On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 04:26:00PM -0500, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
(Incidentally, this would be much less of a problem if we had a way
to add all the needed BuildRequires: automatically, and actually did
that. But the mere presence of these BuildRequires: in spec files
would still be accidental
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:45:39AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 04:26:00PM -0500, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
(Incidentally, this would be much less of a problem if we had a way
to add all the needed BuildRequires: automatically, and actually did
that. But the mere
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:10:43 -0700
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
On 01/12/2015 06:08 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dear Fedora developers,
I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making
minimal build root really
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 02:40:47PM +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
If anyone is interested in having USB/IP working in Fedora, I'm
looking for someone to review the userspace tools at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175270.
Taken.
Zbyszek
--
devel mailing list
Hello Simo,
On Wednesday, 14 January 2015 2:29 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
Sorry this is false. You got enough emails telling you this
change is undesirable, that's the definition of opposition
and means you have no _consensus_.
IIUC, that was for disabling remote root access completely with
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:53 PM, P J P pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
Hello Simo,
On Wednesday, 14 January 2015 2:29 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
Sorry this is false. You got enough emails telling you this
change is undesirable, that's the definition of opposition
and means you have no
On 01/12/2015 08:52 PM, Milan Keršláger wrote:
Dne 12.1.2015 v 20:46 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:39:35 +0100
Milan Keršláger milan.kersla...@pslib.cz wrote:
...snip...
Hey Milan.
I understand you have a strong opinion on this topic as does pjp.
This is however no reason
- Original Message -
From: Marian Csontos mcson...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 7:52:07 PM
Subject: Re: Remove gcc, gcc-c++ and make from minimal build root
On 01/13/2015 06:46 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 13.1.2015 v 18:20 Vít
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 12:51:41 -0500
Ben Cotton bcot...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
wrote:
I could make that work but it is far from ideal as I would need to
make sure that its
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 15:14:03 -0500
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
snip
* #1349 Fedora 22 scheduling strategy (and beyond) (sgallagh,
18:41:13)
* LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/22/Schedule
(mattdm, 18:43:55)
*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 12:26:04 -0500
Ben Cotton bcot...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I updated the change page with a small change to the User Experience
section. It now matches the effect of the updated proposal.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:34 AM,
Dne 13.1.2015 v 18:20 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 13.1.2015 v 18:09 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 13.1.2015 v 17:54 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
So lets try to find what is written in C/C++ by some different way. Is
that true, that every package in C/C++ compiled using gcc depends on
glibc? Then we can
On 01/13/2015 06:53 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Marian Csontos mcson...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 7:52:07 PM
Subject: Re: Remove gcc, gcc-c++ and make from minimal build root
On 01/13/2015 06:46 PM, Vít
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 11:08:30 -0500
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 15:31 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 8.1.2015 v 15:03 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 10:40 +0100, Vít
Dne 13.1.2015 v 17:54 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
So lets try to find what is written in C/C++ by some different way. Is
that true, that every package in C/C++ compiled using gcc depends on
glibc? Then we can use this query to get the number of packages:
$ repoquery --source --whatrequires
Dne 13.1.2015 v 18:09 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 13.1.2015 v 17:54 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
So lets try to find what is written in C/C++ by some different way. Is
that true, that every package in C/C++ compiled using gcc depends on
glibc? Then we can use this query to get the number of packages:
I updated the change page with a small change to the User Experience
section. It now matches the effect of the updated proposal.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
I suspect that to properly support making changes here
it needs to be strongly tied into
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:54:03 +0100
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 13.1.2015 v 17:42 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
On 01/13/2015 12:06 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 13.1.2015 v 08:12 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
So we are even not able to
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
I could make that work but it is far from ideal as I would need to make
sure that its available over a network connection. For one I would need
to remember the url to the key so that it can be fetched.
That's not quite
On 01/13/2015 06:46 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 13.1.2015 v 18:20 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 13.1.2015 v 18:09 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 13.1.2015 v 17:54 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
So lets try to find what is written in C/C++ by some different way. Is
that true, that every package in C/C++
Hello Dennis,
On Tuesday, 13 January 2015 10:05 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
There is no consensus on that.
