On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 01:02:59PM +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Agenda:
- Interview candidates for new memberships
- Optionally accept new members
- Vote for new chairman of the Base Design WG to replace Phil Knirsch
- Open Floor
Please add items by replying to this mail.
Unfortunately
On 25 February 2015 at 16:43, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Ali AlipourR alipoo...@gmail.com wrote:
Why sysrq is limited to only sync command on official fedora kernel?
The kernel itself isn't limited. It's just set that way in
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Tomas Bzatek tbza...@redhat.com
wrote:
I've just made the packages listed below orphan due to my departure
from
my current employer. Unfortunately I won't be able to invest my
personal
free time either.
fpc: epel7 el6 el5
lazarus: epel7 el6 el5
tuxcmd
udisks2
On 02/26/2015 09:43 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 10:39:35 AM
Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
platform in Fedora
On
On 02/26/2015 10:13 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/26/2015 09:23 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 02/26/2015 09:20 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/26/2015 08:42 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
Also, my proposal of introducing java metapackage (see my other post
in this thread), which would always require
On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 09:00 +0100, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 02/24/2015 08:36 PM, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote:
Hi All,
I have been reading this mail chain for some time and there is something I
wanted to say. It's kind
of a long mail, I apologize for taking so much of your time but request you
On 02/26/2015 04:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:26:32 +0100
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:11:33 +0100
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
Hi,
seems to me as if koji has seized operation:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 17:06:03 +0100
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 02/26/2015 04:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:26:32 +0100
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:11:33 +0100
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
Hi,
seems to me
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 09:49:48 +0100
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Yes, we need to maintain both stacks for a while anyways for e.g.
lxde users, etc. Given that XFCE now supports libinput too, we could
reconsider this and make xorg-drv-libinput a hard dep of the X server
so that
On 02/26/2015 05:12 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 17:06:03 +0100
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 02/26/2015 04:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:26:32 +0100
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:11:33 +0100
Ralf Corsepius
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 18:22 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/24/2015 05:21 PM, Mario Torre wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 15:37 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/24/2015 02:15 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 02/24/2015 12:43 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
I am against official guidelines or
Am 26.02.2015 um 16:37 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 02/26/2015 02:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
really?
why?
how do you come to that weird conclusion?
surely, one can say not my package, not my problem but that's
ignorant and needs no guidelines and policies - sanity should be enough
I
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 08:51:46AM -0700, Pete Travis wrote:
The only time I've needed sysrq reboots in recent memory was while running
rawhide and knowingly venturing into uncharted territory. If I'm not the
only one, would it make sense to include appropriate sysctl snippets in
Hi folks today i update to F22 Workstation ( fresh install ) and well when
the adwaita dark theme is active, the textfield of Firefox 35 have as
background color ( white) and the text have the same color.
here a example of devel list page
firefox + adwaita dark
On 02/26/2015 02:51 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
Small restart.
Looking to the discussion, although many people claimed against any
rules at the end it seems to me that everybody agree on some rules -
even if it would be existence of metapackage or only removed virtual
provides and priority
- Original Message -
From: Mario Torre neug...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 4:59:35 PM
Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
platform in Fedora
On
- Original Message -
From: Robert Marcano rob...@marcanoonline.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 5:20:04 PM
Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
platform in Fedora
On 02/24/2015 05:04 AM, Jaroslav
==
#fedora-meeting-2: Env and Stacks (2015-02-26)
==
Meeting started by hhorak at 13:02:49 UTC. The full logs are available
at
On 02/26/2015 02:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
really?
why?
how do you come to that weird conclusion?
