take over the review after that. Thanks, -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [Base] Fedora Base Design Working Group (2014-07-11) meeting minutes and logs
- Original Message - On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:28:11PM -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote: couldn't a single netinstall CD work for all products, as well as a generic, non-productized install, assuming that there were a place in the UI to specify which product the user wanted installed? Actually, this seems to already be the case. A netinstall is produced as a Fedora Server deliverable, but it can be used to install a non-Product system, and, if other Products adopted the same conventions, also any other Product. But does anyone own that netinstall working in this way? Not that I know of. Mirek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Review swaps
On 07/29/2014 07:45 PM, Jerry James wrote: On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote: We are victims of same man :D Victim is kind of a harsh word. I suspect something has happened in Real Life that is making him extra busy. It's a way to saying (in Italy at least) that I get blocked by someone else accidentally. Reviews swap between your RR and mine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103420 ? Sure, I'd be happy to do so. You've informally done the first step of the Reviewer not responding part of the policy for stalled package reviews (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews). Can you do the second step (clearing out the review flag, etc.), so what happened is clear? I'll take over the review after that. My RR is now unassigned. -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[Test-Announce] 2014-07-30 @ ** 16:00 UTC ** - F21 Blocker Review #4
# F21 Blocker Review meeting #4 # Date: 2014-07-30 # Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net We've got another blocker meeting coming up this week. As of today there are 2 proposed blockers and 1 proposed FE for F21 Alpha (same as last week). The full list can be found here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/21/alpha/buglist We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate the Alpha Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not fixed. Information on the release criteria for F21 can be found on the wiki [0]. Product specific plans are still being solidified, but that should be sorted quickly. For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, check out these links: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting works - or how it's supposed to go - check out the SOP on the wiki: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting See you tomorrow! [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria -- // Mike -- Fedora QA freenode: roshi http://roshi.fedorapeople.org signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2014-07-30)
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2014-07-30 17:00 UTC' Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 = Followups = #topic #1322 F21 Changes - Progress on Changes Freeze .fesco 1322 https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1322 = New business = #topic #1326 change to fesco replacement process? .fesco 1326 https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1326 #topic #1327 Process whenisgood results .fesco 1327 https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1327 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The report of the agenda items can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco, e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting. signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Trouble retiring package on F21 branch
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:35:08 +0200 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com wrote: On 07/26/2014 03:09 PM, Gerard Ryan wrote: Hi, We're trying to retire package eclipse-wtp-common on F21 and Rawhide. My understanding is that this should be done F21 first, then Rawhide. F21 has proven problematic so far. AFAIK maintainers can retire packages only in rawhide. For F21 you need a releng ticket. I've retired this now. Can you confirm it looks as you expect? kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Problems with Ghostscript license switched to AGPL?
Hi, I know this is old news, but Ghostscript switched to AGPL with version 9.07 (Feb 2013). I was not able to find any announcement of this on the Fedora lists. Fedora 18 was the last release with the non-AGPL Ghostscript. This is a surprise, because since Fedora 19 we've possibly introduced a fairly large end-user burden on AGPL compliance, with ghostscript being rather deep in the dependency tree. Here are just a few of the affected packages by way of repoquery --whatrequires --recursive ghostscript: ImageMagick-0:6.8.6.3-4.fc20.x86_64 R-0:3.1.0-5.fc20.x86_64 cups-1:1.7.4-1.fc20.x86_64 ejabberd-0:2.1.13-7.fc20.x86_64 emacs-1:24.3-17.fc20.x86_64 erlang-0:R16B-03.7.fc20.x86_64 gimp-2:2.8.10-4.fc20.x86_64 graphviz-0:2.34.0-8.fc20.x86_64 libguestfs-1:1.26.5-1.fc20.x86_64 mediawiki-0:1.21.11-1.fc20.noarch openstack-nova-0:2013.2.3-2.fc20.noarch redhat-lsb-0:4.1-21.fc20.x86_64 vips-0:7.36.5-1.fc20.x86_64 Is seems like a problem that these packages depend on an AGPL package. This list suggests to me that running a print server (cups) or XMPP server (ejabberd) would put a burden on me to comply with AGPL. Am I misunderstanding something? My first reaction would be to fork ghostscript at a pre-AGPL version at this point. Does this seem remotely feasible? Is there a better option? (Also, there is another AGPL package, libquvi, which notably has nautilus and other packages as depending on it. But that's a separate issue.) Adam -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
The GNU C Library will be rebased in F21 to match glibc 2.20.
Fedora, This is a reminder that the glibc team will be rebasing glibc in F21 to match glibc 2.20. The plan remains largely as was written here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC220 Only glibc 2.20 has ABI guarantees, and therefore we will move to 2.20 before F21 goes to GA to ensure that F21 has a strong ABI guarantee. I expect this to be the process forever going forward: * Rawhide tracks glibc master. * Fedora release is branched from Rawhide. * glibc release is made upstream. * Fedora branch is rebased on glibc upstream release to include ABI guarantees. * Fedora release goes GA. The changes in the rebase should be minor since we've been tracking master the whole time. Cheers, Carlos. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Problems with Ghostscript license switched to AGPL?
