Hello everybody,
The recently released libgdata-0.17.1 has bumped its soname. The
highlights are support for version 3 of the YouTube API, and an
initial port to version 2 of the Drive API.
This is only for rawhide. I will be rebuilding affected packages.
Cheers,
Debarshi
pgpl6YVdn6arI.pgp
Why does this bug exist only in Fedora, not in openSUSE or Mageia or *buntu?
All my systems are multiboot, so only a select very few are on UTC. None that
are on UTC have Fedora installed. This means every Fedora boot takes about
twice as long or longer than anything else takes, waiting on all the
On 24/04/15 10:40, Radek Holy wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 8:11:45 PM
Subject: Re: dnf caches
On 23/04/15 18:44, drago01 wrote:
On
- Original Message -
From: Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 8:11:45 PM
Subject: Re: dnf caches
On 23/04/15 18:44, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Pádraig
Compose started at Fri Apr 24 07:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[aeskulap]
aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.armv7hl requires libofstd.so.3.6
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:59 AM, David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
It's taken quite a long time to sort out the bugs in gcc-5 with regard to
lesser-used arches, so I've only just managed to get cross-gcc in rawhide
upgraded to gcc-5, despite the main gcc package having got there a while
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 02:59:09PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
It's taken quite a long time to sort out the bugs in gcc-5 with regard to
lesser-used arches, so I've only just managed to get cross-gcc in rawhide
upgraded to gcc-5, despite the main gcc package having got there a while ago.
Is
- Original Message -
From: Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 11:58:53 AM
Subject: Re: dnf caches
On 24/04/15 10:40, Radek Holy wrote:
- Original Message -
From:
It's taken quite a long time to sort out the bugs in gcc-5 with regard to
lesser-used arches, so I've only just managed to get cross-gcc in rawhide
upgraded to gcc-5, despite the main gcc package having got there a while ago.
Is it too late in the F22 cycle now to upgrade cross-gcc there to
Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I don't think anything in the distro depends on the cross compilers.
There's no associated Change, etc. Unless there's something I'm
missing, you should be able to update them, build, and file an update
in Bodhi to get the appropriate karma.
I was
Felix Miata mrmazda at earthlink.net writes:
Just as a workaround, you CAN make a Windows box use UTC for the RTC...
Multiboot is not a universe limited to Windows and Linux, and certainly not
only the latest version of either. And, there's a whole LAN to consider, not
one PC in isolation.
Andre Robatino composed on 2015-04-25 00:25 (UTC):
Felix Miata composed:
Just as a workaround, you CAN make a Windows box use UTC for the RTC...
Multiboot is not a universe limited to Windows and Linux, and certainly not
only the latest version of either. And, there's a whole LAN to
Cole Robinson crobi...@redhat.com wrote:
FWIW qemu firmware pacakges build with cross-gcc: ipxe, seabios, SLOF,
openbios. We want to build for the target architecture but ship as noarch,
since the roms aren't used by the host machine but only used by qemu-system-*,
which should run on any
(why does this list screw up reply-all!? )
On 04/24/2015 10:35 AM, David Howells wrote:
Cole Robinson crobi...@redhat.com wrote:
FWIW qemu firmware pacakges build with cross-gcc: ipxe, seabios, SLOF,
openbios. We want to build for the target architecture but ship as noarch,
since the roms
Cole Robinson crobi...@redhat.com wrote:
ipxe, seabios, sgabios: binutils-x86_64-linux-gnu gcc-x86_64-linux-gnu
openbios: gcc-powerpc64-linux-gnu gcc-sparc64-linux-gnu
SLOF: gcc-powerpc64-linux-gnu
They all build on x86_64 F21 with the new cross gcc.
David
--
devel mailing list
Andre Robatino robatino at fedoraproject.org writes:
it looks like OS/2 is capable of keeping its RTC in TAI (which AIUI is
basically the same as UTC except that TAI doesn't have leap seconds, so TAI
is real time, and UTC is TAI interspersed with leap seconds, so both
increase monotonically,
Andre Robatino composed on 2015-04-25 01:55 (UTC):
The only reason Linux or any other OS needs to support having
the RTC on local time for now is as a workaround to coexist with broken
Windows.
Not investing resources in disturbing sleeping dogs is a reason that is
always important to some
Felix Miata mrmazda at earthlink.net writes:
AFAIK, Windows is the only OS that has trouble using UTC for the RTC.
Have you ever used DOS or OS/2? I don't remember ever seeing options at
installation time to choose anything other than local in either one. Same for
W95, W98, WXP W7. How
On 04/24/2015 10:18 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:59 AM, David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
It's taken quite a long time to sort out the bugs in gcc-5 with regard to
lesser-used arches, so I've only just managed to get cross-gcc in rawhide
upgraded to gcc-5, despite the
Felix Miata mrmazda at earthlink.net writes:
Why does this bug exist only in Fedora, not in openSUSE or Mageia or *buntu?
