Re: Fedora 23 Branched 20150831 compose check report

> No openQA tests found for compose. And I got high hopes :-(. 2015-09-01 22:33 GMT+02:00 Adam Williamson : > On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 13:15 -0700, Fedora compose checker wrote: > > Missing expected images: > > > > Cloud atomic Disk x86_64 > > Cloud base Disk i386 > >

Re: Looking for new maintainer: ownCloud (Fedora / EPEL)

Le 29/08/2015 23:27, Adam Williamson a écrit : > Hi, folks. So I've been maintaining ownCloud for the last little > while. Unfortunately I sat down today to try again and update the > package to the latest upstream (8.1.1), and somewhere in the second > hour of insanely stupid PHP autoloader code,

Re: Packaging golang for secondary architectures, go-srpm-macros

On Monday, July 27, 2015 10:12:03 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 26.7.2015 v 14:03 Jan Chaloupka napsal(a): > > On 07/24/2015 03:36 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> Dne 9.7.2015 v 11:18 Jan Chaloupka napsal(a): > >>> Recommended use in spec file: > >>> 1) To choose the correct compiler: > >>> %ifarch

Fedora 23 Branched 20150902 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud atomic Disk x86_64 Cloud base Disk i386 Images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20150901: Robotics Live i386 Soas Live i386 Robotics Live x86_64 No images in 23 Branched 20150901 but not this. Failed openQA tests: 1 of 20 ID: 1132Test: x86_64

Fedora Rawhide 20150902 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud base Disk i386 Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20150901: Kde Live i386 Security Live x86_64 Scientific_kde Live x86_64 Kde Live x86_64 Scientific_kde Live i386 Kde Disk armhfp Lxde Live i386 No images in Rawhide 20150901 but not this. Failed openQA tests:

Re: Looking for new maintainer: ownCloud (Fedora / EPEL)

On 2 September 2015 at 08:11, Remi Collet wrote: > Le 29/08/2015 23:27, Adam Williamson a écrit : >> Hi, folks. So I've been maintaining ownCloud for the last little >> while. Unfortunately I sat down today to try again and update the >> package to the latest upstream

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Glibc locale subpackaging

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 05:53:19PM +0200, Florian Festi wrote: > In theory, yes. In the end we'd need something like find-lang.sh that > actually spits out the packages to be included in the main spec file. > debug-info packages are done that way. But it is not pretty. It's not pretty behind the

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2015-09-03 16:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2015-09-03 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. rktime): 2015-09-03 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT 2015-09-03 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT 2015-09-03

Re: Fedora Ring 0 definition

On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 15:24 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > (Also, the original definition included Anaconda because you need > something to actually install Fedora Ring 0 with and that brought in > GTK, etc).) I think 'not self-hosting' should be understood to imply 'not self- installing' - ie don't

Re: Resources for upstream testing?

On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 22:52:42 -0700 Dave Johansen wrote: > I'm working on packaging hgsubversion ( > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221459 ) and I've run > into an issue where some of the tests pass on F22 and F23 but fail on > Rawhide. I've done some simple

Re: Fedora Ring 0 definition

On 09/02/2015 12:24 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: Re-sending this with a better title so people might read it ;-) I read it last week. Perhaps the lack of commentary isn't because of the title. It's because there is nothing

Re: Looking for new maintainer: ownCloud (Fedora / EPEL)

On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 11:00 +0200, Germano Massullo wrote: > Il 31/08/2015 18:19, Adam Williamson ha scritto: > > There isn't really a great alternative to ownCloud (that I know > > of) if > > you actually *want* a 'personal cloud server' with all the bits OC > > has, but I realized I just don't

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2015-09-02)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-09-02) === Meeting started by jwb at 18:00:08 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-09-02/fesco.2015-09-02-18.00.log.html . Meeting summary

Re: Fedora Ring 0 definition

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > Re-sending this with a better title so people might read it ;-) I read it last week. Perhaps the lack of commentary isn't because of the title. It's because there is nothing new here. The proposal boils down to