On 07/30/2014 04:40 AM, Adam Goode wrote: Is seems like a problem that these packages depend on an AGPL package. This list suggests to me that running a print server (cups) or XMPP server (ejabberd) would put a burden on me to comply with AGPL. Am I misunderstanding something? This should go to legal@. I think the interpretation in Fedora land is that the AGPL does not affect Fedora users who run Fedora software without making any changes because the special restriction on top of the GPLv3 only applies to licensees who make modifications to the software. -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Rawhide soname version bumps on evolution-data-server and evolution packages
Hello, I'm going to update evolution packages (evolution-data-server, evolution, evolution-ews and evolution-mapi) in rawhide to their 3.13.4 versions during today, which brings soname version bumps in evolution-data-server and evolution. I'll take care of rebuilds where needed (and I have commit rights for). There are also large changes in 3.13.4, in evolution-data-server are used subprocesses for backends and evolution uses webkit-based composer. Please use GNOME's bugzilla [1] for any issue you might find with these. Thanks and bye, Milan [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=evolution-data-server https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=evolution -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[Bug 1124209] New: perl-Class-Tiny-1.000 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124209 Bug ID: 1124209 Summary: perl-Class-Tiny-1.000 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Class-Tiny Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Latest upstream release: 1.000 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 0.015-1.fc22 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Class-Tiny/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4fsq40zoe5a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1124208] New: perl-Class-Field-0.16 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124208 Bug ID: 1124208 Summary: perl-Class-Field-0.16 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Class-Field Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: berra...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: berra...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 0.16 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 0.15-9.fc21 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Class-Field/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Tu4V9WA6pTa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1124211] New: perl-ExtUtils-Manifest-1.64 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124211 Bug ID: 1124211 Summary: perl-ExtUtils-Manifest-1.64 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-ExtUtils-Manifest Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: mmasl...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Latest upstream release: 1.64 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 1.63-2.fc21 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/ExtUtils-Manifest/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Obtm9xpTgwa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1124212] New: perl-File-NFSLock-1.23 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124212 Bug ID: 1124212 Summary: perl-File-NFSLock-1.23 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-File-NFSLock Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, pertu...@free.fr Latest upstream release: 1.23 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 1.21-10.fc21 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-NFSLock/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0og7La2FHGa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1124214] New: perl-Inline-0.64 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124214 Bug ID: 1124214 Summary: perl-Inline-0.64 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Inline Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: psab...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: mmasl...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, psab...@redhat.com Latest upstream release: 0.64 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 0.62-1.fc22 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Inline/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=O7wtcWAncKa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1124213] New: perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.046 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124213 Bug ID: 1124213 Summary: perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.046 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-HTTP-Tiny Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Latest upstream release: 0.046 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 0.043-2.fc21 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTTP-Tiny/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9GWMwfQZ9Za=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1124215] New: perl-libwww-perl-6.08 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124215 Bug ID: 1124215 Summary: perl-libwww-perl-6.08 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-libwww-perl Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: mmasl...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Latest upstream release: 6.08 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 6.07-1.fc21 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/libwww-perl/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0aQR7mWwvfa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1124218] New: perl-Module-Manifest-Skip-0.19 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124218 Bug ID: 1124218 Summary: perl-Module-Manifest-Skip-0.19 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Module-Manifest-Skip Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: mmasl...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Latest upstream release: 0.19 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 0.17-4.fc21 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Manifest-Skip/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NixENVVR7Na=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1124217] New: perl-Module-Install-ManifestSkip-0.21 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124217 Bug ID: 1124217 Summary: perl-Module-Install-ManifestSkip-0.21 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Module-Install-ManifestSkip Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: mmasl...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Latest upstream release: 0.21 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 0.20-6.fc21 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Install-ManifestSkip/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oOTBnzxLCFa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1124219] New: perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-MoreCoercions-0.12 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124219 Bug ID: 1124219 Summary: perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-MoreCoercions-0.12 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-MoreCoercions Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com, psab...@redhat.com Latest upstream release: 0.12 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 0.11-4.fc21 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Types-DateTime-MoreCoercions/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bmTan79YSma=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1124221] New: perl-Perl-Critic-Tics-0.009 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124221 Bug ID: 1124221 Summary: perl-Perl-Critic-Tics-0.009 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Perl-Critic-Tics Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: mmasl...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Latest upstream release: 0.009 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 0.008-2.fc21 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Perl-Critic-Tics/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3xJPh12x9Ba=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1124222] New: perl-Test-Pod-Coverage-1.10 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124222 Bug ID: 1124222 Summary: perl-Test-Pod-Coverage-1.10 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test-Pod-Coverage Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, pertu...@free.fr, st...@silug.org Latest upstream release: 1.10 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 1.08-23.fc21 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Pod-Coverage/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=71EkAscA6Ya=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1124224] New: perl-WebService-Linode-0.22 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124224 Bug ID: 1124224 Summary: perl-WebService-Linode-0.22 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-WebService-Linode Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: i...@cicku.me Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: i...@cicku.me, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 0.22 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 0.21-1.fc21 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/WebService-Linode/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7gx7499Jhya=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Class-Tiny-1.000.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by jplesnik