Well, no opposition as such either. How is it done otherwise,
do we conduct votes to establish consensus, is that a usual practice?
I do not do enough installs that I use kickstart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 13.1.2015 v 18:01 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
lets get some
concrete data to look at.
So please, is there any chance to get similar data from Koji? You are
probably the best person who could provide something similar to my tests.
Thanks
Vít
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 01:23:36 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
* Last upstream release is from 2007 and the same as offered by Fedora.
Then it's not the Fedora maintainer who is not doing his/her job.
At Fedora, it is _mispackaged_ and untested to begin with. The plugin
packages likely have never
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 15:58 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
The Fedora 21 mass rebuild took about 40 hours. ;)
BTW, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Mass_Rebuild is empty.
What are the goals of a mass rebuild now, given that we just had one
before F21 Beta?
That's really not the reason for
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
wrote:
Vít Ondruch wrote:
I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making
minimal build root really minimal, explicitly specifying build
dependencies, etc.
-1, all the serious software requires gcc,
On 13 January 2015 at 10:37, Marian Csontos mcson...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/12/2015 08:52 PM, Milan Keršláger wrote:
Dne 12.1.2015 v 20:46 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:39:35 +0100
Milan Keršláger milan.kersla...@pslib.cz wrote:
...snip...
Hey Milan.
I understand
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 05:17:08PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sun, 11.01.15 21:29, Tomasz Torcz (to...@pipebreaker.pl) wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:16:38AM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Hello,
I recently noticed Debian/Ubuntu has had support for aclexec in
Am 13.01.2015 um 20:56 schrieb William B:
Unbound creates more flakiness than it solves. Unbound caches no
answer as a negative cache entry. If your wireless blips for an
instant, that's it, result vanishes
simply not true
there is a *huge* difference between a NXDOMAIN response and not
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:35:39AM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 09:15:39AM +0100, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
On 01/11/2015 09:22 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Hello,
People who have their names in the Fedora tcp_wrappers changelog added to
CC list..
Any
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 01/12/2015 02:08 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dear Fedora developers,
I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making
minimal build root really minimal, explicitly specifying build
dependencies,
On 01/12/2015 06:08 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dear Fedora developers,
I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making
minimal build root really minimal, explicitly specifying build
dependencies, etc.
Would it be technically feasible to have a different buildroot for arch
and
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:32:09AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Of the 7742 that are arch specific, we do not know how many need to
have gcc or gcc-c++ installed in the buildroot for them to compile.
though we could likely look at the BuildRequires and make an educated
guess.
Kevin Kofler wrote:
I am user C. I don't need a log of blocked stuff, I'd only be worried
about intruders DoSing the machine by filling the log. I really want
ANY outside access to my machine silently dropped. My machine is NOT a
server, period.
So you never use Bittorrent to download a new
Hello,
On 13 January 2015 at 14:55, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
domi...@greysector.net wrote:
Dear Fedora Community,
I'm orphaning the iscan-firmware package since I no longer have even
one Epson scanner which would require it. Hopefully someone else
with one of the supported scanners
On 2015-01-13, 13:38 GMT, Martin Stransky wrote:
Please file a bug for that at bugzilla.redhat.com
ma.
You mean something like
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161059 ?
Matěj
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
I juste open a FESCO request for kanarip :
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1387
He owns several perl and ruby package, including puppet !!!
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/kanarip/
I'm not a ruby user/dev so I won't be volunteer to take them
Marianne
Le
Dne 13.1.2015 v 14:02 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Sven Lankes wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:16:42PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
That's simply an idiotic thing to say. What is the progress involved
in adding a new BR to thousands of
Hello everyone!
The nomination period for FESCo and Environments and Stacks Working
Group Elections is now open.
We will be selecting five seats on FESCo [1] and four seats on Env and
Stacks Working Group [2]. If you are interested in these roles, please
add yourself to the lists of nominees at
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:37:25AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
any chance to see util-linux v2.26 in F21?
Ah sorry, I missed this your question...
Well, I'm going to push v2.26-rc1 to rawhide this week, and maybe
(depends on feedback) later we can try to upgrade stable release in
Hello everyone!