Re: Fedora Ring 0 definition

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > Re-sending this with a better title so people might read it ;-) > > On 08/31/2015 10:18 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: >> >> On 08/31/2015 08:17 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote: >> [snip] >>> >>> Minutes: >>> >>>

Re: Fedora Ring 0 definition

On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 15:31 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 11:59:55AM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > > Re-sending this with a better title so people might read it ;-) > > Yes, thanks -- I admit to having skimmed over it in my mail-catchup > attempt. > > > >especially how

Re: Fedora Ring 0 definition

On 09/02/2015 12:24 PM, Adam Miller wrote: On 08/31/2015 10:18 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: For today's meeting we didn't really use zodbot minute keeping features, so in the interest of sparking some discussion I'd like to recap. At Flock 2015 there was a 2 hour session on the subject of rings

Re: Copr for FeedReader

On 09/02/2015 01:00 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 1.9.2015 v 22:00 janlukasgern...@freenet.de napsal(a): >> >> Hi, >> >> I was advised to ask on this list for help regarding setting up a copr >> repository. > > Why Copr and not Fedora official package? Is there something which > conflicts with

Re: Looking for new maintainer: ownCloud (Fedora / EPEL)

On Sep 2, 2015 8:46 PM, "Adam Williamson" wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 11:00 +0200, Germano Massullo wrote: > > Il 31/08/2015 18:19, Adam Williamson ha scritto: > > > There isn't really a great alternative to ownCloud (that I know > > > of) if > > > you actually

Re: Looking for new maintainer: ownCloud (Fedora / EPEL)

On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 20:49 -0400, Eric Griffith wrote: > Adam have you gotten in touch with Upstream at all? Seen if maybe > they can > make changes on their end to make packaging any easier? I'm sure > some parts > of it are just a result of php being php, but you did mention > bundling for >

Fedora Ring 0 definition

Re-sending this with a better title so people might read it ;-) On 08/31/2015 10:18 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: On 08/31/2015 08:17 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote: [snip] Minutes:

Release blocking deliverables for Fedora 23

Hi, in the past there was an issue with identification of deliverables which block a Fedora release. We were dealing with this issue specifically during Go/No-go meetings which is quite late for this kind of decisions. To solve this issue FESCo has started an activity [1] to identify these

Re: Fedora Ring 0 definition

On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 03:31:04PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > >5. Ring membership is at the source package level, not the binary > > >package. If one source package's binary/noarch sub-package is in ring > > >0, all sub-packages are in ring 0. > > H. Are we sure about that? That means

Re: Fedora Ring 0 definition

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 15:24 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> (Also, the original definition included Anaconda because you need >> something to actually install Fedora Ring 0 with and that brought in >> GTK, etc).) > > I

Re: Fedora Ring 0 definition

On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 11:59:55AM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > Re-sending this with a better title so people might read it ;-) Yes, thanks -- I admit to having skimmed over it in my mail-catchup attempt. > >especially how the rings interact. As a side note, everyone agreed > >the word

Re: Fedora Ring 0 definition

On 09/02/2015 12:37 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 03:31:04PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: 5. Ring membership is at the source package level, not the binary package. If one source package's binary/noarch sub-package is in ring 0, all sub-packages are in ring 0. H. Are

Re: Fedora Ring 0 definition

On 09/02/2015 12:31 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 11:59:55AM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote: Re-sending this with a better title so people might read it ;-) Yes, thanks -- I admit to having skimmed over it in my mail-catchup attempt. especially how the rings interact. As

Re: Fedora Ring 0 definition

On 09/02/2015 12:47 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 15:31 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 11:59:55AM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote: Re-sending this with a better title so people might read it ;-) Yes, thanks -- I admit to having skimmed over it in my

Re: Resources for upstream testing?

edoraproject.org//work/tasks/7896/10927896/Fedora-Docker-Base-rawhide-20150902.x86_64.tar.xz [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?start=0=all=tree=image=-id -- // Mike -- Fedora QA freenode: roshi http://roshi.fedorapeople.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https:

Re: Cleanup of Upstream Relase Monitoring bugs

On 09/02/2015 06:49 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Hi all, > > Today, I stumbled upon OPEN bugs [1] link on Upstream Release Monitoring > wiki page [2]. And the BZ/packages probably deserves cleanup. There are > several categories I identified as worrying: > > 1) Packages are retired but the bugs are

rpm-4.13.0-rc1 in rawhide

I just pushed the first release candidate for RPM rpm-4.13.0 into rawhide. It now comes with the final syntax for rich dependencies. Also we merged support for file signatures in the security.ima xattr and some smaller fixes. See

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-09-02)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

RE: Re: Copr for FeedReader

There is nothing wrong with FeedReader. I just thought copr is easier than getting it in the official repos.   -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: "Vít Ondruch" [vondr...@redhat.com] Gesendet: Mi. 02.09.2015 13:00 An: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Betreff: Re: Copr for FeedReader Dne

Re: Fedora Ring 0 definition

On 09/02/2015 02:14 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 13:57 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote: On 09/02/2015 12:47 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 15:31 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 11:59:55AM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote: Re-sending this with a

RE: Re: Copr for FeedReader

Thx :) Very helpful links. repo is now available here. Could someone test on 21 or 22 if I made a mistake? :) I already received a bug report about FeedReader crashing on Fedora, and I think it could be the packaging =/ > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Miroslav Suchý > Gesendet: Mi.

Orphaned Packages in branched (2015-09-02)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: Resources for upstream testing?

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 22:52:42 -0700 > Dave Johansen wrote: > > > I'm working on packaging hgsubversion ( > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221459 ) and I've run > > into an issue where

Re: Fedora Ring 0 definition

On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 13:57 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > On 09/02/2015 12:47 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 15:31 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 11:59:55AM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > >>> Re-sending this with a better title so people might read it

Re: Fedora Ring 0 definition

On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 14:24 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > On 09/02/2015 02:14 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 13:57 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > >> On 09/02/2015 12:47 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > >>> On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 15:31 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Sep 02,

Re: Resources for upstream testing?

be used [0] - but we currently don't > have a user friendly way to find them. You currently have to look > through koji to find them [1]. > > Hope this helps! > > [0] > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7896/10927896/Fedora-Docker-Base-rawhide-20150902.x86_

Re: Copr for FeedReader

Dne 1.9.2015 v 22:00 janlukasgern...@freenet.de napsal(a): > I was advised to ask on this list for help regarding setting up a copr > repository. > I just released verion 1.2 of my application "FeedReader": > http://jangernert.github.io/feedreader/ > "FeedReader is a modern desktop application

F-23 Branched report: 20150902 changes

Compose started at Wed Sep 2 07:15:04 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [ScientificPython] ScientificPython-2.8-20.fc22.armv7hl requires libmpi.so.1 [apache-scout] apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires

rawhide report: 20150902 changes

Compose started at Wed Sep 2 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [ScientificPython] ScientificPython-2.8-20.fc22.i686 requires libmpi.so.1 [apache-scout] apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires

Re: Cleanup of Upstream Relase Monitoring bugs

On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Vít Ondruch wrote: 3) Packages are updated, but the bug is kept open I would suggest probably to close the bugs for 1st category, the packages from 2nd category should be orphaned and the packages from 3rd category should not be monitored anymore. Any thoughts? I would

[Bug 1259403] New: perl-Inline-C-0.76-1.fc24 FTBFS: tests fail with recent perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259403 Bug ID: 1259403 Summary: perl-Inline-C-0.76-1.fc24 FTBFS: tests fail with recent perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Inline-C

Re: Copr for FeedReader

Dne 1.9.2015 v 22:00 janlukasgern...@freenet.de napsal(a): > > Hi, > > I was advised to ask on this list for help regarding setting up a copr > repository. Why Copr and not Fedora official package? Is there something which conflicts with Fedora's Packaging Guidelines [1]? Otherwise I can't see

Re: Cleanup of Upstream Relase Monitoring bugs

ovaldi maintainer here. Will update it as soon as possible. Last time when I tried the update, it's incompatible with rpm 4.12+... -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Cleanup of Upstream Relase Monitoring bugs