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Class-Tiny: a8acb0d05e384573d3624406813bf6b4 Class-Tiny-1.000.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Class-Tiny] 1.000 bump
commit 542bd48a3ac93a2aa0ef19030a41dfb847095ddd
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jul 29 10:11:47 2014 +0200
1.000 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Class-Tiny.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 9bd15d1..bba0585 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -6,3 +6,4 @@
/Class-Tiny-0.013.tar.gz
/Class-Tiny-0.014.tar.gz
/Class-Tiny-0.015.tar.gz
+/Class-Tiny-1.000.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Class-Tiny.spec b/perl-Class-Tiny.spec
index 5f70eac..761b8fd 100644
--- a/perl-Class-Tiny.spec
+++ b/perl-Class-Tiny.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Class-Tiny
-Version:0.015
+Version:1.000
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Minimalist class construction
License:ASL 2.0
@@ -87,6 +87,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Tue Jul 29 2014 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.000-1
+- 1.000 bump
+
* Wed Jul 16 2014 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 0.015-1
- 0.015 bump
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index dd48e9b..a62fb9f 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-91562c212b4f906dff0b8bece92e8fd2 Class-Tiny-0.015.tar.gz
+a8acb0d05e384573d3624406813bf6b4 Class-Tiny-1.000.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Class-Tiny/f21] 1.000 bump
commit c36d3ea6c72dedbeffafcda08ffe9250e883
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jul 29 10:21:16 2014 +0200
1.000 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Class-Tiny.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 9bd15d1..bba0585 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -6,3 +6,4 @@
/Class-Tiny-0.013.tar.gz
/Class-Tiny-0.014.tar.gz
/Class-Tiny-0.015.tar.gz
+/Class-Tiny-1.000.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Class-Tiny.spec b/perl-Class-Tiny.spec
index 5f70eac..761b8fd 100644
--- a/perl-Class-Tiny.spec
+++ b/perl-Class-Tiny.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Class-Tiny
-Version:0.015
+Version:1.000
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Minimalist class construction
License:ASL 2.0
@@ -87,6 +87,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Tue Jul 29 2014 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.000-1
+- 1.000 bump
+
* Wed Jul 16 2014 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 0.015-1
- 0.015 bump
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index dd48e9b..a62fb9f 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-91562c212b4f906dff0b8bece92e8fd2 Class-Tiny-0.015.tar.gz
+a8acb0d05e384573d3624406813bf6b4 Class-Tiny-1.000.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1124209] perl-Class-Tiny-1.000 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124209 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Class-Tiny-1.000-1.fc2 ||2 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-07-29 04:23:33 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UtQp9Qx8DAa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1124400] New: perl-MetaCPAN-Client-1.006000-1.fc22 FTBFS:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124400 Bug ID: 1124400 Summary: perl-MetaCPAN-Client-1.006000-1.fc22 FTBFS: Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-MetaCPAN-Client Assignee: p...@city-fan.org Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org perl-MetaCPAN-Client-1.006000-1.fc22 fails to build in F22 due to tests: # Failed test 'Pod coverage on MetaCPAN::Client::ResultSet' # at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Test/Pod/Coverage.pm line 126. # Coverage for MetaCPAN::Client::ResultSet is 87.5%, with 1 naked subroutine: # has_scroller # Looks like you failed 1 test of 12. t/release-pod-coverage.t .. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed Build root difference between last working and this build is: Removed packages: coreutils-8.22 findutils-4.5.13 gdb-7.7.90.20140711 perl-Class-Load-0.21 perl-Devel-PartialDump-0.15 perl-Dist-CheckConflicts-0.11 perl-Eval-Closure-0.08 perl-Moo-1.003001 perl-Moose-2.1005 perl-MRO-Compat-0.12 perl-Package-DeprecationManager-0.13 setup-2.9.0 Added packages: coreutils-8.23 findutils-4.5.14 gdb-7.8 perl-Import-Into-1.002002 perl-Moo-1.005000 setup-2.9.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XvDbHJ0s7Fa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1124417] New: perl-URI-Find-Simple-1.05-2.fc22 FTBFS: test fail with perl-URI-Find-20140709
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124417 Bug ID: 1124417 Summary: perl-URI-Find-Simple-1.05-2.fc22 FTBFS: test fail with perl-URI-Find-20140709 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-URI-Find-Simple Assignee: psab...@redhat.com Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: mmasl...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, psab...@redhat.com perl-URI-Find-Simple-1.05-2.fc22 fails to build in F22 due to tests: # Failed test 'got news.com uri' # at t/find.t line 27. # got: 'http://www.news.com' # expected: 'http://www.news.com/' # Failed test 'got various.com uri' # at t/find.t line 28. # got: 'http://various.com' # expected: 'http://various.com/' # Failed test 'expcted matches new text' # at t/find.t line 43. # got: 'this is a long string with [[ http://www.news.com ]] urls in it in # [[ http://various.com ]] different forms. [[ mailto:t...@jerakeen.org ]]. # Some urls are [[ ftp://not.http.urls/and/have/paths ]]. # ' # expected: 'this is a long string with [[ http://www.news.com/ ]] urls in it in # [[ http://various.com/ ]] different forms. [[ mailto:t...@jerakeen.org ]]. # Some urls are [[ ftp://not.http.urls/and/have/paths ]]. # ' # Failed test 'got news.com uri' # at t/find.t line 49. # got: 'http://weird.com/url/%c3%a9withunicode' # expected: 'http://weird.com/url/%C3%A9withunicode' # Looks like you failed 4 tests of 16. t/find.t .. Dubious, test returned 4 (wstat 1024, 0x400) Failed This is caused by upgrading perl-URI-Find from version 20140702 to 20140709. URI::Find stopped translating URIs to canonical form (see URI-Find changelog). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8bHCjTupqRa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File File-NFSLock-1.23.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by jplesnik
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-File-NFSLock: c675e608449d329a063b9b86ca59af54 File-NFSLock-1.23.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-File-NFSLock] 1.23 bump; Update BRs
commit 02211ca071c2e9127c0b5457844e8689e403afc6
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jul 29 14:58:51 2014 +0200
1.23 bump; Update BRs
.gitignore |1 +
perl-File-NFSLock.spec | 22 ++
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 60d57aa..faa874b 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
File-NFSLock-1.20.tar.gz
/File-NFSLock-1.21.tar.gz
+/File-NFSLock-1.23.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-File-NFSLock.spec b/perl-File-NFSLock.spec
index 021720d..88f9ef3 100644
--- a/perl-File-NFSLock.spec
+++ b/perl-File-NFSLock.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-File-NFSLock
-Version:1.21
-Release:10%{?dist}
+Version:1.23
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Perl module to do NFS (or not) locking
Group: Development/Libraries
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -8,14 +8,18 @@ URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-NFSLock
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/B/BB/BBB/File-NFSLock-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(base)
+BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
BuildRequires: perl(constant)
BuildRequires: perl(Exporter)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp)
+BuildRequires: perl(Fcntl)
+BuildRequires: perl(strict)
BuildRequires: perl(Sys::Hostname)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
-Requires: perl(Exporter)
-Requires: perl(Sys::Hostname)
-Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
+BuildRequires: perl(warnings)
+Requires: perl(Sys::Hostname)
+Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
%description
Program based of concept of hard linking of files being atomic across NFS.
@@ -31,13 +35,12 @@ File::NFSLock was written to be light, generic, and fast.
