From 660290745bc5b997c3281f6971deb49784084437 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 09:58:28 +0100
Subject: Update to 2.00
- New upstream release 2.00
- Added filename_match setting
diff --git a/perl-Test-Version.spec b/perl-Test-Version.spec
index
This commit already existed in another branch.
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Test-Version.git/commit/?h=perl-Test-Version-2.00-1.fc23id=660290745bc5b997c3281f6971deb49784084437
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
c29e8e41482b358722dcf8fd2abd7549 Test-Version-2.00.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Test-Version/Test-Version-2.00.tar.gz/c29e8e41482b358722dcf8fd2abd7549/Test-Version-2.00.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
From 660290745bc5b997c3281f6971deb49784084437 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 09:58:28 +0100
Subject: Update to 2.00
- New upstream release 2.00
- Added filename_match setting
diff --git a/perl-Test-Version.spec b/perl-Test-Version.spec
index
From 660290745bc5b997c3281f6971deb49784084437 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 09:58:28 +0100
Subject: Update to 2.00
- New upstream release 2.00
- Added filename_match setting
diff --git a/perl-Test-Version.spec b/perl-Test-Version.spec
index
- Original Message -
From: Radek Holy rh...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 5:24:52 PM
Subject: Re: dnf woes
- Original Message -
From: Philip Rhoades p...@pricom.com.au
To: Development
WG meeting will be at 12:00 UTC (9:00 EST, 14:00 Brno, 8:00 Boston,
21:00 Tokyo, 22:00 Brisbane) in #fedora-meeting-2 on Freenode.
= Topics =
* Follow-ups, if any progress has been made
* Docker images building within Fedora
* Containers-Testing-Framework
* Open Floor
--
devel mailing list
[Previous discussion here:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-September/thread.html#157495
]
Unison is a fairly widely used file synchronization package. Think of
it as a more efficient, multi-directional 'rsync'.
Unison has the unfortunate property that versions of Unison
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 01:09:23PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
So I went on and spent 30 minutes writing a script to rebuild C++
packages on rawhide that hadn't gotten rebuilt yet, and ran the script
over the weekend. The script was not very smart and it basically just
brute forced its way
From 92ad27ed31296b3644e2fb6ab7d96f3900edd60c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 10:40:36 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.05
- New upstream release 1.05
- New maintainer (PLICEASE) updated meta
- Retained six-digit version number for rpm to maintain
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 08:41:25AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Well, just as mentioned in the previous thread, if you do things this
way it means every user of any unison will have to get a useless update
everytime any version of unison in your combined package updates for
any reason. Thats
Am 07.05.2015 um 21:58 schrieb ToddAndMargo:
Any sign of Red Hat changing their ways? Or are they
just sick and tired of 32 bit?
i686 is dead - there is no RHEL7 for i686 at all
the last non x86_64 i faced was 5 years ago and frankly the whole linux
stack would be much more tiny without
On Thu, 7 May 2015 08:58:45 -0600
Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, just as mentioned in the previous thread, if you do things
this way it means every user of any unison will have to get a
useless update everytime any version of unison in your combined
package updates for
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 11:50:02AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I think the issue is that none of those versions are getting updates
anymore. They are dead code... any fix that is going to be in one is
probably going to be in all of them so they would all need it.
I mean that anytime you say
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 07:01:44PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I think the problem is almost everyone would be using unison-legacy,
since that would be the only version compatible with the broader
ecosystem of Unison servers (by which I mean Debian).
So it doesn't really solve the
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 02:19:27PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 07:01:44PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I think the problem is almost everyone would be using unison-legacy,
since that would be the only version compatible with the broader
ecosystem of Unison
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 07:49:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I don't think your logic is flawed, but there do appear to be more
builds for the combined unison-legacy package -- see my figures
here, assuming unison-legacy would cover the first three packages.