Hi all, Today, I stumbled upon OPEN bugs [1] link on Upstream Release Monitoring wiki page [2]. And the BZ/packages probably deserves cleanup. There are several categories I identified as worrying: 1) Packages are retired but the bugs are kept open. For example: xorg-x11-drv-{mouse,sisusb, ...}

Re: Cleanup of Upstream Relase Monitoring bugs

Dne 2.9.2015 v 14:52 Christopher Meng napsal(a): > ovaldi maintainer here. Will update it as soon as possible. > > Last time when I tried the update, it's incompatible with rpm 4.12+... > This was just random choice out of several other packages, but thank you :) Vít -- devel mailing list

Re: Cleanup of Upstream Relase Monitoring bugs

Dne 2.9.2015 v 16:10 Paul Wouters napsal(a): > On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> 3) Packages are updated, but the bug is kept open > >> I would suggest probably to close the bugs for 1st category, the >> packages from 2nd category should be orphaned and the packages from 3rd >> category

[Bug 1252638] perl-MongoDB-0.708.4.0 bundles bson and yajl libraries

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252638 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com

ppisar pushed to perl-Locale-Codes (master). "3.36 bump"

From 14e45d242f4d23d681b9247666bc2d622461383e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 09:15:05 +0200 Subject: 3.36 bump diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 2a4447f..9d51b4f 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-Socket-SSL (perl-IO-Socket-SSL-2.019-1.fc23). "Update to 2.019 (..more)"

From d23a4091cb40e00d074b4efd0e1b12c0b55011e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 20:12:52 +0100 Subject: Update to 2.019 - New upstream release 2.019 - Work around different behavior of getnameinfo from Socket and Socket6 by using a

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-Socket-SSL (perl-IO-Socket-SSL-2.019-1.fc24). "Update to 2.019 (..more)"

This commit already existed in another branch. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-IO-Socket-SSL.git/commit/?h=perl-IO-Socket-SSL-2.019-1.fc24=d23a4091cb40e00d074b4efd0e1b12c0b55011e2 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[Bug 1258940] perl-Log-Dispatch >= 2.47 causes other modules to fail

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258940 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com

[Bug 1258920] perl-Log-Dispatch-Config-1.04-10.fc24 FTBFS: tests fail

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258920 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||CPAN 106746

[Bug 1258940] new versions of perl-Log-Dispatch cause other modules to fail

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258940 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Bug 1258940] perl-Log-Dispatch >= 2.47 causes other modules to fail

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258940 --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar --- Because the change is documented as: +- Add a utf8 flag for Log::Dispatch::Screen. If this is true, then it sets the + ":encoding(UTF-8)" flag on the handle it uses for output (without

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 293 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3989 cross-binutils-2.23.88.0.1-2.el7.1 177 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 73

[Bug 1252638] perl-MongoDB-0.708.4.0 bundles libbson library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252638 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug 1259095] perl-Locale-Codes-3.36 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259095 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1195343] perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.015-7.fc22 FTBFS: tests fail

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195343 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1252638] perl-MongoDB-0.708.4.0 bundles bson and yajl libraries

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252638 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1208101 Referenced

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-Socket-SSL (f23). "Update to 2.019 (..more)"

From d23a4091cb40e00d074b4efd0e1b12c0b55011e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 20:12:52 +0100 Subject: Update to 2.019 - New upstream release 2.019 - Work around different behavior of getnameinfo from Socket and Socket6 by using a

ppisar uploaded Locale-Codes-3.36.tar.gz for perl-Locale-Codes

4c02ae646d44c740c804890eb257d17b Locale-Codes-3.36.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Locale-Codes/Locale-Codes-3.36.tar.gz/md5/4c02ae646d44c740c804890eb257d17b/Locale-Codes-3.36.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

[Bug 1259095] perl-Locale-Codes-3.36 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259095 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- ppisar's perl-Locale-Codes-3.36-1.fc24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=682199 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1252638] perl-MongoDB-0.708.4.0 bundles libbson library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252638 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-MongoDB-0.708.4.0 |perl-MongoDB-0.708.4.0