%setup -q -n File-NFSLock-%{version}
%build
-%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
+perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
-make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot}
+make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
-find %{buildroot} -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null ';'
chmod -R u+w %{buildroot}/*
chmod a-x examples/lock_test
@@ -50,6 +53,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*.3*
%changelog
+* Tue Jul 29 2014 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.23-1
+- 1.23 bump
+
* Sat Jun 07 2014 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.21-10
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 15f2b61..307a4f4 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-8067802ce7247d0697d6203e26cb7bd7 File-NFSLock-1.21.tar.gz
+c675e608449d329a063b9b86ca59af54 File-NFSLock-1.23.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-File-NFSLock/f21] 1.23 bump; Update BRs
commit 621236af612dbcf8b7b4f69d3a04885ef8a9783c
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jul 29 15:10:36 2014 +0200
1.23 bump; Update BRs
.gitignore |1 +
perl-File-NFSLock.spec | 22 ++
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 60d57aa..faa874b 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
File-NFSLock-1.20.tar.gz
/File-NFSLock-1.21.tar.gz
+/File-NFSLock-1.23.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-File-NFSLock.spec b/perl-File-NFSLock.spec
index 021720d..88f9ef3 100644
--- a/perl-File-NFSLock.spec
+++ b/perl-File-NFSLock.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-File-NFSLock
-Version:1.21
-Release:10%{?dist}
+Version:1.23
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Perl module to do NFS (or not) locking
Group: Development/Libraries
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -8,14 +8,18 @@ URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-NFSLock
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/B/BB/BBB/File-NFSLock-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(base)
+BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
BuildRequires: perl(constant)
BuildRequires: perl(Exporter)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp)
+BuildRequires: perl(Fcntl)
+BuildRequires: perl(strict)
BuildRequires: perl(Sys::Hostname)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
-Requires: perl(Exporter)
-Requires: perl(Sys::Hostname)
-Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
+BuildRequires: perl(warnings)
+Requires: perl(Sys::Hostname)
+Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
%description
Program based of concept of hard linking of files being atomic across NFS.
@@ -31,13 +35,12 @@ File::NFSLock was written to be light, generic, and fast.
%setup -q -n File-NFSLock-%{version}
%build
-%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
+perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
-make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot}
+make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
-find %{buildroot} -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null ';'
chmod -R u+w %{buildroot}/*
chmod a-x examples/lock_test
@@ -50,6 +53,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*.3*
%changelog
+* Tue Jul 29 2014 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.23-1
+- 1.23 bump
+
* Sat Jun 07 2014 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.21-10
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 15f2b61..307a4f4 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-8067802ce7247d0697d6203e26cb7bd7 File-NFSLock-1.21.tar.gz
+c675e608449d329a063b9b86ca59af54 File-NFSLock-1.23.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-ExtUtils-Manifest] 1.64 bump
commit 255f9d6d95387fb80a9a495bc76b90579b4b56c6
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jul 29 15:16:56 2014 +0200
1.64 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-ExtUtils-Manifest.spec | 12 +++-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index b7f28ef..71af982 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
/ExtUtils-Manifest-1.60.tar.gz
/ExtUtils-Manifest-1.61.tar.gz
/ExtUtils-Manifest-1.63.tar.gz
+/ExtUtils-Manifest-1.64.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-ExtUtils-Manifest.spec b/perl-ExtUtils-Manifest.spec
index 394bae3..1adeec8 100644
--- a/perl-ExtUtils-Manifest.spec
+++ b/perl-ExtUtils-Manifest.spec
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
Name: perl-ExtUtils-Manifest
-Version:1.63
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:1.64
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Utilities to write and check a MANIFEST file
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/ExtUtils-Manifest/
-Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/F/FL/FLORA/ExtUtils-Manifest-%{version}.tar.gz
+Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/B/BI/BINGOS/ExtUtils-Manifest-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) = 6.30
@@ -14,13 +14,12 @@ BuildRequires: perl(warnings)
# Run-time:
BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
BuildRequires: perl(Config)
-BuildRequires: perl(Exporter)
+BuildRequires: perl(Exporter) = 5.57
BuildRequires: perl(File::Basename)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Copy)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Find)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Path)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec) = 0.8
-BuildRequires: perl(vars)
# VMS::Feature not used
# VMS::Filespec not used
# Tests:
@@ -58,6 +57,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Tue Jul 29 2014 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.64-1
+- 1.64 bump
+
* Sat Jun 07 2014 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.63-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index ea6acdc..583f25d 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-4e153f1bfdc14a037968681c51b8a93d ExtUtils-Manifest-1.63.tar.gz
+83ce9622088f469148982a077978bdc0 ExtUtils-Manifest-1.64.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File ExtUtils-Manifest-1.64.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-ExtUtils-Manifest: 83ce9622088f469148982a077978bdc0 ExtUtils-Manifest-1.64.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1124212] perl-File-NFSLock-1.23 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124212 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-File-NFSLock-1.23-1.fc ||22 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-07-29 09:17:48 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aodEGg7Dmya=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File HTTP-Tiny-0.046.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTTP-Tiny: 04397f44d37662d910e6f82a95efb546 HTTP-Tiny-0.046.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-HTTP-Tiny] 0.046 bump
commit a779e1a04e9e16741bad774e5887cb2b26062180
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jul 29 15:32:34 2014 +0200
0.046 bump
.gitignore |1 +
...y-0.046-Croak-on-failed-write-into-a-file.patch |8
perl-HTTP-Tiny.spec| 12
sources|2 +-
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 2d2cbcb..7b7bbaf 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -12,3 +12,4 @@
/HTTP-Tiny-0.039.tar.gz
/HTTP-Tiny-0.042.tar.gz
/HTTP-Tiny-0.043.tar.gz