surely, one can say not my package, not my problem but that's
ignorant and needs no guidelines and policies - sanity should be enough
I guess you did not grasp I was referring to the
On 02/26/2015 02:46 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 02/26/2015 10:13 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/26/2015 09:23 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 02/26/2015 09:20 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/26/2015 08:42 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
Also, my proposal of introducing java metapackage (see my other
post
On 02/24/2015 05:04 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in
Fedora =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora
Change owner(s): Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com
Currently Fedora supports one main Java runtime and Java
On Feb 25, 2015 1:50 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 25.02.2015 um 21:38 schrieb Zdenek Kabelac:
Dne 25.2.2015 v 18:44 Reindl Harald napsal(a):
Am 25.02.2015 um 18:37 schrieb Paul Wouters:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Hmm? Syncing is allowed to my
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:26:32 +0100
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:11:33 +0100
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
Hi,
seems to me as if koji has seized operation:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1304/9081304/root.log
On 02/26/2015 04:21 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
Hi
But in f23 it still failed on geos linking...
---
./.libs/libosm2pgsql.a(geometry-builder.o): In function
`geometry_builder::parse_wkt(char const*, osmNode***, int**,
On 02/26/2015 03:49 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
and without the ownership model it would have been prevented
what model would you use?
you can't only say that model is wrong without any alternative
I have already mentioned alternative before no need to repeat that
proposal to you.
Bottom
On 02/26/2015 03:58 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.02.2015 um 16:54 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 02/26/2015 03:49 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
and without the ownership model it would have been prevented
what model would you use?
you can't only say that model is wrong without any
On 02/26/2015 04:20 PM, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 02/24/2015 05:04 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in
Fedora =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora
Change owner(s): Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com
Currently
Am 26.02.2015 um 16:54 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 02/26/2015 03:49 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
and without the ownership model it would have been prevented
what model would you use?
you can't only say that model is wrong without any alternative
I have already mentioned alternative
Without consent from FPC such shift would be problematic.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 05:13:53PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Sure I have a stake in systemd, but certainly none in
fedora-release.rpm. But even for systemd, there are a number of people
Sorry for the somewhat slow reply, but I've been thinking about all of
this I guess, primarily,
On 02/24/2015 10:34 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in
Fedora =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora
Change owner(s): Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com
Currently Fedora supports one main Java runtime and Java
Am 26.02.2015 um 15:05 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 02/26/2015 01:29 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 05:13:53PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Sure I have a stake in systemd, but certainly none in
fedora-release.rpm. But even for systemd, there are a number of people
Hi there
this is a heads up notice that I intend to retire kde-plasma-daisy, the
reasons being:
- no upstream updates in almost 3 years
- FTBFS in rawhide because there's no kde-workspace{-devel}
- I don't use it myself.
- Repackaging for Plasma 5 would probably require a new package
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 03:15:22PM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 02:20:35PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Strictly speaking[1], I don't need a permission to do so. Still, I would
like to ask for opinions here.
It will not be pushed until after alpha
Hi,
I need ccrtp, libzrtpcpp and dbus-c++ to be rebuilt against GCC5 to get
sflphone building [1].
Thanks,
Sandro
[1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4328/9074328/build.log
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 01:36:31PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
I need ccrtp, libzrtpcpp
Building those two now.
and dbus-c++ to be rebuilt against GCC5 to
get sflphone building [1].
Zbyszek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
= Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in
Fedora =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora
== Detailed Description ==
This is no real work proposal.
Stepping back, I’m not sure this has been said explicitly: this is really a
packaging
Yesterday I was browsing the Fedora pkgdb/git/bohdi pages and this morning I
returned to go backwards thru my web browser history when I stumbled upon a
real hidden gem for a HTTP 500 response. Our hot dog armed with a ray gun
against a nuclear panda... oh man that was great. Best 500 I've
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 02:20:35PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Strictly speaking[1], I don't need a permission to do so. Still, I would
like to ask for opinions here.
It will not be pushed until after alpha release unless it gets an exception.
[1]
Hi,
seems to me as if koji has seized operation:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1304/9081304/root.log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1319/9081319/root.log
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:43 AM, Jared K. Smith
jsm...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:40 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
i686 has nothing to do with ARM. So when someone says i686 he/she
means 32bit x86.