Actually, your figures
Hi,
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-6974/dpkg-1.16.16-5.fc22
bodhi says (2015-05-05 12:30:03) that have been push to stable , but
not close the bug
and
dnf repoquery --qf %{repoid} %{name}-%{version}-%{release} dpkg
(...)
updates-testing dpkg-1.16.16-5.fc22
Also
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 01:59:10PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 11:50:02AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I think the issue is that none of those versions are getting updates
anymore. They are dead code... any fix that is going to be in one is
probably going to be in
On Thursday, May 07, 2015 09:03:05 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-6974/dpkg-1.16.16-5.fc22
bodhi says (2015-05-05 12:30:03) that have been push to stable , but
not close the bug
and
dnf repoquery --qf %{repoid} %{name}-%{version}-%{release}
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 11:50:02AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I don't think just adding new packages is that big a deal to save
everyone from this.
I think the main problem is that I'm not motivated to go through the
new package process for unison245, unison247 or unison248, and
evidently nor
On Thu, 07 May 2015 21:03:05 +0100
Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
Hi,
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-6974/dpkg-1.16.16-5.fc22
bodhi says (2015-05-05 12:30:03) that have been push to stable , but
not close the bug
and
dnf repoquery --qf %{repoid}
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217452
--- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Created attachment 1023309
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1023309action=edit
[patch] Update to 1.7034 (#1217452)
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217452
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Recently, there have been some invalid failures in depcheck that take
the form of:
package foo-1.2-3.fc21.i686 requires foo-libs(x86-32) = 1.2-3.fc21, but
none of the providers can be installed
foo-libs-1.2-3.fc21.i686 has inferior architecture
This issue has been particularly difficult for us
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217452
--- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9682201
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
Compose started at Thu May 7 15:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[aeskulap]
aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.armv7hl requires libofstd.so.3.6
From 08f6e5151b6e6bd01e60956e0e90725ebf1e41a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 13:43:25 +0200
Subject: Adapt to changes in Module-Starter-1.71
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219466
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Created attachment 1023090
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1023090action=edit
[patch] Update to 1.79 (#1219466)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219469
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9677828
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 09:17:10AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I think Fedora should have a single unison source package, and it
should contain the multiple upstream branch sources and build
different binary subpackages. The binary subpackages would have the
same names as now (unison227
From 08f6e5151b6e6bd01e60956e0e90725ebf1e41a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 13:43:25 +0200
Subject: Adapt to changes in Module-Starter-1.71
diff --git
From 07946b6b8dc4757bfea6b5130aad9d01eb685338 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 15:01:50 +0200
Subject: Upstream update.
- Update BRs.
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 3bcf636..b834f12 100644
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219466
Bug ID: 1219466
Summary: perl-Config-Properties-1.79 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Config-Properties
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Forwarded Message
Subject: No more binary components in extensions
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 11:03:12 -0400
From: Benjamin Smedberg benja...@smedbergs.us
Reply-To: dev-extensi...@lists.mozilla.org
To: dev-platform dev-platf...@lists.mozilla.org, Firefox Dev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219466
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9677803
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
From 07946b6b8dc4757bfea6b5130aad9d01eb685338 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 15:01:50 +0200
Subject: Upstream update.
- Update BRs.
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 3bcf636..b834f12 100644
---
From 7153b11784ff900b2cb7d73fb744f605a3c88c00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 15:11:52 +0200
Subject: Cleanup merger.
diff --git a/perl-DBIx-DBSchema.spec b/perl-DBIx-DBSchema.spec
index 95a921d..c2c014b 100644
---
From e48186a241eedf7e52db7e48ed4b101932dd0443 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 03:17:15 +0200
Subject: Perl 5.20 rebuild
diff --git a/perl-DBIx-DBSchema.spec b/perl-DBIx-DBSchema.spec
index 57e31bc..9867204 100644
---
From 07946b6b8dc4757bfea6b5130aad9d01eb685338 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ralf=20Cors=C3=A9pius?= corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 15:01:50 +0200
Subject: Upstream update.
- Update BRs.