+/HTTP-Tiny-0.046.tar.gz
diff --git a/HTTP-Tiny-0.042-Croak-on-failed-write-into-a-file.patch
b/HTTP-Tiny-0.046-Croak-on-failed-write-into-a-file.patch
similarity index 90%
rename from HTTP-Tiny-0.042-Croak-on-failed-write-into-a-file.patch
rename to HTTP-Tiny-0.046-Croak-on-failed-write-into-a-file.patch
index 0031597..ba77e4e 100644
--- a/HTTP-Tiny-0.042-Croak-on-failed-write-into-a-file.patch
+++ b/HTTP-Tiny-0.046-Croak-on-failed-write-into-a-file.patch
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-From 05eae4936960e5c53f3e3287a4260c5ccf0ff6b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From 71207052e4ffe2740f258834b4a885e9099c011c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:45:39 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Croak on failed write into a file
@@ -16,10 +16,10 @@ Signed-off-by: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/HTTP/Tiny.pm b/lib/HTTP/Tiny.pm
-index 6db995c..80a5a08 100644
+index cc410fb..8caa47b 100644
--- a/lib/HTTP/Tiny.pm
+++ b/lib/HTTP/Tiny.pm
-@@ -266,7 +266,10 @@ sub mirror {
+@@ -278,7 +278,10 @@ sub mirror {
sysopen my $fh, $tempfile,
Fcntl::O_CREAT()|Fcntl::O_EXCL()|Fcntl::O_WRONLY()
or Carp::croak(qq/Error: Could not create temporary file $tempfile for
downloading: $!\n/);
binmode $fh;
@@ -32,5 +32,5 @@ index 6db995c..80a5a08 100644
close $fh
or Carp::croak(qq/Error: Caught error closing temporary file
$tempfile: $!\n/);
--
-1.8.5.3
+1.9.3
diff --git a/perl-HTTP-Tiny.spec b/perl-HTTP-Tiny.spec
index 0068659..2ae1f5c 100644
--- a/perl-HTTP-Tiny.spec
+++ b/perl-HTTP-Tiny.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-HTTP-Tiny
-Version:0.043
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:0.046
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Small, simple, correct HTTP/1.1 client
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTTP-Tiny/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/D/DA/DAGOLDEN/HTTP-Tiny-%{version}.tar.gz
# Check for write failure, bug #1031096, refused by upstream,
# https://github.com/chansen/p5-http-tiny/issues/32
-Patch0: HTTP-Tiny-0.042-Croak-on-failed-write-into-a-file.patch
+Patch0: HTTP-Tiny-0.046-Croak-on-failed-write-into-a-file.patch
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) = 6.17
@@ -42,8 +42,9 @@ BuildRequires: perl(List::Util)
# Mozilla::CA not needed
# Net::SSLeay 1.49 not needed
BuildRequires: perl(open)
+BuildRequires: perl(Scalar::Util)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) = 0.96
-BuildRequires: perl(version)
+BuildRequires: perl(version) = 0.77
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
Requires: perl(bytes)
Requires: perl(Fcntl)
@@ -80,6 +81,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Tue Jul 29 2014 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.046-1
+- 0.046 bump
+
* Sat Jun 07 2014 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 0.043-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 59c9e7d..b875bbd 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-643b5f1d984ec069e5db406630ac6874 HTTP-Tiny-0.043.tar.gz
+04397f44d37662d910e6f82a95efb546 HTTP-Tiny-0.046.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1124211] perl-ExtUtils-Manifest-1.64 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124211 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-ExtUtils-Manifest-1.64 ||-1.fc22 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-07-29 09:33:56 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iZNfwgJOc1a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1124213] perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.046 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124213 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://github.com/chansen/ ||p5-http-tiny/issues/50 Fixed In Version||perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.046-1.fc22 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- There is bug in tests https://github.com/chansen/p5-http-tiny/issues/50. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=I3AeGzZQYQa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1124400] perl-MetaCPAN-Client-1.006000-1.fc22 FTBFS:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124400 --- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org --- This has been triggered by the recent update of Moo to 1.005000. I think it's probably an issue in either Moo or Pod::Coverage but I'm asking upstream's opinion first: https://github.com/CPAN-API/metacpan-client/issues/16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lgyk289AAEa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-HTTP-Tiny] Build-require CPAN::Meta* modules temporarily
commit ba99959fd839029663eb73340028450dbc1ad98e Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Tue Jul 29 16:00:26 2014 +0200 Build-require CPAN::Meta* modules temporarily The modules are declared as optional, but the tests cannot cope with their absence. All of them are core modules, so it should not be problem to depend on them. https://github.com/chansen/p5-http-tiny/issues/50 perl-HTTP-Tiny.spec |6 ++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-HTTP-Tiny.spec b/perl-HTTP-Tiny.spec index 2ae1f5c..7ff89b6 100644 --- a/perl-HTTP-Tiny.spec +++ b/perl-HTTP-Tiny.spec @@ -45,6 +45,12 @@ BuildRequires: perl(open) BuildRequires: perl(Scalar::Util) BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) = 0.96 BuildRequires: perl(version) = 0.77 +# Optionals tests: +# The CPAN::Meta* is needed due to a bug in tests generated by distzilla +# https://github.com/chansen/p5-http-tiny/issues/50 +BuildRequires: perl(CPAN::Meta) +BuildRequires: perl(CPAN::Meta::Prereqs) +BuildRequires: perl(CPAN::Meta::Requirements) = 2.120900 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version)) Requires: perl(bytes) Requires: perl(Fcntl) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Test-Pod-Coverage] 1.10 bump; Updated license and URL
commit 65ad25a1c46eef848da0661483d619b982c4074d
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jul 29 16:12:54 2014 +0200
1.10 bump; Updated license and URL
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Test-Pod-Coverage.spec | 18 --
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 3be0756..59eecf5 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
Test-Pod-Coverage-1.08.tar.gz
+/Test-Pod-Coverage-1.10.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Test-Pod-Coverage.spec b/perl-Test-Pod-Coverage.spec
index 911b1e1..c040eea 100644
--- a/perl-Test-Pod-Coverage.spec
+++ b/perl-Test-Pod-Coverage.spec
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
Name: perl-Test-Pod-Coverage
-Version:1.08
-Release:23%{?dist}
+Version:1.10
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Check for pod coverage in your distribution
Group: Development/Libraries
-License:GPL+ or Artistic
+License:Artistic 2.0
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Pod-Coverage/
-Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/P/PE/PETDANCE/Test-Pod-Coverage-%{version}.tar.gz
+Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/N/NE/NEILB/Test-Pod-Coverage-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
@@ -25,7 +25,9 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) = 1.14
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
%description
-Checks for POD coverage in files for your distribution.