Well yes -- that's what *I* take it to mean -- I just
Summary of changes:
a656988... 0.48 bump, yet even more performance improvements (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
a656988... 0.48 bump, yet even more performance improvements (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 08:04:54AM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 01:33:57PM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 27/01/15 11:51, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Hello,
** A build containing latest Django will be pushed to f22 branch late in
dev
cycle. If we decide not to
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:11:33 +0100
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
Hi,
seems to me as if koji has seized operation:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1304/9081304/root.log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1319/9081319/root.log
I guess this is the
On 02/26/2015 01:29 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 05:13:53PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Sure I have a stake in systemd, but certainly none in
fedora-release.rpm. But even for systemd, there are a number of people
Sorry for the somewhat slow reply, but I've been
On 02/26/2015 08:31 AM, John Florian wrote:
Yesterday I was browsing the Fedora pkgdb/git/bohdi pages and this
morning I returned to go backwards thru my web browser history when I
stumbled upon a real hidden gem for a HTTP 500 response. Our hot dog
armed with a ray gun against a nuclear panda…
Jerry James wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Does
%undefine _hardened_build
help?
that version works for me
Hmmm, am I doing something wrong? I've tried both:
%undefine _hardened_build
and:
%undefine
I've just made the packages listed below orphan due to my departure from
my current employer. Unfortunately I won't be able to invest my personal
free time either.
fpc: epel7 el6 el5
lazarus: epel7 el6 el5
tuxcmd
udisks2
Feel free to pick up any.
--
Tomas Bzatek tbza...@redhat.com
--
devel
On 2015-02-26, 16:22 GMT, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
That should be completely unrelated to the kojipkgs issue, as that is
talking to the koji hub directly.
And would you have the kindness to tell me what I can to about it?
This is usually very clear and obvious way how Koji tells me
that my
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 17:22:01 +0100
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
And would you have the kindness to tell me what I can to about it?
I'm not sure. It's some issue with your communication to the koji
hub...
Hi
I would like to give away as many packages as I can to others who are
interested. My current job keeps me pretty busy and I have been hanging on
to them in hopes of finding the elusive free time that I don't get much of
anymore. So if you to be a comaintainer or want to take over anything
On 02/26/2015 06:44 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
On 2015-02-26, 16:22 GMT, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
That should be completely unrelated to the kojipkgs issue, as that is
talking to the koji hub directly.
And would you have the kindness to tell me what I can to about it?
This is usually very clear and
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 17:22:01 +0100
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
And would you have the kindness to tell me what I can to about it?
I'm not sure. It's some issue with your communication to the koji
hub...
Can you do a:
koji list-tasks --mine
# koji list-tasks --mine
On 02/26/2015 06:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 17:22:01 +0100
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
And would you have the kindness to tell me what I can to about it?
I'm not sure. It's some issue with your communication to the koji
hub...
Meanwhile I rebooted (for
Sweetness!
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On 02/26/2015 08:31 AM, John Florian wrote:
Yesterday I was browsing the Fedora pkgdb/git/bohdi pages and this
morning I returned to go backwards thru my web browser history when I
stumbled upon a real
Hi Rahul,
I wish you all the best in your new job :)
I suggest that you add the python-sig as co-maintainers for your
python packages.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/group::python-sig/
Regards,
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
I will take deluge.
FAS: mooninite
Done
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 02/26/2015 01:43 PM, Dave Melia wrote:
Are you interested in being a mentor and allow me to assist with Deluge? :)
Sure. Apply for commit access.
Regards,
Michael
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of
Hi
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Matthias Runge wrote:
Congrats to the new job!
I'd take
* python-kombu
* python-gdata
* python-billiard
Thanks and done.
* django-* packages should be all become retired.
I have orphaned them since they have EPEL branches.
Rahul
--
devel
Hi Michael,
Are you interested in being a mentor and allow me to assist with Deluge?