[389-devel] please review: Ticket #47553 - Automated the verification procedure

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47553 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47553/0001-Ticket-47553-Automated-the-verification-procedure.patch pgpP9S0Ua1jWm.pgp Description: PGP signature -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [389-devel] [lib389] Deref control advice needed

On 08/27/2015 02:31 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 08/26/2015 03:28 AM, William Brown wrote: In relation to ticket 47757, I have started work on a deref control for Noriko. The idea is to get it working in lib389, then get it upstreamed into pyldap. At this point it's all done, except that the

[Bug 1258508] perl-Number-Format-1.75 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258508 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Number-Format-1.75-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to

Release blocking deliverables for Fedora 23

Hi, in the past there was an issue with identification of deliverables which block a Fedora release. We were dealing with this issue specifically during Go/No-go meetings which is quite late for this kind of decisions. To solve this issue FESCo has started an activity [1] to identify these

[Bug 1259553] New: cpanspec needs to use dnf repoquery

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259553 Bug ID: 1259553 Summary: cpanspec needs to use dnf repoquery Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: cpanspec Severity: medium Assignee: psab...@redhat.com

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-09-02)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel7 (2015-09-02)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Orphaned Packages in branched (2015-09-02)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel5 (2015-09-02)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: [389-devel] [lib389] Deref control advice needed

> > > > Old !! but it worked like a charm for me. I just had to do this modif > > because of change in python-ldap IIRC > > OK. But I would rather use William's version which is based on pyasn1 - > it hurts my brain to hand code BER . . . https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48262 Please

Re: [389-devel] [lib389] Deref control advice needed

On 09/02/2015 10:35 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: On 08/27/2015 02:31 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 08/26/2015 03:28 AM, William Brown wrote: In relation to ticket 47757, I have started work on a deref control for Noriko. The idea is to get it working in lib389, then get it upstreamed into pyldap.

psabata pushed to perl-Sys-Syscall (master). "EU::MM 7.06+ compatibility hack"

From c7930eda0efd062c2e110655b6743a053774f917 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 13:32:06 +0200 Subject: EU::MM 7.06+ compatibility hack diff --git a/perl-Sys-Syscall.spec b/perl-Sys-Syscall.spec index 67c6af4..7e4b242 100644

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Mock-Quick (master). "Update to 1.110 (..more)"

From ca9e5c7da233b472594940a41fff8c523f72015d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 12:45:35 +0100 Subject: Update to 1.110 - New upstream release 1.110 - Fix #16, overloading + compare warning diff --git a/perl-Mock-Quick.spec

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Mock-Quick (f23). "Update to 1.110 (..more)"

From ca9e5c7da233b472594940a41fff8c523f72015d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 12:45:35 +0100 Subject: Update to 1.110 - New upstream release 1.110 - Fix #16, overloading + compare warning diff --git a/perl-Mock-Quick.spec

psabata uploaded Date-Manip-6.51.tar.gz for perl-Date-Manip

da85d48de8de695d67d0107a477fd501 Date-Manip-6.51.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Date-Manip/Date-Manip-6.51.tar.gz/md5/da85d48de8de695d67d0107a477fd501/Date-Manip-6.51.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel

psabata pushed to perl-Date-Manip (master). "6.51 bump, bugfixes and tzdata updates (..more)"

From 4a67febb46d0bbd3c5a66ff4dd2b90efe8b0f28e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 14:07:45 +0200 Subject: 6.51 bump, bugfixes and tzdata updates - This release changes the behavior of Date::Manip::Delta::value which now returns

pghmcfc uploaded Mock-Quick-1.110.tar.gz for perl-Mock-Quick

1ab6c7ca6fd0b20965ff2cbbab428581 Mock-Quick-1.110.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Mock-Quick/Mock-Quick-1.110.tar.gz/md5/1ab6c7ca6fd0b20965ff2cbbab428581/Mock-Quick-1.110.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Mock-Quick (perl-Mock-Quick-1.110-1.fc24). "Update to 1.110 (..more)"