+Test::Pod::Coverage is used to create a test for your distribution, to
+ensure that all relevant files in your distribution are appropriately
+documented in pod.
%prep
%setup -q -n Test-Pod-Coverage-%{version}
@@ -43,11 +45,15 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {}
';'
make test
%files
-%doc Changes
+%doc Changes README
%{perl_vendorlib}/Test/
%{_mandir}/man3/*.3pm*
%changelog
+* Tue Jul 29 2014 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.10-1
+- 1.10 bump
+- Updated license and URL
+
* Sat Jun 07 2014 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.08-23
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index d1f32c8..5eb656b 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-33405cca7c75b7b89c06ba30eea66692 Test-Pod-Coverage-1.08.tar.gz
+c9ea5f4182415b13d2db18484a38c01b Test-Pod-Coverage-1.10.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1122956] Cannot install amavisd-new in CentOS-7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122956 --- Comment #2 from Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net --- I'm afraid this did not work. 1. amavisd-new requires perl-Unix-Syslog, which is not in epel.repo but is in rpmforge.repo. 2. However, after installing this sudo yum install amavisd-new brings up the error --- Error: Package: clamav-server-systemd-0.98.4-1.el7.noarch (epel) Requires: clamav-server = 0.98.4-1.el7 Available: clamav-server-0.98.4-1.el7.x86_64 (epel) clamav-server = 0.98.4-1.el7 Error: Package: amavisd-new-2.9.1-1.el7.noarch (epel) Requires: clamav-server Available: clamav-server-0.98.4-1.el7.x86_64 (epel) clamav-server = 0.98.4-1.el7 --- 3. Now sudo yum install clamav-server brings up the warning --- Package clamav-server is obsoleted by clamd, trying to install clamd-0.98.4-1.el7.rf.x86_64 instead --- 4. Now after clamd is installed, sudo yum install amavisd-new brings up the error --- Error: Package: clamav-server-systemd-0.98.4-1.el7.noarch (epel) Requires: clamav-server = 0.98.4-1.el7 Available: clamav-server-0.98.4-1.el7.x86_64 (epel) clamav-server = 0.98.4-1.el7 Error: Package: amavisd-new-2.9.1-1.el7.noarch (epel) Requires: clamav-server Available: clamav-server-0.98.4-1.el7.x86_64 (epel) clamav-server = 0.98.4-1.el7 --- which seems to have taken me in a circle. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dyQVv0RGbda=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1122956] Cannot install amavisd-new in CentOS-7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122956 --- Comment #3 from Morten Stevens mstev...@imt-systems.com --- (In reply to Timothy Murphy from comment #2) I'm afraid this did not work. I was able to install amavisd-new without problems. 1. amavisd-new requires perl-Unix-Syslog, which is not in epel.repo but is in rpmforge.repo. It is in Fedora-EPEL. See: http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/beta/7/x86_64/ which seems to have taken me in a circle. Please remove all rpmforge packages and install it only from EPEL repo. It is not a good idea to mix EPEL and rpmforge packages! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RVWyMxfGT5a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1124215] perl-libwww-perl-6.08 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124215 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1124220 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- This run-requires perl(Net::HTTP) = 6.07. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124220 [Bug 1124220] perl-Net-HTTP-6.07 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=d2SUEtekDGa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1124220] perl-Net-HTTP-6.07 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124220 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1124215 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124215 [Bug 1124215] perl-libwww-perl-6.08 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=robwbYXU4ca=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1124213] perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.046 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124213 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-07-29 10:27:27 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SeGwgp9fp6a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Test-Pod-Coverage/f21] 1.10 bump; Updated license and URL
commit e9a4b4fe7108bc51de4777bad500483a94bd2e76
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jul 29 16:29:05 2014 +0200
1.10 bump; Updated license and URL
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Test-Pod-Coverage.spec | 18 --
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 3be0756..59eecf5 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
Test-Pod-Coverage-1.08.tar.gz
+/Test-Pod-Coverage-1.10.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Test-Pod-Coverage.spec b/perl-Test-Pod-Coverage.spec
index 911b1e1..c040eea 100644
--- a/perl-Test-Pod-Coverage.spec
+++ b/perl-Test-Pod-Coverage.spec
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
Name: perl-Test-Pod-Coverage
-Version:1.08
-Release:23%{?dist}
+Version:1.10
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Check for pod coverage in your distribution
Group: Development/Libraries
-License:GPL+ or Artistic
+License:Artistic 2.0
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Pod-Coverage/
-Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/P/PE/PETDANCE/Test-Pod-Coverage-%{version}.tar.gz
+Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/N/NE/NEILB/Test-Pod-Coverage-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
@@ -25,7 +25,9 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) = 1.14
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
%description
-Checks for POD coverage in files for your distribution.
+Test::Pod::Coverage is used to create a test for your distribution, to
+ensure that all relevant files in your distribution are appropriately
+documented in pod.
%prep
%setup -q -n Test-Pod-Coverage-%{version}
@@ -43,11 +45,15 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {}
';'
make test
%files
-%doc Changes
+%doc Changes README
%{perl_vendorlib}/Test/
%{_mandir}/man3/*.3pm*
%changelog
+* Tue Jul 29 2014 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 1.10-1
+- 1.10 bump
+- Updated license and URL
+
* Sat Jun 07 2014 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.08-23
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index d1f32c8..5eb656b 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-33405cca7c75b7b89c06ba30eea66692 Test-Pod-Coverage-1.08.tar.gz
+c9ea5f4182415b13d2db18484a38c01b Test-Pod-Coverage-1.10.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1124222] perl-Test-Pod-Coverage-1.10 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124222 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Pod-Coverage-1.10 ||-1.fc22 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-07-29 10:30:34 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iwcOYCYBXha=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl] Sub-package perl-Term-ANSIColor and remove it (bug #1121924)
commit df31eb47de8becc5bddf2f033b906eb3bf5788f2
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jul 29 16:40:17 2014 +0200
Sub-package perl-Term-ANSIColor and remove it (bug #1121924)
perl.spec | 35 +--
1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl.spec b/perl.spec
index 7682568..ba0fee3 100644
--- a/perl.spec
+++ b/perl.spec
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
Name: perl
Version:%{perl_version}
# release number must be even higher, because dual-lived modules will be
broken otherwise
-Release:301%{?dist}
+Release:302%{?dist}
Epoch: %{perl_epoch}
Summary:Practical Extraction and Report Language
Group: Development/Languages
@@ -1638,6 +1638,24 @@ a string priority and a list of printf() arguments just
like at syslog(3).