:)
Regards,
Dave
On 2015-02-26 19:22, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 02/26/2015 12:06 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
I would like to give away as many packages as I can to others who are
interested. My
On 02/26/2015 12:06 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
I would like to give away as many packages as I can to others who are
interested. My current job keeps me pretty busy and I have been hanging on to
them in hopes of finding the elusive free time that I don't get much of
anymore. So if you to be
On 26/02/15 19:06, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
I would like to give away as many packages as I can to others who are
interested. My current job keeps me pretty busy and I have been hanging
on to them in hopes of finding the elusive free time that I don't get
much of anymore. So if you to be
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:37:49PM -0500, Máirín Duffy wrote:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/inkscape/sdfgsdgf
Beautiful.
--
Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 02/26/2015 11:22 AM, Haïkel wrote:
Hi Rahul,
I wish you all the best in your new job :)
I suggest that you add the python-sig as co-maintainers for your
python packages.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/group::python-sig/
Regards,
H.
I'd like to do this for my
On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 13:06 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
I would like to give away as many packages as I can to others who
are interested. My current job keeps me pretty busy and I have been
hanging on
to them in hopes of finding the elusive free time that I don't get
much of
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 13:06 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
I would like to give away as many packages as I can to others who
are interested. My current job keeps me pretty busy and I have been
hanging
Hi
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I rely on duplicity (via duply) so I'm willing to take it if no-one
else will, but I'm really no expert on duplicity per se so I might not
be the best choice. Is anyone with more experience with it willing to
take it?
Limb asked
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 01:51:13PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 02/26/2015 11:22 AM, Haïkel wrote:
Hi Rahul,
I wish you all the best in your new job :)
I suggest that you add the python-sig as co-maintainers for your
python packages.
On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 15:54 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I rely on duplicity (via duply) so I'm willing to take it if no-
one else will, but I'm really no expert on duplicity per se so I
might not be the best choice. Is
Le jeudi 26 février 2015 à 13:06 -0500, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
Hi
I would like to give away as many packages as I can to others who are
interested. My current job keeps me pretty busy and I have been hanging on
to them in hopes of finding the elusive free time that I don't get much of
On 02/26/2015 11:06 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
I would like to give away as many packages as I can to others who are
interested. My current job keeps me pretty busy and I have been hanging
on to them in hopes of finding the elusive free time that I don't get
much of anymore. So if you to be
On 02/26/2015 09:46 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
If you really think that old JDK should be removed during update and
insist on that
I believe that at least on Windows apps, including browser apps, can
request a specific version of Java runtime. Malware asks for versions
that are vulnerable to
On Feb 26, 2015 9:01 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 08:51:46AM -0700, Pete Travis wrote:
The only time I've needed sysrq reboots in recent memory was while
running
rawhide and knowingly venturing into uncharted territory. If I'm not
the
Hi
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Sereinity wrote:
Hi,
I will take e_dbus and evas-generic-loaders.
Done. The e* stack is quite old in Fedora now. If you or anyone else
wants to keep it more current, that would be nice
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Pete Travis wrote:
I'll take python-dateutil15, and see it through to retirement once the
last of the dependencies are gone.
Done.
I see you've already retired askbot - any sign from upstream that they'll
support a newer django within a reasonable
On 26.02.2015 18:11, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 09:49:48 +0100
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Yes, we need to maintain both stacks for a while anyways for e.g.
lxde users, etc. Given that XFCE now supports libinput too, we could
reconsider this and make
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 20:26:18 +0100
poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
You still do not believe!?
Schedule for and Status of the Xfce 4.12 Development Cycle
https://wiki.xfce.org/releng/4.12/roadmap
2015-02-28 or 1 day later Xfce 4.12 (Final Release)
Celebrate
I shall believe
On 02/24/2015 08:36 PM, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote:
Hi All,
I have been reading this mail chain for some time and there is something I
wanted to say. It's kind
of a long mail, I apologize for taking so much of your time but request you to
please bear with me.