The nomination period for FESCo and Environments and Stacks Working
Group Elections is now open.
We will be selecting five seats on FESCo [1] and four seats on Env and
Stacks Working Group [2]. If you are interested in these roles, please
add yourself to the lists of
I guess ice got retired because I and the other maintainers ran out of time
to maintain it. Actually, I hadn't fully realised until now that it was
retired; I'll check shortly what the issue(s) were because I'd like it to
stay in (it was a LOT of work creating the package in the first place!).
Dne 13.1.2015 v 08:12 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
On 01/13/2015 07:12 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
On Tue 13 Jan 2015 01:35:26 AM CET Kevin Kofler wrote:
Vít Ondruch wrote:
I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making
minimal build root really minimal, explicitly
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:41:30 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
Devel,
I would like to un-retire mumble, but that requires ice.
I've just fixed ice to compile on f21 without much effort.
So I think I'll un-retire ice and mumble and maintain them
unless anyone objects.
Is there any reason
- Original Message -
From: Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 8:33:21 AM
Subject: Re: A little problem with dnf
On 12. 1. 2015 at 07:55:26, Adrian Soliard wrote:
2015-01-12 5:35 GMT-03:00 Igor Gnatenko
Am 13.01.2015 um 10:31 schrieb Karel Zak:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:37:25AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
any chance to see util-linux v2.26 in F21?
Ah sorry, I missed this your question...
no problem
Well, I'm going to push v2.26-rc1 to rawhide this week, and maybe
(depends on
= Proposed System Wide Change: RpmOstree - Server side composes and atomic
upgrades =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RpmOstree
Change owner(s): Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org
The rpm-ostree [1] tool provides a new way to deploy and manage RPM-based
operating systems. Instead of
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 01:28:56PM +0100, Richard Z wrote:
- tune2fs -C 1 dev is apparently ignored on all devices
as pointed out on bugzilla that was my mistake, I have confused the
options in the hurry.
Richard
---
Name and OpenPGP keys available from pgp key servers
pgpu_SRmf_pZY.pgp
On Tuesday, 13 January 2015 4:24 AM, Volker Sobek wrote:
Maybe this difference can be addressed together with what ever is
decided upon in this discussion? I think having some consistency here
would be good.
IMO, the install image consistency issues need to be handled separately and
could
2015-01-13 6:33 GMT-03:00 Radek Holy rh...@redhat.com:
- Original Message -
From: Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 8:33:21 AM
Subject: Re: A little problem with dnf
On 12. 1. 2015 at 07:55:26, Adrian Soliard wrote:
The arguments on change the compiler not near enough is damn failed as well.
LLVM and now clang are growing towards a been a standard soon for many
applications.
Helio
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 02:38:44PM +0100,
Hi,
have very recently upgraded from F19 to F21 and notice scary log entires
after hibernation/resume.
Watch your logs!
The hardware (in combination with F19) was rock solid all the time and
is fairly boring. I am still running 32 bit x86. No sign of any problems
when not hibernating. I have
Am Dienstag, den 13.01.2015, 11:51 + schrieb P J P:
On Tuesday, 13 January 2015 4:24 AM, Volker Sobek wrote:
Maybe this difference can be addressed together with what ever is
decided upon in this discussion? I think having some consistency here
would be good.
IMO, the install
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 04:37 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Hello everyone!
The nomination period for FESCo and Environments and Stacks Working
Group Elections is now open.
We will be selecting five seats on FESCo [1] and four seats on Env and
Stacks Working Group [2]. If you are
Please file a bug for that at bugzilla.redhat.com
ma.
On 01/12/2015 08:59 PM, Nikos Roussos wrote:
I noticed that I'm unable to watch Vimeo videos with Firefox without
Flash plugin. Same is not true if I use the Firefox build from upstream.
Do we disable something on our build that may be
Dear Fedora Community,
I'm orphaning the iscan-firmware package since I no longer have even
one Epson scanner which would require it. Hopefully someone else
with one of the supported scanners can take it.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 02:38:44PM +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 01/12/2015 02:30 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
W dniu 12.01.2015 o 14:08, Vít Ondruch pisze:
I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making
minimal build root really minimal, explicitly specifying
commit 79174afe576c52c8c9eee7daff1254ba05dd4d1d
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jan 13 13:16:01 2015 +0100
1.633 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-DBI.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:16:42PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
That's simply an idiotic thing to say. What is the progress involved
in adding a new BR to thousands of packages?