All my systems are multiboot, so only a select very few are on UTC. None that
are on UTC have Fedora installed. This means every Fedora boot takes about
twice as long or
Andre Robatino composed on 2015-04-24 19:44 (UTC):
Felix Miata wrote:
Why does this bug exist only in Fedora, not in openSUSE or Mageia or *buntu?
All my systems are multiboot, so only a select very few are on UTC. None that
are on UTC have Fedora installed. This means every Fedora boot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214735
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-PAR-1.009-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-PAR-1.009-1.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
211ca38767145b6c362da3b821a5abca Sub-Name-0.14.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Sub-Name/Sub-Name-0.14.tar.gz/211ca38767145b6c362da3b821a5abca/Sub-Name-0.14.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
From bf76d7e9e113912b4e2dbe779374bf428d201dc8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:52:57 +0100
Subject: Update to 0.14
- New upstream release 0.14
- Remove mandatory dependencies for optional test
- Mark the test with B::C as TODO, as it
From 781470abecf1687da732c5e9a0c2e20f4a0e6f17 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:40:57 +0100
Subject: Update to 0.15
- New upstream release 0.15
- Update XSHelper to fix STATIC_INLINE for gcc -std=c89
diff --git
perl-Net-DNS-SEC has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires
perl(Digest::GOST::CryptoPro)
perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Digest::GOST) =
0:0.06
perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires
From bf76d7e9e113912b4e2dbe779374bf428d201dc8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:52:57 +0100
Subject: Update to 0.14
- New upstream release 0.14
- Remove mandatory dependencies for optional test
- Mark the test with B::C as TODO, as it
23f695909296f5d34fb09535a1238a61 Module-Build-XSUtil-0.15.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Module-Build-XSUtil/Module-Build-XSUtil-0.15.tar.gz/23f695909296f5d34fb09535a1238a61/Module-Build-XSUtil-0.15.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
From 781470abecf1687da732c5e9a0c2e20f4a0e6f17 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:40:57 +0100
Subject: Update to 0.15
- New upstream release 0.15
- Update XSHelper to fix STATIC_INLINE for gcc -std=c89
diff --git
perl-Satcon has broken dependencies in the F-22 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Satcon-1.20-3.fc21.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
On i386:
perl-Satcon-1.20-3.fc21.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Satcon-1.20-3.fc21.noarch requires
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215148
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9558543
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215148
Bug ID: 1215148
Summary: perl-Config-Any-0.25 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Config-Any
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215148
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Created attachment 1018450
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1018450action=edit
[patch] Update to 0.25 (#1215148)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824089
--- Comment #1 from David A. Cafaro d...@cafaro.net ---
This bug is VERY old, do we have an udpate/patch for this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
17:00:57 smooge #startmeeting EPEL
17:00:57 zodbot Meeting started Fri Apr 24 17:00:57 2015 UTC. The chair
is smooge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:00:57 zodbot Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link
#topic.
17:01:02 smooge #meetingname epel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215296
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Created attachment 1018653
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1018653action=edit
[patch] Update to 0.15 (#1215296)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215296
Bug ID: 1215296
Summary: perl-Tangerine-0.15 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Tangerine
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215297
Bug ID: 1215297
Summary: perl-Text-CSV_XS-1.17 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Text-CSV_XS
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214766
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215291
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Created attachment 1018643
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1018643action=edit
[patch] Update to 1.88 (#1215291)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215291
Bug ID: 1215291
Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.88 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DateTime-TimeZone
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214699
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215291
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9563092
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215296
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9563387
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215297
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Created attachment 1018654
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1018654action=edit
[patch] Update to 1.17 (#1215297)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214713
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:25:32 -0600
Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
1. New Meeting Time?
I'm pretty flexable. Perhaps someone could do a whenisgood?
2. New EPEL chair?
As I am sure smooge will attest, this is kind of a high burnout thing
doing all the meetings and such. So, I'd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215297
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9563397
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824089
--- Comment #3 from David A. Cafaro d...@cafaro.net ---
Thanks for the update and info. I'll take this back to the Security Team and
see how we want to handle this. We have been working on policy to have
packages that are abandoned removed so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824089
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
I've just pushed new Tangerine, v0.15, to CPAN. Updates should
land in Fedora and EPEL in the coming weeks.
There are quite a few things about this release I'd like to
point out:
- The utility lives in its own distribution now and will have
to be installed separately.
I'll submit it for
51 matches
Mail list logo