I work as a technical consultant on IBM
On 02/24/2015 06:22 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/24/2015 05:21 PM, Mario Torre wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 15:37 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/24/2015 02:15 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 02/24/2015 12:43 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
I am against official guidelines or policy for
On 02/26/2015 09:16 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/25/2015 06:58 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On 02/24/2015 06:41 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Hello,
java would be the preferred JRE in Fedora. The package would have no
content, but it would have Requires on preferred Fedora JRE, currently
Hi,
On 24-02-15 18:34, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi All,
As described here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg
We've been working on making xorg-x11-drv-libinput the default input driver
for the Xorg xserver
On 02/26/2015 09:23 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 02/26/2015 09:20 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/26/2015 08:42 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
Also, my proposal of introducing java metapackage (see my other post
in this thread), which would always require the latest JDK, solves
this
problem in a
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Jared K. Smith
jsm...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com
wrote:
we should strongly consider demoting i686 to secondary architecture
for installation media at the Fedora 23 branch point (about six
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:40 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
i686 has nothing to do with ARM. So when someone says i686 he/she
means 32bit x86.
Well yes -- that's what *I* take it to mean -- I just wanted to make sure
that's what everyone else took it to mean as well. I just wanted to
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com
wrote:
we should strongly consider demoting i686 to secondary architecture
for installation media at the Fedora 23 branch point (about six months
from now).
Is this intended only for 32-bit kernels on x86-based
Hi
I wanted to fix osm2pgsql failure on aarch64 [1]. Went through osm2pgsql
github page and list of issues there.
1. http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2897601
It pointed me to --without-lockfree argument to configure script to fix
libboost_atomic linking issue. Had to
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:52:46PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 February 2015 at 20:48, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
The following packages had their point of contact changed to orphan
based on: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1417
fakeroot -- Gives a fake root
On 02/25/2015 06:58 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On 02/24/2015 06:41 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Hello,
java would be the preferred JRE in Fedora. The package would have no
content, but it would have Requires on preferred Fedora JRE, currently
java-1.8.0-openjdk. This could be easily changed as
On 02/26/2015 08:45 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
I'm not really proposing as I haven't thought about this much yet, but
the idea was about be adding a few empty binary packages java,
java-devel, java-headless and so on (they could be subpackages of
javapackages-tools). Existing provides with the same
- Original Message -
From: Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 10:16:26 AM
Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
platform in Fedora
On 02/25/2015 06:58 PM, Miloslav Trmač
On 02/26/2015 09:31 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 10:16:26 AM
Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
platform in Fedora
- Original Message -
From: Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 10:39:35 AM
Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
platform in Fedora
On 02/26/2015 09:31 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov
* Kevin Fenzi [25/02/2015 12:48] :
The following packages had their point of contact changed to orphan
[...]
perl-Text-CharWidth
perl-Text-WrapI18N
I've taken these two.
Emmanuel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
- Original Message -
From: Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 9:52:42 AM
Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
platform in Fedora
On
On 02/26/2015 08:42 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
Also, my proposal of introducing java metapackage (see my other post
in this thread), which would always require the latest JDK, solves this
problem in a different way, without modifying ordinary Java packages
at all.
May you be more exact with the
On 02/26/2015 09:20 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/26/2015 08:42 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
Also, my proposal of introducing java metapackage (see my other post
in this thread), which would always require the latest JDK, solves this
problem in a different way, without modifying ordinary Java
On 02/26/2015 09:31 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
If no volunteer shows up for maintenance of old JDK then it would be
deprecated and obsoleted, as it's was done with previous JDK packages.
How would that work _exactly_?
1) JDK maintainers announce deprecation in advance and call for
Agenda:
- Interview candidates for new memberships
- Optionally accept new members
- Vote for new chairman of the Base Design WG to replace Phil Knirsch
- Open Floor
Please add items by replying to this mail.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi folks,
the Fedora Base Design Working Group (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Base) is
looking for new members, as Phil Knirsch left Red Hat and Jaroslav Reznik is
tentative to leave the group. So, if you want to influence the base of Fedora
and have a profound knowledge about the inner
1 - 100 of 202 matches
Mail list logo