%endif
%if %{dual_life} || %{rebuild_from_scratch}
+%package Term-ANSIColor
+Summary:Color screen output using ANSI escape sequences
+Group: Development/Libraries
+License:GPL+ or Artistic
+Epoch: 0
+Version:4.02
+Requires: %perl_compat
+BuildArch: noarch
+Conflicts: perl 4:5.18.2-302
+
+%description Term-ANSIColor
+This module has two interfaces, one through color() and colored() and the
+other through constants. It also offers the utility functions uncolor(),
+colorstrip(), colorvalid(), and coloralias(), which have to be explicitly
+imported to be used.
+%endif
+
+%if %{dual_life} || %{rebuild_from_scratch}
%package Term-UI
Summary:Term::ReadLine UI made easy
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -1928,7 +1946,7 @@ Requires: perl-Pod-Checker, perl-Pod-Escapes,
perl-Pod-LaTeX
Requires: perl-Pod-Parser, perl-Pod-Perldoc, perl-Pod-Usage
Requires: perl-podlators, perl-Pod-Simple, perl-Scalar-List-Utils
Requires: perl-Socket, perl-Storable, perl-Sys-Syslog,
-Requires: perl-Term-UI, perl-Test-Harness,
+Requires: perl-Term-ANSIColor, perl-Term-UI, perl-Test-Harness,
Requires: perl-Test-Simple
Requires: perl-Text-ParseWords, perl-Text-Soundex, perl-Thread-Queue
Requires: perl-Time-HiRes
@@ -2807,6 +2825,10 @@ sed \
%exclude %{archlib}/auto/Sys/Syslog/
%exclude %{_mandir}/man3/Sys::Syslog.*
+# Term-ANSIColor
+%exclude %{privlib}/Term/ANSIColor.pm
+%exclude %{_mandir}/man3/Term::ANSIColor*
+
# Term-UI
%exclude %{privlib}/Term/UI.pm
%exclude %{privlib}/Term/UI/
@@ -3605,6 +3627,12 @@ sed \
%endif
%if %{dual_life} || %{rebuild_from_scratch}
+%files Term-ANSIColor
+%{privlib}/Term/ANSIColor.pm
+%{_mandir}/man3/Term::ANSIColor*
+%endif
+
+%if %{dual_life} || %{rebuild_from_scratch}
%files Term-UI
%{privlib}/Term/UI/
%{privlib}/Term/UI.pm
@@ -3704,6 +3732,9 @@ sed \
# Old changelog entries are preserved in CVS.
%changelog
+* Tue Jul 29 2014 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 4:5.18.2-302
+- Sub-package perl-Term-ANSIColor and remove it (bug #1121924)
+
* Fri Jun 27 2014 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 4:5.18.2-301
- Remove bundled perl-App-a2p, perl-App-find2perl, perl-App-s2p, and
perl-Package-Constants
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1124220] perl-Net-HTTP-6.07 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124220 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- This fixes IPv6 support by, not only, preferring IP::Socket::IP. I will replace RPM-dependency from IO::Socket::INET to IO::Socket::IP to implement the fix completely. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bUXsTcJ2i2a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl/f21] Sub-package perl-Term-ANSIColor and remove it (bug #1121924)
commit 75c3fbb4ce84c07f4206551d1f3dd1a5f445d603
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jul 29 17:10:59 2014 +0200
Sub-package perl-Term-ANSIColor and remove it (bug #1121924)
perl.spec | 35 +--
1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl.spec b/perl.spec
index 7682568..ba0fee3 100644
--- a/perl.spec
+++ b/perl.spec
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
Name: perl
Version:%{perl_version}
# release number must be even higher, because dual-lived modules will be
broken otherwise
-Release:301%{?dist}
+Release:302%{?dist}
Epoch: %{perl_epoch}
Summary:Practical Extraction and Report Language
Group: Development/Languages
@@ -1638,6 +1638,24 @@ a string priority and a list of printf() arguments just
like at syslog(3).
%endif
%if %{dual_life} || %{rebuild_from_scratch}
+%package Term-ANSIColor
+Summary:Color screen output using ANSI escape sequences
+Group: Development/Libraries
+License:GPL+ or Artistic
+Epoch: 0
+Version:4.02
+Requires: %perl_compat
+BuildArch: noarch
+Conflicts: perl 4:5.18.2-302
+
+%description Term-ANSIColor
+This module has two interfaces, one through color() and colored() and the
+other through constants. It also offers the utility functions uncolor(),
+colorstrip(), colorvalid(), and coloralias(), which have to be explicitly
+imported to be used.
+%endif
+
+%if %{dual_life} || %{rebuild_from_scratch}
%package Term-UI
Summary:Term::ReadLine UI made easy
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -1928,7 +1946,7 @@ Requires: perl-Pod-Checker, perl-Pod-Escapes,