This commit already existed in another branch. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Mock-Quick.git/commit/?h=perl-Mock-Quick-1.110-1.fc24=ca9e5c7da233b472594940a41fff8c523f72015d -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Mock-Quick (perl-Mock-Quick-1.110-1.fc23). "Update to 1.110 (..more)"

From ca9e5c7da233b472594940a41fff8c523f72015d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 12:45:35 +0100 Subject: Update to 1.110 - New upstream release 1.110 - Fix #16, overloading + compare warning diff --git a/perl-Mock-Quick.spec

Broken dependencies: perl-Method-Signatures

perl-Method-Signatures has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1) On i386: perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1) On armhfp:

Broken dependencies: perl-Devel-BeginLift

perl-Devel-BeginLift has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit) On i386:

psabata pushed to perl-Sys-Syscall (master). "Don't remove nonexistent files (..more)"

From f049f27990fc8bb68577fa0583d71fa5f4273a98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 12:32:07 +0200 Subject: Don't remove nonexistent files - Fix the dep list - Correct bogus dates in %changelog - Don't convert POD to text -

psabata pushed to perl-Date-Manip (f23). "6.51 bump, bugfixes and tzdata updates (..more)"

From 4a67febb46d0bbd3c5a66ff4dd2b90efe8b0f28e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 14:07:45 +0200 Subject: 6.51 bump, bugfixes and tzdata updates - This release changes the behavior of Date::Manip::Delta::value which now returns

[Bug 1259392] New: perl-MooseX-LogDispatch-1.2002-12.fc24 FTBFS: test fail with recent perl-Log-Dispatch

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259392 Bug ID: 1259392 Summary: perl-MooseX-LogDispatch-1.2002-12.fc24 FTBFS: test fail with recent perl-Log-Dispatch Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component:

[Bug 1258940] perl-Log-Dispatch >= 2.47 causes other modules to fail

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258940 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Bug 1259401] New: perl-Module-Install-TestTarget-0.19-7.fc24 FTBFS:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259401 Bug ID: 1259401 Summary: perl-Module-Install-TestTarget-0.19-7.fc24 FTBFS: Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Module-Install-TestTarget Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

[Bug 1259386] New: perl-XML-Merge-1.2.565EgGd-20.fc24 FTBFS: Can't convert '1.12.B55J2qn': Invalid version format (non-numeric data)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259386 Bug ID: 1259386 Summary: perl-XML-Merge-1.2.565EgGd-20.fc24 FTBFS: Can't convert '1.12.B55J2qn': Invalid version format (non-numeric data) Product: Fedora

[Bug 1259389] New: perl-Pod-Readme-1.1.2-3.fc24 FTBFS: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/perl-Pod-Readme-1.1.2-3.fc24.noarch/usr/share/man/man3/Pod::README.3*

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259389 Bug ID: 1259389 Summary: perl-Pod-Readme-1.1.2-3.fc24 FTBFS: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/perl-Pod-Readme-1.1.2-3.fc24 .noarch/usr/share/man/man3/Pod::README.3*

[Bug 1259392] perl-MooseX-LogDispatch-1.2002-12.fc24 FTBFS: test fail with recent perl-Log-Dispatch

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259392 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Bug 1259396] perl-MooseX-LazyLogDispatch-0.02-18.fc24 FTBFS: tests fail with recent perl-Log-Dispatch

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259396 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Bug 1258940] perl-Log-Dispatch >= 2.47 causes other modules to fail

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258940 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Bug 1259396] New: perl-MooseX-LazyLogDispatch-0.02-18.fc24 FTBFS: tests fail with recent perl-Log-Dispatch

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259396 Bug ID: 1259396 Summary: perl-MooseX-LazyLogDispatch-0.02-18.fc24 FTBFS: tests fail with recent perl-Log-Dispatch Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component:

Broken dependencies: perl-POE-API-Peek

perl-POE-API-Peek has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: 1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On i386: 1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0) On armhfp:

  1   2   >