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 3bcf636..b834f12 100644
---
delete changed cra's 'commit' permission on perl-File-KeePass (el5) to
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-File-KeePass/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
delete changed cra's 'commit' permission on perl-File-KeePass (f21) to
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-File-KeePass/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
delete changed cra's 'commit' permission on perl-File-KeePass (f22) to
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-File-KeePass/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wednesday, May 06, 2015 06:53:54 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 6 May 2015 at 18:21, ToddAndMargo toddandma...@zoho.com wrote:
On 05/06/2015 09:31 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 6 May 2015 at 00:28, ToddAndMargo toddandma...@zoho.com wrote:
Hi Kevin and EPEL,
Is there any
Thanks.
Taken.
Marek
gil píše v St 06. 05. 2015 v 19:14 +0200:
Take!
can you review this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214385 ?
regards
gil
Il 06/05/2015 17:53, Marek Skalický ha scritto:
Is anyone up for a review swap? I want to get mongo-tools into Fedora:
Compose started at Thu May 7 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[aeskulap]
aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.i686 requires libofstd.so.3.6
delete changed cra's 'commit' permission on perl-File-KeePass (f20) to
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-File-KeePass/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
delete changed cra's 'commit' permission on perl-File-KeePass (el6) to
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-File-KeePass/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
delete changed cra's 'commit' permission on perl-File-KeePass (epel7) to
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-File-KeePass/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48148
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48148/0001-Ticket-48148-start-stop-restart-dirsrv-utilities-sho.2.patch
git patch file (1.2.11 branch) -- additional fix for restart-dirsrv and
non-root user
--
389-devel mailing list
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48148
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48148/0001-Ticket-48148-start-stop-restart-dirsrv-utilities-sho.3.patch
git patch file (1.2.11 branch) -- revised: additional fix for
restart-dirsrv and non-root user
Thanks to Rich for his suggestions!
Hi
I'm not sure if AGPLV3 is a valid license for Fedora
Requested the intervention of Fedora Legal Tracker guys, for a check
Note: i asked not long ago if neo4j project, with the same Affero
General Public License,
can be imported in Fedora, but is not possible for my case.
If the package can
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:33 PM, gil punto...@libero.it wrote:
Hi
I'm not sure if AGPLV3 is a valid license for Fedora
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#SoftwareLicenses
for lists of good and bad licenses. AGPLv3 is on the list of good
licenses.
HTH. Regards,
--
Il 08/05/2015 00:37, Jerry James ha scritto:
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:33 PM, gil punto...@libero.it wrote:
Hi
I'm not sure if AGPLV3 is a valid license for Fedora
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#SoftwareLicenses
for lists of good and bad licenses. AGPLv3 is on
On Thu, 7 May 2015 09:17:10 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
[Previous discussion here:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-September/thread.html#157495
]
(I guess I was cc'ed directly because I replied in that thread? There's
no need, I am still on this
Hello Everyone,
I have a package that I would like reviewed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186819
Burp is a network backup program, it provides a way automate backups.
I would appreciate a review and I'm willing to do a review swap with
somebody.
Thank you,
--
_
/-\ ndrew
delete changed cra's 'commit' permission on perl-File-KeePass (master) to
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-File-KeePass/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 7 May 2015 at 08:41, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Thu, 7 May 2015 09:17:10 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
[Previous discussion here:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-September/thread.html#157495
]
(I guess I was cc'ed directly because I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086545
lionel.c...@cern.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
45f2d5c134fd3f74afa378c8e33bc65f DBIx-DBSchema-0.45.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-DBIx-DBSchema/DBIx-DBSchema-0.45.tar.gz/45f2d5c134fd3f74afa378c8e33bc65f/DBIx-DBSchema-0.45.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219469
Bug ID: 1219469
Summary: perl-DBIx-DBSchema-0.45 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DBIx-DBSchema
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219469
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Created attachment 1023092
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1023092action=edit
[patch] Update to 0.45 (#1219469)
--
You are
perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.67-5.fc22.x86_64 requires
libplplotd.so.12()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.67-5.fc22.i686 requires libplplotd.so.12
On armhfp:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219469
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
On 05/07/2015 04:58 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 7 May 2015 at 08:41, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Thu, 7 May 2015 09:17:10 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
[Previous discussion here:
65 matches
Mail list logo