Am I wrong assuming that it would be rather easy to add the BR to all
packages semi-automatically previous to a
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Sven Lankes wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:16:42PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
That's simply an idiotic thing to say. What is the progress involved
in adding a new BR to thousands of packages?
Am I wrong assuming that it would be rather
Paul Wouters wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Neal Becker wrote:
How will this impact the following (common) situation?
I carry my linux laptop between home and work. When at work, I need to use
my employer's dns to lookup names of (non-public) local machines.
When connecting to work,
Forgot to add this was measured on my Lenovo T440s, with SSD and 12 GB
RAM, running F21 with mock 1.2.3, configured to use LVM plugin and DNF
(see attached config files). And network? Who knows, probably fast.
Should be 1Gb/s if I am not mistaken.
Not sure how similar/different the tests could
How will this impact the following (common) situation?
I carry my linux laptop between home and work. When at work, I need to use my
employer's dns to lookup names of (non-public) local machines.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 13.1.2015 v 14:02 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Sven Lankes wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:16:42PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
That's simply an idiotic thing to say.
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Neal Becker wrote:
How will this impact the following (common) situation?
I carry my linux laptop between home and work. When at work, I need to use my
employer's dns to lookup names of (non-public) local machines.
When connecting to work, dnssec-trigger will probe the
You can interpret these data yourself, but with less packages in build root,
I can see:
1) Saved build time
2) Saved network bandwidth
3) Saved storage
4) Less things to break
Just to make sure I'm reading the data correctly, your tests show a
maximum approximate savings of 20 seconds
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: RpmOstree - Server side composes and atomic
upgrades =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RpmOstree
Change owner(s): Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org
The rpm-ostree [1] tool
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Dear Fedora developers,
I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making
minimal build root really minimal, explicitly specifying build
dependencies, etc.
Hi,
I think this is a good idea, because
Hello,
Please see: (shared by 'fenrus02' on IRC)
- https://stribika.github.io/2015/01/04/secure-secure-shell.html
Here are few more recommendations for sshd(8) configurations, mostly pertaining
to encryption algorithms.
Does it make sense to incorporate any of the suggestions from there?
Hello Miloslav, all
On Tuesday, 13 January 2015 10:26 AM, P J P wrote:
So, we do seem to have consensus(at least no opposition) for
'PermitRootLogin=without-password' option. I'll update the feature
page with it and details about the specific use-cases.
I have updated the feature page
On 01/13/2015 03:38 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
Please file a bug for that at bugzilla.redhat.com
Thanks for looking into this.
I opened the bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181719
On 01/12/2015 08:59 PM, Nikos Roussos wrote:
I noticed that I'm unable to watch Vimeo videos
Dne 13.1.2015 v 16:35 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
You can interpret these data yourself, but with less packages in build root,
I can see:
1) Saved build time
2) Saved network bandwidth
3) Saved storage
4) Less things to break
Just to make sure I'm reading the data correctly, your tests show
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628655
Jan Pazdziora jpazdzi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 04:53:43 + (UTC)
P J P pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 January 2015 3:06 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
(The general theme of this mail: Being flexible is fine, and
establishing this through this discussion is
On 01/13/2015 12:06 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 13.1.2015 v 08:12 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
So we are even not able to tell how many packages are written in C or
C++ in Fedora, since we do not have the BuildRequires speficied
correctly.
Correct.
Because we have still the false feeling that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:08:24 +0100
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Dear Fedora developers,
I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making
minimal build root really minimal, explicitly specifying build
dependencies,
Dne 13.1.2015 v 17:42 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
On 01/13/2015 12:06 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 13.1.2015 v 08:12 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
So we are even not able to tell how many packages are written in C or
C++ in Fedora, since we do not have the BuildRequires speficied
correctly.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:28:36 -0500
Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com
wrote:
Dne 13.1.2015 v 14:02 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 01:31:06PM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
To install a local DNS resolver trusted for the DNSSEC validation
running on 127.0.0.1:53. This must be the only name server entry
in /etc/resolv.conf.
snip ...