perl-Pod-LaTeX
Requires: perl-Pod-Parser, perl-Pod-Perldoc, perl-Pod-Usage
Requires: perl-podlators, perl-Pod-Simple, perl-Scalar-List-Utils
Requires: perl-Socket, perl-Storable, perl-Sys-Syslog,
-Requires: perl-Term-UI, perl-Test-Harness,
+Requires: perl-Term-ANSIColor, perl-Term-UI, perl-Test-Harness,
Requires: perl-Test-Simple
Requires: perl-Text-ParseWords, perl-Text-Soundex, perl-Thread-Queue
Requires: perl-Time-HiRes
@@ -2807,6 +2825,10 @@ sed \
%exclude %{archlib}/auto/Sys/Syslog/
%exclude %{_mandir}/man3/Sys::Syslog.*
+# Term-ANSIColor
+%exclude %{privlib}/Term/ANSIColor.pm
+%exclude %{_mandir}/man3/Term::ANSIColor*
+
# Term-UI
%exclude %{privlib}/Term/UI.pm
%exclude %{privlib}/Term/UI/
@@ -3605,6 +3627,12 @@ sed \
%endif
%if %{dual_life} || %{rebuild_from_scratch}
+%files Term-ANSIColor
+%{privlib}/Term/ANSIColor.pm
+%{_mandir}/man3/Term::ANSIColor*
+%endif
+
+%if %{dual_life} || %{rebuild_from_scratch}
%files Term-UI
%{privlib}/Term/UI/
%{privlib}/Term/UI.pm
@@ -3704,6 +3732,9 @@ sed \
# Old changelog entries are preserved in CVS.
%changelog
+* Tue Jul 29 2014 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 4:5.18.2-302
+- Sub-package perl-Term-ANSIColor and remove it (bug #1121924)
+
* Fri Jun 27 2014 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 4:5.18.2-301
- Remove bundled perl-App-a2p, perl-App-find2perl, perl-App-s2p, and
perl-Package-Constants
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1122956] Cannot install amavisd-new in CentOS-7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122956 --- Comment #4 from Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net --- Please look more carefully at what I said in (1) above. The package perl-Unix-Syslog, which amavisd-new required, was not in epel. I don't like mixing Epel and Rpmforge, and don't have rpmforge.repo enabled, but in this case it appeared necessary to enable it temporarily to get this package. As to the confusion with clamd/clamav-server, it is possible that the site yum found for me is not up-to-date. I will try again tomorrow, and see if I have better luck. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jI2pfEKY6ha=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1122956] Cannot install amavisd-new in CentOS-7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122956 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org --- Comment #5 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org --- (In reply to Timothy Murphy from comment #4) Please look more carefully at what I said in (1) above. The package perl-Unix-Syslog, which amavisd-new required, was not in epel. I don't like mixing Epel and Rpmforge, and don't have rpmforge.repo enabled, but in this case it appeared necessary to enable it temporarily to get this package. As to the confusion with clamd/clamav-server, it is possible that the site yum found for me is not up-to-date. I will try again tomorrow, and see if I have better luck. That's probably the case, because perl-Unix-Syslog-1.1-17.el7.x86_64.rpm *is* now in EPEL7, as mentioned by Morten in Comment #2 above. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qkTBkWFTWQa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File 1.1.6.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by churchyard
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for slic3r: 78edfa231caba9f13a577a0f7004a70f 1.1.6.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[slic3r] Update to 1.1.6
commit f4c2129d27b5f31654c5b7170257ba8b47ad7328
Author: Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz
Date: Tue Jul 29 20:16:32 2014 +0200
Update to 1.1.6
.gitignore |1 +
slic3r.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index f80adc6..740e887 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -8,3 +8,4 @@
/1.0.0.tar.gz
/1.0.1.tar.gz
/1.1.5.tar.gz
+/1.1.6.tar.gz
diff --git a/slic3r.spec b/slic3r.spec
index ab40abe..9aaaeba 100644
--- a/slic3r.spec
+++ b/slic3r.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: slic3r
-Version:1.1.5
+Version:1.1.6
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:G-code generator for 3D printers (RepRap, Makerbot, Ultimaker
etc.)
License:AGPLv3 and CC-BY
@@ -184,6 +184,9 @@ fi
%{_datadir}/%{name}
%changelog
+* Tue Jul 29 2014 Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com - 1.1.6-1
+- Update to 1.1.6
+
* Sun Jun 29 2014 Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com - 1.1.5-1
- Update to 1.1.5
- Unbundle stuff
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 1207593..13e8ed4 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-16ecfdcc30912d2a705c974a4ed77bfa 1.1.5.tar.gz
+78edfa231caba9f13a577a0f7004a70f 1.1.6.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Introducing Python 3.5 nightly builds for Fedora
- Original Message - On 07/03/2014 11:55 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: Other than the packaging reasons: Fedora might attract Python enthusiasts and developers as it is most likely the only Linux distro that has development version of Python packaged nightly. Developers and powerusers can play with new features committed yesterday just by doing `dnf update`. I actually mentioned this in my recent SciPy keynote, on the grounds that scientists may want to play around with the new matrix multiplication operator without having to build Python from source :) Yeah, I saw that one on YouTube. Good talk :) Actually, I'd like to advertise this even more, e.g. on some of Python upstream mailing list - on the other hand, I don't want to look like I'm spamming everyone needlessly... What do you think would be the best place to announce this? python-announce-list? Thanks, Slavek Cheers, Nick. ___ python-devel mailing list python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/python-devel
Re: Python 2.7 SSL upgrade patch available for testing
- Original Message - PEP 466 approved bring the core Python 2 network security infrastructure up to speed with the modern internet. Alex Gaynor has provided a draft patch of the most complex part of that PEP, backporting the bulk of the Python 3.4 SSL module to Python 2.7: http://bugs.python.org/issue21308#msg223895 This is also the part of the PEP most likely to break things, so figuring out a way to test it in Fedora before it makes it into an upstream CPython release would be a good idea... We could create a copr repo where we would rebuild python (in an SCL?) with these patches and then we'd rebuild some modules that use ssl - to see if the tests pass and if they're actually usable. The disadvantage of this approach is that it just takes lots of time to implement... Or, if we're feeling lucky, we can just build Python with these patches in rawhide and see if something breaks :) That's easy and fast (assuming everything works fine). I'd really love to help here, but I really can't spare enough time to do it properly in Copr as noted above. So the question is, are we feeling lucky? :) I'd say yes, since rawhide has just recently become future Fedora 22 and not much is going on in there right now. If we break something, we can just revert it quickly and everything will be fine. Is someone strictly against this or shall I move on with patching our rawhide Python? Slavek Cheers, Nick. ___ python-devel mailing list python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/python-devel
