2014-10-20 15:04 GMT+02:00 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com:
On a side note, I played around building a package and noticed that only a
sysvinit file is provided. Upstream should develop a systemd service file.
Hi Richard, thank you very much for this note that I reported in the
developer
2014-10-21 8:49 GMT+02:00 Valerio Pachera siri...@gmail.com:
2014-10-20 15:04 GMT+02:00 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com:
On a side note, I played around building a package and noticed that only a
sysvinit file is provided. Upstream should develop a systemd service file.
Hi Richard, thank
2014-10-20 16:19 GMT+02:00 Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com:
On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 19:16 +0200, Sergio Pascual wrote:
2014-10-17 16:00 GMT+02:00 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com:
So I'm OK with retiring python-llvmpy if a patch doesn't appear soon.
I would be too, but I'm going to want 3.5
On 10/21/2014 10:37 AM, Sergio Pascual wrote:
Just a question. If I retire the package in F21, will it affect the F20
F21 upgrade path for those
who have python-llvmpy installed?
I mean, you upgrade, there is a new llvm 3.5, but you have python-llvpmy
that requires llvm 3.4
and... fedup
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 21 Beta.
Thursday, October 23, 2014 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 19:00 CEST)
Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determine
On 17 October 2014 10:22, pravin@gmail.com pravin@gmail.com wrote:
Will be very helpful if you can add how to test information as well. i.e.
after local install package will appear in gnome-software something in bit
detail.
You can't actually preview metainfo files in the same way as
2014-10-21 12:32 GMT+02:00 Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com:
On 10/21/2014 10:37 AM, Sergio Pascual wrote:
Just a question. If I retire the package in F21, will it affect the F20
F21 upgrade path for those
who have python-llvmpy installed?
I mean, you upgrade, there is a new llvm
Compose started at Tue Oct 21 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 October 2014 10:22, pravin@gmail.com pravin@gmail.com wrote:
Will be very helpful if you can add how to test information as well. i.e.
after local install package will appear in gnome-software something in
Compose started at Tue Oct 21 05:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[Agda]
ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHSterminfo-0.3.2.5-ghc7.6.3.so
On 21 October 2014 12:55, Rajeesh K Nambiar rajeeshknamb...@gmail.com wrote:
smc-fonts failed to process with 'unrecognized contents' message
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hughsie/createrepo_as_logs/master/s/smc-fonts-common.log
What could be the issue?
Two things look to be the problem:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 07:10:01PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099299 - systemd - fedup
fails to upgrade F20 to F21 or later - infinite loop when starting udev
- the expected fix for this has been written, but testing is difficult
without it
Hello folks,
I raised a question with the Board a couple weeks ago[1] as to how we
should be branding the different releases. It's been clear that
different groups have different opinions on whether we should call
something Fedora Server 21 vs. Fedora 21 Server (and Workstation and
Cloud, of
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 October 2014 12:55, Rajeesh K Nambiar rajeeshknamb...@gmail.com wrote:
smc-fonts failed to process with 'unrecognized contents' message
Hi,
On 10/21/2014 08:28 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
* Should we start all of the Products at version 1 and say built on the
Fedora 21 platform?
Is there any intention to release the products on different schedules?
~m
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
- Original Message -
Hi,
On 10/21/2014 08:28 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
* Should we start all of the Products at version 1 and say built on the
Fedora 21 platform?
Is there any intention to release the products on different schedules?
Definitely not now or in the near future.
On 10/21/2014 08:42 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
Hi,
On 10/21/2014 08:28 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
* Should we start all of the Products at version 1 and say built on the
Fedora 21 platform?
Is there any intention to release the products on different
On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 08:47 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
On 10/21/2014 08:42 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
Hi,
On 10/21/2014 08:28 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
* Should we start all of the Products at version 1 and say built on the
Fedora 21 platform?
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Hello folks,
I raised a question with the Board a couple weeks ago[1] as to how we
should be branding the different releases. It's been clear that
different groups have different opinions on whether we should call
something Fedora Server 21 vs. Fedora 21 Server
Anyone worked out how to get top to give a normal (ie. old) display in
Rawhide?