People use Fedora on portable/mobile devices which are connected to
diverse
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:24:53PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
The reason for tentative was mostly so we could get feedback
from rel-eng on whether this is actually feasible.
It is not even close to feasible.
[...]
It is still not reasonable to get everything done in that period of
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 04:55:54PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco,
e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
the open floor topic. Note
On 13 January 2015 at 15:39, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:24:53PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
The reason for tentative was mostly so we could get feedback
from rel-eng on whether this is actually feasible.
It is not even close to
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:50:06 -0700
Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
You forgot too many packages? There are 15842 packages in Fedora 21
and 16230 in Rawhide. That is a lot of packages that have to be
rebuilt possibly multiple times due to FTBFS, multiple architectures,
etc.
2.5
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:09:16 + (UTC)
P J P pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
Hello Dennis,
On Tuesday, 13 January 2015 10:05 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
There is no consensus on that.
Well, no opposition as such either.
Sorry this is false.
You got enough emails telling you this
On Tue 13 Jan 2015 01:35:26 AM CET Kevin Kofler wrote:
I actually think that cmake should be added to the minimal build root,
instead of removing stuff. Almost all the packages I work on BuildRequire
cmake (which also implies that they need make to build, and gcc-c++ is the
typical
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:02:09 +0100
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 13.01.2015 um 20:56 schrieb William B:
Unbound creates more flakiness than it solves. Unbound caches no
answer as a negative cache entry. If your wireless blips
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com wrote:
Jaroslav, there is a lot more information on the actual wiki page.
Like the fact that this is only for particular opt-in new installs and
that yum/dnf/RPM can only operate in read-only mode on such installs.
Could you
== Scope ==
* Other developers:
*** Use systemd-tmpfiles instead of placing content in /var (TODO: better
docs
for this)
Is this a strict dependency or a nice-to-have item? That is, are we talking
about having to change all such packages in Fedora (or some specific subset)
within the
Jaroslav, there is a lot more information on the actual wiki page.
Like the fact that this is only for particular opt-in new installs and
that yum/dnf/RPM can only operate in read-only mode on such installs.
Could you resend this with the entirety of the text? It might lead to
fewer
Il 12/01/2015 14:00, Mattias Ellert ha scritto:
Hi!
I have a couple of packages submitted for review and I offer to make
swaps for them:
Globus Toolkit packages (C code - mostly loadable modules)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144800
globus-gridmap-eppn-callout
Dne 13.1.2015 v 08:12 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
On 01/13/2015 07:12 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
On Tue 13 Jan 2015 01:35:26 AM CET Kevin Kofler wrote:
Vít Ondruch wrote:
I basically see several issues:
1. The sheer amount of packages being affect.
snip data
By all accounts we are
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015, at 04:06 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
== Scope ==
* Other developers:
*** Use systemd-tmpfiles instead of placing content in /var (TODO: better
docs
for this)
Is this a strict dependency or a nice-to-have item? That is, are we talking
about having to change all
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2015-01-14 18:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:58:51 -0700
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:50:06 -0700
Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
You forgot too many packages? There are 15842 packages in Fedora
21 and 16230 in Rawhide.
Once upon a time, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com said:
So, while the mass rebuild itself is less than 2 days, it takes a while
to stablize things after that. If we branched right after the mass
rebuild we would have to then stablize both rawhide and f22.
One other thing that takes time (as a
commit c8e2fa78d0d717b37eff8b8d50b1698c553c573d
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jan 13 18:11:24 2015 +0100
Specify all dependencies
perl-parent.spec | 10 +-
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-parent.spec b/perl-parent.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171043
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178399
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178792
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
commit 1b8900e8e33838f661a7f8c23d55048b1e44915a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jan 13 09:38:49 2015 +0100
Modernize spec file
perl-DateTime-Locale.spec | 42 --
1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181652
Bug ID: 1181652
Summary: Please package perl-Apache-Session-LDAP into EPEL
5/6/7
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Component: perl-Apache-Session
Assignee:
1 - 100 of 203 matches
Mail list logo