The default consumes huge amounts of whitespace with a useless display
of per-CPU stats, and [not shown] is completely static until you press 'P'.
Rich.
top - 14:20:04 up 3:46, 3 users, load average: 1.65, 1.18,
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:25:55AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Hello folks,
I raised a question with the Board a couple weeks ago[1] as to how we
should be branding the different releases. It's been clear that
different groups have different opinions on whether
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:28:16AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
A few specific comments that have been made on the Board ticket (to
avoid rehashing them).
* Fedora Server 21 sounds like we've had 21 releases of Fedora Server
and we certainly haven't.
* Should we start all of the Products
Am 21.10.2014 um 15:33 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
Anyone worked out how to get top to give a normal (ie. old) display in
Rawhide?
The default consumes huge amounts of whitespace with a useless display
of per-CPU stats, and [not shown] is completely static until you press 'P'.
after the
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 02:33:39PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Anyone worked out how to get top to give a normal (ie. old) display in
Rawhide?
The default consumes huge amounts of whitespace with a useless display
of per-CPU stats, and [not shown] is completely static until you press 'P'.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 09:42:30AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 02:33:39PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Anyone worked out how to get top to give a normal (ie. old) display in
Rawhide?
The default consumes huge amounts of whitespace with a useless display
of
On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 14:33 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Anyone worked out how to get top to give a normal (ie. old) display in
Rawhide?
The default consumes huge amounts of whitespace with a useless display
of per-CPU stats, and [not shown] is completely static until you press 'P'.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 09:47:45AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
FWIW, if you press 1 (numeral one), it collapses all the CPUs to a
single line covering all of them. I find that quite helpful.
What I really want is one line showing the collapsed view, and a second
line showing me if any of
On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 13:33 +0200, Sergio Pascual wrote:
I have retired python-llvmpy in Rawhide and F21.
Now if the owner of llvm does the Obsoletes trick then the rebase
can go ahead, is it right?
Hopefully! I still need to get dragonegg building, but that at least
does have an active
On 10/21/2014 09:36 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:28:16AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
A few specific comments that have been made on the Board ticket (to
avoid rehashing them).
* Fedora Server 21 sounds like we've had 21 releases of Fedora Server
and we certainly
#fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2014-10-21)
Meeting started by hhorak at 13:02:31 UTC. The full logs are available
at
There's a guy that created a script for he's own purposes.
So, just to have an idea:
[Unit]
Description=Sheepdog QEMU/KVM Block Storage
After=syslog.target
[Service]
EnvironmentFile=/etc/conf.d/
sheep.conf
ExecStart=/usr/sbin/sheep --pidfile /var/run/sheep.pid ${SHEEP_OPTS}
${SHEEP_PATH}
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2014-10-22 17:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets
On Oct 21, 2014, at 9:36 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:28:16AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
A few specific comments that have been made on the Board ticket (to
avoid rehashing them).
* Fedora Server 21 sounds like we've had 21 releases of
Is there a good description of ELF shared library symbol versioning best
practices somewhere?
In particular, under what conditions do you need to create a new section in
the versioning file given to the linker's --version-script option when new
symbols are added?
And what do you do if you've
Should be Fedora 21 $PRODUCT because the Fedora version is underneath
the product, and one product can usually convert into another on an
installed system.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
2014-10-21 16:39 GMT+02:00 Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org:
On 10/21/2014 09:36 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:28:16AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
A few specific comments that have been made on the Board ticket (to
avoid rehashing them).
* Fedora Server 21
See, that's easy ! :)
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
2014-10-21 17:06 GMT+02:00 David Timothy Strauss da...@davidstrauss.net:
Should be Fedora 21 $PRODUCT because the Fedora version is underneath
the product, and one product can usually convert into another on an
installed system.
Caution, there is no guarantee that it will always be supported.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 03:59:46PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
Is there a good description of ELF shared library symbol versioning best
practices somewhere?
In particular, under what conditions do you need to create a new section in
the versioning file given to the linker's --version-script
On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 15:59 +0100, David Howells wrote:
Is there a good description of ELF shared library symbol versioning best
practices somewhere?
In particular, under what conditions do you need to create a new section in
the versioning file given to the linker's --version-script option
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:13:19PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 15:59 +0100, David Howells wrote:
Is there a good description of ELF shared library symbol versioning best
practices somewhere?
In particular, under what conditions do you need to create a new section in
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 03:59:46PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
Is there a good description of ELF shared library symbol versioning best
practices somewhere?
In particular, under what conditions do you need to create a new section in
the versioning file given to the linker's --version-script
On 10/21/2014 10:59 AM, David Howells wrote:
Is there a good description of ELF shared library symbol versioning best
practices somewhere?
If you haven't already read Uli's paper, that's a start:
http://www.akkadia.org/drepper/dsohowto.pdf
(section 3 in particular)
--
devel mailing list
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:56:19PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Hmm, not sure I follow here. Since when is systemd an optional
component in Fedora?
I have been spending much of my time building Fedora-based Docker
containers recently. I've been sticking to the
one-process-per-container
Today I got report that there are failed builds in Copr for rawhide
chroots. [1]
After investigation I find that coreutils are installed too late, so
they are not available to previous postcripts:
Installing : crypto-policies-20140905-1.git4649b7d.fc22.noarch
On 10/21/2014 03:33 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Anyone worked out how to get top to give a normal (ie. old) display in
Rawhide?
It is in F21 too.
Type:
tttmmVbz1W
and you get original look and feel.
For discussion see bug 1153049.
Mirek
--
devel mailing list
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:28:16 -0400
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello folks,
I raised a question with the Board a couple weeks ago[1] as to how we
should be branding the different releases. It's been clear that
different groups have different opinions on whether we should
On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 19:26 +0200, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
On 10/21/2014 03:33 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Anyone worked out how to get top to give a normal (ie. old) display in
Rawhide?
It is in F21 too.
Type:
tttmmVbz1W
and you get original look and feel.
For discussion see
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 19:23:29 +0200
Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com wrote:
Today I got report that there are failed builds in Copr for rawhide
chroots. [1]
...snip...
And there may be even more examples. You can try it yourself by:
rm -rf /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/*
On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 11:26 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 07:53 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 10:46 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
== The Problem ==
It is very common for users to have systems with encrypted root
Fedora 21 Workstation
Fedora 21 Server
Fedora 21 Cloud
That makes it easy for us remixers - CompJournoStick 21 Workstation, for
example.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:28:16 -0400
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 2014-10-21 18:11, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 03:59:46PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
I assumed that adding them to KEYUTILS_1.4 would be okay because nothing
would've tried to use them previously because they didn't exist in any
version.
One thing to bear in mind
On Fri, 12.09.14 10:46, Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) wrote:
It is very common for users to have systems with encrypted root
partitions (or even just /var and /etc). This may be due to a
personal
Nitpicking: we currently do not support split-off /etc on
Fedora/Dracut. /var may be
On Fri, 12.09.14 18:37, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Am 12.09.2014 um 18:33 schrieb Nathanael d. Noblet:
So I don't use Firefox anymore but I do know back in the day if we had
FF open when we updated it would do a double request for each page/form.
However when updating
Am 21.10.2014 um 22:08 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Fri, 12.09.14 18:37, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
1 out of a million cases needs offline updates
really - the only good at it is that you can stick
at using YUM and decide what you have to do at your
own - rarely updates
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:56:35PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Jeff Sheltren wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Rex Dieter
rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
ping, any comment or objection?
I'll work on a patch for epel-release to implement a %{epel} macro, in
case anyone was waiting
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
912
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
244
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0590/oath-toolkit-2.0.2-4.el6
131
-12.20141021git.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3508)
GNU Portability Library
Update Information:
Update on 20141021.
ChangeLog:
* Tue Oct 21 2014
Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:56:35PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Jeff Sheltren wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Rex Dieter
rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
ping, any comment or objection?
I'll work on a patch for epel-release to implement a %{epel} macro, in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154974
Bug ID: 1154974
Summary: perl-Devel-Timer-0.05-2.fc22 FTBFS randomly: Failed
test 'sort by count' at t/test.t line 73
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154974
--- Comment #1 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com ---
I saw similar behavior sometimes earlier too, but haven't found any tendency
since it can fail one 1 time per 10 runs, or so.
Looks like I need to contact upstream for clarification.
--
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Version:
539cf46f84d54f670bff8710ce072ed2 Test-Version-1.004001.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 1a5274ba49f39b6fb8d555b62071efe9e0a46137
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Oct 21 10:08:26 2014 +0100
Update to 1.004001
- New upstream release 1.004001
- Improved consistent check diagnostics (GH#11)
perl-Test-Version.spec |6 +-
sources
Summary of changes:
1a5274b... Update to 1.004001 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Version-1.004001-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
1a5274b... Update to 1.004001
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Version-1.004001-1.fc22' was created pointing to:
1a5274b... Update to 1.004001
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155047
Bug ID: 1155047
Summary: perl-POE-Component-Client-DNS-1.053-5.fc22 FTBFS in
non-koji mock: nameservers: invalid argument at
/builddir/build/BUILD/POE-Component-Client-DNS-1.053/b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127473
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127471
Bug 1127471 depends on bug 1127473, which changed state.
Bug 1127473 Summary: Please update to upstream version = 0.06
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127473
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127471
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150529
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-POE-Test-Loops-1.359-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
perl-Qt has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.18()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Qt-0.96.0-11.fc22.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
user: plautrba set for eseyman acl: approveacls of package: perl-Net-Daemon
from: to: Approved on branch: master
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: plautrba set for eseyman acl: commit of package: perl-Net-Daemon from:
to: Approved on branch: master
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: plautrba set for eseyman acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Net-Daemon
from: to: Approved on branch: master
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: plautrba set for eseyman acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Net-Daemon
from: to: Approved on branch: el5
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: plautrba set for eseyman acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Net-Daemon
from: to: Approved on branch: el5
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: plautrba set for eseyman acl: commit of package: perl-Net-Daemon from:
to: Approved on branch: el5
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: plautrba set for eseyman acl: commit of package: perl-Net-Daemon from:
to: Approved on branch: el6
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: plautrba set for eseyman acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Net-Daemon
from: to: Approved on branch: el6
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: plautrba set for eseyman acl: approveacls of package: perl-Net-Daemon
from: to: Approved on branch: el6
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: plautrba set for eseyman acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Net-Daemon
from: to: Approved on branch: master
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: plautrba set for eseyman acl: approveacls of package: perl-Net-Daemon
from: to: Approved on branch: el5
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: plautrba set for eseyman acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Net-Daemon
from: to: Approved on branch: el6
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: plautrba set for eseyman acl: approveacls of package: perl-Net-Daemon
from: to: Approved on branch: f19
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: plautrba set for eseyman acl: approveacls of package: perl-Net-Daemon
from: to: Approved on branch: f20
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: plautrba set for eseyman acl: commit of package: perl-Net-Daemon from:
to: Approved on branch: f19
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: plautrba set for eseyman acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Net-Daemon
from: to: Approved on branch: f20
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: plautrba set for eseyman acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Net-Daemon
from: to: Approved on branch: f19
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: plautrba set for eseyman acl: approveacls of package: perl-Net-Daemon
from: to: Approved on branch: f21
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: plautrba set for eseyman acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Net-Daemon
from: to: Approved on branch: f20
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: plautrba changed point of contact of package: perl-Net-Daemon from:
plautrba to: eseyman on branch: el5
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: plautrba set for eseyman acl: commit of package: perl-Net-Daemon from:
to: Approved on branch: f21
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: plautrba set for eseyman acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Net-Daemon
from: to: Approved on branch: f19
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: plautrba set for eseyman acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Net-Daemon
from: to: Approved on branch: f21
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: plautrba changed point of contact of package: perl-Net-Daemon from:
plautrba to: eseyman on branch: f21
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: plautrba set for eseyman acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Net-Daemon
from: to: Approved on branch: f21
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: plautrba changed point of contact of package: perl-Net-Daemon from:
plautrba to: eseyman on branch: f19
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: plautrba changed point of contact of package: perl-Net-Daemon from:
plautrba to: eseyman on branch: master
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: plautrba changed point of contact of package: perl-Net-Daemon from:
plautrba to: eseyman on branch: f20
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Daemon
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
